Saturday, March 2, 2013

Vatican will have two Popes - Telegraph



Vatican will have two Popes - Telegraph:


The honorific title added further confusion to Benedict’s exact status after his historic resignation, muddying the lines between his papacy and that of his successor.
The Vatican had earlier indicated that his most likely title would be Bishop Emeritus of Rome, so as not to give the impression that the Catholic Church has two Popes – a scenario that has led to damaging schisms in past centuries.
The 85-year-old German pontiff will continue to be addressed as “His Holiness” after he abdicates and goes into retirement.
His official papal ring, which shows St Peter fishing, will be destroyed with a hammer according to Vatican tradition.
The task of smashing it is entrusted to the ‘camerlengo’ or chamberlain, in this case Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican Secretary of State.
The custom dates back to the Middle Ages, when it was feared that if the ring fell into the wrong hands, documents could be falsely approved in the Pope’s name.
Benedict will give up wearing the soft red leather shoes he has become fond of and will instead opt for brown loafers given to him by shoemakers during a trip to Mexico last year.
Benedict announced earlier this month that he had decided to resign because of dwindling physical and mental strength, becoming the first pontiff since 1294 to willingly give up the papacy.
The resignation has thrown up difficult questions of etiquette and procedure for the Vatican, with officials initially flummoxed as to what he would be called, what he would wear and where he might live.
After long discussion with Benedict, they have decided that his title after retirement will be either “Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI" or "Roman Pontiff emeritus Benedict XVI".
People will be required to address him as "Your Holiness," and refer to him as "His Holiness".
Benedict’s replacement will be elected in a conclave of 115 cardinals, to be held in the Sistine Chapel.
The date on which the conclave starts will be determined by the College of Cardinals when they meet in the days after the papacy becomes vacant at 8pm local time on Thursday.
The cardinals are expected to meet on March 4 and to set the date for the conclave then.
On Monday Benedict issued a special decree, known in Latin as a motu proprio, which gave the cardinals permission to bring forward the conclave, rather than wait for 15 days, as Vatican law stipulates.
The Pope spent Tuesday sorting through his papers – he will take personal correspondence with him into retirement, while official documents will be sent to the Vatican Secret Archives and other repositories of the Holy See.
He will hold his final general audience in St Peter’s Square on Wednesday, with crowds of more than 200,000 expected.
On Thursday he will be flown from the Vatican to Castel Gandolfo, the papal summer residence, where he will stay for two months before moving into a former nunnery inside the Vatican walls.




'via Blog this'

Discussing the Bar Episode Would Violate the Eighth Commandment -
Said Joel Lillo in Discussing the Bar Episode



In the Synodical Conference and ELCA, discussing an issue is a violation of the Eighth Commandment.  No other Commandments need apply.

But according to one Lutheran author, there are three reasons for removing a pastor from his position:

  1. False doctrine.
  2. Refusal to do his work.
  3. Moral turpitude.

But if all three apply to a Church and Changer, nothing at all is done. If you object, you have violated the Eighth Commandment.

---


Joel Lillo has left a new comment on your post "Pastor Joel Lillo Did NOT Answer My Question, But ...": 

Greg,

My question to you is this: "Why would you expect me to provide you with ammunition so that you can break the Eighth Commandment?" You should be thanking me that I'm not being an enabler for your sin.

Antinomian, indeed! Pshaw!!!!

Opus Dei Did This Long Ago.
Vatican admits secretly bugging its own clergy - Telegraph

Vatican admits secretly bugging its own clergy - Telegraph:


Vatican admits secretly bugging its own clergy

The Vatican admitted on Thursday that it had secretly bugged clergy within the Holy See as part of the investigation into the Vatileaks scandal, which resulted in the Pope's butler being imprisoned for stealing confidential pontifical documents.

