Saturday, October 22, 2011

Luther's Sermon on David's Son and David's Lord:
The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity.
Matthew 22:34-46





Sermon for the Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity; Matthew 22:34-46

A Sermon by Martin Luther; taken from his Church Postil. [The following sermon is taken from volume V:170-183 of The Sermons of Martin Luther, published by Baker Book House (Grand Rapids, MI, 1983). It was originally published in 1905 in English by Lutherans in All Lands (Minneapolis, MN), as The Precious and Sacred Writings of Martin Luther, vol. 14. This e-text was scanned and edited by Richard P. Bucher, it is in the public domain and it may be copied and distributed without restriction.]

1. This Gospel consists of two questions. In the first the lawyer on behalf of the other Pharisees asks Christ: Which is the great commandment in the law? In the second the Lord asks the Pharisees and the lawyer: Whose son is David? These two questions concern every Christian; for he who wishes to be a Christian must thoroughly understand them. First, what the law is, and the purpose it serves; and secondly, who Christ is, and what we may expect from him.

2. Christ explains here to the Pharisees the law, telling them what the sum of the whole law is, so that they are completely silenced both at his speech and his question, and know less than nothing of what the law is and who Christ is. From this it follows, that although unbelief may appear as wisdom and holiness before the world, it is nevertheless folly and unrighteousness before God, especially where the knowledge of the two questions mentioned above is wanting. For he who does not know how he stands before the law, and what he may expect from Christ, surely has not the wisdom of God, no matter how wise and prudent he may pretend to be. Let us therefore consider the first question, namely: What the law is; what it commands and how it is to be spiritually interpreted.

3. When the lawyer asked Christ, which was the great commandment in the law, the Lord said to him:

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second like unto it is this, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments the whole law hangeth, and the prophets."

4. As if the Lord would say: He who possesses love to God, and love to his neighbor, has all things, and therefore fulfils the law; for the whole law and all the prophets point to these two themes, namely: how God and our neighbor are to be loved.

5. Now one may wish to ask: How can you harmonize this statement, that all things are to be comprehended in these two commandments, since there was given to the Jews circumcision and many other commandments? To answer this, let us see in the first place how Christ explains the law, namely, that it must be kept with the heart. In other words, the law must be spiritually comprehended; for he who does not lay hold of the law with the heart and with the Spirit, will certainly not fulfil it. Therefore the Lord here gives to the lawyer the ground and real substance of the law, and says that these are the greatest commandments, to love God with the heart and our neighbor as ourselves. From this it follows that he, who is not circumcised, who does not fast nor pray, is not doing it from the heart; even though he may perform external acts, he nevertheless does nothing before God, for God looketh on the heart, and not on our acts, I Sam. 16, 7. It will not profit a man at all, no matter what work he may perform, if his heart is not in it.



6. From this arises another question: Since works are of no profit to a man, why then did God give so many commandments to the Jews? To this I answer, these commandments were given to the end that we might become conscious whether we really love God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our strength, and in addition our neighbor as ourselves; for St. Paul says in Rom. 7, 7 (3, 20), that the law is nothing but a consciousness and a revelation of sin. What would I know of sin, if there were no law to reveal it to me? Here now is the law that saith: Thou shalt love God with thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself. This we fulfil if we do all that the law requires; but we are not doing it. Hence he shows us where we are lacking, and that, while we ought really to do something, we are doing nothing.

7. That the Jews had to practice circumcision was indeed a foolish ceremony, yea, a command offensive to reason, even though it were given by God still today. What service was it to God, to burden his people with this grievous commandment? What good was it to him, or what service to a neighbor? Yea, and it did not profit the Jew, who was circumcised. Why then did God give the command? In order that this commandment and law might show them whether they really loved God with all their heart, with all their soul, and with all their mind, and whether they did it willingly or not. For if there were a devout heart, it would say: I verily do not know why God gave me circumcision, inasmuch as it does not profit any one, neither God, nor me, nor my neighbor; but since it is well pleasing to God, I will nevertheless do it, even though it be considered a trifling and despised act. Hence, circumcision was an exercise of the commandment, Thou shalt love God with all thy heart.

8. It was also a foolish command God gave to Abraham, to slay his son, Gen. 22, 2. For if reason had been the judge in this, both it and all mankind would have come to no other conclusion than this: It is an unfriendly and hostile command, how can it be from God, since God himself said to Abraham that he would multiply his seed through this son, and it would become as innumerable as the stars of the firmament and as the sand by the sea. Therefore it was a foolish commandment, a grievous, hard and unbearable commandment. But what did Abraham do? He closes his senses, takes his reason captive, and obeys the voice of God, goes, and does as God commanded him.

By this he proved that he obeyed from the heart; otherwise, even if he had put his son to death a hundred times, God would not have cared for it; but God was pleased that the deed came from his heart and was done in true love to God; yea, it came from a heart that must have thought: Even if my son dies, God is almighty and faithful, he will keep his word, he will find ways and means beyond that which I am able to devise; only obey, there is no danger. Had he not had this boldness and this faith, how could his fatherheart have killed his only and well beloved son?

9. The Jews later wanted to follow this example and, like Abraham, offered their children unto God, hoping thereby to perform a service well-pleasing to God; but it was far from it. These poor people came to the conclusion: The service of Abraham was pleasing to God, therefore will ours also be, and consequently they killed one child after another. 0, how many healthy, noble and beautiful children perished! The prophets protested against this service, they preached, warned and wrote against it, telling the people that it was deception, but all was in vain. Yea, many a prophet lost his life because of this, as the history in the books of the kings shows.

10. But why was this service of the Jews displeasing to God? For the reason that it did not come from their heart, and was not done out of love to God; but they simply looked upon the service, and did it without the command and word of God; but God saith: My dear sirs, I was not concerned about the fact that Abraham offered up his son, but that he proved by this act that he loved me with his whole heart. There must be first love in the heart, then follows the service that will be pleasing to God; for all the works of the law tend to the end thereby to prove our love to God, which is in the heart; which love the law requires, and will have above everything else.



