Saturday, January 5, 2008

Virginia Diocese Needs to Bust a Schwan Grant



Presiding Bishop Jefferts-Schori Has No Authority To Seize Property


DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA IN FINANCIAL CRUNCH OVER LAW SUITS

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
1/4/2008


The Diocese of Virginia is taking out a $2 million "line of credit" to pursue lawsuits against a dozen parishes that have fled their ecclesiastical grip. Revenues from remaining parishes have fallen short of expectations as parishes cease to pledge or fall behind on their payments.

The diocese also plans to sell "real properties" to raise cash. The Virginia Episcopalian, the official publication of the Diocese of Virginia, is reporting in its current edition that the Executive Board has "authorized the treasurer to open a $1 million line of credit to cover anticipated legal expenses for the near-term. That line has since been increased to $2 million and about $1 million has been accessed."

In addition, the Executive Board of the Diocese of Virginia authorized diocesan staff to plan "the sale of non-strategic diocesan real property" to raise needed cash.

The Diocese also revealed that nine churches have not paid any of their pledges, which Mike Kerr, Treasurer of the Diocese, estimated as a loss to the diocese of $50,000. In addition, other churches have not paid their pledges in full causing the diocese to run a deficit of expenses over income from those pledges.

Baptist Church Growth Service:
So Much Like
WELS-ELS-LCMS-ELCA




From a Baptist layman:

Speaking of my mom, we all gathered together at my brother's house in southern Ohio the last weekend of 2007 for a Christmas celebration together, part of which was attending my brother's church there in Cedarville. This church has a long history of quality and solid foundations, affiliations with the Baptist University there, and a general, overall practice of doing things as right as Baptists can. The service we attended was among the worst I've ever suffered through. We sat down, and I leaned over to Donna and said that pretty much everything that I saw was what I call the "Television Church," and that I hate every bit of it. Huge projection screens covered every wall. The organ console (which I suspect was covered in a layer of dust) was buried by not one, but two drum sets with every trap that any enthusiastic 18-year-old drummer could ever wish to bang on. "Musicians" appeared shortly before the "service" began, having donned jeans with untucked dress shirts and hair that hadn't been visited by a comb in days. There was an electric guitar and bass guitar, two drummers (I cannot call them percussionists) a violinist, and piano player, all over-miked in a room that didn't need amplification at all. Every one of them had his own audio monitor floor speaker, again completely unnecessary.

Then the event began. The violinist was so attrociously out of tune that I wanted to get up and walk out. The individual mics were obviously EQed and mixed by someone who had lost his hearing at some Greatful Dead concert in the 1980s. Awful, awful, awful. Oh, forgot the soloist. She never really sang by herself, but "led" us forcefully along. And I use the term "us" very loosely as I didn't participate. They sang campfire chorus after campfire chorus, each one more insulting to anyone with any musical training than the one before. I tried to ignore the inane "melodies" and just read the lyrics, and they didn't make any sense either. Everything was insulting to anyone with any sense of music or the English language.

Finally they morphed into the hymn Great Is Thy Faithfulness, and I thought there may yet have been hope. As you may know, this hymn is in 3/4 time. These knuckleheads sang it in 4/4 time, making the whole experience something akin to dancing with a camel under water, gimping along with an extra beat every measure. Meanwhile people both on the platform (or shall I call it a stage -- the whole thing was a show, not a worship service) and in the congregation (audience) were waving their hands in the air and swaying back and forth. I couldn't help but think of the stoners in California in the 1960s. They just looked stupid. Meanwhile the words are projected on the huge screens.

Then the pastor took the stage with his wireless mic running down his cheek and proceeded to deliver what I would consider a mediocre, 3rd-grade Sunday School lesson about Mary and Martha attending to Jesus, and Martha's getting upset that Mary wasn't helping serve. It was filled with uneducated conjectures and historically inaccurate suppositions about what they may or may not have been doing. All during this, pictures vaguely relating to the story were shown on the massive screens. They looked like a Target Store advertisement. I suppose this was intended to keep the attention of the audience since his oration certainly couldn't. This was followed by another musically useless and intelligence-insulting ditty that everyone was supposed to sing.

Donna and I made a beeline out of there lest anyone ask our opinion and force us either to lie or actually state the obvious of which everyone seemed oblivious. I managed to get my mom alone later, and she said that she had to bite her lip to keep from crying all during the chaos. I felt differently. I was insulted at having been battered by all that uselessness, and rather angry at having been forced to suffer through it all.

And there you have it. I've experience the Church Growth Movement, and it created quite a movement of a completely different kind within me. I really see little hope for the Church if this one is at the cutting edge of what's going on right now. Most of the College students attend that church, and whether they shape or are shaped by it, that is what they will think is appropriate and proper, and then go out and pastor or participate in their own churches accordingly. It sends a cold shudder down one's spine.

----------
The WELS layman added:

So there is a certain revulsion against the invasion of TV Techniques into even those Reformed areas that used to be respectful of what they did in a building they called Church. If only Lutherans who have the same reaction could get it together enough to call a halt to the nonsense.

***
Another WELS layman:

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Baptist Church Growth Service: So Much Like WELS-E...":

I own THREE drum sets and I am DEEPLY upset with your comments!!! Not really:)

I have had similar experiences in some WELS churches. It usually takes me about a week to get over the angry, confused and creepy feeling, because I know the implications of what occured and where it is all going. (My wife hates it when I project the logical outcome into the future from these such things)

I do have a theory about the 3 ring circus approach with all the visuals etc. Have you ever noticed how much more you can get out of reading a book as opposed to watching the same thing on video? I find that I get a much better understanding of DETAIL when I read it.

I surmise that video in churches is a good way to DISTRACT the people so that a DUMBED DOWN version of what should be communicated can be more readily diseminated to the masses. It is also easier to slide in false doctrines to the auditory senses when the visual senses are distracted. Add the tacky, sentimental music and you can manipulate peoples emotions by using what passes as worship music. Work the emotions and you can tell them just about anything you want and their critical judgement falls flat like a badly played violin.

WELS Too

***

GJ - I have noticed some educators favoring Attention Deficit Disorder by having things all over the classroom. Creating a lack of focus is not a good idea in education, worse in worship. Of course, these services are not intended to be worship. Willow Creek even promoted that idea. Sunday is for tickling and entertaining.

A printed bulletin can easily replace the movie screen and Jumbo-tron for text.

The tackiness is the direct result of abandoning the Means of Grace.

***

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Baptist Church Growth Service: So Much Like WELS-E...":

WELS Too (anonymous):
I had a similar discussion today with my wife when I explained the logical conclusion of slowing creeping contemptible worship. Her reaction was about the same as your wife's. Emotional appeal is at the heart of the contemptible worship methods. I believe that much of the laity in the WELS is really in the dark about the historic liturgies. I wonder if many of them think that it is just another way to "do church". Also, much of this can be snuck into the church under the big umbrella of evangelism. After all, if it increases membership, what can be bad about that? Isn't one soul worth it? Who can argue with a smiley pastor and musicians that make a joyful noise?

Anonymous Throws a Hissy Fit




Greg Jackson is a self-important, little man has left a new comment on your post "Incensed Crypto-Papist Avoids the Doctrinal Issues...":

Dr. Greg Jackson wrote (who holds his doctorate from Notre Dame, that fabulous Roman Catholic institution): "I could not find any argumentation in the comment, only arrogance and scorn."

You must be talking about your Ichabod blog, because that's all I ever see on it--arrogance and scorn.

***

GJ - I agree with you, Anonymous. That is all you have ever seen on it. I believe you are also the same person who complained about all the doctrinal quotations posted on Ichabod. How you must suffer!

Martin Luther also attended a Roman Catholic school.

