Saturday, February 10, 2018

Luther's Sermon for Quinquagesima Sunday. Luke 18:31-43




QUINQUAGESIMA SUNDAY.
 

TEXT:

Luke 18:31-43. And he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all the things that are written through the prophets shall be accomplished unto the Son of man. For he shall be delivered up unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and shamefully treated, and spit upon: and they shall scourge and kill him: and the third day he shall rise again.

And they understood none of these things; and this saying was hid from them, and they perceived not the things that were said.

And it came to pass, as he drew nigh unto Jericho, a certain blind man sat by the way side begging: and hearing a multitude going by, he inquired what this meant. And they told him, that Jesus of Nazareth passeth by. And he cried, saying, Jesus, thou son of David, have mercy on me. And they that went before rebuked him, that he should hold his peace: but he cried out the more a great deal, Thou son of David, have mercy on me. And Jesus stood, and commanded him to be brought unto him: and when he was come near, he asked him, What wilt thou that I should do unto thee? And he said, Lord, that I may receive my sight. And Jesus said unto him, Receive thy sight: thy faith hath made thee whole. And immediately he received his sight, and followed him, glorifying God: and all the people, when they saw it, gave praise unto God.



I. THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST.

1. This Gospel presents to us again the two thoughts of faith and love, both in that Christ says he must go up to Jerusalem and suffer crucifixion; and in that Christ serves and helps the blind man. By the first thought, that of faith, it is proved that the Scriptures are not fulfilled except by Christ’s sufferings; also that the Scriptures speak of no other theme than of Christ, and they treat only of Christ, who must fulfill the Scriptures by his death.

But if his death must do this, then our death will add nothing to that end; for our death is a sinful and a cursed death. However, if our death be sin and cursed, which is the highest and severest suffering and misfortune, what can our suffering and death merit? And since our sufferings are nothing and are lost, what can our good works do, in view of the fact that suffering is always nobler and better than doing good works? Christ alone must be supreme here and faith must firmly lay hold of him.

2. But Christ spoke these words before he finished his passion, when on his way to go up to Jerusalem at the time of the Easter festivities, when the disciples least expected to witness his sufferings, and instead anticipated a joyful occasion at the Feast of the Passover. These words Christ spoke for the purpose that his disciples might later grow stronger in their faith, when they recalled that he had before told them, that he had voluntarily offered himself as a sacrifice, and that he was not crucified by the power or strategy of his enemies, the Jews. Long before Isaiah also had prophesied that Christ would voluntarily and cheerfully give himself as a sacrifice, Isaiah 5:3-7; and the angel also on Easter morning, Luke 26:6, admonishes the women to call to mind what he here utters, in order that they might be assured and the firmer believe how he suffered thus willingly in our behalf.

3. And this is the true foundation, thoroughly to know Christ’s passion, when we not only understand and lay hold of Christ’s sufferings, but also of his heart and will in those sufferings, for whoever views his sufferings in a way that they do not see his will and heart in them, must be more terrified before them than they are made to rejoice on account of them. But if one sees Christ’s will and heart in his passion, they cause true comfort, assurance and pleasure in Christ. Therefore Psalm 40:7-8 also praises this will of God and of Christ: “ In the roll of the book it is written of me: I delight to do thy will, O, my God.” The Epistle to the Hebrews says on this point: “ By which will we have been sanctified;” Hebrews 10:10; it does not say: Through the suffering and blood of Christ, which is also true, but through the will of God and of Christ, that they both were of one will, to sanctify us through the blood of Christ. This will to suffer he shows here in this Gospel when he first announced that he would go up to Jerusalem and allow them to crucify him; as if he had said, look into my heart and see that I do all willingly, freely and cheerfully, in order that it may not terrify nor shock you when you shall now soon see it, and you think I do it reluctantly, I must do it, I am forsaken, and the power of the Jews force me to it.

4. “But the disciples understood none of these things,” says Christ, “And this saying was hid from them.” That is as much as to say: Reason, flesh and blood, cannot understand it nor grasp that the Scriptures should say how the Son of man must be crucified; much less does reason understand that this is Christ’s will and he does it cheerfully; for it does not believe it is necessary for him to suffer for us, it will deal directly with God through its own good works. But God must reveal it in their hearts by his Spirit more than is proclaimed by words into their ears; yea, even those to whom the Spirit reveals it in their hearts believe it with difficulty and must struggle with it. Such a great and wonderful thing it is that the Son of man died the death of the cross willingly and cheerfully to fulfill the Scriptures, that is, for our welfare; it is a mystery and it remains a mystery.