11. We are also to notice here that all the works of the law are not commanded merely for the purpose that we simply just perform them; no, no; for if God had given even more commandments, he would not want us to keep them to the injury and destruction of love. Yea, if these commandments oppose the love of our neighbor, he wants us to renounce and annul them. Take the example of this, I recently gave you: Moses brought the children of Israel out of Egypt, leading them for forty years through the wilderness, and not one of them was circumcised, although it was commanded them. Where was their obedience to the commandment? Was God not angry with them because they did not obey his commandment? No, there was a higher commandment in force at that time, namely, that they were to obey God who commanded them to come out of Egypt in haste to the promised land. By their marching they daily obeyed God, and God accepted it as obedience; otherwise he would have been angry in that they did not keep his commandments. Both the need and the love were at hand, which set aside all commandments, for it would have been unbearable to endure the pain of circumcision and at the same time the burden of the journey. Therefore love took the place of the commandment of circumcision, and thus should all commandments be kept in love, or not at all.

12. In like manner Christ excused his disciples, as is recorded in Matthew 12, 3-4, when the Jews accused them of transgressing the law, of doing on the Sabbath that which was not lawful to do on the Sabbath day, when they plucked the ears of corn and ate them. Then the Lord gave them to understand that they were doing no wrong, as if to say: Here is no Sabbath; for the body needs food, necessity demands it; we must eat, even though it be on the Sabbath. Therefore the Lord cited the example of David, which he laid before the Jews, and said, "Have ye not read what David did; he and 'they that were with him, when he was an hungered, how he went into the house of God and ate the shew bread which was not lawful to eat, nor for those that were with him, excepting for the priests?" 1 Samuel 21, 3f. Then David ate the bread, though he was not a priest, because hunger pressed him to do it. Neither did Ahimelech the priest violate the law in giving the bread to David, for love was present and urged him to give it. Thus even the whole law would have had to serve David in his need.

13. Therefore, when the law impels one against love, it ceases and should no longer be a law; but where no obstacle is in the way, the keeping of the law is a proof of love, which lies hidden in the heart. Therefore ye have need of the law, that love may be manifested; but if it cannot be kept without injury to our neighbor, God wants us to suspend and ignore the law.

14. Thus you are to regulate your life and conduct. There are in our day many customs, many orders and ceremonies, by which we falsely think to merit heaven; and yet there is only this one principle, namely: the love to our neighbor, that includes in it all good works. I will give you an example we recently heard. Here is a priest or monk, who is to read his prayers or the rules of his order, or to hold mass, or say penance. At this moment there comes a poor man or woman to him who has need of his help and counsel. What shall this priest or monk do? Shall he perform his service, or shall he assist the poor man? He should therefore act prudently and think: True, I am required to read my prayers, hold mass, or say penance; but now on the other hand, a poor man is here; he needs my help and I should come to his rescue. God commanded me to do this; but the others man devised and instituted. I will let the mandates of men go, and will serve my neighbor according to God's commandment.

15. However, very seldom do we think that the precious service of holding mass and reading prayers should be put in the background; and such a humble service, as you regard it, should have the preference. But what is the reason? The reason is that these dream-preachers, who have nothing to present to us but the ordinances of men, have made us so timid and fearful that we came to the conclusion, if we did not regulate ourselves in everything according to their preaching, heaven itself would fall. Yea, they would rather let ten poor people starve than fail to say one mass.

We find even today many monks or priests who rather let a poor man freeze, than violate their statutes and ordinances. So lamentably and miserably have they been deceived by their godless preachers and teachers, and by their superiors, who with their statutes and devilish ordinances have drawn, and are still drawing, them away more and more from the law of God to our own notions.

16. These are the principal fruits of unbelief and godlessness, which, as the Scriptures declare, provoke God. Should not God be angry with me, if he commands me to show my neighbor love, and I go and follow my own or other people's dreams? It is as if a master said to his servant: Go and work in the field, and the servant went and desired to wash the dishes. Should not the master rightly be angry with such a servant? Thus it is also with God. He wants us to keep his commandments, and to regard them more than the commandments of men, and all the commandments to be subservient to love, so that all be comprehended in these two commandments, of which the Lord here speaks in this Gospel: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself."



17. Do you want to do something pleasing to God, then do it out of genuine love. That the Jews practiced circumcision, fasted much, prayed much, and performed other like services, was not pleasing to God, for it did not come from the heart, as this commandment requires: Thou shalt love God with all thy heart. Thus it will be also with you, even though you should belong to the Carthusian friars, or to a still more exacting order; all would avail nothing, if you had not the love of God. From this you are to conclude, all works are nothing, that do not originate in love, or are against love. No commandments should be in force, except those in which the law of love can be exercised.

18. From this it now appears what a misleading calling that of the monks and priests is, in that they wish to merit heaven through their works alone, and they also bind the people to do good works, in order that they may thereby merit heaven, which is a cursed and godless service. Hence, as already stated, the law is to be only an exercise to prove our love; otherwise, aside from love, God never inquires about works, no matter how excellent they are.

19. You can now see how many people know what the law means: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself. Surely they are few who know it, and fewer still who keep it. How can they keep that which they do not know? We are blind and our nature is totally blind, and so is also human reason. It knows nothing so imperfectly as that which the law of God requires.

20. Now here Christ shows the Pharisees and the Scribes a twofold kindness. In the first place, he dispels their blindness and teaches them what the law is. In the second place, he teaches them how impossible it is for them to keep the law. Their blindness he dispels, in that he teaches them what the law is, namely: that love is the law. Human reason cannot comprehend this nowadays any more than the Jews did then, for if it had been possible for human reason to comprehend it, the Pharisees and Scribes, who at that time were the best and wisest of the people, could have understood it; but they thought it consisted alone in performing the external works of the law; in giving to God, whether it be done willingly or unwillingly; but their inward blindness, their covetousness, and their hardened heart they could not see, and thought they thoroughly understood the law and were fine fellows, holy and pious people; but they stood in their own light. For no one is able to keep the law unless his nature is thoroughly renewed.

21. Therefore consider it an established fact that reason can never understand and fulfil the law, even though it knows the meaning of the law. When do you do to another what you want him to do to you? Who loves his enemy from his heart? Who loves to die? Who willingly suffers disgrace and shame? Dear sir, point me to a man who enjoys to have a bad reputation or to live in poverty! For nature and human reason flee entirely from this, are afraid, terrified and shocked; and if it were possible, as far as it were in their power, they would never suffer such misfortune. Human nature alone will never be able to accomplish what God in this commandment requires, namely, that we surrender our will to the will of God, so that we renounce our reason, our will, our might and power, and say from the heart: Thy will be done. And indeed, nowhere will you find a person who loves God with his whole heart and his neighbor as himself. It may indeed happen that two companions live friendly together; but even there hypocrisy is hidden, which continues until you are wounded by him; then you will see how you love him, and whether you are flesh or spirit. This commandment therefore requires me to be friendly with all my heart to him who has offended me; but when do I do this?