PS - Unlike Werning, Valleskey, and Bivens, I have never denied attending any given school. I will even admit to being at the Sausage Factory in Mequon. As everyone knows, we will all be judged by the schools we attended and our DNA, not by the doctrine we believe, teach, and confess.

Osiander


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Reasons for WELS-LCMS-ELS Apostasy":

Methinks you frequently stumble into a position that is dangerously close to Osiander, cf.

Try reading "The Fire and the Staff" by Klemet Preus for a clear explanation.

***

GJ - Note the dog-eared approach above. First of all, it is anonymous. How bizarre to call someone a false teacher anonymously! I post these things to show Ichabodians the state of the Lutheran Church.

Secondly, there is no foundation for the accusation. I can only look over Osiander and guess. Common courtesy would dictate a real name and some reasoning. Since nothing is cited on my side or from Osiander, I cannot respond.

I have not read Klement Preus. (I took his class in Persuasive Preaching at Concordia, Ft. Wayne.) Once again, no citation is provided for our edification. I do agree with his father's conclusions in Rome and Justification. I suggest Anonymous read Robert Preus and the Book of Concord.

I made it clear in Thy Strong Word that I disagree with UOJ for Biblical and confessional reasons. I also listed the Biblical passages and Book of Concord passages which support justification by faith alone.

Why Abridge Thy Strong Word


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "How To Buy Thy Strong Word":

I'm not sure why you want to abridge your Thy Strong Word. If you go to Lulu, they can print up a single-copy 650 page 6"x9" book for $17.53, or for less if you buy in quantity. Then you can sell it for $25, and still make $6 or $7 profit on each copy:
http://www.lulu.com/en/products/paperback/

Of course, you could probably get it printed up elsewhere cheaper.

I'm just sayin'

Bruce Church

***

GJ - I have a few copies left and the entire book is on the internet.

The reason for a new edition would be to eliminate some of the highly technical parts and make it English-only.

Profit is not the idea. Making the doctrinal material available is the goal.

Besides, my feisty editor wants more work to do.

Incensed Crypto-Papist Avoids the Doctrinal Issues.
Feel the Love?



I'm a little papist, still smiling,
Here is my censer, here, KISS MY RING!
(tune: I'm a Little Teapot)


Father Hollywood has left a new comment on your post "Baby Steps - Or Alien Doctrine?":


As the dean of the SSP, all I can say is the tin-foil-hat conspiracy stuff is quite a hoot. If anyone wants to know what the SSP is *actually* all about (rather than this straw-man silliness and worst-construction paranoid speculation), feel free to e-mail me at larrybeane@gmail.com.

But if you're really more into "beautiful mind"-type fantasy, and have no shut-ins to visit, no texts to study, and no prayers to say - but want to spend time slandering other Lutherans and breaking the 8th commandment, well, consider these other points:

+ "Polycarp" and "pope" both begin with the SAME LETTER.

+ Both the Roman Catholic Church and the Society of St. Polycarp confess the NICENE CREED and use CANDLES at their services.

+ The SSP includes pastors from both St. Louis and Fort Wayne seminaries, both of which are LINKED to prominent Lutheran expatriot pastors, such as Neuhaus and Fenton. Coincidence? I think not...

+ The current SSP dean attended a seminary whose president and several professors have doctorate degrees from Notre Dame University (Notre Dame is openly ROMAN CATHOLIC, and its name is a *secret code word* for MARY!).

+ Many SSP members belong to the LCMS, whose hymnal uses the word CATHOLIC (a *known practice* of ROMAN CATHOLIC and EASTERN ORTHODOX churches).

+ Crosses (such as those used as bullet points in this very post) are found in ROMAN CATHOLIC churches around the world.

Pax Domini, (which is LATIN, the *secret language* of ROMAN CATHOLICS),

Rev. Larry Beane, SSP
larrybeane@gmail.com

***

GJ - I gave the readers choice quotations from the material posted by this cult, plus the links, so they can harvest their own conclusions. I could not find any argumentation in the comment, only arrogance and scorn. Father Hollywood is welcome to post again if he has something to say about introducing Marian worship into the Lutheran Church.

Moose Attack





GJ - The following comment, reverently reproduced in italics, is broken up into bite-sized bits to facilitate the digestion process:

Rachel, author of The Moose Report has left a new comment on your post "The Slandering So-Called Slander-Victims of WELS":

"Mrs. Moose is an ardent Sweet supporter, now in denial."

I must be in denial, because until you quoted my 2005 post on your blog, I had no idea I was an "ardent supporter."


GJ - I will reproduce her original paragraph from the Moose Report, in bold. The 2005 Church and Change conference invited Leonard Sweet (New Age Methodist) Kent Hunter (LCMS Church Growth Guru), and Waldo Werning (LCMS, Church Growth promoter):

This symposium was on evangelism. Apparently it is breaking fellowship by bringing in those who have effective evangelism programs that actually work because they are not WELS. Our synod is losing members faster than they are gaining them. You’d think they’d be open to new ideas. There is a serious danger here in this fellowship misapplication. Those planning to attend have lost the opportunity to learn about other evangelism methods to win souls for Christ.

"I fail to comprehend how noticing a familiar name is a slanderous attack on the entire Moose herd. Disavowing published support for Sweet is bad enough, but calling me a false witness for quoting her is only going to draw attention to what the entire Moose coalition represents."

I have a coalition now? Not bad for a WLC grad who holds a B.A. in music.


GJ - WELS members are trained in avoiding the issue.

Are you a pastor of a congregation? If you are, I am surprised at your tactics. For someone who is to be "above reproach," why do you find it neccessary (sic) to provoke and make fun of other Christians, mostly Lutherans? What does that accomplish for the Kingdom? And yes, there ARE other Lutherans despite all the apparent conspiracy theories. The definition of "apostate" is one who abandons his religion. The WELS has not abandoned the Bible nor the Lutheran Confessions, attend a Sunday service and you'd know that.

GJ - Lutherans should start reading Luther and the Book of Concord. In most sermons Luther pointed out what the false teachers were promoting and denounced it. The Book of Concord rejects false doctrine throughout. WELS has been dumbed down so much that people do not realize the point of polemics and cannot grasp humor and satire. I accomplish nothing for the Kingdom. The Word of God does everything. WELS has officially and defiantly rejected Biblical doctrine and the Lutheran Confessions. Not even the mildest Lutheran would walk across the street to hear Leonard Sweet or Kent Hunter or Waldo Werning.

Even if you disagree with how things are done in the WELS, what kind of witness is it for orthodox Lutheranism (and orthodox Christianity for that matter) to speak to and about people in such an unloving way? Or to speak in such a tone as to insinuate that you alone are above reproach? I guess one advantage to being a synodical conference of one is that you can say whatever you want.

GJ - The love gambit is well worn among the unionists. They want love, not sound doctrine. Luther said, "Don't speak to me about love. Love does not convert. The Word of God converts." The true Church consists of all those who trust in Christ alone as their Savior. How strange to be so obsessed with a man-made organization, especially one where two church workers have murdered their wives and a DP went to state prison. Try "above reproach" on the officials who covered this up and still deny the facts.

Well, as all Alaskans know, and since you seem to delight in using the metaphor, moose leave an area when there is "no good food" left. I wouldn't feed on what you are selling or promoting. I'm sure, as seems to be your way, you'll have a scathing reply to this comment. Quote me, misquote me, judge me, attack me, say whatever you want. You may hold Masters and Doctorates in everything under the sun, but simple Christian love demonstrated in words and actions has eluded you.

