Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Blog Fellowship Rules Do Not Apply to Church and Changers

SP Schroeder and Keith Free fund those bimbos at The CORE
and St. Peter, Freedom,
with YOUR money WELSians.


quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Ugly Questions for St. Peter, Freedom, Wisconsin -...":

Blog-fellowship is accursed, but devotions toward crap from Reggie McNeal is acceptable? He's a "Leadership Network" writer. Chris Rosebrough has exposed these guys.

Don't they have Bibles at St. Peter for devotions? Or did they already hock those at the pawn shop?

***



GJ - And they brag about it, naming the book and author in their Net-posted council minutes, which are devoid of fact but larded with 'umble self-congratulations.

The Evangelical Collapse

I was going to have goats discussing the TV series, The Bible.
One would say, chewing on a film can, labeled The Bible,
"Do you like it?"
And the other one would say, "I liked The Book better."
That awful series says a lot about this topic,
and I never finished the Photoshop.


rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Randall Schultz Predicted This Evangelical Collaps...":

Pastor Jackson,

Thanks for posting what I have written. This article is spot on. I am certain that there are some details in which we would disagree. Most of today's Americanized Christianity is like a ship without a rudder. It has produced hordes of spiritual vagabonds. I used to work with a gent who was raised as a five point Calvinist. He was a disgruntled member of Elmbrook (Babtist) Church. It was the first mega-church in the metro Milwaukee area. We used to have serious doctrinal discussions. These days, it is hard to find anyone who can discuss doctrine. There were lots of observable clues that churches have been going down the wrong paths. The author of this article enumerates many of them.

There were also many outside of Lutheran circles who have been sounding the alarm, only to have it fall on deaf ears. The antagonism toward Christianity has been subtle, but more noticeable.

When you have a Theology of Glory, you will lose members who cannot stand up to any persecution. Many churches have become carnal, appealing to those who embrace material success, without recognizing the source of all of our blessings. Likewise, the fleshly appeal is to name it and claim it. Lacking the Gospel, they offer your best life now, a fireproofed marriage, Christian financial planning, a purpose driven life, or any other inadequate substitute.

Luther always seemed to hit the nail on the head when it came to this. He talked about the preaching of the Gospel being like a passing rainstorm or how The Lord sends false teachers who flay their disciples to the bone. Every time that I was offered some trendy book that was ghost written for a popular false teacher, I would like to say, “no thanks, I have plenty of Luther plus my Book of Concord. That has been around a whole lot longer.”

***

This describes the WELS Shrinkers,
in more ways than one.


GJ - I certainly see the Lutherans going Methodist - no doctrine, lots of glitz. Count the empty mega-Methodist churches. They were the big ones, long ago.

The Evangelicals supporting the homosexual trend - like Andy Stanley - they are a good indication of what will follow.

The Lutheran Church Shrinkers loathe Christianity but cannot figure out how to find another job where they can do so little for so much money. They openly mock the Word of God and dare anyone to stop them.

They know they are running a confidence game, but the officials (in the same game) are not going to stop them.

Is there a better job than synod official - where one can live in tax-sheltered housing, drive in a synod-paid car, earn top dollar, and do nothing more than sit around in meetings blowing gas? And for work-vacations they go to deluxe resorts and do more of the same.

The old congregations were built with a lot of Gospel sermons and visits. There is little of either one now.

The denominational offices were little appendages with the officials working out of their parsonages or very modest office space.

WELS is like the British Foreign Office, getting more office space while the Empire shrinks to nothing. A bold move.




St. Paul WELS in Columbus, Ohio - Trained Glende Boys in Fuller Seminary Doctrine. And They Teach It Today.
See the Previous Article on Evangelical Collapse


St. Paul is one of those rich, old prune congregations (formerly a plum but now shrunken) - ravaged and pillaged by the Church Growth Storm-brownies.

The Glende boys were wee little lads when Floyd Luther Stolzenburg was welcomed to expand his snake oil program into the Wisconsin Synod. Does this sound familiar? Tons of money were spent on someone the public education system refused to hire after he was kicked out of the LCMS for cause.

A proven false teacher, divorced by his long-suffering wife for emulating Bishop Stephan, Floyd was set up by VP Paul Kuske in another congregation, the sister church of St. Paul in Germantown.

