Wednesday, March 7, 2018

MidWeek Lenten Service - Gerhardt Hymns


The material on this post can be shared freely, without asking permission. I have put this together to promote the great doctrinal, praise, and comfort hymns of Paul Gerhardt.

Midweek Lenten Service

7 PM Central Daylight Savings Time


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


  • Words are linked on the hymn number.
  • The melody is linked on the hymn name.
 My Lutheran Hymnal contains lyrics only
in historical order, arranged by author.

Worship and Praise
Advent

Christmas


New Year

Lent

Good Friday


Easter

Pentecost

The Redeemer

Cross and Comfort



Evening

Harvest and Thanksgiving

The Nation

Death and Burial
TLH#586 - A Pilgrim and a Stranger

Evening and Morning, Sunset and Dawning - Not in TLH, but the hymn is in other Lutheran hymnals and very popular.

Below is a great Gerhardt hymn in German. I have not found it in English.


Paul Gerhardt was born in 1607, and grew up in the era after the Book of Concord (1580). The Calvinists worked hard to suppress Lutheran doctrine. He studied to be a pastor at Wittenberg, with good orthodox professors. One of them had a habit of combining sermons with hymn texts.

Gerhardt graduated in 1642 but did not receive a pastoral call until 9 years later. During that time his poetic talents were discovered and he began working with another person on hymns. He was a tutor for the children in one family, which explains his choice of child-like terms and vivid picture language. That is somewhat obscured by the stuffy translations of his hymns into English. See A Lamb Goes Uncomplaining Forth - the "bark" was a "little ship" in German. "To and fro" in German was "zum und zum."

Gerhardt was known for being an orthodox, Book of Concord pastor, but the Calvinist elector wanted peace between the Calvinists and Lutherans. As a result, Gerhardt was forced out of his Berlin call, where he was loved and respected by both sides. He had to get by for a year in Berlin without a call, then was in limbo entirely. Finally he had a call to a difficult parish where he lived and worked until he died.


Three of his five children had already died in infancy, and now he lost one of his two remaining sons, the child on whose death he wrote his touching hymn,
"Thou'rt mine, yes, still Thou art mine own,"
while his wife, worn out by sorrow and anxiety, fell into a long and slow decline. When she died, Gerhardt was left with only one child, a boy of 6 years. Many of his most beautiful hymns were written at this time, and among others, "If God be on my side."

The Lübben congregation commissioned a life sized painting of him for the church where it still hangs. Beneath it one can read the inscription, "Theologus in cribro Satanae versatus" ("A theologian sifted in Satan's sieve").
As a poet he undoubtedly holds the highest place among the hymn-writers of Germany. His hymns seem to be the spontaneous outpouring of a heart that overflows with love, trust, and praise; his language is simple and pure; if it has sometimes a touch of homeliness, it has no vulgarism,1 and at times it rises to a beauty and grace, which always give the impression of being unstudied, yet could hardly have been improved by art. His tenderness and fervor never degenerate into the sentimentality and petty conceits which were already becoming fashionable in his days; nor his penitence and sorrow into that morbid despondency which we find in Gryphius, and for which the disappointments of his own life might have furnished some excuse.
If he is not altogether free from the long-windedness and repetition which are the besetting sins of so many German writers, and especially hymn-writers, he at least more rarely succumbs to them: and in his days they were not considered a blemish. One of his contemporaries, a certain Andreas Bucholz, who wrote a great deal of religious poetry which was then highly esteemed formally announces in his preface that he has spun out his poems as long as he could, for he observed that when people were reading sacred poems at home, they preferred long ones.
Gervinus, a severe judge of sacred poetry in general, says of Gerhardt: "If one man among the poets of the seventeenth century makes an attractive impression on us, it is Gerhardt. He recurred, as no one else had done, to Luther's genuine type of the popular religious song, only with such modifications as the altered circumstances demanded.In Luther's time the old wrathful, implacable God of the Romanists had assumed the heavenly aspect of grace and compassion; with Gerhardt the Merciful and just One is a loving and benignant Man, whom he addresses with reverential intimacy. With Luther, it was the belief in free grace and the work of Atonement, in the Redemption which had burst the gates of hell, which inspired the Christian singer with his joyous confidence; with Gerhardt it is his faith in the love of God.
https://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/Biographies/paul_gerhardt.htm