Sir David now has the public support not only of Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, but also the leaders of the NHS
Paolo Gabriele's scandal rocked the Catholic Church and reportedly contributed to Benedict's decision to resign Photo: AFP
Like much of the rest of his papacy, Benedict's last day in office was overshadowed by claims of secrecy and intrigue.
An Italian news magazine, Panorama, claimed that Vatican authorities had conducted, and are still conducting, an extensive covert surveillance programme, tapping the phone calls and intercepting the emails of cardinals and bishops in the Curia, the governing body of the Catholic Church.
The surveillance operation was to weed out Vatican insiders who may have helped Paolo Gabriele, the butler, steal and leak to the press compromising papal documents, in a scandal that rocked the Catholic Church and reportedly contributed to Benedict's decision to resign.
The Vatican confirmed that secret surveillance had indeed taken place, but on a far smaller scale than that portrayed by Panorama.
In response to a question by The Daily Telegraph at a press briefing, Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, said surveillance had taken place but "not of the dimensions described".
"In the context of Vatileaks, some intercepts and checks were authorised by the Vatican magistracy," he said.
It was investigators from the Vatican magistracy who led the prosecution against Mr Gabriele in a lightning-fast trial which resulted in his conviction for aggravated theft.
He was sentenced to 18 months behind bars but spent only a few weeks in a Vatican "secure room" before receiving a pardon from Benedict just before Christmas.
Father Lombardi said the secret surveillance operation involved the wiretapping of "two or three" telephone lines, but did not specify who they belonged to.
The Vatileaks scandal exploded last year when it emerged that the Pope's personal valet had been stealing documents from the papal apartments and leaking them to journalists in what he said was an attempt to expose "evil and corruption" within the Church.
Benedict personally appointed three elderly cardinals, including a prominent member of Opus Dei, to investigate the leaks, amid suspicions that the butler had not acted alone.
Many of the documents damaged the standing of Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who as Secretary of State is equivalent to the Vatican's prime minister and is second in authority only to the Pope.
Federico Lombardi said surveillance had taken place but 'not of the dimensions described' (Getty)
Panorama claimed it was he who authorised the secret bugging operation but that was denied by Father Lombardi.
The surveillance operation was carried out by the Vatican Gendarmerie, the papal police force, which is headed by Domenico Giani, a former officer in the Italian intelligence services.
"For more than a year, emails, telephone conversations, meetings and discussions were meticulously placed under observation by the Gendarmerie," said Panorama's Vatican expert, Ignazio Ingrao, in what amounted to "a sort of Vatican Big Brother" operation.
"Everyone was spied on in the Vatican. In the shadow of the cupola of St Peter's Basilica, the biggest and most detailed wiretapping operation ever conducted in the sacred palaces was conducted," the magazine said.
"Even the email accounts of bishops and cardinals were sifted through and their phone lines placed under scrutiny." The three cardinals delivered the results of their investigation to the Pope in December, but the hunt for moles within the Holy See was still going on, Panorama claimed.
Father Lombardi has previously said that the investigation is still formally open.


'via Blog this'

Sounds Just Like the LCMS, WELS, and ELS.
VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - The Episcopal Church's Civil War on its Orthodox Members

Our first Cattle Dog, Sacky, looked just like this,
but she never wore a sissy rainhat.


VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - The Episcopal Church's Civil War on its Orthodox Members:

The Episcopal Church's Civil War on its Orthodox Members

COMMENTARY

By David W. Virtue 
www.virtueonline.org 
February 6, 2013

To even the most impartial Episcopal observer and/or those suffering from peripheral blindness, the Episcopal Church's war on its orthodox members has reached new depths, unimaginable a few short years ago.

Politeness, civility, talk of via media or "why can't we all just get along" have vanished out the stain-glassed window; there is now no more pretense. Episcopal Church leaders like Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori have lined up their ecclesiastical bazookas and aimed them squarely at bishops like Jack Iker, Keith Ackerman, Bob Duncan and, more recently, Mark Lawrence with killer intent. There is now no mercy, no more attempt even to take prisoners, or be nice (a phony Episcopal doctrine now ended), or an offer of an ecclesiastical handshake to "go in peace to love and serve the Lord." 

A VOL reporter who came up against the revisionist mentality of the Episcopal Church while researching a book on The Episcopal Church, was told to "f**k off" by David Booth Beers, Jefferts Schori's personal attorney when she inquired into TEC's legal spending. Her eyes were opened never to close again.

It is now open warfare in The Episcopal Church with some of the harshest language ever uttered from the lips of an ecclesiastical leader. Not even the venal and hateful John Shelby Spong, former Bishop of Newark, who tried his best to reinvent Christianity in his own mind, degenerated to the depths of the recent rip by PB Jefferts Schori. As history now shows, it is Duncan's star that is in the ascendency while Spong's has faded. In time, his will die out completely.

Witness what PB Jefferts Schori said when she came to Charleston recently to inaugurate a new remnant Episcopal diocese. In her speech, she accused Bishop Lawrence (but did not mention him by name) of being a petty dictator and a wolf masquerading among the sheep.

"I tell you that story because it's indicative of attitudes we've seen here and in many other places. Somebody decides he knows the law, and oversteps whatever authority he may have to dictate the fate of others who may in fact be obeying the law, and often a law for which this local tyrant is not the judge. It's not too far from that kind of attitude to citizens' militias deciding to patrol their towns or the Mexican border for unwelcome visitors. It's not terribly far from the state of mind evidenced in school shootings, or in those who want to arm school children, or the terrorism that takes oil workers hostage."