How well has St. Paul done after all those years of Church Growthism, first by Floyd, then by Bob Schumann?

Shriveled. Tiny. Almost gone.

The Glende boys continue to beat the drums for Church Growth. Tim leads a Lutheran congregation (so-called) with Methodist sermons copied from Groeschel and Reggie McNeal devotions at the council meeting.

Doubtless Ron Ash, head of Church and Change, drove out most of the Lutherans before Tim's malignant reign.

How well did Tim do in Illinois? WELS burned tons of money to give him what he wanted. Now the parish he abandoned can barely pay the bill on the cornfield coffee shop he insisted on having. When Star of Bethlehem pays on the debt Glende incurred, they have nothing left in the checking account.

Does anyone see a pattern?

Randall Schultz Predicted This Evangelical Collapse


Did they listen to Pete Wagner and me?
No.

The coming evangelical collapse - CSMonitor.com:


The coming evangelical collapse

An anti-Christian chapter in Western history is about to begin. But out of the ruins, a new vitality and integrity will rise.

By Michael Spencer / March 10, 2009
ONEIDA, KY.
We are on the verge – within 10 years – of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity. This breakdown will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and it will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West.
Ads by Google
Instantly Watch TV Shows & Movies.
Try It Free.

Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants. (Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.) In the "Protestant" 20th century, Evangelicals flourished. But they will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.
This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.

 http://www.normaboecklerart.com
Millions of Evangelicals will quit. Thousands of ministries will end. Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Many Christian schools will go into rapid decline. I'm convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But the end of evangelicalism as we know it is close.
Why is this going to happen?
1. Evangelicals have identified their movement with the culture war and with political conservatism. This will prove to be a very costly mistake. Evangelicals will increasingly be seen as a threat to cultural progress. Public leaders will consider us bad for America, bad for education, bad for children, and bad for society.
The evangelical investment in moral, social, and political issues has depleted our resources and exposed our weaknesses. Being against gay marriage and being rhetorically pro-life will not make up for the fact that massive majorities of Evangelicals can't articulate the Gospel with any coherence. We fell for the trap of believing in a cause more than a faith.
2. We Evangelicals have failed to pass on to our young people an orthodox form of faith that can take root and survive the secular onslaught. Ironically, the billions of dollars we've spent on youth ministers, Christian music, publishing, and media has produced a culture of young Christians who know next to nothing about their own faith except how they feel about it. Our young people have deep beliefs about the culture war, but do not know why they should obey scripture, the essentials of theology, or the experience of spiritual discipline and community. Coming generations of Christians are going to be monumentally ignorant and unprepared for culture-wide pressures.
3. There are three kinds of evangelical churches today: consumer-driven megachurches, dying churches, and new churches whose future is fragile. Denominations will shrink, even vanish, while fewer and fewer evangelical churches will survive and thrive.
4. Despite some very successful developments in the past 25 years, Christian education has not produced a product that can withstand the rising tide of secularism. Evangelicalism has used its educational system primarily to staff its own needs and talk to itself.
5. The confrontation between cultural secularism and the faith at the core of evangelical efforts to "do good" is rapidly approaching. We will soon see that the good Evangelicals want to do will be viewed as bad by so many, and much of that work will not be done. Look for ministries to take on a less and less distinctively Christian face in order to survive.
6. Even in areas where Evangelicals imagine themselves strong (like the Bible Belt), we will find a great inability to pass on to our children a vital evangelical confidence in the Bible and the importance of the faith.
7. The money will dry up.

 http://www.normaboecklerart.com

What will be left?
•Expect evangelicalism to look more like the pragmatic, therapeutic, church-growth oriented megachurches that have defined success. Emphasis will shift from doctrine to relevance, motivation, and personal success – resulting in churches further compromised and weakened in their ability to pass on the faith.
•Two of the beneficiaries will be the Roman Catholic and Orthodox communions. Evangelicals have been entering these churches in recent decades and that trend will continue, with more efforts aimed at the "conversion" of Evangelicals to the Catholic and Orthodox traditions.
•A small band will work hard to rescue the movement from its demise through theological renewal. This is an attractive, innovative, and tireless community with outstanding media, publishing, and leadership development. Nonetheless, I believe the coming evangelical collapse will not result in a second reformation, though it may result in benefits for many churches and the beginnings of new churches.
•The emerging church will largely vanish from the evangelical landscape, becoming part of the small segment of progressive mainline Protestants that remain true to the liberal vision.


