Saturday, January 15, 2011

Wisconsin Synod Piety - Stained Glass Window


Synod VP Joel Voss preached at the Reformation service at St. Paul, German Village. He could not be found after the service, because he was watching the Packers play on TV in another part of the building.

Don't worry WELSians, that will only lift him higher in the eyes of your members.

Joel was famous for never reading the books sent to the official conference book reviewer for NPH. Everyone knew it. He stood up each time and laughed as he showed the book covers to the audience.

Don't worry WELSians, that will only lift him higher in the eyes of your members.

---

grumpy has left a new comment on your post "Wisconsin Synod Piety - Stained Glass Window":

Are you mocking the dead?
Isn't this the same Voss that was killed in a car accident?

***
GJ - He appears to be alive in this photo from his current blog.

Bruce Church thinks this is a candid shot of the synod vp.

Episcopal Roman Catholic in England


Three former Anglican bishops, John Broadhurst, left, Andrew Burnham, second left, and Keith Newton, right, stand with Archbishop Vincent Nichols, the  

AP – Three former Anglican bishops, John Broadhurst, left, Andrew Burnham, second left, and Keith Newton, … 
 
LONDON – Three former Anglican bishops were ordained as Catholic priests Saturday, becoming the first ex-bishops to take advantage of a new Vatican system designed to make it easier for Anglicans to embrace Roman Catholicism.

The crowded ceremony at Westminster Cathedral in London made priests of former bishops Keith Newton, Andrew Burnham and John Broadhurst, Anglicans who had been unhappy with the church's direction.
The three declined to comment after the ordination presided over by the Most Rev. Vincent Nichols, Catholic leader in England and Wales.

Nichols called the ordination service a landmark event.

"Many ordinations have take place in this cathedral during the 100 years of its history, but none quite like this," he said. "Today is a unique occasion marking a new step in the life and history of the Catholic Church."
The groundbreaking ceremony was made possible by a 2009 ruling by the Vatican allowing Anglicans worldwide to join the Roman Catholic Church and still adhere to many Anglican traditions.

Vatican officials devised the new policy without consulting Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the spiritual leader of the global Anglican church.

The new system is designed to entice traditionalist Anglicans opposed to women priests, openly gay clergy, the blessing of same-sex unions and other controversial policies that have caused a deep schism within the church.

Until it was put in place, disaffected Anglicans had joined the Roman Catholic Church primarily on a case-by-case basis.

---

"Its Articles, Homilies, and Liturgy have been a great bulwark of Protestantism; and yet, seemingly, out of the very stones of that bulwark has been framed, in our day, a bridge on which many have passed over into Rome... It harbors a skepticism which takes infidelity by the hand, and a revised medievalism which longs to throw itself, with tears, on the neck of the Pope and the Patriarch, to beseech them to be gentle and not to make the terms of restored fellowship too difficult."
Charles P. Krauth, The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology, Philadelphia: The United Lutheran Publication House, 1913 (first edition, 1871), p. x.

Lifetime Achievement

How much is tuition?




bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Lutheran Cathedrals Are Also In Trouble":


"For many [cathedrals], trust funds and endowments are all that is sustaining them."

That reminds me of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis. With an $80 million endowment and growing, it only has 60-some M. Div students per class, and yet they pay through the nose to go there. Then they have all the non-M.Div. filler GED students (DELTO, etc) who have no business being there. Of course, the deaconesses are all pretty so I can't say anything about them.

Meanwhile, Dean Wenthe is retiring from Ft. Wayne. I guess he thought that making Ft. Wayne as expensive as Yale Seminary was enough of a life achievement, and everything else would just be anticlimactic.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Lie Down with Obama, Get Up With Fleas Fleeced.
Who Won Both Houses and the Presidency in 2008?

The ELCA clergy vote predominantly Democratic.
The ELCA leaders probably vote  Democratic 99%.



ELCA NEWS SERVICE
January 14, 2011
ELCA, Board of Pensions Respond to Lawsuit on Annuity Payment Reductions

     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The churchwide organization of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and the ELCA Board of Pensions responded publicly to a Dec. 3 lawsuit filed against them in a Minnesota state court by four plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claim the ELCA Board of Pensions acted improperly to reduce annuity payments to retirees participating in an annuity retirement fund. 

     The suit was filed in a district court in Hennepin County, Minn., by the Rev. Arthur F. Haimerl, the Rev. Benjamin A. Johnson and two former pastors, Larry D. Cartford and Dr. Ronald A. Lundeen.

     Named as defendants were the ELCA Board of Pensions, based in Minneapolis, and two members of its leadership team, John G. Kapanke, president and chief executive officer, and Curtis G. Fee, vice president and chief investment officer. The ELCA, a separate nonprofit corporation based here, was also named.

     "The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is aware of the allegations contained in the lawsuit filed in the Minnesota District Court," according to a statement from the ELCA churchwide organization. "The lawsuit claims that the ELCA Board of Pensions, a corporation separate from the churchwide organization, acted improperly by reducing certain annuity payments. We are disappointed the plaintiffs chose to name the ELCA as a defendant in this matter. While we deny the allegations, we will not comment publicly on the specifics contained in the lawsuit so long as this matter is in litigation."

     "The ELCA remains concerned about the retirees who filed the lawsuit as we are about everyone adversely affected by the downturn in the stock market and the state of the economy. We ask everyone to keep the retirees and the church in their prayers during these difficult times," the statement said.

     In 2009 the ELCA Board of Pensions informed about 12,500 retirees in the Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund that, because of significant market losses, their annuity payments would be reduced 9 percent for 2010, and would likely be reduced further by 9 percent in 2011 and 2012.

     The reductions were needed because the Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund suffered significant market losses in late 2008 and early 2009, resulting in a funding shortfall of as much as 39 percent in February 2009. To ease the impact on plan members, the trustees decided to implement reductions over a three-year period.

     Last month the trustees of the Board of Pensions announced smaller 2011 reductions in annuity payments for plan members in its Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund, primarily because of positive market performance in recent months. The trustees reduced annuity payments for 2011 by 6 percent instead of 9 percent for plan members in the Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund.

     In the lawsuit the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants' actions were not proper and not permitted based on the terms of the retirement plan agreement. The plaintiffs claimed that "annuity payments were guaranteed for life" and that "increases in these guaranteed lifetime annuity payments would be permanent."

     Earlier this month the Board of Pensions caused the lawsuit to be moved to the federal court in Minneapolis.
     "We believe this lawsuit, brought by four individuals, lacks merit and we are vigorously defending against it," said a statement from the ELCA Board of Pensions.  "The top priority of the Board of Pensions for the ELCA Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund has always been, and continues to be, providing annuity payments to participating plan members during their lifetimes.

     "In January 2010, as a result of the historic and virtually unprecedented downturn in the investment markets in late 2008 and 2009, the Board of Pensions implemented a three-year plan of corrective measures to protect the long-term viability of the Fund for its participating plan members. The Board of Pensions believes it has acted in the best interests of plan members by seeking to return the Fund to fully funded status. The steps implemented by the Board of Pensions are intended to support continued annuity payments to participating plan members during their lifetimes. Currently we are on track to return the Fund to a fully funded status, due primarily to improved investment market performance and the action we have taken in our stewardship of the Fund," the Board of Pensions statement said.

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or news@elca.org

He Rice Stand - WELS Can Do No Other


Jeff Gunn, WELS Emerging Church Pastor:
"Second, receive Jesus’ forgiveness.  When Jesus died on the cross, the entire world was forgiven.  That means you.  The person who repents of his sin can know beyond any shadow of a doubt that all sins are forgiven already through Jesus.  Jesus will absorb your doubt and give you assurance that your sins too are fully forgiven."

