Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Ding-a-Ling:
Mass Bells Are Breaking Up That Old Gang of Mine - Part XII






Every time you hear the bells, another Missouri pastor popes.


Someone wrote that he has suspected LCMS William Weedon of being a closet papist. I thought so myself. The latest blog post suggests he is a Recessional Lutheran, working his way to Rome and hoping to take a bunch with him. His associates in blogging belong to the same smells-and-bells cult, redolent of incense, popery, and Mariolatry.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Weedon wrote recently about being obsessed with Mary.

The latest offering quotes Ratzinger verbatim.

that I happen to think are bang on right:"

Would it be just a little more honest to attribute these bang on quotes to Pope Benedict XVI? I think so. I do not recall any pope being called Roncalli or Montini after elevation to the position of Antichrist.

Father Richard John Neuhaus was a "confessional Lutheran" until he joined Rome. Perhaps many LCMS pastors will walk the tightrope for years to come, but I doubt it.

Paul McCain, part of this circle, worked closely with Fenton until Fenton joined Eastern Orthodoxy and denounced justification by faith. Hearts across Missouri-land sunk as they bid a fond adieu to Fenton, their mentor in stratospherically high church practices.

McCain gushes over Weedon's deep, deep insights. McCain was thrilled that Father Neuhaus helped Missouri be in touch with the pope, who allegedly said, "Oh, those Missouri Lutherans." How many Missourians have poped since then? And how many priests have Martined?



The two-headed calf continues to beckon. Some go to Fuller. Others to Rome and Constantinople.

They never seem to consider the only path: the efficacious Word and the Confessions as a guide (not just a rabbit's foot).

---

Dan @ Necessary Roughness has left a new comment on your post "Ding-a-Ling: Mass Bells Are Breaking Up That Old G...":

I would recommend reading more Weedon and listen to his guest appearances on Issues, Etc., get a better sampling.

Pr. Weedon considered Eastern Orthodoxy but returned from that, refusing to give up Justification and grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone.

There are those in the LCMS that hug so tightly to tradition for the sake of tradition itself and a belonging to the Holy Mother Church, but Pastor Weedon is not one of them. He uses rubrics, etc., to point people to Christ.


***

GJ - That may be true, Dan, but I think it is mischievous to quote the Antichrist favorably when so few know even a smattering of Luther.

I have read pages and pages of Roman theology, very well done in fact, where I agree completely, and then it all  collapses with the Satanic statements on the next page. That is why the Antichrist is so dangerous today. The current candidate is an excellent diplomat, a charming fellow, and very Holy Father-ish. Why quote the pope favorably and use his maiden name?

---

William Weedon has left a new comment on your post "Ding-a-Ling: Mass Bells Are Breaking Up That Old G...":

Dear Pastor Jackson,

You will, I'm afraid, be waiting a very long time if you expect this pastor to "pope." I have absolutely zero positive reasons to turn Rome and countless negative reasons why doing so would be fool-hardy - the first and foremost of which being Rome's continual inability to distinguish law and gospel and thus continually confounding the doctrine of justification with sanctification. Beyond that there are the little matters of indulgences, purgatory, prayers to the saints, treasury of merits and so forth. I abominate all of these.

As for the bells, does your indictment then rest against the numerous generations of Lutherans in Saxony who used them after the Reformation???


***

GJ - Adiaphora, Formula of Concord, SD

5] Namely, when under the title and pretext of external adiaphora such things are proposed as are in principle contrary to God's Word (although painted another color), these are not to be regarded as adiaphora, in which one is free to act as he will, but must be avoided as things prohibited by God. In like manner, too, such ceremonies should not be reckoned among the genuine free adiaphora, or matters of indifference, as make a show or feign the appearance, as though our religion and that of the Papists were not far apart, thus to avoid persecution, or as though the latter were not at least highly offensive to us; or when such ceremonies are designed for the purpose, and required and received in this sense, as though by and through them both contrary religions were reconciled and became one body; or when a reentering into the Papacy and a departure from the pure doctrine of the Gospel and true religion should occur or gradually follow therefrom [when there is danger lest we seem to have reentered the Papacy, and to have departed, or to be on the point of departing gradually, from the pure doctrine of the Gospel].

10] We believe, teach, and confess also that at the time of confession [when a confession of the heavenly truth is required], when the enemies of God's Word desire to suppress the pure doctrine of the holy Gospel, the entire congregation of God, yea, every Christian, but especially the ministers of the Word, as the leaders of the congregation of God [as those whom God has appointed to rule His Church], are bound by God's Word to confess freely and openly the [godly] doctrine, and what belongs to the whole of [pure] religion, not only in words, but also in works and with deeds; and that then, in this case, even in such [things truly and of themselves] adiaphora, they must not yield to the adversaries, or permit these [adiaphora] to be forced upon them by their enemies, whether by violence or cunning, to the detriment of the true worship of God and the introduction and sanction of idolatry. 11] For it is written, Gal. 5:1: Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not again entangled in the yoke of bondage.

