Thursday, March 7, 2019

Education for WELS World Mission Partners - We Know That ELCA Is a Degenerate Sect from the Posts on ELCA Exposed, So Let's Take a Photo Test: ELCA or WELS?

Photo 1 - Gay Ministry - ELCA or WELS?

 Photo 2 - High school boys dressed as girls, wearing makeup. ELCA or WELS?

Photo 3 - College men vamping as girls, ELCA or WELS?

 Photo 4 - College men plagiarizing a gay video (Fire Island Pines), acknowledging it and denying it. ELCA or WELS?

 Photo 5 - Attending a rock worship festival hosted by a gay advocate. ELCA or WELS?

 Photo 6 - The pastor and council members dress as women and the children put makeup on the men. ELCA or WELS?

Photo 7 - Staff convicted for child porn photos and video swapping, many stored at denominational headquarters. ELCA or WELS?

Photo 8 - Changes from male to female at the denomination's Lutheran college. ELCA or WELS?


 Photo 9 - Convicted as a sex offender while a district official, featured afterwards in the denomination's college magazine. ELCA or WELS?
Photo 10 - Uses beer to draw members. Hates to use "Lutheran" in the church name. Fuller alumnus. ELCA or WELS?
 ***

GJ - Answer - all ten are WELS, not ELCA.

We Love Hilarious False Teachers - They Energize Blogs, Delight Laity by Taking Away Their Fleece and Baring Their Lupine Fangs




Pastor Rolf David Preus (Rolf)
Senior Member
Username: Rolf

Post Number: 10215
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Saturday, March 02, 2019 - 8:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I am not convinced that Becker taught a different doctrine than Walther, Marquart, Robert Preus, the CTCR and Buchholz. The LCMS and the WELS teach the same [gangrenous] dogma. Hale does a fine job of showing where ELDoNA, Jackson, and others [like my Dad in Justification and Rome] err.
Pastor Rolf David Preus
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David Jay Webber (Djw)
Advanced Member
Username: Djw

Post Number: 989
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Saturday, March 02, 2019 - 8:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Rolf, don't you have to admit that Becker, and especially Meyer, did not always express themselves well with respect to certain important aspects of this doctrine? My endorsing of Buchholz's essay includes my endorsing of his criticisms of the poorly-chosen and misleading expressions that were sometimes used by WELS writers in earlier decades.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pastor Rolf David Preus (Rolf)
Senior Member
Username: Rolf

Post Number: 10216
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Saturday, March 02, 2019 - 8:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

They did not always express themselves well. You're right. Meyer's words in his 2 Corinthians commentary were poorly chosen. Becker has been criticized for what he wrote when he tried to put the best construction on the Kokomo theses. Maybe he shouldn't have tried, but as I read what Becker wrote, I don't find him teaching anything wrong. He did point out where the Kokomo statements were off.
Pastor Rolf David Preus
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Schmidt (Sschmidt)
Intermediate Member
Username: Sschmidt

Post Number: 489
Registered: 3-2017
Posted on Thursday, March 07, 2019 - 12:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/JustificationObje ctiveSubjectiveMarquart.pdf

Reviewing the bibliography takes one to this 1872 Synodical Conference essay on Justification by Walther, in my estimation the best thing he ever wrote. Hopefully, CPH's Walther's Works series will include a volume entitled "Justification," with this piece, which answers every question about Lutheranism anyone might ever have.

A Tour de Farce in "Conservative" Lutherdom.
Tactics Used by the Objective Justification Calvinists.
Hale Book Review Proves My Case

 The official teaching of the Holy Spirit is found throughout the Bible, and is stated with great clarity in Romans 3 - 5.
 Ask the OJists to say these words above without spitting up. They cannot. John Sparky Brenner says - "individual appropriation of sin." He likes to write about the "Justification of the World" - without faith.

 Read this slowly and carefully, because this Chief Article includes Luther, Melanchthon, and Chemnitz.


I have experienced and heard about many tactics used by the Objective Justification Stormtroopers for decades. I will review them below. Note that they never say, "You believe in Justification by Faith, and we reject it." Those words are never spoken. Reasons are given below.

"You have abandoned the teaching of our synod, the lessons taught by your professors."
This has been used in the WELS, the tiny Orthodox Lutheran Conference, and the LCMS. We should ask why they are teaching error, especially because WELS and Missouri taught Justification by Faith in their catechisms, until the OJists took over.

Matt the Fatt Harrison cannot avoid sounding like a pope when he writes about "the official teachings of the Lutheran Church" (i.e. the Missouri Synod). At the last LCMS conclave, they voted to expel any pastor who discussed doctrine outside of his official role. That revealed the efforts of the crypto-Jesuit McCain, who has never served as a pastor and has proven to be incompetent in his high-priced jobs.