Think about that. She is saying that the godly Bishop of South Carolina Mark Lawrence is a "local tyrant" and his state of mind is like the "school shooter", Adam Lanza who walked into an elementary school and slaughtered some 23 children in Connecticut.

REALLY!

Canon Phil Ashey of the American Anglican Council called on the Presiding Bishop to apologize to the leadership of the official Diocese of South Carolina and retract her remarks. 

She has not, of course, and apparently will not. Ashey cited Jesus' statement that it is out of the overflow of the heart of men (and women) that we truly speak (Mt. 12:34). He concluded his remarks by saying that her tremendous anger towards orthodox Episcopalians allows no room for them to practice their faith in the Episcopal Church. He is absolutely right.

Ironically the first half of that verse is even more damning. Jesus said, "You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart..."

Quite simply the words we speak and what we do are controlled by our thoughts and the passions of our flesh. These are the fruits of our minds. Thus, a person who does evil bears evil fruits; a person who does good bears good fruit in words, deeds and behavior. The point Jesus was making is that it is not possible for an evil person to bear good fruit and vice versa.

Jesus himself would call Mrs. Jefferts Schori the evil one and not Mark Lawrence. And what is the fruit of her labors? Is it a Church thriving and growing? Is it a Church at peace with the vast majority of the Global South who uphold the faith and order of the Church? Is it a Church proclaiming the gospel of God's salvation to all who will hear and repent?

Indeed not. In fact what is happening is the reverse. The Episcopal Church now has fewer than 700,000 practicing Episcopalians on any given Sunday, a figure that is steadily dropping. Its message is to save the world for God by doing good works (Millennium Development Goals and the Five Marks of Mission), but nothing remotely salvific. The vast majority of its parishioners are nearly 65; its parishes have fewer than 65 members. Its coffers are fast drying up causing apoplexy to House of Deputies President Gay Jennings who is trying desperately to rescue the institution by restructuring the church in the hopes that it can grow again. Its seminaries are contracting. Worst of all, liberal and progressive bishops are now saying they don't want any new ordinands unless they are financially self-sufficient because there aren't big enough parishes with budgets to support for them. "We need more laity," Washington Bishop Budde was heard to say recently.

In the "reap what you sow" department, we see the venality of certain bishops who are actually set on destroying their diocese in the hope that out of the ashes some new church will emerge. It won't, of course; those who say so only deceive themselves. Former Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold gave an "appreciation and thanksgiving sermon" dropping the usual "sacred space", "sacred place" and "giving thanks for the sacred presence" when he eulogized at a memorial service for the cathedral in Delaware that will now join many others that have closed in The Episcopal Church from Kalamazoo in Western Michigan to Providence, Rhode Island and surely, in time, the Washington National Cathedral. Most Episcopal cathedrals are on life support. Over the next 20 years, they will quietly close and be sold off to developers.

Stupider bishops like Western Michigan's Robert Gepert seem to actually delight in sabotaging their best operating parishes, alienating orthodox parishioners and forcing them out to form more perfect unions in other jurisdictions.

It is as though the leadership of The Episcopal Church is holed up in a bunker. When orthodox global south primates and the ACNA surround them, they send out a message blaming ordinary Episcopalians for not doing enough to save the denomination. Then, sensing failure, they drink the Kool Aid.

Not even in their worst public moments did liberal presiding bishops like Ed Browning or Frank Griswold say the things that Jefferts Schori has said of orthodox Episcopalians. Browning and Griswold hated "narrow-minded" "uninclusive" orthodox Episcopalians, but they had the good sense to keep it to themselves, or say it in private. Their public face, however hypocritical, looked with contempt or benign serenity on lowly orthodox believers, but they never uttered words the like of which Mrs. Jefferts Schori has done.

This past summer the noose tightened to the point of strangulation when a revised canon was passed at General Convention placing clergy at a far greater risk of facing ecclesiastical discipline than ever before under revisions made to Title IV Canons of The Episcopal Church.

Michael Rehill, former chancellor of The Diocese of Newark, NJ, says that as a result of recent revisions to Title IV (Canons IV.3 or IV.4.), many more Members of the Clergy are now facing ecclesiastical discipline. "Not a week passes without our receiving at least one call from a Priest who is suddenly facing Title IV issues or a Title IV proceeding. We frequently hear Priests saying, 'I never thought it could happen to me.' But it can happen to any Member of the Clergy, regardless of age, gender, experience or Diocese. You need to be prepared before it happens to you."

Is it any wonder that Rome created the Ordinariate for disaffected Anglo-Catholics and the Global South has put its imprimatur on the Anglican Church in North America for Evangelicals and evangelical catholics?