GJ - I did not pick the name Moose Report. I prefer to quote people verbatim. That is enough. In fact, many have complained about being quoted. Larry Olson (D.Min., Fuller Seminary) published an article in Christian News about that very topic.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Not Every Evangelical Is Fooled by Church Growth





It's not only Lutherans who have been victimized by the CG-PURPOSE DRIVEN heresy. Just substitute "Lutheran" for "Baptist" when reading the following, and the show goes on. Same false idea, same, modus operandi, same disillusionment by discerning layman, resulting in conscience bound departure due to betrayal by leaders and pastors who look to the next program, the next CGM guru, the next "numbers game" instead of "Thus saith the Lord".

Mary Thompson
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
IS YOUR CHURCH SUFFERING FROM R & R?

By Paul Proctor
January 2, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

The Lord sent me on a difficult journey several years ago. It has been a long, painful and frustrating excursion. But it has also been quite rewarding in that I have learned so much along the way. He called me out of The People's Church in August of 2000 for reasons I have already chronicled in a published piece by the same name. It wasn't a mere critique of a church gone bad from a disgruntled ex-member with an axe to grind, but rather the beginning of a calling of sorts to
expose what I discovered to be a growing movement and trend in church life that in reality robs people of their faith in Jesus Christ. In my ten or so years as an untrained writer and columnist with an undeserved high school diploma and a very basic knowledge of the scriptures that came largely through personal study and prayer, I started writing commentary for the internet barely knowing even how to
punctuate a sentence, much less how to structure one properly. It was more or less on-the-job-training; so frankly, I learned as I wrote what I witnessed. And not having the luxury of editors most of that time, it meant that any embarrassing errors I made involving grammar, punctuation or spelling were promptly published for all the world to see - and in many cases, still are.

In retrospect, I suppose that helped keep my ego in check, at least most of the time, especially when the praise and support of other Christians began coming in - not unlike the Apostle Paul's thorn in the flesh that tormented him throughout his ministry. By the same token, I guess those words of encouragement helped keep my discouragement, embarrassment and humiliation from overwhelming me when all the criticism and rejection followed.

I had been a musician all of my adult life and until the mid-nineties, had no inkling or desire to write about anything that didn't involve music - much less controversial matters of church and faith. To this day I'm amazed that anyone is interested in anything I have to say - and moreover, that the Lord would compel a fool like me to write it down. But I do nonetheless, for whatever it's worth.

After leaving The People's Church, I ended up at a smaller more traditional Southern Baptist fellowship where the pastor assured me numerous times over the four years I was there that he would not bring that church growth movement stuff I had agonized through at my previous church into his church, only to end up, much to my dismay, hearing him quote Rick Warren and his Purpose Driven Life principles time and again
from the pulpit - eventually going so far as to offer a class on it to those who were interested in attending - that is, until I reminded him of his promise to me. It was as if every time I tried to settle in and serve the Lord in some capacity there, either as a teacher, a committee member or as a trustee, the CGM would reappear in one form or another and distract me into a confrontation and response in order to restrain its influence. As I would soon learn, many others who were reading my articles were also enduring the same kinds of struggles at their churches.

Whenever I questioned my pastor about his PDL proclivities, the justification was that, even though he didn't actively promote The Purpose Driven Life and Church per se, there were some practical things in Warren's books he thought would help our congregation. I suspect he was also under at least some peer-pressure, intentional or not, from local promoters and sellers of PDL products and materials which may have
included fellow pastors and representatives from LifeWay Christian Resources here in Nashville, where such things have been for sale for years - a company that once employed him as an editor - not to mention the fact that he was shepherding a handful of misguided church members who were absolutely taken by Warren's unbiblical notions and ideas. Still I remained, hoping to persuade him otherwise.

What finally sent me packing and back on my journey in search of a faithful church (not to be confused with a perfect church) was a Sunday morning message given in two services on November 21st, 2004, where he told of being impressed by a missionary and speaker he heard a few days earlier named Rick Leatherwood, who shrewdly used certain Proverbs from the Old Testament as a means of evangelizing Muslims by referring to the God of the Bible as "Allah," in hopes of winning them to Christ. After the service was over, I obtained a CD copy of my pastor's sermon, to make sure I had actually heard him correctly, so as not to jump to conclusions and falsely accuse him of something he didn't actually say. Citing the Apostle Paul as an example, this is an excerpt of what he preached that morning:

Paul had learned to become all things to all men. Rick Leatherwood has done that too. He does so many interesting things. And, he was trying to figure out, "How do I connect with these Muslims? They believe in the same God, sort of, that I do. They believe in the same God Abraham believed in. They believe in that God. Well, what can I do to connect with them? I can't just walk in and start talking about Jesus. They believe that Jesus was a real man but they don't believe He really died. So, I just can't walk in and start telling the good news about Jesus." So, he came up with the idea, he said, "They believe in God; why not tell them about God? And so the one way I can do that is to give them a copy of the book of Proverbs from our Old Testament." It tells all this wisdom about God, from God and how to know God. And so, what he did; he printed up these little booklets - and he's done it - he's got them printed in various Arabic languages. And he'll go up, and when he gets to know somebody, he said, "I'd like to give you a gift. I'd like to give you this copy of the wisdom of God." Because they believe in God, he can say, "I'm talking about the same God." After listening to the CD at home I called my pastor and politely told him: "Jesus is not the Son of Allah." He responded to my concerns by saying, that wasn't what he meant, followed by an apology for "offending me." You see, he cleverly turned an Absolute Truth issue into a Relationship issue and quickly apologized for having offended me rather than admitting that he had in fact contradicted the Word of God.

After a short but heated discussion, I closed the conversation stating, if I were he, I'd revisit the issue from the pulpit and clear up any confusion his remarks may have caused. When two or three Sundays passed without any mention of his mistake, my
wife and I discontinued our participation in worship there, but did continue in Sunday School with friends for a time, visiting another nearby church for worship, waiting on the Lord's leading elsewhere or our pastor's public confession and repentance - whichever came first. Almost three months later, on February 6th of 2005, my pastor made the following remarks in passing during his sermon that morning:

"Muslims claim to know God; but the god that they say they know, when you really study what they say; we did a study, some of you may remember, on Muslims and Muslim religion a few months back. When you really study what they believe, you see that the god they're worshipping is not the God you and I worship. It's a different God. It's not the God that Jesus revealed to us."

So, apparently this was, to his way of thinking, an acceptable substitute for confession and repentance; to ever-so-briefly re-visit the issue months later as if no real error had actually been committed - as if his unofficial follow-up sermon communicated what he really believed all along about God and Allah. I was left to ask myself: How could such a man ever call on sinners to confess and repent when he was so stubbornly unwilling to do so himself? We never looked back. And that brings me to the point of this article about my ongoing journey and the question I offered as its title:

Is your church suffering from R & R?
Both my previous churches obviously were; and amazingly, so have every one of the Southern Baptist churches my wife and I visited across three counties here in Middle Tennessee over the last three years.

Blame whomever and whatever you will; but somewhere along the way, they all to varying degrees, quit believing God - they lost their faith - their conviction - their focus and their Divine call to hear, believe, proclaim and obey the Word of God at all costs, whatever may come - and made the call to repentance and faith in Christ at best, secondary to the pragmatic pursuit of Results and Relationships - refashioning their religion into something more marketable - more practical - more
horizontal and humanistic, so as to please prospects and participants into jumping onboard, that they might artificially grow their congregations into something impressive instead of something faithful - boasting of "fruit" while yielding a great harvest of weeds.

In spite of all this, the numbers steadily drop and revival continues to evade the Southern Baptist Convention whose members stare at their baptisteries year after year, longing for more Results - and then at each other, longing for more Relationships - this, while ignoring the Provider of both Who patiently waits for their confession, repentance and obedience, that He might bless. Eve took the forbidden fruit because she wanted Results. Adam took it to protect and sustain his Relationship with Eve. Today, the church of the 21st century shamelessly continues to pursue both at God's expense in a desperate and disobedient attempt to satisfy "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life." (1st John 2:16)
May God have mercy on us all in 2008.
© 2008 Paul Proctor - All Rights Reserved

***

GJ - I noticed that the lies and the sneakiness are the same, whether in a Lutheran synod or in an Evangelical congregation.