22. Thus Christ desires to show us that we preach the law rightly, only when we learn from it that we are unable to fulfill it, and that we are the property of the devil. This we learn from experience, and it is shown now and then in the Scriptures, especially by St. Paul when he says in Romans 8, 7-8: "Because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be," and it follows, that they who are in the flesh cannot please God.

23. Hence, take to thyself this commandment: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and think upon it, contemplate it, and search what kind of a law it is; how far you are from fulfilling it, yea, how you have not yet even made a beginning to suffer and to do from the heart what God demands of you. It is pure hypocrisy, if anyone wants to creep into a hiding- place and think: Oh I will love God. Oh, how I do love him, he is my Father! How gracious he is to me I and the like. Yes, when God does our pleasure, then we can easily say such things; but when he sends misfortune and adversity, we no longer regard him as our God, nor as our Father.

24. True love to God does not act in this way, but in the heart it thinks and with the lips says: Lord God, I am thy creature; do with me as thou wilt; it matters not to me. I am ever thine, that I know; and if thou desirest, I will die this very hour or suffer any great misfortune; I will cheerfully do so from my heart. I will not regard my life, honor and goods and all I have, higher and greater than thy will, which shall be my pleasure all my days. But you will never find a person who will constantly regulate himself according to this commandment; for the whole life you are living in the body, in the five senses, and whatever you do in your body, should all be so regulated as to be done to the glory of God, according to the regulations of this commandment, which saith, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind." As if Christ said: If you love God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind, then nothing will be lacking; you shall experience it in your daily life, namely: when everything you do, whether you wake or sleep, whether you labor or stand idle, whether you eat or drink, is directed and done out of love to God from the heart. In like manner your mind and thoughts will also be directed wholly and entirely to God, so that you will approve of nothing you are not certain is pleasing to God. Yea, where are those who do this?

25. And this part where he says, "With all thy mind, argues powerfully against the writings and teachings of man, upon which he especially depends, and thinks thereby to obtain a merciful God and merit heaven. Such imagination of the human reason draws us in a wonderful manner from this commandment, so that we do not love God with all the mind; as has been done hitherto, and is still done at the present day. For these priests and monks think nothing else than that God is moved by the mass and by other human inventions; but he abhors it and does not desire it, as is said in Isaiah 29, 13: "In vain do they serve me, because they are teaching such doctrines which are only the commandments of men." 'Mat. 15, 8-9. The commandment here requires you to consider nothing good that is against God and against everything he has commanded or forbidden. It thus requires, you to give yourself wholly and entirely to him in all your life and conduct.

26. From this you can conclude, there is no human being who is not condemned, inasmuch as no one has kept this commandment, and God wants everyone to keep it. There we stand in the midst of fear and distress, unable to help ourselves, and the first knowledge of the law is, that we see our human nature is unable to keep the law; for it wants the heart, and if it is not done with the heart, it avails nothing before God. You may indeed do the works outwardly, but God is not thus satisfied, when they are not done from the heart, out of love; and this is never done except man is born anew through the Holy Spirit. Therefore God aims to accomplish through the law nothing more than that we should in this way be forced to acknowledge our inability, frailty and disease, and that with our best efforts we are unable to fulfil a letter of the law. When you realize this, the law has accomplished its work. This is what Paul means when he says in Romans 3, 20, "Through the law is the knowledge of sin."

27. From this it appears clearly that we are all alike, and are one in the inner wickedness of the heart, which the law reveals, when we look into it rightly. Therefore we might well say, If one is good, then all are good. Therefore no one should accuse another. It is indeed true that in public and gross sins there sticks a deeper sin; but the heart is alike bad, unless it be renewed by the Holy Ghost. But what shall I do when I once recognize my sin? What does it profit me? It helps me very much, for when I have come thus far, I am not far from the kingdom; as Christ says to a scribe in Mark 12, 34, who also knew that the works of the law were nothing without love.

28. But what shall we do to get rid of our bad conscience? Here follows now the other part of this Gospel, namely, who Christ is and what we can expect of him. From him we must receive and secure freedom from a wicked conscience, or we shall remain in our sins eternally, because for this purpose is Christ made known and given by the Father, in order that he might deliver us from sin, death, from a wicked conscience, and from the law.

29. We have now heard what the law is, and how through the law we come to the knowledge of sin; but this is not enough, another has a work to do here, whose name is Christ Jesus; although the first, the law, must indeed remain; yea, it is necessary. For if I have no sense of my sins, I will never inquire for Christ; as the Pharisees and scribes do here, who thought they had done everything the law commanded and were ready to do yet more; but of Christ they knew nothing. Therefore, first of all, when the law is known and sin revealed through the law, it is then necessary that we know who Christ is; otherwise the knowledge of sin profits us nothing.

30. But the law is known, when I learn from it that I am condemned, and see that there is neither hope nor comfort anywhere for me, and I cannot even help myself, but must have another one to deliver me. Then it is time that I look around for him who can help, and he is Christ Jesus, who for this purpose became man, and became like unto us, in order that he might help us out of the mire into which we are fallen. He loved God with all his heart and his neighbor as himself, and submitted his will to the will of his Father, fulfilled the law in every respect; this I could not do and yet I was required to do it. Therefore, he accepts him; and that which he fulfilled in the law, he offers me. He freely gives me his life with all his works, so that I can appropriate them to myself as a possession that is my own and is bestowed upon me as a free gift. He delivers us from the law, for when the law says, Love God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself, or thou wilt be damned, then I say, I cannot do it. Then Christ says: Come to me, take me and cling to me by faith; then you shall be rid of the law.

31. Now this is accomplished in the following manner: Christ has through his death secured for us the Holy Spirit; and he fulfils the law in us, and not we. For that Spirit, whom God sends into your heart for the sake of his Son, makes an entirely new man out of you, who does with joy and love from the heart everything the law requires, which before would have been impossible for you to do. This new man despises the present life, and desires to die, rejoices in all adversity, and submits himself wholly and entirely to the will of God. Whatever God does with him, is well pleasing to him. This Spirit you cannot merit yourself, but Christ has secured and merited it. When I believe from the heart that Christ did this for me, I receive also the same Holy Spirit that makes me an entirely new man. Then everything God commands is sweet, lovely and agreeable, and I do everything he desires of me; not in my own strength, but by the strength of him that is in me, as Paul says in Philippians, 4, 13: "I can do all things through Christ that strengtheneth me."