An ecclesiastical and legal noose has been tied around the necks of orthodox Episcopalians. A new cry might well go up, "Will no one rid us of this meddlesome Presiding Bishop?" It is time. Who will take up the gauntlet?

END

'via Blog this'

LCMS Consumer Fraud! - Isn't That Policy?
Ask All the Seminary Students with Huge Debts and No Calls - Or a Quick Ejection from the First Call



11 Concordia students sue over accreditation

February 28, 2013|By Ellen Jean Hirst | Tribune reporter

(Tribune illustration)
Eleven students who will graduate in May 2013 from Concordia University Chicago’s school counseling master’s program filed a lawsuit against the university in Cook County Circuit Court on Wednesday for what they say is consumer fraud.
The individuals claim that the university had promised them upon admission that they would graduate from a school accredited by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs – an important distinction, they said.
But in an e-mail correspondence between the students and the private Lutheran liberal arts university located in River Forest, the lawsuit states that the university told the students it had decided to no longer be accredited by the organization.
The students are asking that the university be required to reimburse their tuition costs as well as damages for the devalued degree.
In the lawsuit, the students claim that while their master’s degree incurred an above-average cost – they said they spent more than $20,000 each –the “coveted prize” of the valuable accreditation the university boasted would have made the price worth it.
Through recruiters, online and packet information, the students said they had been assured that they would graduate from an accredited university, an important step for someone hoping to become a licensed professional counselor, they said.
The accrediting organization states on its website: “Not (attending an accredited institution) can have significant and unfortunate implications for your future ability to obtain licensure as a professional counselor or your ability to continue on for further graduate-level education.”
Calls and emails to the university were not returned Wednesday night.

"My degree is worthless?
After those promises?
Just like a pastor's?"

Luther's Sermon for Oculi - The Third Sunday in Lent. Luke 11:14-23




OCULI. THIRD SUNDAY IN LENT

German text: Erlangen edition 11:127; Walch 11:752; St. Louis 11:550.

TEXT:

Luke 11:14-23. And he was casting out a demon that was dumb. And it came to pass, when the demon was gone out, the dumb man spake; and the multitudes marveled. But some of them said, By Beelzebub the prince of the demons casteth he out demons. And others trying him, sought of him a sign from heaven.

But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house divided against a house falleth. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand? because ye say that I cast out demons by Beelzebub. And if I by Beelzebub cast out demons, by whom do your sons cast them out? therefore shall they be your judges. But if I by the finger of God cast out demons, then is the kingdom of God come upon you. When the strong man fully armed guardeth his own court, his goods are in peace: but when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him his whole armor wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.

CONTENTS:

CHRIST’S DEFENSE AGAINST THOSE WHO SLANDERED HIM.
* The different doctrines presented in this Gospel 1-2.

I. CHRIST’ S DEFENSE AGAINST HIS SLANDERERS.

1. Christ defends himself with fair and reasonable arguments 8-5.

2. He defends himself with a public example and a like work 6-9.

3. He defends himself with a parable taken from experience 10.

4. He defends himself with beautiful sayings and teachings 11.

5. He defends himself with a threat

* How and why we are not to trust in the works and worthiness of saints, but in God’s Word 18.

II. THE SPIRITUAL MEANING OF THIS GOSPEL.

1. Of the deaf, dumb and possessed man 14.

2. That the Jews called the devil Beelzebub

3. Of the strong man, who guards his house in peace

4. Of the stronger man who overcomes the strong man 17-18. 5 . That the unclean spirit wanders through desert places 19.

6. That Satan returns, and takes with him seven more wicked spirits 20.

I. CHRIST’S DEFENSE AGAINST HIS BLASPHEMERS.

1. This is a beautiful Gospel from which we learn many different things, and in which nearly everything is set forth as to what Christ, his kingdom and his Gospel are: what they accomplish and how they fare in the world.

In the first place, like all the Gospels this one teaches us faith and love; for it presents Christ to us as a most loving Savior and Helper in every need and tells us that he who believes this is saved. For we see here that Christ had nothing to do with people who were healthy, but with a poor man who was greatly afflicted with many ills. He was blind, as Matthew says; also dumb and possessed with a demon, as Luke tells us here. Now all mutes are also deaf, so that in the Greek language deaf and dumb are one word.

By this act Christ draws us to himself, leads us to look to him for every blessing, and to go to him in every time of need. He does this that we also, according to the nature of love, should do unto others as he does unto us.

This is the universal and the most precious doctrine of this Gospel and of all the Gospels throughout the church year. This poor man, however, did not come to Christ without the Word; for those who brought him to Christ must have heard his love preached and were moved thereby to trust in him.