It is irrelevant whether pastors in Saxony used mass bells, as you mention on your blog. This is a time of confessional crisis, when Lutheran ministers are slinking around, edging into Romanism, and covertly instructing others to do the same. Lutheran pastors should avoid aping the papal priests, as the Book of Concord states so clearly above.

Nor does it matter whether you ever join the Church of Rome. You are giving false support to those who are looking for encouragement in their escape to the Gospel of Purgatory and papal infallibility.

The Book of Concord indictment applies to all the smells-and-bells Lutheran clergy who make Rome the gold standard of worship.


---

Pr. Lehmann has left a new comment on your post "Ding-a-Ling: Mass Bells Are Breaking Up That Old G...":

On what basis do you make the charge that Pr. Weedon makes Rome the gold standard for worship?

As one who worshiped at Saint Paul's for a year, preached over 30 times from its pulpit, and has seen first hand the resources that Pr. Weedon uses to plan for worship, I can tell you with absolute certainty that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Do us all a favor and find something that you know about to talk about.

***

GJ - Pastor Weedon's blog is self-indicting, regardless of what I post. He should retract it.

I know something about Roman Catholic doctrine.

Mark Jeske was never going to leave WELS, in one communication, and he was advertised on the front page of the LCMS website a few weeks later. That may not be the biggest switch of all time, but even Peter, our first pope, swore he would never deny Christ. Oaths are sometimes forgotten.

20 comments:

Dan @ Necessary Roughness said...

I would recommend reading more Weedon and listen to his guest appearances on Issues, Etc., get a better sampling.

Pr. Weedon considered Eastern Orthodoxy but returned from that, refusing to give up Justification and grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone.

There are those in the LCMS that hug so tightly to tradition for the sake of tradition itself and a belonging to the Holy Mother Church, but Pastor Weedon is not one of them. He uses rubrics, etc., to point people to Christ.

Anonymous said...

Are these quotes taken from before or after he rose to the throne of Antichrist? That may be why Rev. Weedon decided to use his former name.

SceleratissimusLutheranus said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qo0V57INpA

Brett Meyer said...

A good comment was left on the post, "Rev Rydecki said...
I appreciate much of what you share on your blog, Fr. Weedon, but this one gives me great pause.

The demons were "bang on right" when they confessed that Jesus was the Son of God, too. But Jesus shut them up because he didn't want that kind of publicity.

Do you really want to be quoting Antichrist as the author of "gems"?"

The posting may make some WELSians drool. The thought of being able to plunder the Church of the Antichrist for some tasty morsels...say it isn't so!

William Weedon said...

Dear Pastor Jackson,

You will, I'm afraid, be waiting a very long time if you expect this pastor to "pope." I have absolutely zero positive reasons to turn Rome and countless negative reasons why doing so would be fool-hardy - the first and foremost of which being Rome's continual inability to distinguish law and gospel and thus continually confounding the doctrine of justification with sanctification. Beyond that there are the little matters of indulgences, purgatory, prayers to the saints, treasury of merits and so forth. I abominate all of these.

As for the bells, does your indictment then rest against the numerous generations of Lutherans in Saxony who used them after the Reformation???

Pr. Lehmann said...

On what basis do you make the charge that Pr. Weedon makes Rome the gold standard for worship?

As one who worshiped at Saint Paul's for a year, preached over 30 times from its pulpit, and has seen first hand the resources that Pr. Weedon uses to plan for worship, I can tell you with absolute certainty that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Do us all a favor and find something that you know about to talk about.

Anonymous said...

Norm Tiegen is at it again complaining about the service organizations, like the Right to Life organizations that compete with the church appealing for funds from church members (see link below).

Here's my analysis. Membership in large congregations gives more to synod because the economies of scale mean large established churches have less overhead per communicant, and have no mortgage debt, so they can give more to synod than small newer churches burned with debt and more overhead.
The membership in small churches hasn't dropped as much as that in large churches, so even though the synod membership hasn't dropped by a third, the synod actually has a third or half as many members who are in a strategic position, i.e., a large church that's able to give a lot of money to the synod.

So while it seemed a good idea to allow the service and charitable organizations to compete for funds from members back in the 1970s, now too many organizations are chasing
too little money from too few people, and these organizations
all want nice salaries and pensions. Even CN is in the act
with Otten's many reminder blurbs "Remember CN in your will."
So that's really why Norm's strongly against Right to Life, etc., soliciting funds from church members.