Baby Steps - Or Alien Doctrine?



Ripley Concluded Something Was Wrong When She Felt Footprints


L P Cruz has left a new comment on your post "Chameleon Lutherans":

Dr. Greg,

I am just curious as to what you think of Society of Saint Paul? Is this baby steps to the Tiber do you think?

LPC

Oops I meant Society of Saint Polycarp I think by LCMS pastors here is the link

Society of Saint Polycarp

***

GJ - Baby steps? This website is a perfect example of the Missouri Synod underground in favor of Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. I will quote some of most febrile passages below in italics.

The Rule of the Society of St. Polycarp

Pastor Larry Beane-Dean For questions or comments: Contact Pastor Bean.


7. As the Lutheran Symbols confess the Blessed Virgin Mary to be "the pure, holy, and ever-virgin Mother of God" (Theotokos, Gottes Mutter), as well as "that the blessed Mary prays for the Church" (Ap. XXI, 27; SA I, IV, Latin; FC SD VIII, 24), it is altogether fitting, proper, and consistent with the Faith of the Church Catholic to honor the Blessed Virgin in liturgical celebration. Members of the Society will seek to restore the traditional Marian feasts of the Church of the Augsburg Confession (i.e., the Feasts of the Purification, Annunciation, and Visitation) as a testimony of the grace of God through her, that we might imitate the Blessed Virgin in word and example, and in thanksgiving for the Incarnation of the Son of God through her humble submission to the will of God. Members of the Society will also promote the observance and celebration of saints' days and commemorations. This is wholly in keeping with the evangelical and catholic tradition of the Church of the Augsburg Confession, whose Symbolical Books acknowledge the saints as fitting exemplars of the catholic Faith worthy of imitation, as well as our heavenly intercessors (AC XXI, 1; Ap. XXI, 4-9).

8. As the Church of the Augsburg Confession understands herself as a part of the One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, particularly as she exists in the West, members of the Society will take seriously the commitment to the proper ecumenicity this demands. Members will pursue dialogue with:

- Fellow Lutheran Christians to foster and promote Lutheran unity.

- Our separated brethren in the Roman Church, with which the Lutherans at the Diet of the Augsburg in 1530 clearly sought reconciliation.

- The Eastern Orthodox Church, following the example of the exchange between the Lutheran theologians of the University of Tübingen and Ecumenical Patriarch Jeremiah II of Constantinople (1573-1581).


***

GJ - In spite of the obligatory Lutheran orthodox sounding words not quoted, this page is far more than baby steps toward Rome and Constantinople. More like a double back-flip with a half gainer.

The Mariolatry cited above gives the scheme away. As Schmauck said, the more people veer away from the Confessions, the more they insist they are the true Lutherans. Chemnitz, the primary editor of the Book of Concord, said we should not give Mary more titles than the Scriptures reveal. This group would have Mary replace Jesus as the object of worship, which is the fetish of Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Here's more:

On Theosis and the Mystical Union

Pastor William Weedon


I have made no bones about the fact that I think there is enormous congruity between what the East calls theosis and what the Lutherans of the 16th and 17th centuries termed mystical union. The loss of that whole mystical union way of thinking has been a sad loss, in my estimation, for the Lutheran Church, and it has disfigured us. The exclusive description of justification in forensic terms has been reduced to the imparting of information: God declares you righteous for Christ's sake. That's indeed the truth, but it is not all of the truth.

***

GJ - Where did we hear about theosis before? Oh yes, the ELDONA/Augustana (sic) conference. And the term Church Catholic? That was a favorite of Richard J. Neuhaus before he poped.

Pastor William Weedon is quite active, but not alone. Rev. Fenton (who repudiated Lutheran doctrine and joined the EO) posts on Weedon's blog.

Here are team members of Weedon's blog on the Lutheran Confessions. Thanks to some HTML skills, I was able to copy their links so Ichabodians can see what floats their boats or lights their incense:

Blog Authors





***

GJ - Few things shock me about Lutheran apostasy these days, but I was astounded that
McCain (LCMS) and Webber (ELS) would associate with a Romanist like Weedon on a site supposedly dedicated to the Lutheran Confessions.

These Recessional Lutherans have given me an idea. I will start Roman Catholic blogs with names that will draw people in from their Google searches: Scapular Devotions, Holy Mother Church, Quenching the Purgatory Fires, Boys Town, and Luther's Errors. The blogs will make people believe I am a Ultramontane Roman Catholic, but I will spice them up with material that will turn them into Lutherans. That is better by far than pretending to be a Lutheran while turning people into papists.

Anonymous asked: How are you determining that these men are "team members"? There is no reference along these lines on either of the sites you link from the post. Also, are each of these individuals writing for Weedon's blog, or merely linked by him? Since no one can control who links to their blog, it would be unfair to criticize the men on your list merely for being a link from Weedon's blog. Please be more precise.

I just make this stuff up! Here is the verbatim information about the blog:

Blog Name Team Members
Concordia | The Lutheran Confessions orthodoxy hunter; Paul T. McCain; David Jay Webber; Paul Gregory Alms; ABC3+; Rev. Ryan Fouts; Petersen; Holger Sonntag; wm cwirla; GEVeith


Orthodoxy Hunter is not linked on the main page or listed, but McCain says she is a new friend who designed his new Google blog.

The Slandering So-Called
Slander-Victims of WELS




According to the US Supreme Court, crying Slander! in a crowded blogosphere is the same as committing slander.


I found this paragraph from the aptly named Moose Report a good example of WELS defending false doctrine by deceitfully crying "Slander!" Frosty Bivens did the same thing when I quoted his pal Paul Kelm. Actually, I have heard this dodge used so often that I can no longer count. Werning is quick to scream "Slander!" too. The Church Growth zombies violate the Eighth Commandment even more than they cite it.

Third, and this really gets me, Gregory Jackson adds a note stating “I see a familiar name associated with the Moose Report.” It’s bad enough that he mars my blog and falsely testifies that I “support” Sweet, but he adds an unnecessary comment to slander those associated with me, which could easily mean any of my brothers who are faithful WELS members, or even my sainted father.

I’m quite irritated, just FYI.


***

GJ - I said "a familiar name" because there is a cluster of WELS blogs associated with Mrs. Moose. People link the blogs they like, so anyone with an IQ above room temperature can detect some doctrinal affinities from checking those out.

Mrs. Moose (DMLC grad?) links her brother, Revvin Rev. He links Pastor Rick Johnson, who is the Crown of Life, Corona, California pastor known for being a Leonard Sweet-heart. When I mentioned this on my blog and went back to his blog, the slobbering reference to Sweet was gone - overnight. So were the offering statistics (like the Red Sea, man) that he posted. He said someone let him know about the offering posting, so he got rid of it. He forget to mention the Sweet pangyric which disappeared at the same time.

Bloggers check out other blogs, so I figured that perhaps Revvin Rev or the brother-in-law let Pastor Rick Johnson know his offerings were totally exposed to the public. Pastor Rick Johnson said it was "unclassy" to mention his offerings. Publishing on a web or blogsite means making it public.

Mrs. Moose is an ardent Sweet supporter, now in denial.

The Crown of Life pastor, a known CGM fan, is a Sweet supporter, but silent about it now.

I fail to comprehend how noticing a familiar name is a slanderous attack on the entire Moose herd. Disavowing published support for Sweet is bad enough, but calling me a false witness for quoting her is only going to draw attention to what the entire Moose coalition represents.

Ichabodians must be asking, "Why is a hippy, Methodist, New Age gasbag like Sweet so appealing to WELS people, who cannot find the Large Catechism in the dark?"