We learn therefore that faith comes through the Word; but more of this elsewhere.

2. Secondly, it is here demonstrated how Christ and his Gospel fare in the world, namely, that there are three kinds of hearers. Some marvel at him; these are pious and true Christians, who consider this deed so great that they are amazed at it. Some blaspheme the Gospel; these are the Pharisees and scribes, who were vexed because they could not do the like, and were worried lest the people should hold Christ in higher esteem than themselves. Some tempt him, like Herod desired a sign after his own heart, that they may make sport of it. But he answers both parties; at first, the blasphemers in this Gospel, and later on the tempters, saying that no sign shall be given this wicked generation except the sign of the prophet Jonah, of which we read in the verses following. He answers the blasphemers in a friendly way and argues five points with them.

3. In the first place, with honest and reasonable arguments he concludes from two comparisons that one devil cannot cast out another; for if that were so, the devils would be divided among themselves and Satan’s kingdom would indeed not stand. For nature teaches that if a kingdom is divided against itself and its citizens drive out each other, it is not necessary to go to war against it, for it will come to ruin soon enough of itself. Likewise a house divided against itself needs no other destruction.

Even the heathen author Sallust, teaching only from the light of nature and experience, says: “Great wealth passes away through discord, but through concord small means become large.” If now the devils were divided among themselves to such a degree that one should drive out the other, Satan’s dominion would be at an end, and we would have rest from his attacks.

4. What then were these blasphemers able to say to such clear arguments?

They were put to silence, but their hearts were hardened, so that they did not heed his words. A hardened heart will not be instructed, no matter how plainly and clearly the truth is presented; but the faith of the righteous is strengthened when they see that the ground of their faith is right and good.

And for the sake of such we must answer those whose hearts are hardened, and put them to silence. Even though they will not be converted nor keep silence still it serves to reveal their hardened hearts, for the longer they talk the more foolish they become, and they are caught in their folly, and their cause is robbed of the appearance of being right and good, as Solomon also says in Proverbs 26:5: “Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.” That is, answer him according to his folly that his folly may be put to shame for the sake of others, that they may not follow him and be deceived, thinking that he is right. Otherwise, where no such condition exists, it is better to keep silent, as Solomon also says in the same chapter, verse 4 “Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.”

5. Nor could they say here that the devils only pretended to be divided among themselves and to yield to one another in order to deceive the people, for it is publicly seen how they resist and contend, cry and rave, tear and rage, when they see that Christ means to expel them. It is then clearly seen that they are opposed to Christ and his Spirit, and they are not united with him, to whom they must yield so unwillingly. Therefore it is only a flagrant blasphemous lie, in which they are caught and put to shame, by which they try in venomous hate to give the devil credit for a work of God. From this we learn not to be surprised when our doctrine and life are blasphemed and stubborn hearts will not be convinced nor converted, although they are overwhelmed, as it were, with tangible truth and completely put to silence. It is enough that through our arguments their obstinate folly is revealed, acknowledged and made harmless to pious people, so that the latter may not be misled by its fine pretension. They may then go whither they will, they have condemned themselves as St. Paul says, Titus 3:11.

6. In the second place, he replies with a public example and a similar work, when he says: “By whom do your sons cast them out?” As if he would say: “Is this not simple idiocy? Just what you praise in your sons, you condemn in me. Because your sons do it, it is of God; but because I do it, it must be of the devil.” So it is in this world. What Christ does, is of the devil; if some one else did it, it would be all right. Thus the tyrants and enemies of the Gospel do now, when they condemn in us what they themselves do, confess and teach; but they must proceed thus in order that their judgment may be publicly approved, when they are condemned by all justice. The sons, of whom Christ here says that they drive out devils, were, I think, certain exorcists among the people, for God, from the beginning, had given this people manifold spiritual gifts and he calls them their “sons,” as though to say: I am the Son of God and must be called a child of the devil, while those who are your sons, begotten by you, do the same things and are not to be considered children of the devil.

7. “Therefore shall they be your judges,” that is, I appeal to them. They will be forced to decide that you wrongfully blaspheme me, and thus condemn yourselves. For if one devil does not drive out another then some other power must do it that is neither satanic nor human, but divine. Hence the words: “But if I by the finger of God cast out demons, then is the kingdom of God come upon you.” This finger of God is called in Matthew 12:28 the Holy Ghost, for the words read thus: “But if I by the Spirit of God cast out demons,” etc. In short, Christ means to say: If the kingdom of God is to come unto you, the devil must be driven out, for his kingdom is against God’s kingdom, as you yourselves must confess.

But demon is not driven out by demon, much less by men or the power of men, but alone by the Spirit and power of God.