'via Blog this'

http://www.normaboecklerart.com

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Randall Schultz Predicted This Evangelical Collaps...":

This post made me think the Presby church I went to when I was toying with Calvinism. I note now how they easily could adopt some contemporary notions in the culture and work it in the church. Comparatively speaking they would be considered by secularists as more relevant than Lutheran churches.

Now why is it that Calvinistic churches can appear to get results on this? I figure because they do not a thorough going reliance on the Means of Grace. So if if there is no reliance on the Means of Grace, then other techniques to make it look relevant would be acceptable.

LPC

***

GJ - I went to an inerrancy conference where the Calvinist speaker lit into Robert Preus for not making his essay relevant, even saying that he would not allow that kind of essay from freshmen in college. I thought the comments said a lot more about the speaker than the essay.

Making the Scriptures reasonable, relevant, and appealing is the first step in removing the work of the Holy Spirit from the Word. Everything else follows.

Lutheran lust for being real, relevant, and relational has driven many to Eastern Orthodoxy and Rome.

Mid-Week Lenten Service



Mid-Week Lenten Vespers, March 6, 2013


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Central Time

The Hymn #227   Come Holy Ghost                 2. 72  
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody                   Psalm                          p. 128
The Lection                            The Passion History

The Sermon Hymn #249            Isaiah Mighty Seer            2.72  

The Sermon –      Isaiah’s Preaching of the Gospel
 
The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                            p. 45

The Hymn # 558                 All Praise                         2:9


KJV Isaiah 53:1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed? 2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. 4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all. 7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. 9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.

10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. 11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.

12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.



Isaiah’s Preaching of the Gospel

KJV Isaiah 53:1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?

This verse is a clear representation of the Gospel in a few words. This means we have both the proclamation of the truth and faith in that preaching.

The “report” as translated in Romans 10, in citing Isaiah 53, is a combination of preaching and hearing.

The Jackson Living KJV translates Romans 10:16 as

Who has believed the Word which is heard?

Isaiah 53 unfolds and Romans 10 completes it. The Passion of Christ was revealed centuries before, and Paul teaches – this atonement is preached and heard, so that all who believe in the Gospel are forgiven and saved. Their sins are washed away, removed forever, and this forgiveness continues as along as they abide in the True Vine (John 15) through the Means of Grace.

This righteousness of faith (in the words of Paul, Romans 10, is the result of proclaiming the atoning death of the Suffering Servant, from Isaiah 53.

KJV Romans 10:6 But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)

There is the righteousness of the Law or the righteousness of faith. One opposes or displaces the other. If someone rejects the righteousness that comes from believing the Gospel, he lives under the righteousness of the Law.

2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

This verse only makes sense in light of the ministry of Christ, a prefiguring of the crucified Messiah. This is so clear that Isaiah 53 has been taught successfully in the conversions of Jews to the Gospel, since the chapter does everything except name Jesus as the topic of the passage.

So it is no surprise that Paul, the Jewish Pharisee who lived the righteousness of the Law, persecuting faith, found Isaiah 53 so harmonious with his message to the Romans. This was not simply the choice of Paul, but the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, showing how the Old Testament and the New Testament are one unified truth.

3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. 4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Rationalists do not like this chapter, but believers find great comfort in it. These two verses describe the suffering of the Messiah, but it is suffering for a reason. Apart from the Gospel, the idea of the Servant suffering for others makes no sense. This falls outside of the ancient concept of the warrior king.

He has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows…

This is reflected in the atonement passages of 1 Corinthians, that Jesus took our sin upon Him so that we might receive His righteousness in faith.

This chapter is antiphonal in this sense – the facts are reported followed by the divinely-planned reason why they happened.

These events happened because…
  • He was wounded for our transgressions.
  • He was bruised for our iniquities.
  • The chastisement of our peace was upon Him.
  • And with His stripes we are healed.


6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all. 7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

Old Testament poetry beautifully explains one verse or one part of a verse with another. The same thought is repeated in different words, so we can understand from both parts. One example – The Lord is my Shepherd, which explains I shall not want.