5. From this it now follows how foolish they act who teach that people should patiently bear their sufferings and death in order to atone for their sins and obtain grace; and especially those who comfort such, who should be put out of the way by the civil law and the sentence of death, or who are to die in other ways; and pretend that if they suffer willingly all their sins will consequently be forgiven them. Such persons only mislead the people for they bury out of sight Christ and his death upon whom our comfort is founded, and bring the people to a false confidence in their own suffering and death. This is the worst of all things a man can experience at the end of his life, and by it he is led direct into perdition. But you learn and say.

Whose death! Whose patience! My death is nothing; will not have it nor hear of it for my consolation. Christ’s suffering and death are my consolation, upon it I rely for the forgiveness of my sins; but my own death I will suffer, to the praise and honor of my God, freely and gratuitously, and for the advantage and profit of my neighbor, and in no way whatever depend upon it to avail anything in my own behalf before God.

6. It is indeed one thing to die boldly and fearlessly, or to suffer death patiently, or to bear other pain willingly; and another thing to atone for sin by such death and sufferings, and thus obtain grace from God. The first the heathen have done, and many reckless villains and rough people still do; but the other is a poisonous addition, devised by Satan, like all other lies, by which he founds our trust and consolation upon our own doings, and works, against which we are to guard. For as firmly as I should resist one, who teaches me to enter a monastery, when I wish to be saved; so firmly should I also oppose any who would in my last hour point me to my own death and suffering for consolation and hope, as if they would help to wash away my sins. For both deny God and his Christ, blaspheme his grace and pervert his Gospel. They, however, do much better who hold a crucifix before the dying and admonish them of Christ’s death and sufferings.

7. I must relate an example and experience that is in point here and is not to be despised. There was once a good hermit, reared in this faith of human merit, who was called upon to comfort a man of prominence upon his death bed, and he approached the sick man dauntlessly and consoled him thus: My dear friend, only suffer death patiently and willingly and I will pledge you my soul you will be a child of eternal life. Well, he promised him he would do so, and he passed away by death with this comfort. But three days later the hermit himself became sick unto death, when the true teacher, Rev. Reuling, came and opened his eyes so that he saw what he had done and taught, and he lay until he died and lamented that he had given such counsel and consolation: O, woe is me, what have I advised!

Frivolous people laughed at him that he failed to do as he had taught others to do; he offered another the pledge of his own soul that he might die in peace and he himself now sinks in despair not only before death, but also at the advice he so confidently had given and now so publicly rebuked and recalled. But God surely said to him that which is written in Luke 4:23: “Physician, heal thyself;” and another passage, Luke 12:21; “So is he that layeth up treasures for himself, and is not rich toward God.” For here surely the blind led the blind and both fell into the ditch, and both were condemned. Luke 6:39. The first, because he died trusting in his own patient suffering and death, the other, because he despaired of God’s grace and had not acknowledged it, and besides he also thought, had he not committed sin, he would have departed this life saved; and in both Christ remained unknown and was denied. On this point some books are misleading, in which the sayings also of St. Augustine and others are sounded forth, how death is only a door to life and a medicine against sin; for they do not see that these words are to be understood as referring to Christ’s death and sufferings. But simple and plain as this example is, it teaches us in a masterly manner how no work, no human suffering, no death can help us or stand before God. For one cannot indeed deny here that the first did the highest work, namely, suffered death with patience, in which free will did its best; and yet he was lost as the other who confessed and clearly proved by his despair. And whoever will not believe these two examples must find it out by experience for himself.

8. The above is said concerning faith in the sufferings of Christ. As he now offered himself for us, we should also follow the same example of love, and offer ourselves for the welfare of our neighbor, with all we have. We have spoken sufficiently on other occasions that Christ is to be preached in these two ways; but it is talk that no one desires to understand; the Word is hid from them; for “the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God.” 1 Corinthians 2:14.

II. THE FAITH AND LOVE OF THE BLIND MAN.

9. The second part of our Gospel treats of the blind man, in which we see beautifully and clearly illustrated both the love in Christ to the blind man and the faith of the blind man in Christ. At present we will briefly consider the faith of the blind man.