8. From this follows that where the finger of God does not cast out the devil, there the devil’s kingdom still exists; where Satan’s kingdom still exists, there the kingdom of God cannot be. The unavoidable conclusion then is that, as long as the Holy Spirit does not enter our hearts, we are not only incapable of any good, but are of necessity in the kingdom of Satan.

And if we are in his kingdom, then we can do nothing but that which pleases him, else it could not be called his kingdom. As St. Paul says to Timothy: “The people are taken captive in the snares of the devil unto his will” 2 Timothy 2:26. How could Satan suffer one of his people to take a notion to do something against, and not for, his kingdom? Oh, it is a striking, terrible and powerful statement that Christ here admits such a dominion, which we cannot escape except by the power of God; and that the kingdom of God can not come to us until that kingdom is driven out by divine, heavenly power.

9. This truth is proved in the case of this poor man, who was bodily possessed of the devil. Tell me, what could he and all mankind do to free him from the devil? Without a doubt, nothing. He had to do and suffer just as his master the devil willed, until Christ came, with the power of God.

Now then, if he could not free himself from the devil as to his body, how could he, by his own power, deliver his soul from Satan’s spiritual dominion? Especially is this the case since the soul, because possessed of sin, is the cause of all bodily possession as a punishment, and sins are more difficult to remove than the punishment of them, and the soul is always more firmly possessed than the body. This is proved by the fact that the devil permits the body to have its natural powers and functions; but he robs the soul of reason, judgment, sense, understanding, and all its powers, as you readily see in the case of this possessed man.

10. He answers them in the third place, by a comparison taken from life, namely that of a strong man overcome by one stronger, and robbed of all his armor and goods etc. By this he testifies also that no one but God can overcome the devil, so that again no man can boast of being able of himself to drive out either sin or the devil. Notice how he pictures the devil! He calls him a mighty giant who guards his court and home, that is, the devil not only possesses the world as his own domain, but he has garrisoned and fortified it, so that no one can take it from him. He rules it also with undisputed sway, so that it does whatever he commands. Just as little as a house or court may withstand or contend against the tyrant who is its master, can man’s free will and natural powers oppose sin and Satan, that is, not at all; but they are subject to them. And as that house must be conquered by a stronger man and thus wrested from the tyrant, so must man also be ransomed through Christ and wrested from Satan. We see again, therefore, that our works and righteousness contribute absolutely nothing toward our salvation; it is effected alone by the grace of God.

11. He answers them fourthly, with pointed proverbs and teachings, as: “He that is not with me is against me,” and, “He that gathereth not with me, scattereth.” “The devil is not with me for I drive him out, hence he must of necessity be against me.” But this saying does not apply to the devil alone, but also to the blasphemers whom he here convicts and condemns, as being against him since they are not for him. “To be with Christ” is to have the same mind and purpose as Christ, that is, to believe in Christ that his works save us and not our own, for this is what Christ holds and teaches. But “to gather with Christ” is to do good out of love to him, and to become rich in good works. He that does not believe is, by his own free will, not with Christ but against him, because he depends upon his own works. Therefore, he that does not love, does not gather with Christ, but by fruitless works becomes only more sinful and drifts farther and farther from the faith.

12. In the fifth place, he answers with a threat, namely, that the last state always is worse than the first. Therefore we should take heed that we not only refrain from blaspheming the Gospel and Christ, who does such great things for us and drives the devil out of us; but with zeal and fear hold fast to them, in order that we may not become possessed of seven worse devils whereas one possessed us before. For thus it was with the Jews, who had never been so wicked as while the Gospel was being preached to them. So also under the papacy, we have become seven times, (that is, many times) worse heathen under the name of Christ than we ever had been before as St. Peter says: “The last state is become worse with them than the first.” 2 Peter 2:20. And if we neglect the great light which we now have, it will come to pass in our case also, that we shall become worse than we were before, for the devil does not slumber. This should be sufficient warning.

13. Finally, when the woman cries out to Christ and praises him, saying, “Blessed is the mother that bore such a son,” etc., he opposes her carnal worship and takes occasion to teach all of us the substance of this Gospel, namely, that we should not go gaping after the works or merits of the saints but rather see to it that we hear and keep the Word of God. For it does not concern or profit us in the least to know how holy and honorable the mother of this child might be, nor how noble this Son of hers may be; but rather what this Son has done for us, namely that, by grace, without any merit or worthiness on our part, he has redeemed us from the devil.

This fact is proclaimed to us through the Word of God, and this we are to hear and hold in firm faith; then shall we too be blessed like this mother and her child.

Although such a Word and work will be blasphemed, we should suffer it and give an answer with meekness, as St. Peter teaches, for the improvement of others.