***

GJ - How can anyone who supports UOJ attack Jeff Gunn on that epic devotional - He Rice Stand?

He clearly teaches UOJ Enthusiasm, just as his DP (Buchholz) does. The long line of UOJ advocates goes back through Wayne Mueller, David Valleskey, J. P. Meyer, Sig Becker.

---

lance-weber (http://lance-weber.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "He Rice Stand - WELS Can Do No Other":

The long line of UOJ advocates goes back through Wayne Mueller, David Valleskey, J. P. Meyer, Sig Becker.

They sound like a secret society practicing personal forms of presumption and Gnosticism – as opposed to following the Word of God. Should it be attributed to stupidity or overbearing egos?

***

GJ - I have spent many years trying to figure this out. More research is coming along to help. My tentative answer is the influence of Walther amalgamating Orthodoxy and Pietism. He also promoted a style of theology where theses were followed by justification for those grand declarations. Paul Calvin Kelm would call it upside-down theology, his primary skill.

The same blindness to the efficacy of the Word instigated Receptionism - the notion that the bread becomes the Body of Christ when received by the communicant. The often heard declaration that "we do not know the Moment of Consecration" reveals the stupefaction of Enthusiasm.

Enthusiasm begat UOJ and UOJ begat the Church Growth/Emerging Church Movement.

Church Growth will beget atheism - it already has.

Touch Not!

"Touch not mine anointed!"



LPC has left a new comment on your post "Abusive Church Bodies":

Pr. Greg,


Ohh the Sin-nods are so Pentecostal!

When I was in charismania and I questioned a high ranking pastor, I was given this passage:

Psalms 105:14-15 , “He suffered no man to do them wrong: yea, he reproved kings for their sakes; Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm"

LPC

Mind Control in Abusive Sects Holy Mother Synod

Do you have a problem with their doctrine and practice? They will phone you long distance and question you.



rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Abusive Church Bodies":

Recently, I downloaded and read a book entitled The Heresy of Mind Control. The attempt at mind control is one of the many dirty tricks that abusive sects engage in. We also know that a knee jerk reaction of attempting to discredit sources of factual information is another tactic that the abusive sects use. The actions of the staffer at the Guilt Shack are very revealing. Those who were closest to Joseph Stalin revealed after Stalin’s death just how paranoid old Uncle Joe really was. I guess that the despotic ones have to always watch their backside. Abusive sects can be very Stalinesque.

Abusive Church Bodies


One reason for massive defections from mainline church bodies is abuse. There are many forms of abuse, and they all stem from corrupt doctrine.

Hazing in high school, college, and seminary is a good indication of an abusive sect. The whole idea is to divide the synod between the elite (no matter how dumb they are) and the slaves. The slaves do the work so the elite can enjoy their luxury trips around the world, their bonus pay, their extra help because they labor so long and hard for the Lord.

No one is allowed to question this system, because that is equal to debating with God. The Holy Spirit has complete control of the sect, so all decisions are godly, all dissent demonic. Ralph Bohlmann used to climax his venomous letters with "Satan must be laughing right now..."

Therefore, the sect pushes people out because they disagree while protecting the corrupt, the incompetent, and the adulterous. The formula is simple to comprehend. If the elite commit a crime, they are promoted. If the slaves do something wrong, they consigned to the lower depths of Hell and shunned. Doing something wrong includes truly bad things, like marital infidelity, but also includes questioning Holy Mother Synod.

Stay with me - it is not that complicated. The elite can question Holy Mother Synod all they want. They usually attack all the old traditional things that are holding back the Kingdom of God. While ELCA tried to cure all the injustice in the world through Marxism, abortion, and homosexuality, WELS-LCMS-ELS knew the answers were revealed at Fuller Seminary and its clones. Both sides, ELCA and the Syn Conference, managed with "Our way or the highway to Hell." No surprise - bullying worked.

ELCA and its previous bodies were abusive, but everyone overlooked it. Now the drama is public. ELCA pastors and congregations are communicating their experiences through the Internet. If the ELCA bishops could burn people at the stake today, they would be happy to do so.

I have tried to tell many innocent pastors and laity that these sects specialize in one thing - spying. Yes, the leaders pretend they are dumber than rocks about important issues. They do not know. They do not remember. They do not comprehend. But they make sure they know every detail that may concern them.

Several people have been accosted for the crime of knowing me--gasp--or reading this blog. That is pretty hilarious by itself, because the synod leaders read this blog and know me. They are the elites, so that is OK. My Facebook friend list of 1280+ includes a rainbow coalition, from Otten and Werning to Church Growth leaders of various sects and factions. One WELS DP is on my list. He has looked over the names and jumped on one person I know.

Here is an even better example. I friended someone I never met. He is no longer WELS. A staffer at the Guilt Factory published on this man's wall: "Are you the one leaking to Greg Jackson?" That was a public accusation, especially paranoid since the friend was not in WELS and we had no communication except "Happy Birthday."

WELS leaders will tell anyone with ears that I have no friends and no one pays attention to me. So why are they jumping on my distant and casual friends like a hobos on a hotdog? And why do they care what I write, if I have no credibility? A good friend, via the Net, says, "Because they are frightened."

One LCA pastor assured me that no one in the LCA read Christian News. I said, "Those leaders who know you are reading every word. That is their job."

For example, I was a microbe in the LCA when I left. I published a few things here and there, but I was not on any national or district committees - too nauseating. When I sat down for lunch with LCA President Crumley at the Ad Fontes meeting, he began by asking me about WELS colloquy and what it entailed.

Crumley did not even ask if he had the right person or "What are you up to, uh, Greg?" Someone would think, "This guy watches over 3 million members and thousands of pastors. He could not keep up with all the personal details." Yes, he could, if it mattered to him. The LCA was facing merger with the ALC at that time and did a great job of suppressing defections. There were almost no clergy or congregational exits.

WELS and ELS have also suppressed congregational exits by pushing people out, but they have not stopped massive losses by their abusive behavior. People slip away, one by one.

The damage continues. I hear from various people because they trust me to hear about their pain and to keep things to myself. Therefore, I keep background vague. I urge them to rely on the Word and to read the Gospel of John, not to expect anything from an abusive sect.

One pastor dismissed Tabor murdering his wife as piffle because "it happened a long time ago." I still hear from people deeply affected by Tabor's adulterous behavior and the synodical cover-up of the murder. A number of clergy and laity come to mind. That is an ongoing effect because of the felonies committed in the name of making Holy Mother Synod look innocent.

Old news? Fred Adrian was involved in a similar cover-up in Michigan, WELS. No murder, just a minor child, a member of his congregation. He is back serving as a pastor.

Someone suggested that I attend the WELS-ELS-LCMS trifecta in May. I responded that I was not interested, not as long as the abuse continued.

I know - write a letter. I did.

I sent three certified letters to WELS clergy, and all three signed the receipt card. That included reform candidate SP Schroeder. No one answered or acknowledged the letter. A previous email, sent a long time ago, was never acknowledged.

Months later, after receiving my certified letter, Schroeder wrote:

---


Greg,

I did write to you I regard to the matter in the email I mentioned.  This was some time prior to your sending of the certified letter.  Since the certified letter was not addressed to me but sent as a “CC”, and since I had encouraged you to contact these men directly and you were doing so, I did not respond directly to your letter.   

Regardless, I apologize if this appeared to be a lack of response.  It was not intended to be.

Thanks.

Rev. Mark Schroeder
WELS President


***

GJ - That was the extent of his response, except for his previous advice - "Write a letter."

See how that works?