10. First, he hears that Christ was passing by, he had also heard of him before, that Jesus of Nazareth was a kind man, and that he helps every one who only calls upon him. His faith and confidence in Christ grew out of his hearing; so he did not doubt but that Christ would also help him. But such faith in his heart he would not have been able to possess had he not heard and known of Christ; for faith does not come except by hearing.

11. Secondly, he firmly believes and doubts not but that it was true what he heard of Christ, as the following proves. Although he does not yet see nor know Christ, and although he at once knew him, yet he is not able to see or know whether Christ had a heart and will to help him; but he immediately believed, when he heard of him; upon such a noise and report he founded his confidence, and therefore he did not make a mistake.

12. Thirdly, in harmony with his faith, he calls on Christ and prays, as St.

Paul in Romans 10:13-14 wrote: “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed.” Also, “Whoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.”

13. Fourthly, he also freely confesses Christ and fears no one; his need constrains him to the point that he inquires for no one else. For it is the nature of true faith to confess Christ to be the only one who can and will help, while others are ashamed and afraid to do this before the world.

14. Fifthly, he struggles not only with his conscience, which doubtless moves him to think he is not worthy of such favor, but he also struggles, with those who threatened him and urged him to keep quiet. They wished thereby to terrify his conscience and make him bashful, so that he should see his own unworthiness, and then despair. For wherever faith begins, there begin also war and conflict.

15. Sixthly, the blind man stands firm, presses through all obstacles and triumphs, he would not let the whole world sever him from his confidence, and not even his own conscience to do it. Therefore he obtained the answer of his prayer and received Christ, so that Christ stood and commanded him to be brought unto him, and he offered to do for him whatever he wished. So it goes with all who hold firmly only to the Word of God, close their eyes and ears against the devil, the world and themselves, and act just as if they and God were the only ones in heaven and on earth.

16. Seventhly he follows Christ, that is he enters upon the road of love and of the cross, where Christ is walking, does righteous works, and is of a good character and calling, refrains from going about with foolish works as workrighteous persons do.

17. Eighthly, he thanks and praises God, and offers a true sacrifice that is pleasing to God, Psalm 50:23: “Whoso offereth the sacrifice of thanksgiving glorifieth me; and to him that ordereth his way aright will I show the salvation of God.”

18. Ninthly, he was the occasion that many others praised God, in that they saw what he did, for every Christian is helpful and a blessing to everybody, and besides he praises and honors God upon earth.

19. Finally, we see here how Christ encourages us both by his works and words. In the first place by his works, in that he sympathizes so strongly with the blind man and makes it clear, how pleasing faith is to him, so that Christ is at once absorbed with interest in the man, stops and does what the blind man desires in his faith. In the second place, that Christ praises his faith in words, and says: “Thy faith hath made thee whole;” he casts the honor of the miracle from himself and attributes it to the faith of the blind man. The summary is: to faith is vouchsafed what it asks, and it is moreover our great honor before God.

20. This blind man represents the spiritually blind, the state of every man born of Adam, who neither sees nor knows the kingdom of God; but it is of grace that he feels and knows his blindness and would gladly be delivered from it. They are saintly sinners who feel their faults and sigh for grace. But he sits by the wayside and begs, that is, he sits among the teachers of the law and desires help; but it is begging, with works he must appear blue and help himself. The people pass him by and let him sit, that is the people of the law make a great noise and are heard among the teachers of good works, they go before Christ and Christ follows them. But when he heard Christ, that is, when a heart hears the Gospel of faith, it calls and cries, and has no rest until it comes to Christ. Those, however, who would silence and scold him are the teachers of works, who wish to quiet and suppress the doctrine and cry of faith; but they stir the heart the more. For the nature of the Gospel is, the more it is restrained the more progress it makes. Afterwards he received his sight, all his work and life are nothing but the praise and honor of God, and he follows Christ with joy, so that the whole world wonders and is thereby made better.

Herman Otten's Christian News 2-12-2018,
Publishes the UOJ Brief Statement of 1932,
Which Is Now the Filter Through Which the Scriptures Are Read

 Does this say we were already pronounced forgiven, even before we were born, as Cascione and McCain claimed, quoting Preus quoting Edward Preuss?
Hardly!