32. But you must take heed, that you do not undertake to secure this faith in Jesus Christ by your own works or power, or that you think lightly about this matter; for it is impossible for the natural man; but the Holy Spirit must do it. Therefore beware of the preachers of selfrighteousness, who simply blabber and say: We must do good works in order to be saved. But we say that faith alone is sufficient to this end. Our good works are for another purpose, namely, to prove our faith, as you have already frequently heard from me.

33. Now this is the purpose of the question the Lord put to the Pharisees: What think ye of Christ; who is he and whose Son is he? But their answer, in that they say, He is the son of David, the Lord rejects and obscures their answer and refers to a passage from the Psalm, in order to leave them in doubt; so that no one is able to answer him a word.

34. However, when David calls Christ his Lord, in that he says in Psalm 110, "But the lord said unto my Lord, 'Sit thou on my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool,'" it is to be understood that David speaks of him both as God and man, for according to the flesh alone he was the son of David. Paul also joins these two when he says in Romans 1, 1-4: "I am called to be an apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God, which he promised afore through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh; who was declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead." But it is something to know that Christ is Lord; for this has might and power and is especially comforting in the time of affliction. But concerning this I have said more elsewhere and will therefore now close, and pray God for grace.



Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Faith.
Chemnitz or the Synodical Conference?



Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Faith:

'via Blog this'

Lutheran Free Conference :: Nov. 9-10 - New Ulm, MN



Lutheran Free Conference :: Nov. 9-10 - New Ulm, MN:

'via Blog this'


Presentation #1

(10:30 a.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Is there any genuine Lutheranism left in American Lutheranism?" And "Can it be brought to bear?" Mark Braun (Wisconsin Lutheran College, Milwaukee) will read an essay by Mark Noll originally entitled, "American Lutherans Yesterday and Today," from Lutherans Today: American Lutheran Identity in the 21st Century, Eerdmans, 2003.
Reactions by John Pless (Concordia, Ft. Wayne), Gaylin Schmeling (Bethany, Mankato)


Presentation #2

(1:30 p.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Lutheranism is catholic and evangelical," by David Scaer (Concordia, Ft. Wayne)
Reactions by Mark Mattes (Grand View College, Des Moines), Mark Schroeder (WELS President)


Presentation #3

(3:30 p.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Lutheranism's Chief Article--Justification by Faith and Its Flipside--Bondage of the Will," by James Nestingen  (North American Lutheran Church)
Reactions by Joel Fredrich (Martin Luther College, New Ulm), Scott Murray  (LC-MS Vice President)

Presentation #4

(9:00 a.m., November 10--Martin Luther's Birthday!; reactions follow)
"Luther's Doctrine of the Word: The Incarnate Word in the Written Word," by John Brug  (Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, Mequon)
Reactions by Steven Paulson (Luther, St. Paul), Dan Metzger (Old Zion Lutheran Church, Philadelphia)

WELS Contradicts Itself on UOJ.
WELS DP Buchholz Contradicts Himself on UOJ.
The Solution: Efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace

The prince of theologians or a WELS DP?
I am working on that.


AC V has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law: WELS Stewardship Pr...":

WELS UOJ confusion:

WELS theologians should consult with each other before they publish. In the October 2011 edition of Forward in Christ contributing editor Forrest Bivens, a professor at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, states: "The astonishing reality is that God has forgiven the sins of the whole world, whether people believe it or not" (p.9).

Yet WELS CA/AZ District President Jon Buchholz states in his paper entitled Justification Expounded by Scripture presented to the synod in convention in 2005:

"The doctrine of objective justification is a defining doctrine for the Wisconsin Synod and for the old Synodical Conference. In our zeal to expound the true, biblical doctrine of objective justification against those who oppose the doctrine, we have, at times, 'pushed the envelope,' and employed words and phrases in imprecise and incorrect ways. ... I offer the following as a loving critique of some wording and phraseology which has circulated in our midst:

'God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins.' This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word 'forgive' is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, 'God has forgiven the world.' Rather, the Spirit of Inspiration overwhelmingly uses the word 'forgive' (Greek: afihmi) within the context of repentance and faith, effected through the means of grace. There are good reasons why the Spirit chooses a particular word to be used in a particular context. Using the word 'forgiveness' in the atypical sense, apart from repentance and faith, one might easily find himself in the incongruous position of saying to the impenitent or unbelieving, 'God has forgiven your sins [objective gospel], but your sins are not forgiven [Ministry of the Keys].'"

Note to Jon Buchholz, if in Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense, then it should not be used in a universal sense, i.e. UOJ. Maybe it's because we are justified by faith alone?


Mark Jeske's Change and Die Program:
It's Working for WELS and Should Spill Over for LCMS



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality. Meet Mark Jeske...":

Rev. Jeske said something to the effect of, "Design the worship service for the visitor, for the young people, not the 'club members'."

Young, famous, comedian Jimmy Fallon would disagree:

Listen from about 32:30 and especially why he doesn't go to Mass anymore:

http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=3&islist=true&id=13&d=10-21-2011  

***

GJ - The audio is worth a listen, because Fallon complains that the new Catholic mass is too involved and silly. He liked the traditional mass. He cannot go to the relevant, relational masses.

Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality.
Meet Mark Jeske, the Real Synod President of WELS,
Appointed by a Few, Just Like the Pope


Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality:

'via Blog this'

The comments regarding Holy Communion are at approximately 58:00 minutes in the video. Do yourself a favor and view the whole video here. The Church belongs to Christ and His believers. We do not accommodate culture at the expense of the Church. We disciple the Word in our daily lives and bring believers into the church where there is the forgiveness of sins.

UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law:
WELS Stewardship Program To Emphasize the Work of Man Instead of the Efficacious Gospel in the Means of Grace



Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

Christ's Love, Our Calling.  That's the theme of our Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod.  It's also the focus of the second year of our four year stewardship emphasis.

The word "stewardship" usually brings to mind encouragement to be more intentional with how we use our worldly wealth.  However, there are other important aspects of stewardship as well.  This year our primary focus will be on talents.  We all have different gifts, but share in the same grace of Jesus Christ!