What Sasse Says: Concerning the Unity of the Lutheran Church

What Sasse Says: Concerning the Unity of the Lutheran Church

Lutheran Cathedrals Are Also In Trouble

The State of Episcopal Church Cathedrals in the US

A SPECIAL REPORT

By David W. Virtue and Mary Ann Mueller
www.virtueonline.org
December 16, 2010

A special VOL investigation into the state of Episcopal cathedrals across the U.S. has revealed that many are living on borrowed time, while a handful are thriving in difficult economic circumstances. Cathedrals usually occupy prime real estate locations in major cities, locations that, should they go out of business, offer great opportunities for developers or evangelical mega churches.

The cathedral of the Diocese of Western Michigan - the diocese of the now deceased Bishop Charles E. Bennison, Sr. - was sold to an evangelical mega-church for less than the price to build it. The diocese is now without a cathedral. Fire sales can be expected in other dioceses across the US in the next decade.

Of the some 100 domestic dioceses in the Episcopal Church, 18 dioceses have no cathedrals including: Alaska, East Carolina, Eastern Michigan, Eastern Oregon, North Texas (Fort Worth); Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Northern Michigan, Northwest Texas, Rochester, San Joaquin, Southern Virginia, Southwestern Virginia, West Texas, West Virginia, Western Michigan and the Navajoland.

ELCA and The Episcopal Church Agree

Diocese of Virginia Faces Critical Resolutions on Sexuality, Property Negotiations

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
January 10, 2011

When the Diocese of Virginia meets January 20-22, high on the list of resolutions will be one affirming "same-gender unions" and another relating to current ecclesiastical wars regarding property issues.

Liberals in the diocese want to see the full blessing of same-sex unions and view it as "providing a generous pastoral response" in keeping with General Convention resolution C056 allowing bishops to bless same-sex unions though not necessarily to marry them. (An exception occurred recently in the Diocese of Massachusetts.) Virginia statutes define marriage as between one man and one woman. Voters in seven states, including Virginia, have approved constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage.

Should this resolution pass at the 216th convention, and there is every likelihood that it will, it will place the Diocese of Virginia firmly in the revisionist camp from which there is no immediate return, if at all. It means that the diocese can no longer claim to recognize those of conscience who may disagree with the diocese's position. While it will not be mandated or coercive for a priest to have to perform a same sex blessing, it should be noted that women's ordination was optional until it was made mandatory by General Convention, violating the consciences of traditionalist priests and forcing a number of parishes and dioceses to cede from The Episcopal Church.

Apostasy and Schism Are the Fruits of Marrying the Spirit of This Age

The Dubliners: Why Peter Carrell has it all wrong

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
January 11, 2011

In an article written for The Living Church, http://tinyurl.com/4l57exd the Rev. Dr. Peter Carrell of the Diocese of Christchurch, in the Anglican Church of New Zealand, opines that the non attendance of eleven orthodox primates in the Anglican Communion in Dublin, later this month, amounts to nothing and "in ten years or so, all will be well again."

Perhaps it is because the Rev. Carrell lives in far off NZ, has never attended a Primates meeting, a CAPA meeting, has never met or talked with orthodox archbishops like Henry Orombi (Uganda) or Nicholas Okoh, (Nigeria), has not seen what Archbishop Robert Duncan has gone through, (it was Duncan who said orthodox Episcopalians would have been exterminated if they had not left TEC), has never met an ACNA bishop nor seen the devastating impact that theologically revisionist bishops like Jack Spong and the takeover of the Episcopal Church by a handful of politically correct pansexualists has done, that he can write the nonsense he does from the safety and distance of NZ. (In NZ only one diocese - Nelson - is remotely orthodox, the rest rolled over a long time ago.)

Thursday, January 13, 2011

BBC’s Story of the King James Bible – The Translation « Churchmouse Campanologist

BBC’s Story of the King James Bible – The Translation « Churchmouse Campanologist

"My thanks to D Philip Veitch of Reformation Anglicanism for letting me know about the BBC Radio 4 series, The Story of the King James Bible.

Yesterday, I summarised the first part of the story, the Commission. Today’s post examines what happened during the translation of the King James Version (KJV). You can also read a BBC synopsis of James Naughtie’s broadcast."

For the rest of this excellent, informative post, click the link.

Let's embarrass the WELS-LCMS Leftist combine. They will probably use the wretched ESV to replace the disgustingly bad NIV anyway, but we can make them pay for it in the year of the KJV.

CrossWalk's Jeff Gunn - He Rice Stand.
The Last Belch from the Pepsi Generation - We Hope


Jesus Is My Rice

2010-07-22T22:52:00
 
So an acquaintance I was talking to this last week related how he had to jump in the pool to try and save his puppy.  Apparently, the puppy was not a very sure swimmer yet.  He did in fact save the puppy from drowning, but unfortunately the cell phone in his pocket was not so fortunate.

This acquaintance had heard that if a cell phone gets wet, you can dry out the phone by sticking it in a bowl of rice.  The rice apparently has the ability to absorb the moisture and draw it out even from the interior of the phone.  Well, according to this acquaintance of mine, it works!  His formerly drowned phone was restored to full use.

I got to thinking that I could use some rice.  There are a lot of things I drown in—some regularly, some just from time to time.  Here’s a short list:
  • Sin
  • Temptation
  • Guilt
  • Shame
  • Self-pity
  • Anger
  • Sorrow
  • Anxiety
  • Grief
  • Frustration

I’ll stop with my “top ten.”  Maybe you can relate.  Maybe you have some things that threaten to drown you too.

So let me share my rice with you.  When I’m drowning in these things, I look for Jesus.  And then I drop myself into him.  How I do this is usually called “repentance” in the Bible.  When I repent, I “dry out” in a three-step process.  Dropping yourself into Jesus is a process you can adopt too:
  • First, be authentic with Jesus.  Pray and tell him what you are experiencing.  If it’s sin, own up to it.  If it’s guilt or shame, be real and admit what you’ve done wrong.  If it’s worry or grieving or frustration over hurts and challenges in your life, then open up your heart to Jesus and tell him what you feel.  Jesus will absorb your sin and take it to himself.
  • Second, receive Jesus’ forgiveness.  When Jesus died on the cross, the entire world was forgiven.  That means you.  The person who repents of his sin can know beyond any shadow of a doubt that all sins are forgiven already through Jesus.  Jesus will absorb your doubt and give you assurance that your sins too are fully forgiven.
  • Third, ask for the Holy Spirit’s strength to do what you cannot do by your own strength.  And then, with the Spirit’s support and strength working in you, commit to living a changed life.  Don’t go back.  Move ahead and Jesus’ blood and righteousness will absorb your past way of life.  The good news of Jesus will power you on to live a new, courageous and adventurous life—to the glory of God.
Every now and then I like to look at other translations and paraphrases.  Here’s one that struck my eye this week.  See if you don’t think it’s telling you that Jesus makes good “rice”:

“Christ redeemed us from that self-defeating, cursed life by absorbing it completely into himself. Do you remember the Scripture that says, "Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree"? That is what happened when Jesus was nailed to the cross: He became a curse, and at the same time dissolved the curse. And now, because of that, the air is cleared and we can see that Abraham's blessing is present and available for non-Jews, too. We are all able to receive God's life, his Spirit, in and with us by believing—just the way Abraham received it.”  (Galatians 3:13-14, The Message)

They Used To Call This a Boston Marriage

CAMBRIDGE, MA: Two Episcopal Lesbian Leaders Marry in Boston Cathedral
Massachusetts Bishop Tom Shaw officiates at first lesbian marriage

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
January 3, 2010

In an act that will further alienate The Episcopal Church from the Global South and raise tensions for the Archbishop of Canterbury at the upcoming Primates meeting in Dublin, two top Episcopal leaders were married at the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in Boston on Saturday.

The lesbian service "united" Episcopal Divinity School dean and president, the Very Reverend Katherine Hancock Ragsdale and Mally Lloyd, Canon to the Ordinary. It was the first lesbian marriage solemnized by Thomas Shaw SSJE, Bishop Diocesan of the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts.