II. THE ALLEGORICAL OR SPIRITUAL MEANING OF THIS GOSPEL.

14. This dumb, deaf, blind, and demon-possessed man represents all the children of Adam, who through the flesh are possessed of Satan in original sin, so that they must be his slaves and do according to his will. Hence they are also blind, that is, they do not see God. They are deaf, for they do not hear God’s Word, and are not obedient or submissive to it. They are also dumb, for they do not give him one word of thanks or praise, nor do they preach and proclaim Christ and the grace of God. But they are all too talkative about the teachings of the devil and the opinions of men. In these things they see only too well and are wiser than the children of light in their undertakings, opinions, and desires. In these things they hear with both ears and readily adopt the suggestions of flesh and blood. So then, whatever we do, in word and deed, as to both body and soul, is of the devil, whether it be externally good or bad, and must be redeemed through the work of God. We are in his kingdom and therefore we acknowledge him, see, hear, and follow him and praise and proclaim his name. All this takes place through the Spirit of God in his Word, which casts out the devil and his kingdom.

15. The Jews called the chief of the devils Beelzebub. The Hebrew word “sebub” means a fly; “baal” or “beel,” a man or ruler, as a householder.

When the two words form a combination, they mean an arch-fly or chieffly, or, in plain German “Fliegenkoenig oder grosse Hummel,” that is, kingfly or the great drone. They gave Satan this contemptuous epithet as though they were entirely free from him, secure against him, and lords over him. That is the way all conceited, corrupt hypocrites do; they imagine they are so pure and holy, that the devil is a helpless, feeble fly compared with them, and that they do not need the grace of Christ nor the Word of God.

Still they think he is strong enough for others, yet, that whatever godfearing people teach and do must be the devil’s own work, and they consider it such a trifling thing as though it were a dead fly. The devil can well endure such contempt, for by it he is placed above the true God in their hearts.

16. The tyrant in the court or palace is the devil, as I said before. He is in peace, however, as long as God’s Word and finger do not oppose him, and just like this deaf-mute, his people do whatever he wishes, for they know no better. His weapons and armor are the carnal conceit, doctrines and traditions of men, by which he terrifies the conscience and protects himself.

17. But when the stronger man, the Gospel, comes, peace flees, and he rages like a madman, for he resents being condemned, unmasked, punished, and publicly branded. Then he gathers up his armor, the powerful, wise, rich and holy people, and sets them all to attacking God’s Word, as we see in the persecution of the teachers of the Gospel. Such rage and persecution signify that the devil retires very unwillingly and raves in his whole body; for as he acts in the body and its members when he must depart, so he also behaves in the whole world, resisting with all his power when he is to give place to the Gospel; but it is all in vain, he must be expelled.

18. For a Stronger One, that is, Christ, comes and overpowers him and takes away his whole armor, that is, he converts some of those same persecutors, and to that extent makes him weaker, and his own kingdom stronger. He divides the spoils too, that is, those he converts he uses for various offices, graces, and works in Christendom, of which Paul writes in Romans 12:6. He is also in the court yard or ante-room of the palace, for the devil’s kingdom consists in outward appearances and pretences of wisdom, holiness, and strength; but when it is captured by the Gospel it is found to consist of pure folly, sin and weakness.

19. The text continues, “When the unclean spirit has gone out, he wanders through dry places, seeking rest,” etc. This means as much as the saying, “The devil never takes a vacation” and “The devil never sleeps,” for he is seeking how he may devour man. “Dry places” are not the hearts of the ungodly, for in such he rests and dwells like a mighty tyrant, as the Gospel here says; but there are dry and waste places here and there in the country where no people live, as forests and wildernesses. To these he flees in wicked rage because he is driven out. You will remember that the devil found Christ in the wilderness. Now, in Judea, there is not much water, hence we read that it contains many and wastes. In other countries, however, as in our own, which are well watered, the devils stay in rivers and lakes, and there they sometimes drown those who bathe or sail upon them. Furthermore, at some places there are water spirits, who entice the children from the shores into the water and drown them. These are all devils.

20. That he comes again and finds the house swept and garnished (Matthew adds “empty”) signifies that the man is sanctified and adorned with beautiful spiritual gifts, and that the evil spirit clearly sees that he can do nothing there with his familiar tricks, for he is too well known. Thus when the worship of idols was driven from the heathen, he never attacked the world with that device again. But what did he do then? He tried something else, went out, took with him seven spirits, more evil than himself, and entered in with them and dwelt there, and the last state of that man was worse than the first. So he has dealt with us. When Christ had become known in the world and the devil’s former kingdom with its idol worship had been destroyed, he adopted another plan and attacked us with heresy and introduced and established the papacy, in which Christ was entirely forgotten, and men became worse heathen under the name of Christ than before he was preached, as we can see now with our own eyes.