TLH#349 - Jesus Thy Boundless Love   
                       
TLH#142 - A Lamb Goes Uncomplaining Forth
                 
The Lection                The Passion History and John 10


Sermon - The Good Shepherd


TLH#171 - Upon the Cross Extended                   

Gerhardt - Confession and Bearing the Cross
verses 1, 11-15

The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                            p. 45

10 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.
But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.
To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.
And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.
And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.
This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.
Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.
All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.
13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.
14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.
15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.

Norma A. Boeckler


The Good Shepherd

10 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.
But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.
To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.

The Fourth Gospel is well known for the I AM sermons, and this chapter has four examples of I AM. Moreover, this chapter is especially appropriate for Lent, because Jesus identifies Himself as God - I AM - and teaches the disciples that that means, in contrast to the false shepherd, the hired hands, thieves and brigands.

The sermon itself is a wonderful blend of actual detail and Gospel Promises, which combine to remind us of Jesus as the Creating Word, John 1:3. In those days, sheep were kept in group pens at night. There was only one proper entrance, but thieves came in the other way, like those false teachers send themselves today and cause all matter of mischief. They are not called but call themselves, push themselves on others instead of waiting to be called by God.

One definite sign of a false teacher is that he comes another way, sending himself. The people who troubled Corinth were like that. They only wanted to improve matters for everyone while denigrating the Gospel. Thus the Fulleroids and other pests have charged great sums to teach people to oppose the Gospel and believe in works, in numbers, in material success.

Throughout John's Gospel, Jesus is the One Sent by the Father. He has the ultimate call to accomplish His task of dying for the sins of the world and rising up to show God's victory over sin, death, and Satan. Since He alone is the One Sent, there can be no other Messiahs, no true ones. 

And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.
And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.
This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.

Everyday shepherds did this, and Jesus was using their own customs to teach them about His own work. The normal shepherd went to the group pen in the morning, using the door opening guarded by an associate, and led out his own sheep, calling them by name. The shepherd knew his own sheep and called them by name. Likewise the sheep knew their shepherd's voice and followed only that person.

In that way we know we belong to Jesus the Good Shepherd. We are baptized in His Name and we gladly hear His voice. We follow Him and no other. He goes before us and leads us to green pastures and clear waters. Notice this is told as a parable that was not understood at that time, but became ever so clear later.

Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.
All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

These statements are treated simply as identification, but together, they certainly are more than that. The message of John's Gospel is to clarify Jesus' role as the Messiah, to define it in various ways so we are completely clear about it.

I see this more in the light of apposition. We use that all the time, and our grammar is based on Greek and Latin. Answering a question, a woman could respond to the question, "What are you if you do not work outside the home?" I am - a cook, a driver, a mother, a gardener, a teacher of gardener. Jesus' two key answers are "I AM, the One speaking to you." That is what He said to the Canaanite woman who talked about the Messiah, the Christ. Although many believed in the Messiah, they also needed to know He is the true Son of God, God Incarnate, more than anyone expected, though it was all foreshadowed in Isaiah. Like this passage, the people heard but did not fully understand.

It is more than identification because of God speaking from the Burning Bush, Exodus 3 - Tell them I AM is sending you. So Jesus said to the Jewish opposition, "Before Abraham was, I AM." So I believe we should relate all the I AM statements first as that revelation and secondly to those defining roles. In that way, Jesus teaches us what it means to be the Savior.

The door of the sheep is another description of His role as the Savior, the only Savior. We can picture that - one correct door, many false claimants. After His resurrection there was a pretended called Bar Kochba. He caused great turmoil and loss of life, though he was successful for a period of time around 135 AD, about one century later.

The true door gives us life and salvation. The false teachers only provide death and destruction.

11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.
13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.
14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.
15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.

The door of the sheep pen was an opening guarded by someone, so that is one part of this sermon. The next step is to change from that door to the Good Shepherd Himself. This is expressed literally as The Shepherd The Noble, which means The Shepherd above all shepherds.