"God always rejoices when two people who love each other make a life-long commitment in marriage to go deeper into the heart of God through each other. It's a profound pleasure for me to celebrate with God and my friends, the marriage of Katherine and Mally," said Shaw. Some 400 guests attended the marriage.

Though the Episcopal Church's canons and formularies still state that marriage is between a man and a woman, the church at its General Convention in July of 2009 decided to allow "bishops, particularly those in dioceses within civil jurisdictions where same-gender marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships are legal, may provide generous pastoral response to meet the needs of members of this church."

In November 2009, Shaw announced his decision to allow clergy in the Diocese of Massachusetts to solemnize all marriages--a long wait for many given that same-gender marriage was legalized in Massachusetts more than five years earlier.

Ragsdale, 52, became dean of the historic Episcopal Divinity School in October 2009. She is the first woman to hold that position.

Same-sex marriage in the state of Massachusetts was permitted on May 17, 2004, as a result of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruling in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health that it was unconstitutional under the Massachusetts constitution to allow only heterosexual couples to marry.

At that time, Massachusetts became the sixth jurisdiction in the world (after the Netherlands, Belgium, Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec) to legalize same-sex marriage. It was the first U.S. state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Although the U.S. District Court in Boston ruled in two related cases on July 8, 2010, that the provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act barring federal recognition of legally married same-sex couples are unconstitutional, the final judgment is stayed pending the federal government's appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. An appeal was filed on October 12, 2010, by the U.S. Justice Department. Consequently, same-sex couples in Massachusetts are not eligible to receive federal recognition of their marriages, pending the outcome of the appeals process.

The dean is also known for her radical view on abortion. In April 2009, the then new Dean of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, gave a sermon describing abortions as a "blessing" for the women who undergo them. She also said that people who run abortion clinics are "heroes" and even "saints".

Speaking in Birmingham, Alabama, she said that "when a woman becomes pregnant within a loving, supportive, respectful relationship; has every option open to her; decides she does not wish to bear a child; and has access to a safe, affordable abortion - there is not a tragedy in sight - only blessing."

According to a diocesan press release, this is a second marriage for Canon Lloyd. She was married to a man in her first marriage. It is the first for Dean Ragsdale, 52. "It's astonishing how the world is changing," Dean Ragsdale said, "when I grew up, I never believed I would be able to have someone special in my life and now to have almost 400 people show up to support us at our marriage ceremony is wonderful."

Canon Lloyd commented: "We have a lot in common, we each have a spiritual life that the other understands and respects and we also understand the amount of travelling and often late hours that our work requires. Somehow too when you are in your fifties, certain things just aren't as big a problem as they seemed in your twenties."

Perhaps. However this action will only confirm in the minds of orthodox Anglicans around the world that the Episcopal Church has walked apart, snubbing its nose at Lambeth resolution 1:10, the Windsor Report and a Covenant designed to hold the Anglican Communion together.

It will also mean the Archbishop of Canterbury will not be permitted to yawn if and when the issue is raised at the Primates' meeting. It also further confirms why some eleven orthodox primates will not be attending the Dublin meeting called by Dr. Williams.

Don't Worry



---

Joel has left a new comment on your post "Don't Worry":

Bruce--

But then the sanitation unions would have less (sic - fewer) people collecting NYC wages and less union dues coming in.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

McCain On an Otten Rampage

Paul McCain, aka Nicholas Amsdorf!, is posting about his political ally Herman Otten, 
on the ALPB Forum.


The American Lutheran Publicity Bureau Online Forum has a long thread on Otten speaking at Concordia, Mequon.

I saw posts from "Nicholas Amsdorf" that were clearly Paul McCain's - no effort to disguise them.

Name: Nicholas Amsdorf
Posts: 81 (27 per day)
Position: ALPB Forum Member
Date Registered: January 09, 2011, 02:54:03 PM
Website: Cyberbrethren

I saw 27 posts per day for 3 days! I consider a 6-post day a good one here, but I have a real job, teaching adults at two universities. And I preach every Sunday, so I don't need to pose in a clerical outfit with a bishop's neclace hanging down.

The strangest part of this is McCain's endless rant against Otten. They were best buddies when it came to getting Al Barry elected covertly. As both of them explained to me, separately, McCain got all of Barry's materials to Christian News early, so Otten could pretend to be publishing what came in the mail.

Both of them later denied the collusion, but Otten has all the correspondence in his files.

McCain got a job at the Purple Palace as his reward, but he did not tell Otten. McCain told me but asked me to keep it a secret, so I did. When Otten told me, I said I already knew. He asked how that happened, so I told him. Otten was not happy, but they stayed in contact with each other for a period of time. Then, as always, Otten became the enemy and was shunned.

Barry and McCain spent 9 years placating the Left while dissing the conservatives.

According to Otten, McCain spiked the invitation that Barry extended to meet with Otten. According to CN, McCain reported to Barry that Otten refused to meet with the Synod President. Of course, Al could have jumped in a car and driven to New Haven (two hours) on his own.

McCain does not like his machinations known. ALPB has found him quite tiresome more than once, and that is really a debating web forum, where there is a fair amount of snarkiness, nastiness, and posturing. McCain seems to be a bottom feeder, even in that crowd.

The episode is a portrait of the Missouri Synod as it continues to sputter. The leaders all play a political game, biffing one another while complaining about being biffed. They all agree about UOJ, their one and only doctrine, but that does not unite them. McCain is more fanatical about UOJ than Otten is, but Universalism and Enthusiasm do not unite.

Here is another example of how Missouri works. The convention voted in SP Harrison by a margin slightly more than 50%. However, more than half of the voters who backed Harrison also voted to continue working with ELCA. That vote was more like 75-80%.

Yet Missouri pretends to be different from and superior to ELCA. McCain promotes that mirage whenever possible, even though he sought cuddle time with the pope via ex-LCMS, ex-AELC, ex-ELCA Father Richard Neuhaus.

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "McCain On an Otten Rampage":

I searched McCain's blog for references to Otten. Nothing current but certainly a significant mention when Pope worshiping Richard Neuhaus died.

Having said that, I am already cringing at the possibility that there will be featured in a certain newspaper from New Haven a graceless, ham-fisted tirade against Richard John Neuhaus the Catholic convert and more's the pity. But the Roman Church has its share of graceless, ham-fisted apologists and I suppose we must have our fair share too.

Clear reference to Otten and Christian News. Seems McCain takes offense that Otten would not be as kind as he when speaking of Neuhaus who died and went to Hell if he remained steadfast in his Roman Catholic confession.

The rest of the post must have made the Popes' wives all swoon:

"He [Neuhaus] opened several doors for me while I served The LCMS President, making it possible for LCMS leadership to make direct contact with the Vatican, when ELCA leaders were intent on cutting us out of formal conversation with Rome."

http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/01/08/a-grief-observed-richard-john-neuhaus-1936-2009/

***

GJ - Brett did not do justice to the McCain post, so I have kelmed the whole thing. Here is an accurate portrait of the "confessional" leadership of the LCMS and "conscience" of the ALPB Online Forum.

---


Neuh190
Richard John Neuhaus died today. I feel a sadness of heart and an emptiness of spirit. A place at the table of enriching conversation that I enjoy with a number of people across Christendom is now empty, a very large empty place, indeed. Father Neuhaus, once LCMS Pastor Neuhaus, then ELCA Pastor Neuhaus, was, for me, a source of ongoing inspiration and encouragement.