This section gives us a picture of the Lamb who is sacrificed for our sins, yet we are the sheep. He is both Lamb and Good Shepherd, just as He is both victim and priest. (Hebrews is especially eloquent about Jesus as the High Priest.)

8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. 9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.

This section says so much about the death and resurrection of Christ. This reveals His sinless nature, His divinity, and also the grave where He was placed. He died as a criminal but was buried in a new grave from a rich man, one never used before. (Lazarus prefigured this rising from the dead, showing how the Word could raise the dead.)

12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

The unity of the Scriptures can be seen in how this passage harmonizes with Christ teaching about the stronger man who takes over the possessions of the strong man (Satan) and takes away his spoils, sharing them.

The earth no longer belongs to Satan, who still rules the best he can until the end. Christ is the victor and calls all into His Kingdom by His Word. He has won the victory, which is ours by faith.

  


  

Quotations

"Other writings, however, of ancient or modern teachers, whatever name they bear, must not be regarded as equal to the Holy Scriptures, but all of them together be subjected to them, and should not be received otherwise or further than as witnesses, [which are to show] in what manner after the time of the apostles, and at what places, this [pure] doctrine of the prophets and apostles was preserved."
            Formula of Concord, Epitome, Part I, 2, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 777. Tappert, p. 465.                

"We believe, teach, and confess that the sole rule and standard according to which all dogmas together with [all] teachers should be estmated and judged are the prophetic and apostolic Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament alone, as it is written in Psalm 119:105:  'Thy Word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path.'  And St. Paul:  'Though an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you, let him be accursed,' Galatians 1:8."         Formula of Concord, Epitome, Part I, 1, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 777. Tappert, p. 464. Psalm 119:105; Galatians 1:8.              

"Therefore, before the conversion of man there are only two efficient causes, namely, the Holy Ghost and the Word of God, as the instrument of the Holy Ghost, by which He works conversion.  This Word man is [indeed] to hear; however, it is not by his own powers, but only through the grace and working of the Holy Ghost that he can yield faith to it and accept it." Formula of Concord, Epitome, II, Of the Free Will, #19, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 791. Tappert, p. 472. 
                 
"This power {the Keys} is exercised only by teaching or preaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments, according to their calling, either to many or to individuals.  For thereby are granted, not bodily, but eternal things, as eternal righteousness, the Holy Ghost, eternal life.  These things cannot come but by the ministry of the Word and the Sacraments, as Paul says, Romans 1:16:  The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth.  Therefore, since the power of the Church grants eternal things, and is exercised only by the ministry of the Word, it does not interfere with civil government; no more than the art of singing interferes with civil government."
            Augsburg Confession, Article XXVIII, #8, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 85. Tappert, p. 82. Romans 1:16        

"For this reason we shall now relate, furthermore, from God's Word how man is converted to God, how and through what means [namely, through the oral Word and the holy Sacraments] the Holy Ghost wants to be efficacious in us, and to work and bestow in our hearts true repentance, faith, and new spiritual power and ability for good, and how we should conduct ourselves towards these means, and [how we should] use them."
            Solid Declaration, Article II, Free Will, 48, Formula of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 901. Tappert, p. 530.                

"Therefore God, out of His immense goodness and mercy, has His divine eternal Law and His wonderful plan concerning our redemption, namely, the holy, alone‑saving Gospel of His eternal Son, our only Savior and Redeemer, Jesus Christ, publicly preached; and by this [preaching] collects an eternal Church for Himself from the human race, and works in the hearts of men true repentance and knowledge of sins, and true faith in the Son of God, Jesus Christ.  And by this means, and in no other way, namely, through His holy Word, when men hear it preached or read it, and the holy Sacraments when they are used according to His Word, God desires to call men to eternal salvation, draw them to Himself, and convert, regenerate, and sanctify them.  1 Corinthians 1:21:  'For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.'  Acts 10:5‑6..."
            Solid Declaration, Article II, Free Will, #50, Formula of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 901. Tappert, p. 530f. 1 Corinthians 1:21; Acts 10:5‑6.  