Along the same lines, my vicarage pastor didn't allow the district's financial planning rep to meet with the congregation because all the congregation's money would end up going to the district/synod even before they died, and also when their wills were executed. Another pastor in St. Louis said he didn't allow financial counselors to meet the congregation because they would tell congregants not even to give any money to their children,
but give it all to the synod, because "if you leave a sum to your
children, they'll just use it as a down payment for something they can't really afford, and then they'll become overwhelmed by debt."

http://normanteigen.blogspot.com/2009/12/lutheran-study-bible-conversation-among.html

Anonymous said...

In response to 8:51 pm,
Same story here! A financial advisor from Corner Stone came to our house. He did mention that grown children mis-use money, but you should be careful how much you leave them. Mother WELS needed it more.(so it was the impression I was left with)


In Christ,
from WELS church lady

Anonymous said...

Janesville WI Trivent members send retired Thrivent rep to ELCA seminary. He graduates this year, but another female seminarian from Janesville begins seminary this fall:

Janesville couple 'Aware of the call', 28 Dec 2009

http://www.gazettextra.com/news/2009/dec/28/janesville-couple-aware-call/

Christopher Esget said...

You are worse than wrong – you have given false testimony and slandered a faithful Lutheran pastor, who has done nothing outside of what our Symbols allow. You have also impugned other Lutheran parishes (such as mine) that have bells rung at the consecration. You should read Dr. Walther's essay concerning "Romish" practices. If we are to follow your line of thinking, we must also stop praying the Lord's Prayer, reading Scripture, baptizing, lighting candles, making the sign of the cross, and myriad other fine Christian practices, for Rome does these as well.

I'll say it again: Pr. Weedon is a fine, faithful Lutheran pastor who takes the Symbols with utmost seriousness.

Brett Meyer said...

I find Pastor Weedon to be leaning heavily toward Mary idolatry. He holds Mary up as an idol, not like us and with a faith never before seen on earth. He prays that Christians would become "more like her" and not, by the grace of God, more like Christ. He states that Neuhaus a former Lutheran and at his death a Roman Catholic is currently resting in Christ's arms. This is not true considering Neuhaus embraced the Antichrist as his god and savior.
Here is some information from Pastor Weedon's blog.

O Blessed Trinity, lift us to the humility of the Mother of God!
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/10/on-mary.html


How are you doing at blessing Mary? Lutherans are in little danger of falling into the excesses that have characterized her veneration across the centuries, but we’ve certainly fallen into the ditch on the other side. We’ve pretended she’s just like us.

When we become like Mary, when we by the grace of the Holy Spirit speak our “yes” to the promises of God and hold them tight, then into us comes Mary’s Son with all His divine life.

And so we learn to call Mary blessed together with Elizabeth and all the Church...Blessed above all in her faith and trust in God’s Word. And we pray God, though she is not much like us, that He would make us more like her, His blessed promise believing Mother, that He would increase our faith in all that He promises so that we might come finally to the joys of heaven and share with the most holy Virgin and all the angels and saints the blessedness that never ends. Amen.
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/08/homily-for-tonight.html


I had a question posed to me from our Church's website about the practice of the elevation, that is lifting up the Lord's body and then genuflecting before it; and then our Lord's blood and genuflecting before it. The young man wanted to know a bit about the origin and meaning of this ceremony. I thought it would be worthwhile to share my answer:

By the way, the practice really isn't ancient, but medieval. It arose in the centuries before the Reformation, where it was regarded as THE high point of the Mass - the moment at which the "sacrifice" was offered to the Father.
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2007/11/on-elevation.html


My friend Kiran Krishna shared this with me today. I thought it quite profound. I'd not heard of McAuley who was a Roman Catholic Christian in Australia.
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/11/poem-by-james-mcauley.html


(READ THE COMMENTS ON THIS ONE - THERE ARE A LOT OF RCC WORSHIPERS FOLLOWING HIS BLOG - BM)
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/11/on-ewtn.html


Cont...

Brett Meyer said...

Cont...