Answer - Sweet has been promoted by Church and Change. According to a recent post, they were bold enough to give seminarians free tickets to their 2007 conference.

Why is Church and Change so in love with the doctrine of a hippy, Methodist, New Age gasbag like Sweet?"

Answer - Sweet is closely connected to the Church Growth gurus of America: Robert Schuller, Fuller Seminary, etc.

Loehe Missionaries Founded the LCMS - Not Walther




+ Wilhelm Loehe +
2 January AD 1872


Verbatim from Aardvark Alley

Christened Johann Konrad Wilhelm Löhe, he established a reputation already as a young pastor for being "too" theologically conservative and "too" politically progressive. This led to his being moved to at least twelve positions until he received his own parish in Neuendettelsau, Bavaria in 1837. Beginning his career with difficulty, he accomplished much from such a small place. Even though he had aspirations of a more prominent position in a major city, church and government officials never allowed that to pass.

The Catholic king of Bavaria was de facto leader of the Lutheran Church. His main desire was to keep the churches from becoming places of political unrest. Thus arose strict restrictions, such as an assembly of more than five people needing a police permit. He prohibited mission circles and other "subversive enterprises," thus relegating church activities to not much more than Sunday services only.

In 1840, Loehe read a newspaper account from America by Pastor Friedrich Wyneken. It told of German emigrants not having church or pastoral care &mdash nobody could baptize their children, teach, visit the sick, or bury the dead. Pastor Loehe felt compelled to aid the German Lutherans in America and published an article in a church periodical asking for help. Beginning in the spring of 1841, several young men responded to Loehe's letter, expressing the desire help the settlers with their own skills and occupations. In the summer of 1842 he sent them to America at his own expense. He called them Nothelfer ("helpers in need") or "auxiliary saints", and trained them to be "emergency pastors."

Even while he had no theologians to assist his plans, Loehe published a map entitled "Overview for the German Lutheran Mission Work in the United States." It illustrated a system he developed for advancing pastoral care and outreach among German speakers in the United States. More young men followed and by his death, at least 185 came to America. Loehe paid for many of them himself and was always trying to raise money.

After only six years of marriage, Loehe's wife died, leaving him to raise their four children alone. Even among such hardships, his dreams remained clear and his desire to serve the Lord strong. Indeed, recent years have brought recognition for his farsightedness. This contrasts sharply with the handed-down opinions of many contemporaries who, while recognizing him as a founder of social institutions and mission education in Neuendettelsau, regarded him as divisive, narrow-minded, or combative. Changes in attitude began taking place especially after 1985, when several thousand of his letters were published, many previously unknown to scholars in Germany.

Seeking to support and strengthen missions and pastoral ministry in the United States, Loehe established a large parish cooperative throughout Germany. As support grew, he could publish his 1845 "Letter from the Home Country to the German Lutheran Emigrants" which 946 people, including 350 theologians, signed.

With the home churches finally behind him, he could at last send pastors! Loehe saw to the training of twenty-two pastors for work in America. Due in large part to his direct influence a seminary was established in Fort Wayne, Indiana in 1846 as well as a teachers' institute in Saginaw, Michigan. Some of the men he sent to the U.S. helped to establish The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod. Today, two LCMS seminaries, Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri continue equipping and forming men to send out into the Savior's harvest fields.

Besides his interest in the United States, Loehe also assisted in training and sending pastors to care for emigrants in Brazil and Australia, both of which still have relatively small but vital Lutheran populations. He will continue to be remembered for his confessional integrity and his interest in liturgy and catechetics. He also never forgot the physical needs of those less fortunate and his works of Christian charity include the establishment of a deaconess training house, homes for the aged, an asylum for the mentally ill, and other caring institutions.

Please see Loehe etexts translated through Project Wittenberg for his Sonntagsblatt Appeal, his 1842 Instructions of Adam Ernst and Georg Burger, letters between C.F.W. Walther and Loehe About the Fort Wayne Seminary, and Loehe's Report of Walther's and Wyneken's Visit.

Von Schenk Question


Would you happen to know why so many confessional Lutheran pastors favor Berthold von Schenk and why all I get is a chuckle and the 8th Commandment in return when I complain about it?

***

GJ - I was not aware of him, except I heard about his group when working on my dissertation at Notre Dame.

Oddly enough, I just volunteered to write a review of his book, which will appear in Christian News in the near future.

From my first reading of the book I would say that someone defending and following Von Schenk is anything but a Confessional Lutheran. Remember that Rev. Richard J. Neuhaus (LCMS, Seminex, ELCA, Church of Rome) called himself a Confessional Lutheran until he poped. His Confessional Lutheran friends have also poped.

How To Buy Thy Strong Word



Church Growth Results: It's Your Faulty for Not Inviting People to Our Sneaker Services, Where We Ape the Reformed and Mock the Means of Grace


saxoniae has left a new comment on your post "Reasons for WELS-LCMS-ELS":

I stumbled upon your online version of Thy Strong Word when googling for articles about Robert Preus after reading his Getting into the Theology of Concord and the two volumes on Post-Reformation Lutheranism.

I liked it! I plan to go to Scholia/Repristination Press and buy it -- they produce a great Advent devotional (Tim Pauls) and their translation of Chytraeus' Catechesis was very good. I've noticed you're one of the few people who ever mention David Chytraeus.

Would you happen to know why so many confessional Lutheran pastors favor Berthold von Schenk and why all I get is a chuckle and the 8th Commandment in return when I complain about it?

***

GJ - I am not sure if His Beatitude, The Right Reverend James Heiser, Bishop of Malone, Texas, and Adjoining Counties, is still selling Thy Strong Word through Repristination Press. Heiser thinks being a bishop is everything, but having an ELCA member on his board is fine - because of all the orders placed by the ELCA member. And yet, a whole new nano-sect (ELDONA) must be started over Yankee Stadium unionism. Is that a contradiction or ironic humor?

I have a few copies of Thy Strong Word left. Post your email as a comment (not to be published) and I will send information about buying it.

My plans shifted back to more publishing and teaching in 2008. Man proposes; God disposes - as the Germans say. Thanks to an industrious editor, I can do a new version of Thy Strong Word. That would be a more popular edition, cut down in size, available on Lulu.com.

I am being double-trained online starting January 7th. I will start at a new online university so I have to learn their system, which will be time-consuming. Secondly, I will start a master's in journalism on the same day. To teach writing at more schools I need a master's in the field. No, do not weep for me. I think it will be fun and edifying.

Question


L P Cruz has left a new comment on your post "Chameleon Lutherans":

Dr. Greg,

I am just curious as to what you think of Society of Saint Paul? Is this baby steps to the Tiber do you think?

LPC

***

GJ - I am not sure which group this is. Please post a link to them.

Some of these groups are launching pads for poping and semi-poping. Others may start with good intentions but tip the weak in the direction of Rome and Constantinople.

Apostates can live very comfortably with high church mandates (Patristic Fundamentalism, as they called it at Notre Dame). The Episcopalians and ELCA are both fine examples of that problem.

That does not make formal worship bad. I favor it over aping the Reformed Church Growth manias, now reduced to semi-idiocy (St. John's Ellisville, Missouri).

Lutherans can see that sound doctrine must be first or it will be last.

The micro-mini Lutheran sects of America do not specialize in sound doctrine but in legalistic formulae they happily violate.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Reasons for WELS-LCMS-ELS Apostasy



Cranach Painting


1. Sound doctrine is not taught in the seminaries, not defended by the bureaucrats.

2. Equally important, sound doctrine is actively persecuted by the synodical officials.

3. Unionism with ELCA and Rome is accepted. Unionism is either the result or the cause of false doctrine being promoted.

4. The old Synodical Conference was weak on the efficacy of the Word and the Real Presence.

5. The old Synodical Conference was hopelessly wrong about justification, thanks to Walther and his acolytles. Errors have been magnified in recent years.