Of Justification
17.  Holy Scripture sums up all its teachings regarding the love of God to the world of sinners, regarding the salvation wrought by Christ, and regarding faith in Christ as the only way to obtain salvation, in the article of justification. Scripture teaches that God has already declared the whole world to be righteous in Christ, Rom. 5:19; 2 Cor. 5:18-21; Rom. 4:25; that therefore not for the sake of their good works, but without the works of the Law, by grace, for Christ’s sake, He justifies, that is, accounts as righteous, all those who believe, accept, and rely on, the fact that for Christ’s sake their sins are forgiven. Thus the Holy Ghost testifies through St. Paul: “There is no difference; for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,” Rom. 3:23, 24. And again: “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the Law,” Rom. 3:28.

 These words are never mentioned by the UOJ Stormtroopers, and the fanatics are absolutely allergic to the phrase Justification by Faith.


Herman Otten and His UOJ Stormtroopers Are the Radical Liberal Universalists. 
Notice - he is reading Christian News,with a big feature on Valleskey and Church Growth.

Pietism has no use for the Creeds of Christendom and considers the cell group and their faction as the One True Church. That was the belief of Walther and his buddies following Martin Stephan. They alone had the Gospel, and when they left Europe, the Gospel left with them. One person from the group disagreed, and he lost his financial subsidy until he retracted. That sounds just like the LCMS-WELS-ELS today.

Pietism degenerates quickly into rationalism, and rationalism into Universalism. Missouri already took a quasi-Universalistic stance in the name of Objective Justification in 1932. Although the 1932 Brief Statement was just a political move, the UOJ fanatics seized on it (selectively) as their canon law, their most excellent way to beat people to death.



Although Otten likes to denounce the liberals, he is The Heresiarch, cleverly adopting a pious stance while removing the Biblical foundations of the efficacious Word and Sacraments. Honoring Stephan's pimp and enforcer - CFW Walther - Otten dishonors the Scriptures and the Book of Concord, St. Paul, Augustine, Luther, Melanchthon, and Chemnitz.

"But that cannot be right!" loyal readers cry out. "CFW Walther judges everyone and everything."

If anyone disagrees with Walther, who learned UOJ from the promiscuous Bishop Stephan, that person is a blasted liar, heretic, and secret buyer of Girl Scout cookies (WELS only).



 Walther repudiated faith and never recovered from his training in rationalism and Pietism. But we do not need to be bound to his ignorance. Faith comes from God, and Jesus teaches us to believe in Him and His righteousness,
the righteousness of faith. 

Practical Reflections on the Book of Ruth by Rev. M. C. Horine - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry





Practical Reflections on the Book of Ruth by Rev. M. C. Horine - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry:



"Ruth forsook father and mother, country and friends, to cast in her lot with the people of God, and her name is linked with that of the greatest king of Israel, and with that of the great Redeemer of mankind. In her noble act of self-sacrifice she honored God; and God, in accordance with His promise, honored her. No one ever lost anything by being true to God. He is able to reward His faithful servants, and He does reward them liberally.

From the Introduction by Rev. Eli Huber, Messiah Lutheran Church, Philadelphia
About M. C. Horine

Download the E-book
From the Introduction by Rev. Eli Huber, Messiah Lutheran Church, Philadelphia
“The discourses that make up the little volume before us were prepared by a well-known Lutheran pastor for the members of his own congregation. They are based on continuous sections of the Book of Ruth; and they gain not a little advantage from the fact that they have for their foundation a portion of the Divine word so full of interest and so rich in material for useful instruction.

“That the Book of Ruth is interesting is a universally acknowledged fact. The story it tells holds the attention from first to last. The characters it delineates awaken sympathy in all hearts. The pictures it paints are specially attractive and afford enjoyment to young and old, to cultured and rude. The scene in which Ruth makes known her unalterable purpose to cleave to Naomi, let come what will, is one of surpassing tenderness and loveliness.

About M. C. Horine
Mahlon C. Horine was born July 14, 1838 in Frederick County, Maryland. In 1861 he married Emma Frances Winebrenner in Gettysburg. They had six children.

Dr. Horine graduated from Gettysburg College in 1861, Gettysburg Lutheran Seminary in 1863, and earned D.D. from Muhlenburg College in 1892. He served pastorates at Smithsburg, Maryland 1865-1869, Dayton, Ohio 1869-1870, Zanesville, Ohio 1870-1873, Danville, Pa. 1873-1881, St. James. Reading, Pa., 1881-1909, and Trinity Lutheran, Monoa, DE 1913-1917.