"Now, although both, the planting and watering of the preacher, and the running and willing of the hearer, would be in vain, and no conversion would follow it if the power and efficacy of the Holy Ghost were not added thereto, who enlightens and converts the hearts through the Word preached and heard, so that men believe this Word and assent thereto, still, neither preacher nor hearer is to doubt this grace and efficacy of the Holy Ghost, but should be certain that when the Word of God is preached purely and truly, according to the command and will of God, and men listen attentively and earnestly and meditate upon it, God is certainly present with His grace, and grants, as has been said, what otherwise man can neither accept nor give from his own powers."            
Solid Declaration, Article II, Free Will, 55‑56, Formula of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 903. Tappert, p. 531f.        

"Is the Lord's Supper the place to display my toleration, my Christian sympathy, or my fellowship with another Christian, when that is the very point in which most of all we differ; and in which the difference means for me everything‑‑means for me, the reception of the Savior's atonement?  Is this the point to be selected for the display of Christian union, when in fact it is the very point in which Christian union does not exist?"
            Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: 1911, p. 905f.        
        
"Another defect of Reformed preaching is its contempt for the Means of Grace.  They will tell you that the Holy Spirit needs no vehicle, neither ox‑cart nor aeroplane, to enter the heart of man; and by this rationalistic argument they think to have done away with the Means of Grace.  But notice how they set about immediately to construct their own Means of Grace.  Luther told them in his day:'If the Holy Spirit needs no vehicle, no preaching, then why are you here?  And why are you so earnest in spreading your errors?  It seems that what you really meant to say was that the Holy Spirit does not need true prophets, but He is very much in need of false prophets.' If the Holy Spirit needs no Means of Grace, who do these Reformed churches undertake their campaigns of revivalism?"
            Martin S. Sommer, Concordia Pulpit for 1932, Martin S. Sommer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1931, p. iv.      

"Transubstantiation is also one of the pillars that support the papalist kingdom...Rather, it is that they may retain and establish the sacrifice of the Mass, reservation, carrying about, adoration of the bread, and all the things which, outside of the divinely instituted use, have been joined to these things‑‑for this reason they fight so persistently about transubstantiation."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 253.                  

"For Scripture never calls either Baptism or the Lord's Supper mysteries or sacraments.  Therefore this is an unwritten (agraphos) appellation."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 29.    

"They imagine that by means of these actions, motions, gestures, and ceremonies, with certain words added about sacrifice, oblation, and victim, they are sacrificing and offering the body and blood of Christ, yes, Christ, the Son of God Himself, anew to God the Father through such a theatrical representation (which is either a comedy or a tragedy) of Christ's passion."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 446.                  

"To institute a form of worship beside and without the Word of God, and indeed one to which is ascribed propitiation for sins, appeasement of the wrath of God, is a vain thing; it cannot please God; yes, it is idolatry.  For 'in vain they worship Me with doctrines and commandments of men.'  Likewise: 'Without faith it is impossible that a thing should please God.'  Faith, however, 'comes by hearing, and hearing by the revealed Word of God.'"
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 493.                

"That it lacks true, firm, and solid grounds in Scripture is, however, not the only thing we criticize in the papalist Mass; what we complain about most of all is that it is an abomination, conflicting with the doctrine of the Word, the sacraments, and faith‑‑yes, that it is full of abuse against the unique sacrifice of Christ and against His perpetual priesthood, as this has been demonstrated at length by the men on our side in fair and honest writings."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 493.                

"The papalist Mass, as we have described it in the beginning, militates against the one propitiatory sacrifice of Christ in many ways and is an affront to it.  For there is only one propitiatory sacrifice that expiates and renders satisfaction for sins‑‑the offering of Christ made on the cross (Hebrews 7:27; 9:12, 26; 10:12)."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 494.                  


"The papalist Mass, as we have described it in the beginning, militates against the one propitiatory sacrifice of Christ in many ways and is an affront to it.  For there is only one propitiatory sacrifice that expiates and renders satisfaction for sins‑‑the offering of Christ made on the cross (Hebrews 7:27; 9:12, 26; 10:12)."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 494.                  

"In addition there is this perversion, that whereas Christ instituted the use of His Supper for all who receive it, who take, eat, and drink, the papalist Mass transfers the use and benefit of the celebration of the Lord's Supper in our time to the onlookers, who do not communicate, yes, to those who are absent, and even to the dead."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 498.                  