Encouragement? Yes, encouragement to be and remain the very best Lutheran God allows me to be. Now why do I say this? I fervently differed with Father Neuhaus on several core issues of the confession of the Christian Gospel, and he knew that. Over the many long years I had struck up a very informal and not-frequent-enough conversation with him, as I'm sure thousands of other people. I know he kindly entertained my letters and thoughts because of our shared Lutheranism, a Lutheranism he believed fervently was realized fully in communion with Rome, a Lutheranism I believe must remain apart from Rome as long as Rome clings to its Gospel-obscuring errors.

Having said that, I am already cringing at the possibility that there will be featured in a certain newspaper from New Haven a graceless, ham-fisted tirade against Richard John Neuhaus the Catholic convert and more's the pity. But the Roman Church has its share of graceless, ham-fisted apologists and I suppose we must have our fair share too.

I always enjoyed my back-and-forths with Father Neuhaus. He opened several doors for me while I served The LCMS President, making it possible for LCMS leadership to make direct contact with the Vatican, when ELCA leaders were intent on cutting us out of formal conversation with Rome. Father Neuhaus was able to make direct personal appeal to Pope John Paul which led to direct contacts with Cardinal Ratzinger, with the result that the The LCMS was again given a place at the table of discussion and dialog with Rome, and most importantly, a point sadly lost on some, the chance in this formal context to make the good confession of faith. I learned from Father Neuhaus how the highest levels of the Vatican looked with considerable appreciation on the bold confession The Missouri Synod made at the time of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, and it was from Father Neuhaus that I learned that Cardinal Ratzinger had made the point, "If the Lutherans do not take their Confessions seriously, why should we?" But then he would always say, "But there is the Missouri Synod!"

Father Neuhaus kindly asked me to write a couple pieces for FIRST THINGS and he was always interested in what The LCMS was up to. He introduced me to George Weigel and others through the years. Like I said, these kindnesses were commonplace and I know many, many others shared my experiences with Father Neuhaus.

As much as I disagreed with Father Neuhaus, I agreed with so much of what he wrote in RJN
First Things. Of course, he was a constant advocate for his "new" church, but he was fair and even-handed in his criticism, liberally applied, from a conservative point of view, of all trends and movements in Christendom. I admired his rhetorical and writing skills and the first section I always turned to in First Things was his column at the end. I suspect most First Things readers did! His wit, wisdom and breadth of engagement with contemporary trends in our culture was breathtaking. What a noble and bold spokesman for unborn human life he was!

I will miss Father Neuhaus. Through all the years he was a Roman Catholic priest there was no doubt that his Lutheran piety and catechesis was clearly a part of his very being. I felt Richard John brought to the Romanism he embraced a hearty and full measure of the joyful Gospel rediscovery of Martin Luther, for which I am grateful.

I will miss Father Neuhaus, and I join with many others in expressing my appreciation for his life and work, both for what he did that I fervently agreed with, which was much, and that which I had to disagree with, which was substantial. In both cases, he challenged me to think, to reflect, to grow and to strive for excellence in our common confession of Christ. Here is a nice reflection from a fellow Lutheran who worked with Father Neuhaus, Anthony Sacramone.

And here are comments from Fr. Neuhaus, reflecting on his own death, written a number of years ago:
“When I come before the judgment throne, I will plead the promise of
God in the shed blood of Jesus Christ. I will not plead any work that I
have done, although I will thank God that he has enabled me to do some
good. I will plead no merits other than the merits of Christ, knowing
that the merits of Mary and the saints are all from him; and for their
company, their example, and their prayers throughout my earthly life I
will give everlasting thanks. I will not plead that I had faith, for
sometimes I was unsure of my faith, and in any event that would be to
turn faith into a meritorious work of my won. I will not plead that I
held the correct understanding of “justification by faith alone,”
although I will thank God that he led me to know ever more fully the
great truth that much misunderstood formulation was intended to
protect. Whatever little growth in holiness I have experienced,
whatever strength I have received from the company of the saints,
whatever understanding I have attained of God and his ways – these and
all other gifts received I will bring gratefully to the throne. But in
seeking entry to that heavenly kingdom, I will…look to Christ and
Christ alone.”
- Richard John Neuhaus.  Death on a Friday Afternoon.  New York:  Basic Books, 2000)  p. 70.
Requiescat in pace

***

GJ - I knew Richard Neuhaus; I heard his father preach on Easter Sunday in Canada. We met at the Ad Fontes conference in Pennsylvania and corresponded for years. I found him to be a great sparring partner, but it saddened me that he joined Rome after calling himself a "confessional Lutheran" for years.

McCain has tossed the mantle of "confessional Lutheran" on himself--the one thrown down by Neuhaus. McCain likes to brag about his collection of Book of Concord editions. Like most librarians, he is more concerned with the title page than the contents. We confess that the papacy is the very Antichrist, so all self-righteous comments posted by McCain reveal one thing alone - he is a confessed apostate, an anti-confessional Lutheran in Name Only.

It is indeed sad that so many graduates of Concordia Seminary, Ft. Wayne, which had so much to offer, will end their careers as life-long advocates of UOJ, teaching against Luther's Biblical doctrine, proud of the corpses they have left behind.

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "McCain On an Otten Rampage":

McCain quotes Neuhaus above: "I will not plead that I held the correct understanding of “justification by faith alone,” although I will thank God that he led me to know ever more fully the great truth that much misunderstood formulation was intended to protect."

Pure RCC blasphemy. Says a lot about Paul McCain as Paul prefaces that blasphemous self eulogy with, "In both cases, he challenged me to think, to reflect, to grow and to strive for excellence in our common confession of Christ."

Common confession of Christ?!? That I do not doubt. Especially considering McCain's attacks on Justification by Faith Alone while defending UOJ on Extra Nos.

This situation reminds me of an ELS essay that rivals the UOJ mishmash of Buchholz, Zarling, H.A. Preus, Becker, Wendland, Beckman, Webber, Deutschlander etc. It's titled, The Birth that Gave Rebirth to the Doctrine of Justification, by The Rev. Wilhelm W. Petersen. In it he quotes Quanbeck discussing Lutheran and Catholic confession on Justification which ties in with an Ichabod post a few days ago where (W)ELS Pastor Seiltz' confession is identical to that of the Antichrist regarding Justification By Faith Alone.

Petersen:
Dr. Warren Quanbeck, a spokesman for the American Lutheran Church, is quoted as saying, “Today biblically informed theologians in both traditions can agree on the teaching of the New Testament concerning justification by grace alone through faith, and can agree on theological formulations of the doctrine without denying or betraying their theological heritage.” In other words there is a Roman Catholic/Lutheran convergence today on justification. This is also evidenced by Dr. Hans Kung, a Roman Catholic theologian, who says “that neo-Lutheran doctrine is quite compatible with that expressed by Trent.” Page 19

http://www.blts.edu/essays/petersenWW/Birth%20that%20Gave%20Rebirth%20to%20Justification.pdf

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "McCain On an Otten Rampage":

And further...McCain said I felt Richard John brought to the Romanism he embraced a hearty and full measure of the joyful Gospel rediscovery of Martin Luther, for which I am grateful.

What da?

How can a so called confessional Lutheran say such a thing unless he is warped in the head?

Romanism rejects the Gospel Luther rediscovered! How can one say that Neuhaus brought to Romanism the Gospel rediscovered by Luther?

Only when one has embraced absurdity as something authored by God! This confuses God with the devil, the one who authors confusion.

LPC

***

GJ - The ALPB writers are a tolerant bunch, a rainbow coalition, but they find McCain's self-serving diatribes difficult to bear.

Cardinals in the Snow

All cardinals on this post are by Norma Boeckler.


Birds reward those who feed them regularly by flocking to the food when cold and snowy weather arrive.

As Bruce Church noted, all the companies promote their food by painting cardinals on the containers. Everyone loves to see them.