His ordination in 1864 was at the Maryland Synod, Baltimore, Maryland. Rev. Horine went to be with the Lord on May 16, 1917.1

“The Bible is a perennial fountain which sends out a continuous stream of living water to refresh the thirsting souls of weary men… The book of Ruth is one of the brightest gems of sacred biography. it abounds in beautiful, touching and interesting incidents, and while it charms and pleases the reader, it at the same time instructs and improves him.”"



'via Blog this'

Practical Reflections on the Book of Ruth by Rev. M. C. Horine - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry





Practical Reflections on the Book of Ruth by Rev. M. C. Horine - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry:



"Ruth forsook father and mother, country and friends, to cast in her lot with the people of God, and her name is linked with that of the greatest king of Israel, and with that of the great Redeemer of mankind. In her noble act of self-sacrifice she honored God; and God, in accordance with His promise, honored her. No one ever lost anything by being true to God. He is able to reward His faithful servants, and He does reward them liberally.

From the Introduction by Rev. Eli Huber, Messiah Lutheran Church, Philadelphia
About M. C. Horine
Contents
Download the E-book
From the Introduction by Rev. Eli Huber, Messiah Lutheran Church, Philadelphia
“The discourses that make up the little volume before us were prepared by a well-known Lutheran pastor for the members of his own congregation. They are based on continuous sections of the Book of Ruth; and they gain not a little advantage from the fact that they have for their foundation a portion of the Divine word so full of interest and so rich in material for useful instruction.

“That the Book of Ruth is interesting is a universally acknowledged fact. The story it tells holds the attention from first to last. The characters it delineates awaken sympathy in all hearts. The pictures it paints are specially attractive and afford enjoyment to young and old, to cultured and rude. The scene in which Ruth makes known her unalterable purpose to cleave to Naomi, let come what will, is one of surpassing tenderness and loveliness.

About M. C. Horine
Mahlon C. Horine was born July 14, 1838 in Frederick County, Maryland. In 1861 he married Emma Frances Winebrenner in Gettysburg. They had six children.

Dr. Horine graduated from Gettysburg College in 1861, Gettysburg Lutheran Seminary in 1863, and earned D.D. from Muhlenburg College in 1892. He served pastorates at Smithsburg, Maryland 1865-1869, Dayton, Ohio 1869-1870, Zanesville, Ohio 1870-1873, Danville, Pa. 1873-1881, St. James. Reading, Pa., 1881-1909, and Trinity Lutheran, Monoa, DE 1913-1917.

His ordination in 1864 was at the Maryland Synod, Baltimore, Maryland. Rev. Horine went to be with the Lord on May 16, 1917.1

“The Bible is a perennial fountain which sends out a continuous stream of living water to refresh the thirsting souls of weary men… The book of Ruth is one of the brightest gems of sacred biography. it abounds in beautiful, touching and interesting incidents, and while it charms and pleases the reader, it at the same time instructs and improves him.”"



'via Blog this'

Plain Simple Language about the Atonement and Justification by Faith

 This would be a fitting and an honest replacement of the Martin Luther statues in Lutheran higher education.

The LCMS-WELS-ELS seminaries teach students to be loyal to their denomination, which means being in awe of their manufactured history and their pioneering pastors. Missouri breeds loyalty in one seminary versus the other, and WELS holds itself above the ELS at all times, though they "cherish their fellowship."

But no passage exists in the Scriptures to teach loyalty to men or human institutions. Quite the opposite is true. One of harshest judgments comes upon those who are "face persons," respecters of persons in older English, those who only look at outside appearances.



The entire Bible teaches faith in Christ, from the beginning to the end, telling us about the mighty acts of God so we might have hope in the future and the comfort of forgiveness in our Savior. This faith is not what cowardly Universalists try to teach people, as if it were something bad, evil, and coming from man. The Holy Spirit teaches us through the Word, and the Spirit plants this faith in our hearts, so we trust the divine and effective message of the Word. The Holy Spirit continues to work in the invisible Word of teaching and preaching, the visible Word of the Sacraments, to renew and strengthen and increase our faith in God's grace.

That is the great shame of Universal Objective Justification, which reminds me of the cool liberal clergy who equated coffee and doughnuts after the service with Holy Communion. During the coffee hour they would say, "We are having Communion now!"

 Graduation day at the Mequon campus.