 The Dogma-tanic and the new, enormous Small Catechism make OJ/SJ the official Calvinistic teaching of the LCMS. Pathetic - even more disgraceful than the CPH Here I Stand socks.


"You Reject Objective Justification!"
They do not say - "You teach the Chief Article of the Christian Faith, which we hate."

The OJists cannot say the words - Justification by Faith. They pretend to by saying, "Oh that's Subjective Justification." But by tossing in their terms, they are saying - agreeing with OJ. That is what SJ always means, which is contrary to faith in Christ. SJ is factually and precisely "agreeing with the concept of OJ - world absolution (Universalism)."

They are lying when they pretend OJ is the Atonement and SJ is Justification by Faith. Opposing the Chief Article is their passion, and they are happy to accomplish that by replacement - replacing Justification by Faith with SJ and dividing everything in the Bible into OJ and SJ, two sides of the same rotten, slimy apple.

Mark Zarling and Frosty Bivens (both WELS) are so lacking in honesty that they call their precious OJ "the Chief Article" and apply the descriptions of Justification by Faith to OJ - the Master,  the Prince, the Judge of all Articles, the Article on Which the Church Stands or Falls.  Galling yes - but the deception is unnoticed by the timid shepherds of the Wisconsin Sect.

 SJ is definitely not Justification by Faith.
---

And now a brief pause for a review - a book about Objective Justification. Observe the language -

"I attended Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne from 1979–1983, when the waters were being roiled by those denying the teaching of objective justification. Papers were written, pamphlets published, and even professors were accused and defended. It was all very painful. It’s still unpleasant, but it’s a necessary pain to bear as the very Gospel itself is at stake in the doctrine of objective justification. Rev. Hale’s book addresses this subject in a way and to a depth no other book I have read on the subject does. He answers the deniers, as well as asking and answering questions that reveal the many faceted aspects of this jewel of a doctrine..."

Reviewing the Hale book on OJ.

---

"You Are a Calvinist"
Nothing betrays their ignorance more that this accusation, which is slanderous and stupid. What do OJists and Calvinists have in common - bypassing the Means of Grace, the Word and Sacraments.

How does forgiveness come to OJists and Calvinists? Answer - it just does, without any Biblical support for their claim. Edward Preuss, backed by Robert Preus, Paul the Plagiarist McCain and Jack B. Simple Cascione, stated - We are born forgiven! (Does that explain the lying, the intrigue, the backstabbing of OJists, especially among their own kind? Yes!)

 Pre-orders have started. Send an email with your address and phone number to greg.jackson.edlp@gmail.com
The ELS likes SJ - "must accept by faith the general absolution pronounced" (where exactly?)

"You Are Making Faith a Work!"
Nothing has harmed the LCMS more than Walther's sick aversion to Biblical faith.

Faith is never a work in the Bible - because God creates faith through the Gospel Promises, beginning with Abraham in Genesis 15:6 (never quoted by the useful idiots of OJdom).
These weavers of dark webs contrast grace and faith, showing they have never read Romans 4 with comprehension.
Romans 4:16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,
 Cascione, McCain, and Jay Webber loved this baloney because it is cited by Robert Preus, but they refused - like Rolf - to acknowledge Bob's change of heart in Justification and Rome. 

Making WAM II a Pariah
The hatred for Justification by Faith - when it was an opportune moment, at least - led the Righteous Brothers, Jack and Bob Preus, to make Walter A. Maier II a pariah in the LCMS.

My only criticism of WAM II's essays (one a summary of the longer one) is this - He was too defensive, too eager to keep writing grace, grace, grace when the error was on the Preus-Walther side.


The Preus Crime Family owes WAM II a profound apology, and Herman Otten even more so. Otten participated in the beat-down and yet published his own book on Dr. Walter A. Maier. If you read that book, as I have, you will see that that the only mention of Justification inside is brief. More in that chapter is about Billy Graham. But on the back of that book, which I own (signed copy, Herman Otten to someone) is posted just below. Does anyone have a conscience in the LCMS?

This is scanned from the Maier book published by Otten, who used the same cover photo as one on the book by Paul Maier.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Ash Wednesday, 2019. Matthew 6 - Treasure Not the Treasures on Earth



Ash Wednesday, 2019, 7 PM Central

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson



The Hymn #552           Abide with Me 
            
The Order of Vespers                                                p. 41
The Psalmody               Psalm 1                              p. 123
The Lections                 Joel 2:12-19
Matthew 6:16-2


The Sermon –   Raised Up by Faith
The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                       p. 45

The Hymn #654        Now the Day Is Over           


KJV Joel 2:12 Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: 13 And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil. 14 Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God? 15 Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly: 16 Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet. 17 Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God? 18 Then will the LORD be jealous for his land, and pity his people. 19 Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and ye shall be satisfied therewith: and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:



KJV Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. 19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.