This explains why Jesus is the door, the only way of salvation. He will lay down His life for the sheep. That is His unique role, because shepherds do not die for their sheep. Anyone acquainted with shepherding would think about their care for the sheep, their efforts to thwart predators and thieves, but this is another level about anything they did. The hired hand does not own the sheep, so he runs when the wolf comes and lets the wolf tear up and scatter the flock. Many celebrity ministers have shown themselves to be wolves, whose behavior and teaching was glorious in the material sense but terrible in shocking and scattering their congregations.

The clergy, DPs, and professors who served their own interests - they are hired hands too - or wolves. They seem to work together well.

But the Good Shepherd knows His sheep and they know Him. The Father knows the Son, and the Son the Father. This relationship to God the Father is expressed various ways in the Gospel, showing God the Father to be gracious in sending His Son. That is why "Show us the Father" is revealed as an absurd request. We see the Father in the Son, and the Son's relationship to us is the same as the Father's.

John 14:8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.

This is very important because people brought up in an overly strict and accusing household can think of God the Father as threatening, accusing, and condemning. But the gracious love of the Son is exactly the same as the gracious love of the Father. The Scriptures uphold and emphasize faith in God, and condemn unbelief, which is the root of all sin. Sadly, when people have the wrong concept of God, they react accordingly and God becomes to them what they falsely imagine.

 Norma A. Boeckler



Greek Lesson

10 αμην αμην λεγω υμιν ο μη εισερχομενος δια της θυρας εις την αυλην των προβατων αλλα αναβαινων αλλαχοθεν εκεινος κλεπτης εστιν και ληστης
ο δε εισερχομενος δια της θυρας ποιμην εστιν των προβατων
τουτω ο θυρωρος ανοιγει και τα προβατα της φωνης αυτου ακουει και τα ιδια προβατα καλει κατ ονομα και εξαγει αυτα
και οταν τα ιδια προβατα εκβαλη εμπροσθεν αυτων πορευεται και τα προβατα αυτω ακολουθει οτι οιδασιν την φωνην αυτου
αλλοτριω δε ου μη ακολουθησωσιν αλλα φευξονται απ αυτου οτι ουκ οιδασιν των αλλοτριων την φωνην
ταυτην την παροιμιαν ειπεν αυτοις ο ιησους εκεινοι δε ουκ εγνωσαν τινα ην α ελαλει αυτοις
ειπεν ουν παλιν αυτοις ο ιησους αμην αμην λεγω υμιν οτι εγω ειμι η θυρα των προβατων
παντες οσοι προ εμου ηλθον κλεπται εισιν και λησται αλλ ουκ ηκουσαν αυτων τα προβατα
εγω ειμι η θυρα δι εμου εαν τις εισελθη σωθησεται και εισελευσεται και εξελευσεται και νομην ευρησει
10 ο κλεπτης ουκ ερχεται ει μη ινα κλεψη και θυση και απολεση εγω ηλθον ινα ζωην εχωσιν και περισσον εχωσιν
11 εγω ειμι ο ποιμην ο καλος ο ποιμην ο καλος την ψυχην αυτου τιθησιν υπερ των προβατων
12 ο μισθωτος δε και ουκ ων ποιμην ου ουκ εισιν τα προβατα ιδια θεωρει τον λυκον ερχομενον και αφιησιν τα προβατα και φευγει και ο λυκος αρπαζει αυτα και σκορπιζει τα προβατα
13 ο δε μισθωτος φευγει οτι μισθωτος εστιν και ου μελει αυτω περι των προβατων
14 εγω ειμι ο ποιμην ο καλος και γινωσκω τα εμα και γινωσκομαι υπο των εμων
15 καθως γινωσκει με ο πατηρ καγω γινωσκω τον πατερα και την ψυχην μου τιθημι υπερ των προβατων

 Norma A. Boeckler

Never Study a Topic with Automatic Assumptions - They Are Often Wrong

 Note Walther's firm grip on his smartphone.

First, I will address the news, using my lost cell phone as a lesson for us all, about bad assumptions.

I use "call my lost cell phone" from the Net when we cannot find the cell phone, our only phone. Often the flip-phone has fallen to the floor or has been covered or obscured by something.