Consider the following:
1) If God's people aren't regularly using their talents at worship, should it really be called worship? [GJ   - If the congregation offers the Means of Grace instead of the Law...yes!]
2) If we don't invest our talents in raising our children and serving our neighbor, what will soon happen with our society? [GJ - That is why God started this precious program, to save society through our work.]
3) If we aren't interested in using our talents to promote the preaching and teaching of Christ in our midst--and around the world--what will soon happen to mission work? [GJ - What will happen to the paid vacations around the world for the elite if we have no exotic locations to visit?]

The point?  God has blessed each member of his body, the church, with certain talents.  When each member uses those talents to serve God and each other, the body thrives.  If members leave their talents untapped, the body suffers. [ GJ - God is counting on you to do His Word. He has no hands but yours, no feet but yours, no cash but yours.]

A special Bible Study and Worship service titled Different Gifts, Same Grace will use Romans 12:6-8 as the biblical framework for this Sunday, which includes discussions about the talent of serving and whether everyone has that talent or not.  For those members who regularly attend Bible study, we'll pause the "Speaking the Truth in Love to other Christians" Bible study for a week and take a look at the Gift of Service.  Whether or not you regularly attend Bible study, I'm confident you will really appreciate and enjoy this Bible study.  It begins at 9:00.

We'll see you in church this Sunday!  Until then, know for certain that the Lord of the church has richly blessed every member of our congregation with gifts and abilities to be used to God's glory and our neighbor's good: "We have different gifts, according to the grace given us.  If a man's gift is prophesying, let him use it in proportion to his faith.  If it is serving, let him serve; if it is teaching, let him teach; if it is encouraging, let him encourage; if it is contributing to the needs of others, let him give generously; if it leadership, let him govern diligently; if it is showing mercy, let him do it cheerfully" (Romans 12:6-8).


---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law: WELS Stewardship Pr...":

WELS UOJ confusion:

WELS theologians should consult with each other before they publish. In the October 2011 edition of Forward in Christ contributing editor Forrest Bivens, a professor at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, states: "The astonishing reality is that God has forgiven the sins of the whole world, whether people believe it or not" (p.9).

Yet WELS CA/AZ District President Jon Buchholz states in his paper entitled Justification Expounded by Scripture presented to the synod in convention in 2005:

"The doctrine of objective justification is a defining doctrine for the Wisconsin Synod and for the old Synodical Conference. In our zeal to expound the true, biblical doctrine of objective justification against those who oppose the doctrine, we have, at times, 'pushed the envelope,' and employed words and phrases in imprecise and incorrect ways. ... I offer the following as a loving critique of some wording and phraseology which has circulated in our midst:

'God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins.' This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word 'forgive' is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, 'God has forgiven the world.' Rather, the Spirit of Inspiration overwhelmingly uses the word 'forgive' (Greek: afihmi) within the context of repentance and faith, effected through the means of grace. There are good reasons why the Spirit chooses a particular word to be used in a particular context. Using the word 'forgiveness' in the atypical sense, apart from repentance and faith, one might easily find himself in the incongruous position of saying to the impenitent or unbelieving, 'God has forgiven your sins [objective gospel], but your sins are not forgiven [Ministry of the Keys].'"

Note to Jon Buchholz, if in Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense, then it should not be used in a universal sense, i.e. UOJ. Maybe it's because we are justified by faith alone?

***

GJ - This statement contradicts what was just quoted above:


Thursday, October 20, 2011

WELS Essay Files Warning:
Set Filter To Accept UOJ



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Teaching Against Justification By Faith Has Toxic ...":

"There is so much of this UOJ bile in the WLS online essay files"

True. I have my browser SafeSearch filter set to No UOJ, and the filter clogs up and computer crashes every time I navigate to the WELS Essay files.

Occupy London protests — an eyewitness reports « Churchmouse Campanologist



Occupy London protests — an eyewitness reports « Churchmouse Campanologist:


"Two more things: one, banking is our only remaining ‘industry’ here in the UK. We’ve lost our manufacturing and our services. Two, a Tobin Tax on financial transactions, mooted around the EU, would kill off our one remaining means of self-sufficiency. So, pray tell, what happens when the banks and their highest earning employees are gone?"

'via Blog this'

The Official Norms of the Wisconsin Synod Are Not the WELS Essay Files,
But the Word and the Confessions



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":

Notice how the WELS Constitution reads for synod and its districts:

ARTICLE II

Confession of Faith

Section 1. The synod/district accepts the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments as the divinely inspired and inerrant word of God, and submits to this Word of God as the only infallible authority in all matters of doctrine, faith, and life ("and practice" is in the district constitution).

Section 2. The synod/district also accepts the confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church contained in the Book of Concord of 1580, not insofar as, but because they are a correct presentation and exposition of the pure doctrine of the word of God.

I dug out my congregation's constitution. Notice the difference:

Section 4.
Hence, no doctrine shall be taught or tolerated in this congregation which is in any way at variance with these symbolical books and the Holy Scriptures.

Section 5.
Likewise, all controversies which may arise in this congregation shall be decided and adjusted according to this norm of doctrine and practice.

Is there significance that in the synod constitution there is no "all controversies shall be decided and adjusted according to this norm of doctrine and practice" I.e. Scripture and the Confessions?

I think so. Ask your local WELS pastor or synod official, "Is the Book of Concord the final word on interpreting a disputed doctrine, esp. when the BoC addresses the doctrine in question?

Vestiges of first WELS president Johannes Muehlhauser who said the Confessions were "paper fences."

***

GJ - Now the Mequon graduates say that the Confessions are "boring and irrelevant." They would not say that if they actually studied the Book of Concord.


Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification, Part 2.
Calov and Chemnitz, or Bivens and Valleskey?
Hmmmm.



Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification, Part 2: "The way is broad that leads to damnation, and there are many that walk in it. Mt 7:13.

[PAR – Here Chemnitz asks the very specific question: “Are all men justified?” He makes no distinctions, as modern theologians have done. He does not speak of an “objective sense” in which all men are justified, and then a “subjective sense” in which only believers are justified. Nothing of the sort. He simply responds to this simple question with a simple answer, “There are many who walk on the way that leads to damnation.” In other words, “No, not all men are justified. Far from it.”]"