The Treasures of the Gospel – Formula of Concord, SD,
Article XI – Election


The Treasures of the Gospel – Formula of Concord, SD,
Article XI – Election

Matthew 6:19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

This is an important text for the Book of Concord, because treasure is used often for the Gospel. The Concordists and Luther did not think of treasure as a way to slide into a stewardship talk. That error is more like treasuring the treasure. Jesus used treasure in the sense of the value of the Gospel in Matthew 13 – the treasure hidden in the field and the pearl of great price. If I found a box of gold in my backyard, wouldn’t I sell my classic Town Car and anything else to buy the land?

That is so clearly the Gospel – nothing is more valuable to us. If someone weighs matters in the balance, what is more important – eternal life or those things which are

94] So much concerning the controverted articles which have been discussed for many years already among the theologians of the Augsburg Confession, in which some have erred and severe controversiae (controversies), that is, religious disputes, have arisen.

Because the truth of God’s Word matters so much, there have been many efforts to subvert it and change it into man’s opinion of what it should be. This mattered so much to the sincere Biblical scholars and princes that they had many conferences and discussions about how to remove the errors that had crept into the Lutheran Church. At that time they were called Protestants – for their positive witness to the truth – and Evangelicals for their faithfulness to the Gospel.

95] From this our explanation, friends and enemies, and therefore every one, may clearly infer that we have no intention of yielding aught of the eternal, immutable truth of God for the sake of temporal peace, tranquillity, and unity (which, moreover, is not in our power to do).

This is a great statement for us to remember. From faith in the Gospel Word comes witness to it. That is the pattern of the Gospel and Epistles in the New Testament. Therefore, when people disbelieve or reject what is clearly taught, they compromise and change the Word of God. Many will plead for compromise for the sake of outward peace, and they insist on this peace and unity, which cannot come about because of agreement on falsehoods. This is clearly understood in the Sacraments and the invisible Word itself. If someone is unsure that Baptism and Communion can do so much – which are clearly taught as giving forgiveness of sin first of all – is that not also a denial of the Word? If one is not true, does that not lead to the others also being false? And why? Because some doubt? If my human reason decides on the truth of the Scripture, there is no difference between the Bible and religious books of the world.

Nor would such peace and unity, since it is devised against the truth and for its suppression, have any permanency. Still less are we inclined to adorn and conceal a corruption of the pure doctrine and manifest, condemned errors.

A false peace and a false unity cannot endure, since some formula must be devised to suppress those differences. Here is a clear example. In the last century, religious leaders reached an agreement that the Bible is inerrant but not necessarily in regards to history or geography. So they made infallible the word they would use because inerrant said too much for their delicate nerves to bear. Conflict might break out. The old ALC went along with this for that original merger in 1930. To do that, they had to silence Professor Lenski, who is still regarded as a great New Testament scholar. They replaced him at their seminary – with a liberal. Now that seminary is barely alive (even with mergers and partnerships) and no one even says “infallible.” The 1960 ALC merger was more of the same, affirming and denying the same truth, an uncertain foundation for a false, temporary, and conflict-causing “unity.” The weaker word (for them) infallible was kicked under the bus for the 1987 merger. An equivalent of the entire ALC has quit since then 2 million people.

96] But we entertain heartfelt pleasure and love for, and are on our part sincerely inclined and anxious to advance, that unity according to our utmost power, by which His glory remains to God uninjured, nothing of the divine truth of the Holy Gospel is surrendered, no room is given to the least error, poor sinners are brought to true, genuine repentance, raised up by faith, confirmed in new obedience, and thus justified and eternally saved alone through the sole merit of Christ.

This is the reason for the struggle for healthy (sound) doctrine. God should be glorified, not questioned about whether He is capable. The divine truth of the Gospel should never be surrendered so that people imagine they are saved without faith or that contrite sinners think their faith in Christ needs to be supplemented by works, by more income or standing. Notice the order here:
1.    Sinners are brought to true, genuine repentance.
2.    Raised up in faith.
3.    Confirmed in the new obedience.
4.    Thus justified and saved through the merit of Christ alone.
So this is the true treasure. And here is a little Greek insight from the Matthew passage in Greek. Jesus literally said, “Do not treasure the treasures…” the verb used as a noun, very much like Hebrew expressions. So do not treasure the treasures that disappear, where vermin and decay destroy and thieves break in and thieve (noun/verb again). But treasure the treasures in heaven, where none of these bad things happen. Where your treasure is, there will your heart also be.