WELS Different from LCMS?

The WELS AnswerMan has done it again. I suspect AnswerMan also wrote the letter being answered. The basic content is - We visited an LCMS congregation and could not wait to get back to the oasis of orthodoxy that is WELS/ELS.

I will allow that some WELS/ELS members are so brain-washed that they actually believe this nonsense. The laity I know are a bit wiser. They judge matters congregation by congregation, pastor by pastor.

The denominational label means nothing now. A significant number of LCMS congregations are Pentecostal. Others long for the embrace of ELCA. (Get your shots first, and always, always, wear your galoshes.) WELS has had a number of pastors go Pentecostal. The Love Shack bureaucrats would love to be in ELCA. Here and there pastors want to be Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox.

Missouri, WELS, and ELS all practice open communion or semi-open communion. The confessional congregations practice demi-semi open communion. ELS MDiv theologians Jay Webber argued for giving communion to ELCA members because "it prevents a lot of conflict."

I would never join the ELS now. Their toleration of Pope John the Malefactor shows a studied indifference toward sound doctrine and a timidity alien to their history. No sect is in greater need of a regime change.

Missouri is infected with papalism. Much of it comes from Ft. Wayne. That is good medicine for them, so they can avoid real issues. Picking the right incense and arguing for titles will keep them from discussing Biblical doctrine. I actually heard a presentation from a future Ft. Wayne professor where he condemned the use of individual Holy Communion cups! Patristic legalists are another version of Pietistic legalists - why talk about the Gospel when the Law is so much more fun?

Here is a favorite story from Pietism. An Augustana (the real Augustana, not the new fake one) leader visited a church, where the young pastor gave a blistering sermon against tobacco. At the dinner afterwards, the visitor lit up a cigar. The young Augustana pastor said in shock, "Why are you smoking after that sermon I gave?" The old man said, "Simple. This is give young pastors something to preach about when they cannot give a Gospel sermon."

The high church people might want to consider this point:

When Lutherans pastors are falling over each other to join Rome or to get their Fuller Seminary/Willow Creek tattoos, the time has arrived to avoid, in the clearest way possible, any assocition with both errors. That is the meaning behind the article on adiaphora in the Formula of Concord. I will post more on that later.

I fear too many pastors want to please that invisible seminary professor in the pew. This was a problem at Yale Divinity. Every seminarian wanted to give a sermon on the Binding of Isaac because of one particular professor and course. They failed to give a sermon for the professor and certainly missed the congregation. The senior pastor said, "I never want to hear another sermon on the Binding of Isaac." Some young pastors try to please their Fuller-trained professors and their Fuller-trained mission board zombies. Others think they will succeed when they get their congregations to call them Father, demand incense, and ask - "Would you please chant the announcements from now on?" Why would a Lutheran use the term Mass, which carries so much Roman baggage and so many associations with Purgatory? Is not Holy Communion a perfectly clear term for all Lutherans?

In the future, honest Lutheran pastors will either join Rome or the Assemblies of God. Then the remaining ones can study the Book of Concord in relative peace and harmony.