'via Blog this'

Teaching Against Justification By Faith Has Toxic Consequences



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":

Excellent observations, rlschultz!

Did you catch how Bivens described the pastor's role in the Divine Service rite of Confession/Absolution in his Q&A answer posted here on Ichabod (http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/10/false-teachers-mislead-students-at.html)?

"This is why (AC V - i.e. UOJ) we may speak to one another to say 'Your sins are forgiven' or 'In the name of God, I forgive your sins.' This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing."

That's not how the rite reads even in the WELS CW hymnal: "Therefore, as a called servant of Christ and by his authority, I forgive you..."

***

GJ - UOJ extinguishes the concept of the Means of Grace and obliterates the real Gospel with a fake Gospel of all-forgiveness masking all-law, which is really their message for most people. For the right people, it is all-forgiveness, which means they can do whatever they want. Notice how they waver between excusing whatever they do while condemning everyone else.


Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused by Previous Fuller Programs in WELS.
Enthusiasm Breeds Enthusiasm



rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own ...":

Allegedly, the forthcoming emphasis for the WELS Stewardship Sunday is an emphasis upon time and talents of the laity. Recently, I heard a pastor call it "our ministry", as in "everyone is a pastor". There are several aspects of this attitude which bear emphasis. First, there is a downgrading of pastoral ministry, especially as it applies to the Means of Grace. Secondly, this places emphasis upon the laity as being stakeholders. It is akin to a communitarian approach to public ministry. The effect of this is to make members hamsters on a treadmill. This approach manifests itself with a nonstop parade of committee meetings, agendas, workshops, and lame "Bible studies". Great emphasis is placed upon members serving, with continued reminders that the "ball is in their court". The "technician approach" is undertaken, with members getting the impression that all one has to do is flip the right switches and tweak the controls, and the plans will fall into place. Plausible deniability is built in to this with certain Scripture passages that are proof texted to support the effort. What you end up with are members who no longer believe in the Efficacy of the Word and have instead become small m Methodists.

***

GJ - The Lutherans really need a comprehensive study of the Book of Concord, but who will lead them? The faculties despise their own confessions and reject them. The MDivs find the Book of Concord "boring and irrelevant."

If there were a groundswell to study the Confessions, the Conference of Pussycats would finally find their claws and stop it. After all, Mequon has dogmatics notes that label justification by faith passages from the orthodox as "MISLEADING." That is also why Mequon is hotter than Georgia asphalt to buy the NNIV.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":

Excellent observations, rlschultz!

Did you catch how Bivens described the pastor's role in the Divine Service rite of Confession/Absolution in his Q&A answer posted here on Ichabod (http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/10/false-teachers-mislead-students-at.html)?

"This is why (AC V - i.e. UOJ) we may speak to one another to say 'Your sins are forgiven' or 'In the name of God, I forgive your sins.' This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing."

That's not how the rite reads even in the WELS CW hymnal: "Therefore, as a called servant of Christ and by his authority, I forgive you..."

Anglican Curmudgeon: The Dog in the Manger

Anglican Curmudgeon: The Dog in the Manger:

'via Blog this'


The Episcopal hierarchy stole this property and closed it. 
The members left the denomination, so the denomination took the property.

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop Mathes.
Bishops and DPs Love To Trash Honest Lutheran Writers


VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop Mathes:

'via Blog this'

Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop James R. Mathes

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
October 14, 2011

MATHES: In an online story published by The Wall Street Journal, titled "Twenty-first Century Excommunication," and accompanied by a video interview of the reporter, Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, the recent property disputes of The Episcopal Church were grossly mischaracterized. I have served as the Episcopal bishop of San Diego for almost seven years, and, in that capacity, dealt with three congregations in which the ordained leaders and their followers attempted to leave the Episcopal Church with parish property. In these dealings, I was threatened with death and told I will go to hell by those who claim to love Jesus more than I do. Other colleagues have had similar experiences, from death threats to being spit at during church services. Ms. Hemingway would have you believe that the animus we have received is about scriptural interpretation, but make no mistake: this is about power. If Mathes had been threatened with death he should have called the Police.

VOL: It is partly about power - power wielded by liberal and revisionist bishops who have "another gospel" that is not the genuine Good News proclaimed in Holy Writ. As a result, tens of thousands of Episcopalians have left the Episcopal Church and are forming orthodox Anglican communities of faith that do proclaim the Good News that does not include endorsing a variety of pansexual behaviors, is not accepting of sexual sin and demands that all repent and come to a knowledge of Jesus Christ. It IS primarily about "scriptural interpretation" and theology and the wielding of power is a part of it.

Bishop Mathes has lost fully one quarter (nine) of his parishes (Episcopalians) to other Anglican jurisdictions because of the Episcopal Church's apostasies.

On the issue of power.

No Presiding Bishop has wielded more power in the history of The Episcopal Church than Katharine Jefferts Schori. She has deposed more bishops than any other Presiding bishop in American ecclesiastical history.

She has spent more money (upwards of $22 million) on lawyers to litigate for properties that she and her bishops will ultimately be forced to sell than any other Presiding Bishop in history.

Recently, Bishop Paul Marshall of Bethlehem came out blasting her silence over l'affair Bede Parry (a pederast former RC priest Jefferts Schori admitted into TEC) threatening to tell all in an article, maybe even a book, on cover-ups in the Episcopal Church that he knows about. She has intimidated her bishops into silence about the real goings on behind the scenes in TEC, according to the Bethlehem Bishop.

Jefferts Schori is a bully who bullies bishops who don't fall into line with her revisionist gospel.

What is happening to South Carolina Bishop Mark Lawrence is a pure power play to wrest the diocese from him and turn it over to a liberal bishop.

MATHES: To fully understand this situation, it is important to grasp the canonical (i.e. legal) structure of The Episcopal Church. Parishes are creations of the diocese in which they are situated, in some cases deriving their tax-exempt status because they are an irrevocable part of the diocese. As a condition of ordination, clergy vow obedience to their bishop. Congregations begin as mission churches under the direct supervision and financial support of the bishop with property held by the diocese. When such a church becomes a parish, by vote of diocesan legislature, the congregation pledges to be subordinate to the constitution and canons of the Episcopal Church as well as the constitution and canons of the diocese. After becoming a parish, they may incorporate under the religious incorporation statutes of the state in which the congregation is situated. The diocese will usually transfer title to real property to the parish at that time to be held in trust for The Episcopal Church.