6. The pastors and laity do not have enough faith in the Word to address these problems, so the cancer spreads, as exemplified by the malignant presence of Leonard Sweet.

7. Marvin Schwan pounded a wooden staken in the heart of the old Synodical Conference by giving them tons of money and no responsibility. Marvin's lovely second wife turned Roman Catholic soon after he died. Unionism: post-mortem.

Moose Retreats to Quilting



Quilter Cannot Take a Little Needling



This is all I have to say about that…
January 2nd, 2008

Well, in response to my last post, Gregory Jackson posts again here. It is futile to respond as in reading other posts on the blog I’ve discovered it’s pretty much a vendetta against the various Lutheran synods (or perhaps organized Lutheranism?) and there’s no use trying to discuss anything reasonably there. Wonder if I should point out that the “he” which GJ refers to as the author of the moose report is actually a “she.” On reading what he has to say about the role of women, probably not a good idea. It’s interesting to note, however, that a Lutheran who does not agree with him suddenly becomes a pagan. Thankfully my Lord and Savior knows better. Anyway, you will find no more comments or discussion from me on the subject. Next topic: Quilting!!

***

GJ - It is possible to sign a comment with one's own true name. The trouble with anonymous or fake name comments is that no one really knows who has written. The only venomous emails I get are from one or two anonymous WELS defenders, who are the equivalent of little boys phoning people, saying something rude, and hanging up.

The gratuitous comments above are too silly to parse.

If someone thinks it is a tragedy that Leonard Sweet, Kent Hunter, and paleo-Werning cannot teach WELS about evangelism, then that person is worth quoting, to show how far apostasy has reached.

As they say, "A fish rots from the head down." Denominations begin rotting at headquarters and at the seminary. WELS Pastor Steve Kurtzahn called Valleskey a wolf in sheep's clothing 11 years ago.

The Church Growth Movement came from the bowels of Hell, WELS headquarters. First they had their cheap little newsletter, TELL, published at headquarters. Then they got their TELL editor appointed as Secretary of Evangelism. All the chief posts at headquarters went to Church Growth, Fuller-trained robots. Somehow a number of Church Growth professors got selected through their political process to befuddle the minds of future pastors.

Now the false doctrine is glibly parroted in every corner of WELS, with the Amen corner in Mankato (The Little Sect on the Prairie).

False doctrine is like cancer. It has to be rooted out, not cheered on. Twenty years ago, the LCA would have laughed at Sweet as a hippy leftover from campus chaplaincy days. Now he is courted by WELS, fawned over by WELS bloggers, and interviewed with sacred awe by the president of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis.

That's what I meant about Sweet and the apostates winning, even though the 2005 conference was canceled, with violins long-bowing I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry in the background.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Stained Glass - The Next Generation



Bret Favre surrounded by adoring cheeseheads.


Source

I saw this image of a stained glass window and had to copy it. I can think of no better way to bring in members in the State of Wisconsin.

**

PS - I do not think this is an actual stained glass window. I think someone did a PhotoShop as a satire.

I was at a communications conference for the LCA in Washington State. We visited an older Episcopalian church which included a stained glass window showing crossed tennis rackets.

Someone said, "I don't think they had tennis in Biblical times."

"Joseph served in the courts of Pharoah," I offered, to a chorus of groans.

Note on Political Comments




I am not going to post comments about politics on this blog. The purpose is to focus on issues of apostasy among Lutherans and to some extent in other confessions. I encourage people to be politically active, to vote, to support candidates who can govern wisely. I could point to several publications, Left and Right, which seem to identify a political stance with correct Lutheran doctrine. That is a mistake. There are some fine political blogs where people can post comments.

I do want to comment about soldiers and politicians. In every war politicians make terrible mistakes, costly errors that cause the deaths of thousands, even millions. Anyone with some knowledge could list events in WWI, WWII, Korea, Viet Nam, and later. Military leaders also endanger the lives of their own soldiers for various reasons. Our soldiers have to live with the results of politics and incompetence at various levels. Nevertheless, they serve their country bravely and sacrificially.

I have the honor of knowing many of our active duty soldiers. I am proud of their service, their ability, and dedication. I wish I could say the same about political leaders, ecclesiastical and secular.

WELS Seminary Students Given Free Admission for Church and Change



New Age Professor of Wikiletics, Leonard Sweet


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Leonard Sweet-hearts War, 2005":

Note also that the leaders of Church and Change approached various Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary students asking them to spread the word about the upcoming 2007 conference. Word was passed that the registration fee would be lowered to $75 for seminarians. None of this went through "official" channels. Eventually, senior Tom Engelbrecht sent out an email to the entire student body (but not the faculty) letting everyone know that the registration fee had now been waived. Seminarians got free admission to the Change-fest! I believe that only a small handful of people attended workshops there. Many students saw those handful of students with Church and Change name tags as permanently branded: "Apostate."

***

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Not So Sweet-heart":

The methods of the WELS apostates remind me of what my father used to say when he quipped - "give 'em an inch and they'll take a foot". When called out on the carpet for inviting a New Age guru like Sweet they say, "well, we are really not engaging in any kind of fellowship. Therefore, we can glean some good ideas from him". Why not take a page from Ralph Bohlmann's book and say they you are just engaging in different "levels of fellowship"?

***

themrs has left a new comment on your post "The Leonard Sweet-hearts War, 2005":

I have posted a comment and am curious as to why it hasn't been approved? I want to reiterate the fact that I did not in my post say anything in support of Sweet and am irritated that you introduced my post by saying my blog supported Sweet. The point of my post was that hosting non-WELS speakers is not breaking prayer fellowship. Please allow my feedback on your post or remove any references to my post or blog from your site as it has been misinterpreted and misused. Thank you.

GJ - There is no name for the comment above, no link to identify the writer with the Moose Report. The most telling paragraph was exactly what the author wrote. I will repeat it below, with the link.

The Moose Report
This symposium was on evangelism. Apparently it is breaking fellowship by bringing in those who have effective evangelism programs that actually work because they are not WELS. Our synod is losing members faster than they are gaining them. You’d think they’d be open to new ideas. There is a serious danger here in this fellowship misapplication. Those planning to attend have lost the opportunity to learn about other evangelism methods to win souls for Christ.

Marks of Apostasy
The marks of apostasy are clearly visible in one paragraph. "Effective evangelism programs" = the Word of God is not effective or efficacious. "Open to new ideas" = Lutherans cannot rely on the Means of Grace. "Our synod is losing members" = abandon trust in God's Word. "There is a serious danger" = It is wrong to avoid false teachers. In the newest version of the NIV, "Mark and avoid" means "register and attend."

Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. Romans 16:17-18 KJV

Not So Sweet-heart



The Moose Report: An Abundance of Bullwinkle



I quoted this from the Moose Report:

I’m not quite sure how hosting non-WELS speakers constitutes prayer fellowship and a violation of Scripture. Pretty soon we’ll get to the point where just talking to people who are non-WELS will be breaking fellowship.

It is an unfortunate fact that great confusion exists among clergy and laity alike around applications of the church fellowship principles.

“Confusion” is an understatement.

Rather than contribute to this confusion, the leaders of The CHARIS Institute have decided to cancel this year’s symposium. Our prayer is that we will find a way to resolve this confusion about church fellowship so that CHARIS can again host outstanding scholars on relevant subjects in the future without controversy.

May God guide us to live and work in the freedom of His Gospel so that we can be salt and light to a dying world.

This symposium was on evangelism. Apparently it is breaking fellowship by bringing in those who have effective evangelism programs that actually work because they are not WELS. Our synod is losing members faster than they are gaining them. You’d think they’d be open to new ideas. There is a serious danger here in this fellowship misapplication. Those planning to attend have lost the opportunity to learn about other evangelism methods to win souls for Christ.