The far deeper and harder thing for Lutherans to face is that so many of these pastors have left because they became convinced that Lutherans no longer wished nor intend to BE Lutheran

A day ago or so, several Lutheran blogs posted the wise words of Neuhaus:

It is not ours to judge another Man's servant. Our Lord makes that clear and so does the Apostle. (Man's - HE MUST MEAN THE ANTICHRIST IN THIS INSTANCE. NEUHAUS EMBRACED THE ANTICHRIST AND WORKS RIGHTEOUSNESS AS HIS WAY TO HEAVEN THROUGH HIS ROMAN CATHOLIC FAITH - BM)
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/04/when-another-one-leaves.html


My friend Doug and I were talking today about pathways of growth in the faith. Does the Church have a way to help folks mature in the faith? We acknowledge that the Sunday Divine Service is vital - the Table of the Lord's Word and His Supper are at the very heart - but they cannot do the whole job, nor were they ever intended to.
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/03/pathways-of-growth.html


http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/01/two-fine-tributes-to-fr-richard-john.html


Catholic Priest Neuhaus - Asleep in Jesus.
Rest eternal grant him, O Lord, and let light perpetual shine upon him. (IF NEUHAUS, PRIOR TO HIS DEATH, DIDN'T REJECT THE ROMAN CATHOLIC FAITH HE LEFT LUTHERANISM FOR HE RESTS ETERNALLY IN HELL. PASTOR WEEDON ON THE OTHER HAND SEES THE CATHOLIC FAITH AS ANOTHER PATH TO ETERNAL SALVATION - BM)
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/01/fr-richard-john-neuhaus.html


POPE RATZINGER'S BOOK MADE WEEDON'S TOP 25 BOOK LIST
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2007/09/25-top-books-for-theology.html


HOOKED ON EWTN - Eternal Word Television Network, Global Catholic Network
Father John Fenton\'s blog - Father John is an outstanding homilist and a great student of the Fathers. Although there will be things that I don't agree with from time to time (to be expected, since he is an Orthodox priest and I a Lutheran pastor), I find his insights refreshing.

David Schütz\'s Site - David is a former Lutheran pastor from Oz and he is currently a Roman Catholic layman. I enjoy his insights - always balanced and fair. He's a big Ratzinger fan (along with someone else I won't name).
http://weedon.blogspot.com/2007/07/5-blogs-that-make-me-think.html

Brett Meyer said...

From Pastor Weedon's blog

08 January 2009
+ Fr. Richard John Neuhaus

Asleep in Jesus.

Rest eternal grant him, O Lord, and let light perpetual shine upon him.
Posted by William Weedon at 9:46 AM

Comments:
Schütz said...
Yes, I think today is a day of mourning for all Lutherans and Catholics who, like Fr Neuhaus, longed and prayed for the re-unification of our two communions.

http://weedon.blogspot.com/2009/01/fr-richard-john-neuhaus.html

Brett Meyer said...

Pastor Weedon also confesses his belief in Universal Objective Justification. That the whole world has been forgiven of all sin and stand righteous and justified before God. All that is now required is that they believe they in fact have Christ's righteousness and are the children of God - while they are yet carnally minded and slaves to sin.

A child of the Reformation
October 20, 2009 in Uncategorized

"In my admittedly small mind there is really only one question about the validity of the Reformation of the Western Church:

Are God’s commands, threats, and punishments – His Hammer which shatters – to be proclaimed so that persons may see themselves as sinners – sinners who should then be given the confidence of faith – i.e. be actively persuaded via the Promise (Christ) that they have God’s forgiveness for all their sins (and hence, life and salvation) – even as they tremble?


October 20, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Weedon

A triple Amen to your post, Nathan. I’ve linked it from my blog.
http://infanttheology.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/a-child-of-the-reformation/

L P said...

Speaking of RC liturgy...

Try doing this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6AOvStZS64

I am sure some will get a *high* on this one.

LPC

Anonymous said...

You worship Santa Claus.

Anonymous said...

"Pastor Weedon's blog is self-indicting, regardless of what I post. He should retract it."

Well, then, sauce for the goose. Your blog indicts you as a slanderer, therefore your blog should die.

Brett Meyer said...

Anonymous, please present what you believe to be slanderous.

Anonymous said...

Reference Norm Tiegen and his opposition to church connected anti-abortion service orgs.

Here's some history on that:

Norwegians on the Prairie: Ethnicity and the Development
of the Country Town, by Odd S. Lovoll, pp. 200-201:

excerpt: There were obviously ulterior motives involved in
the [Norwegian] Synod's opposition to temperence societies. The Synod clearly feared organizational
movements that it did not control, ones that might even pose a threat to the Synod's religious mission, since the secular temperance societies would bring people into contact with non-Lutherans and nonbelievers.

http://www.amazon.com/Norwegians-Prairie-Ethnicity-Development-Country/dp/0873516036/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1262223413&sr=8-1

Anonymous said...

In response to Brett Meyer's detractor, accusing him of being a slanderer:

LUTHER: This is a blessed dissension, disturbance, and commotion which the Word of God produces. It is the beginning of true faith and of war against false faith: it is the return of suffering and persecution and the right condition of Christendom. But Emser (Brett's detractor), thinks one ought to preach other, peaceful subjects in order to be sure to keep this from happening.

WHAT LUTHER SAYS, p.1194, Concord. Publ. Hse., St. Louis, 1959.