VOL: Legally correct. Perhaps. It should be remembered that nearly every parish was built and paid for by its people, not the church. The Dennis Canon has been defanged in the State of South Carolina. By no means is there certainty that the National Church will win in Ft. Worth, Virginia, San Joaquin or Quincy. Even if they do, the victories will be pyrrhic. TEC is losing market share and closing the equivalent of one whole diocese a year. The Diocese of Delaware will put its cathedral on the chopping block next year. The rump Bishop of Pittsburgh is trying to cut deals with a modicum of success, but at the end of the day, he will be left with empty properties he will be forced to sell for pennies on the dollar in the name of the Dennis Canon, Jefferts Schori and The Episcopal Church.

Even when they win the properties in property disputes, the victories are pyrrhic. The congregations are aging fast and disappearing. There is virtually no youth coming forward to take their place in the coming years either in the pews or pulpits.

MATHES: When individuals purported to alienate property, which had, been given to The Episcopal Church, I was bound by my fiduciary role as a bishop to prevent that from happening. Because The Episcopal Church, like so many others, follows state laws of incorporation, I had no alternative but to file suit in civil court to remedy the matter. This is analogous to a landlord finally going to civil court to gain relief from a non-paying renter or an owner using legal means to deal with a squatter. Thus, those leaving The Episcopal Church were catalysts of these lawsuits by breaking their solemn vows and by attempting to seize property they had no right to possess.

VOL: Not true. Some bishops have settled without going to court. Mathes conveniently forgets that the bishops of Central Florida, Dallas, Kansas and New Jersey have settled property disputes without going near a courtroom.

MATHES: What is particularly regrettable about Ms. Hemingway's piece is confusion about the relationship between The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion, which is easily remedied with a simple visit to the Anglican Communion's official website. There you will find every diocese of The Episcopal Church in their cycle of prayer; you will not find The Anglican Church in North America on that list. This is not to say they do not need our prayers. It is simply an indicator of who is an Anglican and who has merely appropriated the label. You will not find Missouri Synod Lutherans there either. Thus, The Episcopal Church remains a constituent member of the Anglican Communion. Despite Ms. Hemingway's interpretations, our leader (called a primate), the Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, is a participant in the Meeting of Primates of the Anglican Communion; Robert Duncan, the leader of the breakaway Anglican Church in North America, is not. At our last House of Bishops meeting, a gathering of all bishops of The Episcopal Church, we were visited by the primates of Japan and Central Africa. Like an eclectic extended family, we have our differences, but we regularly gather together.

VOL: The ABC or the Anglican Consultative Council might not recognize The ACNA and AMiA, but Archbishop Duncan, (ACNA) Bishop Chuck Murphy (AMiA) and all their fellow bishops are recognized by GAFCON/FCA and have strong collegial ties with nearly all Global South Anglican provinces including Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, South East Asia and the Southern Cone - together they represent more than 80% of the Anglican Communion

MATHES: Ms. Hemingway suggests that The Episcopal Church is depriving these departing Episcopalians of a relationship to Anglican bishops and foreign dioceses. Oddly, these individuals claim to desire a relationship with a bishop of their own choosing. But bishops are those who by definition maintain order and oversight over the church. To put it in historical terms, this is rather like choosing to succeed from the nation when the current leadership is not to your liking. Thus, when the presiding bishop of The Episcopal Church urges her colleagues not to provide aid and comfort to those who would undermine our church, she has history on her side.

VOL: How much "order and oversight" has there been since Bishop Gene Robinson, an avowed non-celibate homosexual, was ordained to the episcopacy in 2003? It has brought nothing but chaos to the whole church. In nearly every diocese priests of conscience have asked for oversight or been forced to flee.

The argument that "choosing to succeed from the nation when the current leadership is not to your liking" is absurd. We can vote the leadership out or we can leave the nation (read church), which over 100,000 have done. Jefferts Schori could step down as the Archbishop of Canterbury is said to be contemplating -- 10 years before his time.

How much history will the Presiding Bishop have when all the indications are that by 2050 the Episcopal Church will be a shadow of its former self with a small handful of dying dioceses and large churches that have consolidated from dying ones? AMIA and ACNA are not looking for aid and comfort from TEC. They have never asked for it nor do they want it. They are getting on with the business of preaching the Good News, taking up the urgent call of the Great Commission and making disciples of Christ that TEC is not. And yes, they are planting new churches, opening up new dioceses across the country. What about that does Mathes not understand?

MATHES: In the final analysis, no one has been excommunicated; rather some individuals have left our church. On their way out, they have tried to take what does not belong to them and, in an unimaginative attempt to cover their unseemly behavior, they have pointed the finger at their victim, The Episcopal Church. The Wall Street Journal and Ms. Hemingway have either been duped or shown a stunning lack of care in reporting. The only thing in this story that has been excommunicated is the truth.

VOL: What do you call "inhibition" and "deposition" if it's not excommunication by another name? If TEC is a "victim", it is a victim of its own bad theology and equally bad morals. TEC is reaping what it is sowing. It is sowing to the wind and reaping the whirlwind. TEC's own decline and fall is happening because they are doing it to themselves. No one is doing it to them.



---



Re: Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Di...
+Mathes is delusional if he seriously imagines that TEC has the sole claim on Anglicanism in this country.

As I said over at StandFirm, there is no evidence in writing anywhere in the Anglican Communion which gives TEC permission to claim sole legitimacy....the recent "disaffiliation" clauses notwithstanding. They are merely "A CONSTITUENT MEMBER" of the Anglican Communion, and not THE SOLE CONSTITUENT MEMBER.

And with respect to the afore-mentioned clauses, I don't believe there's a court in the land that would tell any congregation who they could religiously affiliate with and not violate the U.S. Constitution by doing so.

TEC is its own worst enemy. The rot is from within and most emphatically NOT from without. It is morally and theologically bankrupt.

And where's the proof that you were harassed, "threatened with death and spit upon," Bishop Mathes?

Show us the proof, Bishop! Show us the police reports.

---





Mathes seems to be reflective of the delusional rot of TEC. It seems he actually believes the apostacy of Queen Katie and the ne Gospel of Holy Lawsuit.


In Pittsburgh, Bishop Duncan offered to give ownership of each parish's property to the parish. If the liberals wished to stray off somewhere, they were welcome to take their places of worship with them. Schori, on the other hand, refuses even to sell parish property to an orthodox Anglican parish. She views Christian Anglicans as "competitors". Maybe they are. Maybe the Anglicans are the Christians against the non-Christian hoards of Katie. If that's the case, there's really no competition - God will win.