Because cardinals love sunflower seeds and the shelter of bushes, we are especially blessed by them, with three males feeding at a time, and one or more females hopping to the feeder. The feeder is only eight feet from my desk, so I have a close-up view of the males, sitting in the sun, rolling seed into their mouths, spitting out the hulls, enjoying the food with a droll look of satisfaction. Bright sunlight highlights the brilliant contrasts of black and red.

The female cardinals are equally beautiful, and their subtle coloration is far more distinctive in sunlight. They are also a bit more shy than the males, so they get less press.

Although the snow and cold were on the way, the birds and squirrels did not immediately eat all the popcorn I spread for them. This makes me think they realize the duration of the bad weather and make an effort to extend the extra food supply. Birds seldom eat all of the berries, seed, suet, or other food at once.

Squirrels seem to waste food, such as scattering the corn kernels from the squirrel-feeder. Their eating habits make it easier for birds to have individual corn seeds. Blue birds dive for the ground and eat what the squirrels leave.

When New Ulm was truly socked in with a major sleet storm, the birds and squirrels ate in a panic. The squirrels chewed corn out of the ice rather than letting the seeds fall carelessly to the ground. When famine threatens, food is a luxury.

God lets us endure difficult times so we hunger and thirst for His Word. Later, remembering how He brought us through, we see our faith deepened by the experience of His wisdom, which transcends our thoughts entirely (Isaiah 55:8-10).

Bird feeders are great fun, year around. They really help the population during harsh weather. When snow and ice reduce the food supply, some fatty seeds and suet can mean the difference between surviving one more night, when extra calories are needed to remain warm.

Today the temperatures are in the single digits, with two inches of snow on the ground - extreme for NW Arkansas. The cardinals are wearing their sweaters to keep warm. Birds have downy feathers for warmth. They fluff them out in cold weather to trap extra warmth.

No one has matched the lightness and warmth of down blankets and coats.

Birds remind us daily of God's Creation. The most ardent evolutionist on TV declared their feathers are "a miracle."



Kretzmann and Objective Justification

Nothing proves the boobocracy of the Synodical Conference more than the proliferation of Objective Justification Enthusiasm.



WELS church lady has left a new comment on your post "WELS Church Lady Unloads on UOJ":

Thanks Brett. My bad! I failed to read the Kretzmann project in its entirety. I read the sections under "Justification" and "Election." These two sections appeared to have clean language in terms of Justification. I decided to read the Kretzmann section under Romans.(it is several pages long) I found some STUFF that was not worded under the Justification and Elections headings.

"In this way Christ earned righteousness for all man; the OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION concerns the whole world: every person without exception belongs to the number of those for whom the benefit of Christ's work has been obtained. Of the fact that this OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION actually becomes the property of the individual person by faith."

This reminds me of pastors who preach an excellent sermon about faith. These same pastors backflip when writing an essay or teaching a Bible Class about faith. In the Lutheran Confessions, there is NO exegesis to anything close to OJ/UJ dialogue. The quotes that I provided are found in the Romans 5 section of the Kretzmann Project.

In Christ,
from WELS church lady

***

GJ - Why didn't Lutherans stand up and laugh this OJ nonsense out of the Synodical Conference?

  • Walther and Pieper slowly established it, with their minions enforcing it with great zeal.
  • The Prussian style of leadership made questioning an authority a grave sin, so error only had to make it to the top to spread it outwards.
  • The Synodical Conference was weak on Biblical exegesis but enchanted with theses floating in the air without Biblical support.
  • The Synodical Conference was extremely weak in teaching the efficacy of the Word and remains captivated by Enthusiasm.
  • Calvin was a boogey-man, but Calvism shrouded in Pietism was untouchable, because Spener and Halle were sacred topics beyond criticism. Thus unionism, Enthusiasm, and doctrinal indifference came back full in force to dominate the unwary.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Can Cornerstone (WELS/LCMS) Sign This Statement?

Defeating the Church and Change bull.



Professional Code of Ethics

  • FRCI believes it is in the best interest of our clients that:
  • Initial meetings with prospective clients should not be construed as services for which payment is expected.
  • No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
  • No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
  • Fees should be mutually agreed upon in advance of services.
  • A flat, fixed fee is charged based on the level and extent of professional services provided. Fees are not based on the amount of charitable income raised or expected to be raised.
  • Contracts providing for a contingent fee, a commission, or a fee based on percentage of funds raised are prohibited. Such contracts are harmful to the relationship between the donor and the institution and detrimental to the financial health of the client organization.
  • Fundraising expenditures are within the authority and control of the not-for-profit organization.
  • FRCI feels it is in the best interest of clients that solicitation of gifts is undertaken by Board members, staff and other volunteers.
  • Subsequent to analysis or study, FRCI should engage a client only when the best interest of the client is served.
  • FRCI should not profit directly or indirectly from materials provided by others, but billed to the FRCI, without disclosure to the client.
  • FRCI does not engage in methods that are misleading to the public or harmful to their clients; do not make exaggerated claims of past achievement; and do not guarantee results of promise to helps clients achieve goals.
  • Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed by the firm to clients and prospective clients.
  • FRCI will not acquire or maintain custody of funds and/or gifts directed to client organization.

***

GJ - I challenge any congregation using Cornerstone (Heart in Focus) to examine whether the fund-raisers are living up to the code of conduct listed above.

Cornerstone is a Church Growth/Church and Change operation. They use their connections to promote their work as especially WELS blessed. They also work with LCMS congregations and have LCMS staff.

It's not religious unionism, because it's all about the money, honey.

Any large prosperous congregation looking for fund-raising help should get a second opinion after hearing a presentation from Cornerstone. When the smoke clears and the mirrors are gone, another proposal may be far less onerous.

Lest you think I back any group in particular - I believe the Gospel alone should be trusted. The temptation for hucksters is to dream up a project that will excite people into pouring funds into it.

The man who started this Possibility Thinking is the CEO of a bankrupt ministry - Robert Schuller of Garden Grove Community Church. After all the years of bragging and building, he cannot pay his bills. His son and daughter are engaged in spiritual fratricide, and his big entertainments are canceled because he cannot pay for the previous one.

Schuller presided over the expansion of the Church Growth Movement. He invented it and his gooey excesses slopped over into nearby Fuller Seminary.

Ron Roth (WELS) is the director of Cornerstone. He began the open promotion of CG in WELS with the start of TELL. The sole purpose of TELL was to promote CG in WELS.

Roth did for WELS stewardship what Schuller did for Garden Grove's. So the same people should teach Lutherans how to manage money and give it (to them)? Hahaha. And Mothers Against Drunk Drivers will give their next award to James P. Tiefel.