***

Someone, anonymously, has said the quotation above does not support Sweet. I guess that person would headline the post a bit differently--like this--"Not so!" Sweet-heart.

themrs has left a new comment on your post "The Leonard Sweet-hearts War, 2005":

I have posted a comment and am curious as to why it hasn't been approved? I want to reiterate the fact that I did not in my post say anything in support of Sweet and am irritated that you introduced my post by saying my blog supported Sweet. The point of my post was that hosting non-WELS speakers is not breaking prayer fellowship. Please allow my feedback on your post or remove any references to my post or blog from your site as it has been misinterpreted and misused. Thank you.

GJ - Next I found this outraged post on The Moose Report:

The injustice of being misquoted
January 1st, 2008
My brother-in-law drew my attention to this post which, after a very, very long description quotes my post in support of Leonard Sweet. As my comments have not been approved by the administrator of that blog, let me speak here about this as it makes my blood boil.

First, when he inserted my post as a quote in his, he did not differentiate between what was quoted from CHARiS and my response. You can find my original post here. The point of my post is not to support Sweet’s doctrinal beliefs–I never even mention or refer to Sweet so I’m not sure how Ichabod can state “Here is a WELS blog supporting Sweet.” I have never posted in support of him!

Second, the whole point of my post was not about the doctrines of the speakers, but questioning the application of the fellowship principal in regards to the symposium. It’s that simple. I have other thoughts on the matter, but I’ll withhold those from this post at the moment.

Third, and this really gets me, Gregory Jackson adds a note stating “I see a familiar name associated with the Moose Report.” It’s bad enough that he mars my blog and falsely testifies that I “support” Sweet, but he adds an unnecessary comment to slander those associated with me, which could easily mean any of my brothers who are faithful WELS members, or even my sainted father.

I’m quite irritated, just FYI.


***

GJ - Ichabodians, was my characterization of the original post wrong? I see The Moose Report doing double back-flips in favor of "great scholars" like Leonard Sweet (pagan New Age fraud), Kent Hunter (Fuller Seminary Puppet), and Waldo Werning (Voted Fuller Seminary Useful Idiot, 2006).

Did you know the Methodist Church was growing? The Moose Report says so. Leonard Sweet is a Methodist, and he is making them grow with his new ideas! When I looked up statistics on the United Methodists, I found a split and irrelevant denomination.

The Moose Report also offered this startling factoid - the LCMS is growing, too, thanks to Hunter and Werning! These great scholars have new ideas. However, whenever I quoted Werning and Hunter verbatim, I found the same new ideas in earlier Fuller Seminary publications. In 2005, the Church Growth Movement of Werning and Hunter was hardly new, certainly not new in WELS. I have recorded, with great precision, the orgins of Church Growth in WELS.

Missouri and WELS began shrinking when they discovered the Church Growth Movement and began implementing its methods and doctrines.

WELS Pastor Steve Kurtzahn wrote, in 1996: "But as you can see from the above references, ever so slyly, like a wolf in sheep's clothing, Valleskey is promoting the Church Growth Movement. [emphasis in original] I will argue that with anyone. God forbid, but my guess would be the next such book out of WELS will be even more CG oriented and even more blatant in its CG statements."

Church Growth false doctrine was about 20 years old in the Wisconsin Synod then. As Kurtzahn predicted, WELS is far more blatant today.

The Moose Report was engaging in typical GA double-talk. Clearly the author was fulminating that his denomination put a slight brake on on the impact of Sweet, Werning, and Hunter. Now the author is angry at his words being understood correctly. So we are left wondering - Is this moose a Lutheran as he claims, or a pagan, New Age Church Growth disciple?

Bullwinkle: Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.
Rocky: Again?
Bullwinkle: Presto!
Lion: ROAR!!!
Bullwinkle: Oops, wrong hat.

Monday, December 31, 2007

Happy New Year, Soldiers




These are times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.

Thomas Paine

How Conservatives Can Win by Losing, Through the Efficacy of the Word Alone





The Word of God (A Scripture Fragment) and the Book of Concord Editors


Christians have a weapon far more powerful than the combined crafts and assaults of the apostates: the Word of God. Conservatives should not aspire to take over the reigns of power. We end up accomplishing only what we concentrate upon (and often not even that).

When the Cloaca Maxima of Hell, Fuller Seminary, got ministers, members, and mission boards to think about numbers, all the energy and focus turned on "How do we increase our numbers each year?" Gone was any thought of being faithful to the Word of God and the Confessions. In a few years, Biblical and Confessional thinking became the enemy.

Nevertheless, the great power of the Word is revealed in the demonic hatred of the apostates toward any semblance of fidelity to the Scriptures. The wrath and vindictiveness of these people can be stunning. They are not nice people, as they pretend. They cry out "Slander!" when questioned about their false doctrine and run the crudest slander machines on the planet, making the secular politicians look tame.

Believers only have the Word and the Confessions. Satan cannot tolerate ordinary, weak, fallible humans having a weapon that will always defeat him, so he rages without mercy. He will tear apart pastor's families, divide friends, ruin people financially. All this is cloaked with sanctity, but there is no doubt about the malice behind it. That is why so many are afraid of synodical apostates. Pure poison is beneath the buttered words.

Therefore, believers will always seem to be in a weak and losing position. Faithful pastors will get the two-point calls to Forgotten Lutheran and Misbegotten Lutheran, in Buffalo Chip, Oklahoma. People will sneer at their misfortune, as they should. As Luther said, "What the world loves, God despises; what God loves, the world despises."

A faithful layman or pastor will fulfill the dream of Archimedes: "Give me a place to stand and with a lever I will move the whole world." The lever for the faithful pastor or layman is the Word of God. Archimedes' hyperbole is reality with the efficacy of the Word.

The Invocation of the Holy Trinity is calling upon the power of God. The Absolution is the Promise of God fulfilled. The Creed, the liturgical service, and genuine hymns all support the proclamation of the Gospel, justification by faith alone. The Votum is a prayer by Paul and by the pastor for all the worshipers in the Lutheran service. The Aaronic benediction is not a sign-off, a time for grabbing the coat, purse, and kids, but the blessing of God Himself: the Holy Trinity, God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. Each time we hear those words we should think of the Trinity implicitly taught already in Numbers 6--The Lord, The Lord, The Lord.

Who can predict what one baptism will accomplish when accompanied by the nurture of the family (and even without it)? One believer marries another or converts the spouse. In a few years, that one baptism has turned into 100 family members as people gather for the funeral of a matriarch or patriarch. Some family members drift away from the Gospel, but others are converted by marriage or association. No one will write this up in Time, Newsweek, or the National Enquirer: Baptism in Steam Corners, Ohio lays foundation for 100 Christians.

Lutherans have forgotten the cross. The cross consists of those experiences directly related to being faithful to the Word. Cancer is not bearing the cross. Heart disease is not bearing the cross. Nor is homework, as one seminary student suggested.
When the synodical pope kicks congregations and pastors out for questioning his ambiguous political statements, that is bearing the cross. When the district popes remove pastors for questioning Church Growth doctrine and support known false teachers, that is bearing the cross.

The Wisconsin Synod ministerium has an informal communication system (much like a prison) called the Grapevine. The pastors are deathly afraid of the Grapevine. The apostates feed excuses for their fellow-apostates into the Grapevine and pitch slander against the faithful in the same way. For example, the former seminary president was called senile by the Grapevine, because he opposed the NWC-DMLC Anschluss. While he was dying of a stroke, a highly respected pastor was called brain-damaged for writing against Church Growth. He published his article before the stroke, but the Grapevine does not care about facts.

We should be afraid of God, not the Grapevine.