It seems it comes down to God vs. goodies. More and more Anglican parishes are simply saying bye-bye. TEC is left with empty buildings, an empty Gospel message and empty souls.


TEC plays the "victim" because that is the classic liberal posture. If TEC is a victim, it is the victim of its own false teaching and apostacy.


---


The Anglican Curmudgeon has an excellent post about this story.


http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/


For the King,


Brian


***


GJ - The author of the WSJ article, Molie Hemingway, is a FB friend of mine, a highly respected author of features about denominations, including her LCMS.

Delegates discuss Bible translations | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)



DELEGATES DISCUSS BIBLE TRANSLATIONS
Delegates had an opportunity to ask questions on Bible translations at a special open forum at the convention.

Prior to the convention, the Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC) conducted a review of the recently released NIV 2011. WELS President Mark Schroeder appointed the TEC in 2010 because the NIV 1984, the translation currently used in WELS publications, will not be available for use in the near future.

After a preliminary report, the committee expanded the review, asking for reactions from professors and others on the entire translation.

Following that larger review and other additional study, the committee published a supplemental report with its recommendation. All delegates had access to the report online before the convention.

The committee's supplemental report stated that "the new NIV could serve us adequately as a translation for our synodical publications." The TEC came to that conclusion because it believes that

the revision is a faithful and accurate translation, for the most part, and that it is the best of all the versions for public reading in our churches;
no other current translation—one that addresses all the NIV's weaknesses without adding its own new ones to the mix—would be a significant improvement over the NIV; and
the use of the new NIV in its revised form would provide the greatest continuity and cause the fewest disruptions among our schools and congregations who are already using the older NIV.



Delegates discuss Bible translations | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS):

'via Blog this'

The Lutheran | The Lutheran - Breaking News

The Lutheran | The Lutheran - Breaking News: "• The assembly responded with applause when offered the greeting “The Lord be with you” from Sayyid M. Sayeed, general secretary of the Islamic Society of North America."

'via Blog this'

“I have seen him in corridors of power speaking truth to the power,” said Sayyid M. Sayeed about Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson. Also, “No church or organization on earth can fight these mountains of bigotry alone. It is a collective responsibility.”



Retired ELCA pastor Ralph Eckard knew Marple for 48 years, including the 27 years he served as an assistant to LCA presidents and later bishops. "Dorothy and I served as colleagues from 1976 until the merger in 1988," Eckard said. "She was a prodigious worker and a great colleague in every sense of the word. She had a breadth of experience, which she could apply to any situation."
Marple's funeral service is set for Saturday, Aug. 13, at Upper Dublin Lutheran Church, Ambler, Pa. She is survived by a sister, Virginia Reynolds; nine nieces; and a longtime friend, Lois Leffler.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business

Gottesdienst Online

Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business: "Naiveté can get one into trouble. I should have smelled something fishy when I received a request from the LCMS International Center to have my parish participate in a “Perceptions of Ministry Inventory,” a survey designed “to enhance the formation and professional development of parish pastors”; had I been paying closer attention, I might have wondered why the Board for Pastoral Education and the Council of Presidents wanted to assure me that my “privacy and anonymity will be preserved throughout the process.”"

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - WELS did something like this. A circuit pastor was furious about this and wrote a letter.

Soon he was out of the ministry.

Read the article and ask where millions of dollars go. In fact, you will stop asking.

Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks

Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks: "Seminary to Host Anglican Church in North America and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue

FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""

'via Blog this'

The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language



The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language:

'via Blog this'


The King James Version (KJV) was born out of political compromise and royal patronage. Church life in 16th-century England was characterized by high and often violent tensions over vernacular translations of the ancient Latin version of the Bible known as the vulgate. Early translators such as William Tyndale and John Rogers were burned at the stake. When the Reformation gathered momentum after Queen Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, the Puritans popularized the Geneva Bible, which went through 70 editions selling more than half a million copies. But when James succeeded Elizabeth, the new and scholarly king (called "the wisest fool in Christendom") identified footnotes in the Geneva Bible that he deemed to be subversive of royal authority.
At Hampton Court Palace in 1604, King James moved to end this subversion by convening a conference of established church bishops and moderate political Puritans. Keeping the latter on his side was one of James's priorities, although he was theologically opposed to their low church governance, as he showed by his comment, "No bishops, no King." Nevertheless James commissioned six committees drawn from both Puritan and Episcopalian scholars to translate a new English language version of the Bible dedicated to himself as "the principal mover and author" of the translation. So the KJV was conceived as a unifying production, endorsing the idea of a monarchical national church.

Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night, LCMS:
You Are Worse Than ELCA, Because You Work with ELCA
AND Kick People Out of Church



Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumb...":

Nice job, Minn. South. Enjoy your $3.2-million while Missouri runs around and bad-mouths ELCA and ECUSA for kicking parishioners out of their churches.

***

GJ - I was thinking today - Concordia Publishing House has $26 million in the bank from their hymnal sales. (Remember someone scoffing about my claim that new hymnals are like minting money? It is.) CPH could have bought the building and leased it back to the campus ministry. Many different agencies could have done that. It would be hard to lose out, since the location alone made it valuable.

But readers, this is why all the Lutheran sects love to close congregations. They make the congregation pay for the mission building and land, even if the mission board did a horrible job of picking the land, the location, and the building. The members pay and pay. When the sect forecloses, the sect keeps all the money. Sometimes they let the congregation vote on which entity gets how much money.

At one point the closing of parishes was keeping many LCA districts in the black. In other words, they could pay outrageous staff salaries because they were spending the equity gained from the congregations trying to pay for their white elephants for 20 years and finally giving up.

The LCA in Michigan built an underground (earth-sheltered) building, which cost a lot of money but used very little energy. The community laughed at it and called it Holy Moley.

Wally Oelhaven's mission committee got some good land, allowed a zoning restriction on it, and erected one of the strangest and ugliest WEFs ever - and the competition was stiff. Shepherd of Peace. They moved and knocked the WEF down. The bulldozer took one jab at it and poof, down it went.

All the Lutheran groups waste millions of dollars, calling it reaching out with the Gospel. The leaders know how much each pastor makes, but no one dares to ask what the SP makes in salary and benefits.