---
Cornerstone is a team of dedicated disciples who love their Lord Jesus. We consider it a privilege to serve God's kingdom by challenging His people to grow in the grace of giving. With almost 150 years of combined service in public ministry and 58 years of stewardship education, we strive to conduct programs that bring honor to Jesus while giving thanks to him for all things. We are highly approachable and ready to serve!
Jeff Davis (Co-Founder) - Oh Noes! He is on the Board of Church and Change! And his bio there is blank, erased. I find that scary.
Lake Mills, Wisconsin Jeff's 28 years of experience in administration, ministry and consulting, coupled with a strong desire to serve Jesus, have helped form his servant characteristics. Jeff enjoys teaching, directing and leading God's people. His personal commitment to stewardship is a reflection on his beliefs and thankfulness to Jesus. He has written extensively on stewardship, guiding and challenging God's people to live lives of thanks. Recently, Jeff co-authored Heart in Focus, a faith focused financial course (www.heartinfocus.com). Jeff and Sally, his wife, reside in Lake Mills, Wisconsin. They have been blessed with 5 children and 1 grandchild.
Tom Grunow (Co-Founder of CSM, MEd, CFRE)
Portland, Oregon Tom Grunow is a 33-year veteran in Christian Education, Fund Development and Strategic Planning having served with Lutheran educational ministries in Florida, Texas and Oregon. Following in the footsteps of his father, Dr. Robert A. Grunow, known throughout the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS) for his estate planning and fundraising expertise, for the past 14 years he has served as a consultant to Lutheran churches and schools throughout the U.S. Previously he served as Vice President of the Concordia University Foundation Portland and on the National Board of Directors of the Association of Lutheran Development Executives (ALDE). He currently serves Trinity Lutheran Church, as Volunteer Minister of Stewardship & Gifts, is an active member of ALDE, a member of the Christian Stewardship Association (CSA), and serves as Board Chair of the Lutheran Education Association (LEA). Tom resides in Portland, Oregon with his wife, Karin, a commissioned Lutheran schoolteacher. They have 3 children and 3 grandchildren.
Ron Roth (Director) - Founder of Church Growth in WELS
Hales Corners, Wisconsin Ron loves to teach and encourage God's people to respond to God's grace with thankful and generous gifts. He has served four congregations as pastor, leading three of them through capital expansion programs. As administrator of Christian giving for an international Lutheran church body, he developed a major gifts ministry and led three national campaigns. He was instrumental in developing a planned giving ministry which after twelve years is blessing various ministries with annual gifts of $10-12 million in current donations and matured bequests. Another $400+ million in estate gifts for the Lord's work have been completed. Ron and his wife Arlene live in the Milwaukee, WI area and are blessed with three children.
Wayne Baxmann (Associate)
Colgate, Wisconsin Wayne's forty plus years in public ministry have provided him with numerous opportunities to practice servant-leadership. He eagerly applies his spiritual gifts in working with God's people, particularly in the areas of organization, teaching and administration. He strongly believes in and models the attitude that Christian Stewardship is a manifestation of one's love and gratitude for what God has done. Wayne and his wife Renee live in Colgate, Wisconsin, just northwest of Milwaukee, and are active members of Risen Savior Lutheran Church in Milwaukee. Their three adult children and their families live in Washington and Texas.
Jon Mahnke (Associate)
Round Rock, TX One of Jon’s strengths is that of teaching where he has opportunity to personally connect with God’s people. Jon has served as pastor of a church plant, a medium size congregation, and the lead pastor of a large multi-staffed church and school ministry. He led his congregations through four highly successful major building programs. Throughout his ministry he implemented annual, congregation wide stewardship programs and emphases. Synodically, Jon has served on the Mission Board, Evangelism Commission, Synodical Council, Conference of Presidents (COP) as well as numerous sub-committees of the same. Jon and his wife Myrna live in Round Rock, TX. They have been blessed with four children and nine grandchildren.

Mel Fournier (Associate)
Leesburg, Florida Mel is "Mr. Lutheran" throughout Florida having served as a layperson in various Lutheran churches and in
every capacity both during his work as an independent electrician and later in his retirement years. He has served as both paid and volunteer for Thrivent (formerly AAL) in fraternal assistance and is well versed on the Biblical concepts of Christian stewardship.

---


Ronald D. Roth

  |   Visit Guest Book

Roth, Ronald D. Went home to be with his Lord and Savior on January 3, 2011. Loving husband of Arlene (nee Biever). Father of Steve (Mary), Cindy (Andy) Petraske, and Michael. Grandfather of Kelsey, Zachary, and Noah Petraske, and Marisa Roth. Further survived by brother Phillip (Carol), nephews Rodney and Ryan (Sheila), and their children Reagan and Carson. Visitation to be held Thursday, January 6, at St. Paul's Lutheran Church, S66 W14325 Janesville Rd., Muskego, from 4 to 7 PM, service to follow at 7PM. In lieu of flowers, donations to St. Paul's Lutheran, WELS Missions, or the CJD Foundation appreciated.

WELS Church Lady Unloads on UOJ

"Makes sense to me."




WELS church lady has left a new comment on your post "Robert Preus - Justification and Rome":

"The whole world is saved, just not heaven saved."

Now tell me which Bible translation is the above quote found? He who does not believe will be condemned! "Mishmash" was the term used by DP Buccholz. He called both Becker and Myers Justification teachings a mishmash. "Somebody" talked the DP into writing the essay.(more like coercion). I motion that the DP write a new paper. "Through faith in Jesus."

My pastor quoted, "Through faith in Jesus" several times during a funeral. When pastors preach the Word as written, there is no room for UOJ garbage.

I would like to see how far one gets with the fourth Kokomo statement being used in a WELS funeral sermon. Kretzmann did not teach UOJ. Fuerbringer did not teach UOJ. J.T. Mueller did not teach it in his "My Church and Others." However, Mueller did use the term "objective justification" in his 1934 Dogmatics. When writing the Dogmatics, he used Franz Pieper as a source! I still do not understand where Pieper came up will forgiveness without faith. Faith is required, Pieper said it is not required. Faith is implanted by the Holy Spirit.(from hearing the Word) Even the BOC says that faith is needed.

In Christ,
from WELS church lady

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "WELS Church Lady Unloads on UOJ":

WELS Church Lady,
I understand and am glad you know I'm not trying to dismantle your comment. Your disgust and righteous anger is, in my opinion, appropriate to the severity of the problem and overall situation.

While reading Kretzmann, I also saw mainly faithful confession concerning the doctrine of Justification. His nod to UOJ may have simply been a mistake due to other factors than direct intention. This is another lesson for us. Many people today will read false doctrine and say, "but it can be understood correctly if..." All the while they allow the false teaching to exist and future generations only see the false teaching and without a Berean effort using the foundation of Scripture and the Confessions, they fall to such false doctrines.

You're right there is nothing in the BOC to support UOJ. Anyone, including Buchholz and Schroeder who point to the Ministry of the Keys as proof are blatant deceivers and not only mock and blaspheme Christ but also His Church who have the BOC and can plainly see that the assurance of the forgiveness of sins is only given to those who confess faith in Christ. Payment for sins, Christ as Mediator, is not the same as our obtaining Christ as Mediator, for the remission of sins. Christ is only obtained as Mediator through faith worked graciously by the Holy Ghost through God's Word in the Means of Grace.

Like identifying Kretzmann's error, it will be good if everyone calls it like it is and not as they would like it to be. Then, maybe, the clergy would begin to proof read their own writings and hold their tongues in an effort to ensure pure doctrine is taught and right practices are advanced.

L. P. Cruz Could Go To Town with This Fallacy

"Sounds reasonable to me."



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Robert Preus - Justification and Rome":

(W)ELS Pastor James Humann also provided this quote in defense of his teaching of UOJ:

(W)ELS Our Great Heritage, "Finally, "If forgiveness were dependent on faith in the sense that God does not forgive until we believe, we would always have to be sure that we are believers before we would be sure that we are forgiven." (p.60)
September, 2008

This is directly opposed to Christ when He declares in Mark 4:12, "That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them."

For those who still do not believe that UOJ replaces the faithful Gospel of Justification by Faith Alone Pastor Humann also quotes Our Great Heritage here, "God forever remains the God who punishes all sin, and at the same time he is forever the God who forgives every sin. And only the person who by God's grace has in the vicarious atonement of Christ found a way to believe both truths worships the God of the Bible." (p.53)

There are many other (W)ELS quotes that declare if Objective Justification as taught by the (W)ELS is denied then the Gospel is destroyed. Therefore they admit, and confirm with Pres. Robert Preus, that UOJ is not synonymous with the Atonement and is the once and for all divine verdict of acquittal for the entire unbelieving world. This leads into UOJ's perversion of the unforgivable sin which they call "Unbelief" but that can be the subject of another post.

***

GJ - I believe Eduard Preuss--who joined the Church of Rome, after teaching UOJ at St. Louis--invented this argument.