For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the LORD: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word. Isaiah 66:2 KJV

Benefits of Being a Faithful Pastor, Ascending Order
1. Frequents moves. The adulterous (whether spiritually or carnally, often both) cannot abide the Word of God. They keep pastors moving.
2. New friends. The political pastors will not associate with anyone tainted by dissent from apostasy.
3. Lasting friends. Those who love orthodox Lutheran doctrine are united across synodical lines.
4. Renewed friends. Some people turn away when the painful truths are made known, but return to say, "It's worse than anything you ever said or wrote."
5. Knowledge that God's will is accomplished through His Word alone and never apart from His Word.
6. Seeing God at work in the Means of Grace, pastoral visitation, and teaching.

There is an abundant supply of evil people in the visible church. As Rauschenbusch said, religion is powerful. When united with good, it is a powerful good. When united with evil, it is a powerful evil.

However, God is just. Time wounds all heels.

The temptation is great to compromise for a better position, a chance to leave the cares and concerns of a congregation. The warped and twisted nature of our world is revealed in that pastors long to leave the Means of Grace to sit around at synodical meetings dealing with everything except the Means of Grace - and for higher pay and benefits. The rich, black suits and oreo collars! The new model cars! Housing allowance! Trips around the world on the synod's budget! Hobnobbing with the nabobs of Wikiletics! Name-dropping: Maxwell, Sweet, McNeal, Warren--at a seminary reunion!

Unfortunately, ministers are not encouraged to think of their work as worthwhile. Even if no one else thinks so, each minister should realize the power of God's Word and the wisdom of the Confessions.

Reading small histories has always been a hobby. Booklets tell about one small group of Lutherans, a group of missionaries, a district, a synod that emerged from various trends and merged into a new one. My dissertation was about the Augustana Synod, which lasted 100 years. The puzzle is figuring out who those leaders were. Many mother churches are gone, due to demographic and doctrinal trends. I wonder, "What remains?" Those who liked to strut about because of their power are forgotten by everyone. The Word of God remains forever. When those leaders were faithful, the Gospel bore fruit one hundred-fold. The faithful of those years embarrass the mods of today. The faithful are forgotten but God's work and will remain. The faithful win by losing.

Apostates Win by Losing When Conservatives Are Weak










"Whoa! That's my job, Antichrist."



How the WELS Apostates Won Big with Leonard Sweet, Kent Hunter, and Waldo Werning

I put together material about the infamous Leonard Sweet, Kent Hunter, Waldo Werning conference promoted and canceled by WELS Church and Change. The WELS conservatives celebrated their brave stand and the results in 2005. I started to take notice of Leonard Sweet because several WELS contacts let me know about the proposed event in advance.

Step by step, this is how the apostates won by losing. Take note, Hot Air Merchants of the Right. You may learn something from the Left.

First the apostates proposed the most obnoxious speakers they could find. Sweet is so fatuous, Left-wing, and ridiculous that a mildly Lutheran minister should have fits over the Methodist guru. Kent Hunter is a Lutheran version of the same model - the Church Doctor, as he calls himself. If Hunter has been helping his own LCMS, here is some news - the patient died under your care. His elder brother in promoting WELS/LCMS/ELS Church Growth is Waldo Werning.

By the way, the Church Growth Movement--favored so much by Werning and Hunter--is moving into New Age mysticism, through Leonard Sweet and his pal Rick Warren. Just study Leonard Sweet's website for proof. Or his vita for a Robert Schuller conference: "LEONARD SWEET, Ph.D. Morristown, NJ - Leonard is author and founder of Wikiletics, a futurist, a semiotician, and a preacher who communicates the gospel to a postmodern world." (He forgot to list - Hippy Gasbag.) More content can be found on the Sweet website.

Second, the WELS apostates played the role of victim when the furor forced them to cancel the 2005 Church and Change conference. The Leonard Sweet-hearts sent their letters to Charis/Church and Change, and their names were omitted from the published letters. Critics sent their letters, which were also published - with the names included. How convenient. The Sweet-hearts could remain a closely knit and secretive group while their opponents were revealed. The whole withdrawal process was done not in the spirit of godly contrition. Instead, the leaders were resently, self-pitying, and accusatory.

Third, the conservatives suffered from a collective case of premature celebration. They won! Charis (the journal) was crushed. Church and Change was no more. The deceivers at WELS headquarters really pulled the wool over the critics' eyes. While the critics were high-fiving across the country, the apostates were making Church and Change an official part of the WELS.net website, not just part of Wisconsin Lutheran College/Charis.

The conservatives forgot that Wayne Mueller was voted out of office, waited for the new VP to refuse to serve, and then voted back into office. He turned that defeat into victory and even saw his defeat omitted from the magazine's account of the convention. The canceled conference was a minor setback.

Fourth, when the 2007 conference was set up on the WELS.net website, no one objected. The conservatives--who tire easily and often--did not put up a fuss. There may be some hope. The Church and Change jumpword is gone from the WELS website. Church and Change has the same website as before, but the lack of an official link is telling.

Conclusion. The apostates have won in all the denominations by being persistent. They retreat two steps and then move three steps forward a bit later. They lose the vote on the third day of the convention and reverse the vote on the fourth day, when everyone is packing up the suitcases and heading for the airport. The apostates have won by avoiding the doctrinal battles in favor of the political fights. That is where their Father Below always wins. As I heard so many times, "He is not a false teacher. He is a nice guy." One WELS circuit pastor defended a Fuller Seminary graduate by saying, "I drank a lot of beer with him in school." I never determined how beer consumption made someone a sound teacher.

Episcopal Congregation Leaves Behind Building

This is fun, getting rid of conservatives!





Leaving A Church Behind

Congregation Prepares For A New Beginning

By KATIE MELONE | Courant Staff Writer

December 31, 2007


WATERTOWN — - It was the last Sunday service at Christ Church. Unable to go "further in a church that continued in a false gospel," the entire congregation, including the rector and church leaders, will sever ties with the national Episcopal Church and reform under a new name: New Hope Anglican Church.

One of the "Connecticut six," the half-dozen churches in the state diocese that disagree with national leadership on departure of scripture, including the appointment of a gay bishop, the congregation will trade its historic building on the town green for a free community room at the Thomaston Savings Bank around the corner.

The Sunday service will be held at the bank, starting Jan. 6, until they find or build another house of worship.

"We need to celebrate today, but we need to recognize there is a dying," the Rev. Allyn Benedict said in his final homily at the church. Reading off an overhead projector, church members sang hymns enthusiastically, clapping and raising hands in acknowledging their faith. They hugged one another, wishing peace.

The church was founded under the Church of England in 1764. In 2003, Benedict and several other Connecticut rectors clashed with Connecticut Bishop Andrew D. Smith, who supported the naming of V. Gene Robinson as New Hampshire's bishop. Robinson is gay. Benedict and Christ Church leaders also feel the national church is rejecting scriptural authority and traditions of the church.

In cutting affiliation with the national leaders, the congregation has agreed to give up its church buildings and property, estimated to be worth $7 million, and its name, "Christ Church Parish." The congregation also ended its participation with the other Connecticut churches in a protracted legal battle against national leadership over church real estate, deciding that "it's not worth living under this oppression just for the property," said Paul LePine, the senior warden. Four of the "Connecticut six" have also ended their connection to the national church, LePine said.

"It's a tragedy when relationships fail," LePine said. "There's a relief of being free of that dysfunctional relationship we've been in for many years."

LePine's daughter, Rachel, 15, commented that while leaving is the right thing to do, "it is sad."

"That's kind of why we named it New Hope," she said.

"We're just moving on to where we're supposed to be," said Chris Varian, who was married at the church and has been a member for three years. "It's a transition. It's a lot of history and a lot of memories. It's bittersweet."

Contact Katie Melone at kmelone@courant.com.