Such also was the lot of the Jews after the destruction of Jerusalem, and of the Greeks under the Turks. And so all will fare, who at first hear the Word of God and afterwards become secure and weary of it. St. Matthew says, in Matthew 12:14, that Satan finds the house empty. And in Matthew 13:25, he sowed tares among the wheat, by night, while men slept. Therefore it is necessary for us to watch as the apostles always admonish us, especially St. Peter in 1 Peter 5:3: “Brethren, be sober, be watchful: your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour”; for wherever he overthrows faith, he easily restores again all former vices.

Moral Failures Come from Doctrinal Apostasy



How ironic! - to have a church named Faith that drops faith from a classic passage about justification by faith - in a denomination where they pretend to teach justification by faith but excommunicate those who teach it.

Also from Faith, Radcliff -

Check out this article... Time of Grace ministry is based in Milwaukee, WI, at St. Marcus Lutheran Church, one of our sister congregations. The Holy Spirit works through the Word of God, and the Word of God continues to be spread through many different avenues! 

And more!

The Paladins of Christ Youth Group thanks everyone who supported us in our spaghetti dinner. It was extremely helpful. We raised over four hundred dollars that won't just be used for the youth group, but will also go towards the congregation's activities. Thanks to everybody again! Sunday that we will be having a youth group meeting after Sunday School and that our agenda for that meeting will be the following: An after actions review of the spaghetti dinner, plan for parents night out and future activities. Check out the photos. [GJ - We compete with local restaurants because we cannot or will not support ourselves with giving.]

For reasons that surpass all human understanding, the UOJ fanatics imagine that removing faith from the Christian Faith will make grace abound.

This rank false doctrine comes from a system where repeat-after-me is considered an education, where no one dares ask a question.

Grace is not an opponent of faith, and faith is not an antagonist toward grace. The Scriptures and the Confessions associate them together.

If the readers think I emphasize this too much, consider this - WELS and Missouri clergy often say, "I was saved 2,000 years ago."

The LCMS clergy are heading to Rome,
following their UOJ leader, Edward Preuss.


That claim is identical to the Edward Preuss delirium, that everyone is born forgiven - endorsed by such UOJ warriors as Paul McCain and Jack Cascione. Such pratfalls come from divorcing grace from the Means of Grace, failing to acknowledge the Holy Spirit always at work in the Word.

Using faith as a postscript does not make UOJ Lutheran - or even Christian. The first claim is absurd - the entire world was declared forgiven (without the Word or faith or the work of the Holy Spirit) when Christ died - or when He rose from the dead. One would hope that universal absolution could be a little more precise than that.



Secondly, because UOJ starts with a falsehood, the second part is also false. Now you must believe that the entire world has been forgiven (Walther). The Great Kidnapper learned that from Bishop Stephan, who studied at Halle University, where G. C. Knapp taught the same. We know Knapp was not unique because the Pietist Rambach also identified the resurrection of Christ with world absolution, as Samuel Huber did. 

The Moral Failures of UOJ
Readers may recall that Tim Glende started two (2) blogs because he appointed himself the watchman over Ichabod (copying the title) and the blog of his attorney-member Rich Techlin.

Tim Glende used his two blogs to attack justification by faith, promote UOJ, and expose his scatological obsessions. But did the watchman watch himself? While pretending to be the Guarding of Lutheran Orthodoxy, Glende was plagiarizing the false teacher Craig Groeschel and lying about it. When confronted with the facts, he:
  1. Excommunicated Rich Techlin, with Deputy Doug's support.
  2. Got rid of the circuit pastor who dared to criticize his plagiarism - again with DP Doug's help.

Joel Lillo, his Enthusiasm wingman, just crowed that they got away with it again. The incident took place six months ago. What is normally a firing and criminal offense elsewhere is an adiaphoron in WELS - a matter of indifference.

That is why I suggest the first step as talking to an attorney, not a WELS pastor. Obviously the synod has been aware for half a year and done nothing.

If anyone thinks Missouri is better - they have a policy of destroying all evidence if the officials are so foolish that they take notes. Discussions are banned as well. SP Harrison ordered the "Steadfast" Lutherans to erase the thread about the most recent pastor-rapist, Darwin Schauer, and they steadfastly did what was ordered by the Synodical Pope.

When everyone is born forgiven, nothing is wrong - except questioning Holy Mother Synod. That, my friends and opponents, is a sin against the Holy Spirit, because God will not allow His Synod to err in any matter.

"I learned some Latin - Anathema sit!"