Theology professors and MDivs stick to the same talking points without examining them closely.

Some important questions are:

1. Is this argument Biblical, with some anchor in the Scriptures?
2. Has the Book of Concord uncovered this insight?
3. Is this a logical fallacy, arguing in a circle? The author is saying, "This has to be true, because if universal absolution were not true, I would not have any certainty that it is true."

---

Garrett has left a new comment on your post "L. P. Cruz Could Go To Town with This Fallacy":

This leads into UOJ's perversion of the unforgivable sin which they call "Unbelief" but that can be the subject of another post.

Please elaborate. I can remember my grade school teachers trying to pound this doctrine into my head: "The only unforgivable sin is unbelief". By Confirmation time, I started getting confused. "But didn't Jesus atone for all sins?"

***

GJ - Jesus said there is no forgiveness for the sin against the Holy Spirit. For non-Lutherans, the verse is a trip into fantasy land. Faithful Lutherans realize that the Holy Spirit and the Word are used for each other in the Scriptures, although they are not the same. One is used for the other because God has bound His Spirit to the Word.

Therefore the sin against the Holy Spirit is dying without faith in Christ alone as our Savior.

KJV Matthew 12:31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.


---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "L. P. Cruz Could Go To Town with This Fallacy":

Pr. Greg.

we would always have to be sure that we are believers before we would be sure that we are forgiven.

Yes, Pastor, this is an absolute fallacy, it contains a false assumption about faith, an assumption that is not defined by Scripture. Yet NT in Heb 11:1 says faith is the assurance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen.

I know of the same thing that happened to E Preuss happened here recently. A Reverend Doctor of LCAus, who articulated UOJ, is now an RC parishioner and lecturing at an RC college here.

UOJ and Poping are connected, specially with Vatican II.

LPC

This is just a quick answer. If I can add more later, I will.

Robert Preus - Justification and Rome



From Luther versus the UOJ Pietists: Justification by Faith:



Dr. Robert Preus is known for advocating UOJ in the 1980s, when Concordia Seminary in Ft. Wayne was also deep into Church Growth Enthusiasm.[1] In his last book, edited after his death by his sons Daniel and Rolf, his clear stance against UOJ is obvious.

When does the imputation of Christ’s righteousness take place? It did not take place when Christ, by doing and suffering, finished the work of atonement and reconciled the world to God. Then and there, when the sins of the world were imputed to Him and He took them, Christ became our righteousness and procured for us remission of sin, justification, and eternal life. “By thus making satisfaction He procured and merited (acquisivit et promeruit) for each and every man remission of all sins, exemption from all punishments of sin, grace and peace with God, eternal righteousness and salvation.”[2]
But the imputation of Christ's righteousness to the sinner takes place when the Holy Spirit brings him to faith through Baptism and the Word of the Gospel. Our sins were imputed to Christ at His suffering and death, imputed objectively after He, by His active and passive obedience, fulfilled and procured all righteousness for us. But the imputation of His righteousness to us takes place when we are brought to faith.[3] 
Quenstedt says, It is not the same thing to say, “Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us” and to say “Christ is our righteousness.” For the imputation did not take place when Christ became our righteousness. The righteousness of Christ is the effect of His office. The imputation is the application of the effect of His office. The one, however, does not do away with the other.  Christ is our righteousness effectively when He justifies us. His righteousness is ours objectively because our faith rests in Him. His righteousness is ours formally in that His righteousness is imputed to us.[4]

The Enthusiasts often mention Calov as their champion, knowing that almost no one has access to Calov’s books. Preus, who knew this period of Lutheran orthodoxy quite well, quoted this statement from Calov with approval, which is worth repeating -

Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe.[5]

I understand these two passages to be a repudiation of UOJ and an apology for all the harm done in the name of that fad.



[1] "In an initial burst of enthusiasm reflecting Preus's concern for missions, the Fort Wayne faculty had petitioned the 1977 convention of the Missouri Synod to have each of its subdivisions or districts ‘make a thorough study of the Church Growth materials.’ What is more, the districts were to be urged to ‘organize, equip, and place into action all of the Church Growth principles as needed in the evangelization of our nation and the world under the norms of the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions.’ By the time of the 1986 synodical convention, however, the same faculty, while appreciating the ‘valuable lessons of common sense’ to be learned from Church Growth, asked that ‘the Synod warn against the Arminian and charismatic nature of the church-growth movement.’ Kurt E. Marquart, "Robert D. Preus," Handbook of Evangelical Theologians, ed., Walter A. Elwell, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1995, pp. 353-65. Reprinted in Christian News, 6-26-95, p. 21.                                                
[2] R. Preus footnote: Systema, Par. II, Cap.3, Memb. 2 S. 1, Th. 44 (II, 363). Cf. Abraham Calov, Apodixis Articulorum Fridei (Lueneburg, 1684), 249: “Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God’s children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe.” Justification and Rome, footnote 74, p. 131.
[3] Robert D. Preus Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 72.
[4] Systema, Par. III, Cap. 8, S. 2, q. 5, Observatio 19 (II, 787). R. Preus footnote #76, Justification and Rome, p. 132.
[5] Apodixis Articulorum Fide, Lueneburg, 1684. Cited in Robert D. Preus Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 131n.                                                                                           

---

CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
NEWSLETTER – Spring 1981
6600 North Clinton
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46825

THE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE – "OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION"

The doctrine of objective justification is a lovely teaching drawn from Scripture which tells us that God who has loved us so much that He gave His only [sic - missing Son?] to be our Savior has for the sake of Christ’s substitutionary atonement declared the entire world of sinners for whom Christ died to be righteous (Romans 5:17-19).


Objective justification which is God’s verdict of acquittal over the whole world is not identical with the atonement, it is not another way of expressing the fact that Christ has redeemed the world. Rather it is based upon the substitutionary work of Christ, or better, it is a part of the atonement itself. It is God’s response to all that Christ died to save us, God’s verdict that Christ’s work is finished, that He has been indeed reconciled, propitiated; His anger has been stilled and He is at peace with the world, and therefore He has declared the entire world in Christ to be righteous.

Spring, 1981, Concordia Seminary, Ft. Wayne Newsletter.


***
GJ - Note that Concordia Seminary was swooning from the exotic perfume of the Church Growth Movement while Preus was declaring the entire world forgiven, without faith, without the Word, without the Means of Grace.

Later, Preus and Marquart were quite critical of the Church Growth Movement, and Preus clearly repudiated UOJ late in life.

Rolf Preus and Jack Casione want this passage to disappear down the memory hole.

I believe the passage quoted above, from Justification and Rome, does a fine job of defining what justification is and what justification is not. That is the essence of a confessional stance, defining the positive and rejecting any and all false variations.


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Robert Preus - Justification and Rome":


I'm glad you footnoted a comment on the harm done by the teaching of UOJ in the Lutheran Synods.


The nature of this false doctrine, as with all false doctrine, is that it never remains within the confines of the womb that conceived it. It has grown and morphed into a dozen different variations so that the greatest offenders in the promotion of UOJ, such as (W)ELS DP Buchholz' 2005 Conference paper, have to repudiate portions of other UOJ teachings within his own denomination. Buchholz went so far as to repudiate his own statements within the same conference essay in which he made the contradictory statements. Now there's UOJ teachings coming from (W)ELS school teacher's "condemning anyone teaching justification by faith alone" and "the whole world is saved, just not heaven saved".


(W)ELS' own Our Great Heritage (Vol 3) states, "And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)


How long will the (W)ELS laity allow the Synod administrators and school systems to abuse and pervert the central doctrine of Christian faith - leading their children and families away from the true teaching of Justification by Faith Alone. They've built their foundation on sifting sand and it's eroding.


In Christ,
Brett Meyer