I used the service this weekend and thought I heard weak bleating for a second or two. I assumed, "It is under the bed." What followed was a thorough and heroic cleaning effort. After several days of no results, our Army Ranger neighbor began searching on his own while I was phoning the cell phone company for one of several solutions - using his phone, of course. Ranger Bob looked all over, in the fridge and freezer, and under the bed. I was ready to order the new phone. "Found it!"

Ranger Bob found it where I did not look. My assumption was that the phone was far away. In fact, it was inches away from my desk, eye level, with a very weak battery, behind a bottle of Sam's Club water.

The News
We should never assume that the drivel they market on the TV as news is anywhere close to the truth. First of all, it is too shallow to cover much of anything. Secondly, they rely on print news for all their stories.

Significantly, much of the so-called news is manipulative, self-serving, erroneous, and deceptive. A good example came in the mail just after the Presidential election, from Yale Divinity School.  The article assumed that everyone would be hailing President Hillary Clinton. The professor said, "Trump will still be remembered as an important person."

How patronizing! The vast majority in the ruling elite assumed Hillary would win in a landslide. They were repeating that assumption to each other, because their statistics told them that truth.

 The treachery  of the Concordia St. Louis faculty on Creation
is an example of departing from the efficacy of the Word.
Ditto their decades of jackass hee-hawing about the benefits of Fuller's Church Growth Movement.
Ditto - WELS, ELS, CLC (sic).


Christian Theology
Assumptions are equally misleading in theology - fatally misleading. Luther said one little error when magnified over time will bring everything down.

There are some basic, good assumptions - all subject to the ruling norm, the Scriptures.

  1. The Bible is one Truth revealed by the Holy Spirit.
  2. The difficult passages are illuminated by the passages clearest to us.
  3. Problems for us are often a matter of bad translating.


Much more is implied by #1, such as the infallibility and inerrancy of the Scriptures, the efficacy of the Word. However, some rules become empty slogans, such as people separating the Word from the Spirit and signing a statement on Biblical inerrancy.

You say you firmly hold to inerrancy and yet reject infant baptism and traditional baptism, insisting on Spirit baptism proven by speaking in tongues? One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism... Ephesians 4 for Fuller alumni.

Walther suffered - or made us suffer - from his theses that he made the outline of his works. This thetical style was not derived from the Word of God and did not lead to the Word of God. Moreover, he trained his disciples the same way, for hours at a time.

Hoenecke was comparatively free of this malady, but he fell into it at times. John Sparky Brenner employed this bad habit while quoting Hoenecke's way of supporting Walther's error on election. One must line up election verses and not include anything else!?

Who judges that list? Clearly, the list will shape the results.

Some bad assumptions:

  1. My synod is always correct and has always been correct.
  2. My relatives were never wrong about anything, thus justifying hiring children and in-laws for faculty positions. "Thanks, Dad."
  3. My sect does not need correction about anything. To do so would damage our claims of infallibility.
  4. That is a gre-e-e-e-e-e-e-ey area of Scripture (false!) used to excuse a shifting and shifty position.

Dogmatics Based on Prior Assumptions - Not Biblical, Not Lutheran, Not Christian.
But Lo, How Easily They Agree with ELCA about UOJ.
Thrivent, Babe, Show Me the Money!