"In addition there is this perversion, that whereas Christ instituted the use of His Supper for all who receive it, who take, eat, and drink, the papalist Mass transfers the use and benefit of the celebration of the Lord's Supper in our time to the onlookers, who do not communicate, yes, to those who are absent, and even to the dead."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 498.                  

"If anyone says that the canon of the Mass contains errors and should therefore be abrogated, let him be anathema."  [Chapter IV, Canon VI] Chemnitz:  "The power, yes, the substance and as it were the soul of the papalist sacrifice is the canon of the Mass.  Therefore they labor much more for its retention than about the canon of Scripture itself, which they are not afraid to corrupt by mixing in other, noncanonical books."
            Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II,  p. 508.             

Ugly Questions for St. Peter, Freedom, Wisconsin - Home of The CORE, Appleton

 Reggie McNeal, Fuller Seminary.

http://www.stpetercares.com/images/stories/Church_Newsletter_-_3-13.pdf

  • Swing for Success - a golf outing - raised $15,000 last year. Who will be outed this year?
  • The council meeting began with a devotion from Reggie McNeal's Practicing Greatness. Isn't Tim Glende the pastor who raged that I linked Lutheran resources on this blog?
  • The annual budget for St. Peter is more than $1 million, so why did they need an enormous grant from WELS to buy a stinky old bar in downtown Appleton?
  • Please keep our brothers and sisters at the CORE in your prayers as well, as they move forward during a somewhat challenging time in their life as part of the kingdom...Remember Pastor Ski and his family as well in your prayers. Does this mean Ski was suspended? Will this appear in the Call Reports from Mark Schroeder, as it did with Paul Rydecki?




What did he know and when did he know it?

The CORE - WELS - Anticipated the Bar Church

About Bar Church - bar church abilene:


Bar Church - Abilene

Picture

A lot of people seem to be interested in Jesus but are turned off by religion or just the idea of walking into an institutional church.  We get that.  At Bar Church, we're interested in creating a place where any person - regardless of their background, accomplishments, failures or issues - can come experience friendship, acceptance, and the grace that comes through Jesus.

We invite you to join us when you're ready.  We meetbeginning March 24, 2013, at Memories Bar541 China St. in Abilene, TX, every Sunday morning at 11:30 a.m. Come as you are.




'via Blog this'

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The CORE - WELS - Anticipated the Bar Church":

Ichabod -

I suppose that the Bar Church will serve adult beverages during Lenten services. At least, that is what I gather from the one question and its corresponding answer.

German Lessons for Dr. Lito Cruz



Dr. Lito Cruz, blogger at Extra Nos, has expressed an interest in learning German, to appreciate Bach's great music even more.

And I have an answer, which I learned from Dr. Roland Bainton, famous Yale biographer of Martin Luther.

Since Lito already knows Greek, this is especially easy.

Open a Greek New Testament to the Gospel of John and a German Bible to the same place. Read the first verse in German and look at the Greek.

The idea is to translate what is obvious and guess the rest. That is how we learn any language, unless some scowling schoolmaster is forcing us to memorize vocabulary lists and grammar rules.


John 1:1 Im Anfang war das Wort, und das Wort war bei Gott, und Gott war das Wort. 2 Dasselbe war
im Anfang bei Gott. 3 Alle Dinge sind durch dasselbe gemacht, und ohne dasselbe ist nichts gemacht, was
gemacht ist. 4 In ihm war das Leben, und das Leben war das Licht der Menschen.

For those new to German, use the English. But look at how often Gott is used in a few verses. And war, Wort, und Leben. Look I am writing German already.

Read out loud and get the first verse in German firmly in mind. Then the next.

After four chapters of John, start over and work faster. It will be a breeze the second time. Then chapter 5 will be far easier in German than chapter 1 was the first time.

John's vocabulary and grammar are simple. The words repeat often, yet this is the most profound Gospel of the four.

For Bach fans, the Fourth Gospel is ideal for learning theological German.


---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "German Lessons for Dr. Lito Cruz":

That is a great idea Dr. Greg, I will hunt for a German Bible here.
That is so true the Gospel of John uses very simple constructs.


Reading John 1:1, I can pick up the German already :-)

LPC


---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "German Lessons for Dr. Lito Cruz":

I will start with Luther's Bible

http://www.bibledbdata.org/onlinebibles/german_l/index.htm

LPC

***

GJ - It will open a new vista in theology for you, professor.