This is from the chapter 5 of Election and Conversion. A Frank Discussion of Dr. Franz Pieper’s Book on “Conversion and Election,” with Suggestions for Lutheran Concord and Union on Another Basis
True, our Missouri brethren will reply: “We have said again and again that this is the mystery of election; we do not try to solve it; we leave it with the eternal counsels of the Almighty to be revealed in the next life.” But why should we, in our theologizing, make the Bible a book of contradictions and inconsistencies by a method of setting proof-text over against proof-text? Why not study it more deeply, and see whether we cannot coordinate its teachings and find their inner harmony? Surely if God is the altogether excellent One, He must be harmonious in His own being, and when He gives His children a revelation, it surely cannot be so full of contradictions as to turn them into infidels. We believe in “the divine unity of the Scriptures.” By collating Scripture with Scripture, we can, more and more, find the beautiful and higher harmony of its teachings. We like Dr. Jacobs’ view-point here (page 9, ut supra); he defines the proper hermeneutical principle as being an observance of “the organic relation of the various parts of Holy Scripture to one another.”* True, we confess to some doubt about what is known as the doctrine of “the analogy of faith,” for it seems to set up a human standard of interpretation outside of the Bible, while we believe in taking the Bible teaching just as it stands. But then every text ought to be interpreted in its true contextual setting and according to the meaning of the writer, with due attention to the correct exegesis. 
* GJ - I like Hoenecke for his many strengths, but it is troubling that he wrote - "We must put the election verses together..." (paraphrased) No, Professor Hoenecke, that filters the results. The Scriptures are one unified Truth. A synodical star is not always correct because he was a synodical star. The final authority is the Word, not "how we define that in our circles," a famous, dog-eared excuse offered up by smirking WELSians.
Mere phrases and brief sentences should not be treated in an insulated way, nor wrenched from their context, nor interpreted merely according to the sound of the words, when the real sense may be something quite different. You cannot truly and fairly interpret any writing in that way – that is, by simply quoting a detached sentence here and there; for sometimes a preceding or succeeding statement of the author may qualify the quoted statement. Take, for instance, 1 Cor. 2:9. Suppose a dogmatician should try to formulate from that passage the doctrine that the glories of heaven are far beyond human conception and imagination, because Paul says: “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard,” etc. 

The true interpreter of Scripture would simply tell him to read the next verse, when he would see that Paul was not referring to heaven at all, but to the revelations Christians now have through the Spirit of God. We shall have occasion more than once, in succeeding chapters, to show how our Concordia brethren miss the mark in drawing their peculiar doctrines from the Scriptures by a too infinitesimal treatment of the Bible.
 They agree in their opposition to Luther,
but they will sell you overpriced Luther trinkets.
 Funny how the garbage and lint collects on the drain.

 The Wolf of Wall Street Made Himself Famous by Bragging about His Thievery.
Thrivent perked up its lupine ears and licked its slavering jaws.

The Conflict Of Fundamentalism And Modernism by Leander Keyser - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry – "Faithful to the Reformation"



The Conflict Of Fundamentalism And Modernism by Leander Keyser - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry – "Faithful to the Reformation":

Download the E-book




"What’s happening in 21st Century “Evangelical Christianity” echoes a battle that took place 100 years ago. The terms then were “modernist” and “fundamentalist”. Today the “modernists” go by many names. What were the “fundamentalists” are now those who hold with sincerity and understanding those orthodox Confessions of the Reformation.

According to Dr. Keyser, modernists can be identified by these tendencies:

They place high importance on “being strictly up-to-date”.

They boast of “scholarship” above faithfulness to the Scriptures.

They take a rationalistic approach to the Word.

They believe in evolution.

They tend to reject the supernatural events in the Bible such as the flood.

They reject some or all of these specific doctrines of historic Christianity:
The plenary inspiration of the Bible
The Virgin Birth of our Lord
The real Godhood of our Lord
The vicarious or substitutionary atonement wrought by our Lord through His sufferings and death
The bodily resurrection of Christ
The apocalyptic or visible second coming of Christ to raise the dead and judge the world.
They show respect for “ethnic religions”."

Download the E-book



About the Author – Leander S. Keyser

Leander S. Keyser was born March 13, 1856 in Tuscarawas County, Ohio. He was educated at Wittenberg College Seminary, Springfield, Ohio, and served pastorates at La Grange, Indiana (1879-1881), Elkhart, Indiana (1883-1889), Springfield, Ohio (1889-1895), Atchison, Kansas (1897-1903), and Dover, Ohio (1903-1911). He was appointed professor of Systematic Theology at Hamma Divinity School in 1911, and was considered one of the leading theologians of the General Synod.
Dr. Keyser’s works include The Conflict Between Fundamentalism and Modernism, The Rational Test, A System of Christian Evidence (Apologetics), A System of General Ethics, A System of Natural Theism, and In The Redeemer’s Footsteps.
Professor Keyser went to be with his Lord on October 18, 1937
'via Blog this'