The Scriptures teach the death and resurrection of Christ as one matter, Justification by Faith as another. The UOJ fanatics are completely confused, because some of them teach the Universal Salvation of the World at the moment of Christ's death. But others abuse 1 Timothy 3:16 to claim their precious World Absolution without Faith the moment He rose from the dead. No passage in the Bible or the Book of Concord claims such a confused, merged concept.

The Atonement is not God's declaration that the world is forgiven and saved without faith. The Atonement is called many things in the Bible, such as redemption and propitiation. Yes, Christ died for all sins. Teaching Justification by Faith is not a denial of the Atonement. It takes a lot of ignorance to suggest that Justification by Faith means a Limited Atonement. But look at the babble from the UOJ rabble - they do not trust the Word but fill the world with their books, articles, and self-bestowed honors.

Various Proofs of Their Duplicity
The UOJ Stormtroopers will never quote Justification by Faith. They cannot even say the dreaded words - Justification by Faith. John Sparky Brenner and Daniel the Dence Preus have proven that claim for me - and there are others.

The Enthusiasts may mention the Means of Grace, with delicacy born of their life of lies, but they exploit the phrase to give their ravings a Lutheran sound.

The UOJ Gestapo is quick to shun, punish, and expel anyone suspected of Justification by Faith fidelity - ironic, eh? Therefuse to discuss the doctrinal issue with anyone who disagrees with them and refuses to bow the knee to Baal, Edward Preuss, and Rambach.

 From time to time, the UOJ Stormtroopers
gather to discuss their precious dogma of UOJ.


Non-Reciprocity of the False Teachers
The false teachers must be quoted to show everyone their errors, but they refuse to say - "We teach world salvation without faith, but the critics teach Justification by Faith as found in the Scriptures and the Book of Concord." They do not ever reciprocate with a fair response to the other side, not even with verbatim quotations from Luther, Melanchthon, Chemnitz, Gerhard, or the Book of Concord.

When will Rolf or Daniel Preus or someone from the clan post a graphic from Justification and Rome?

That comparison will never happen. Likewise, the Fuller faculty never has a kind or generous word to say about Luther, but the false teachers - filled with UOJ Enthusiasm - never stop quoting and plagiarizing their masters at Fuller, Willow Creek, and Trinity Divinity.


 "Our work in WELS has borne fruit, team."

 Source - Robert Preus, Justification and Rome.


 Robert Preus, Justification and Rome,
edited by Daniel and Rolf Preus.

Daniel - The Dense - Preus Unravels the Walther Myth and the Swindle of the Synodical Conference -
Unawares, As Always

 Walther was the new Pope, the Anti-Luther.


 The ELS-WELS-LCMS celebrated Luther's 500th by having a conference about their local heroes: Walther, Hoenecke, and Koren.

I do not have time to expose all the knee-slapping honkers in the Daniel Preus essay, found here. CFW Walther was another Luther - without knowing it.

In the Synodical Conference, 90% of the clergy believe only 10% of the Walther mythology, and only 10% believe 90% of the fables.

Walther was Bishop Martin Stephan's pimp and enforcer, never standing in the way of the founder's young female groupies, always enforcing the law imposed by the bishop. Yes, Walther signed the document making Stephan their bishop for life, much as Heiser gathered clergy around him who would who also give him his heart's desire, a fish hat and stick.

To Fall for the Walther Mythology...

  1. We must forget Walther's Pietistic and rationalistic circle moving to Stephan's cult once their first cell group leader died. 
  2. We must ignore that Stephan was often seen in the company of young women in the wee hours of the night, breaking the law about having conventicle meetings away from his Pietistic congregation.
  3. We must deny that Walther happily kidnapped his niece and nephew, boarded a ship with them - 
  4. And even knew Stephan abandoned his wife and family to take his mistress to America with him - on the same ship, with her cabin nearby. Walther's brother was on that adulterous ship - and CFW did not know? Please.


Daniel the Dense was once the curator of the LCMS Hysterical Society, a parachurch organization that has fits when Walther is considered less than divine. Paul McCain was too. It seems the organization was a halfway house for unemployable synod ex-bosses. Both men should know better, but they repeat the old bromides learned at Ft. Wayne, which lacked a library at that time. No, it must have, because a few books on the Reformation would have taught them the folly of applying Calvinistic and Pietistic dogma to the Reformation.

So Much For Walther the "Founder." Now - the "Theologian."

Preus uses the term "justification" no less than 28 times! - but Justification by Faith - not even once. Preus is not even related to John Sparky Brenner, but they have the same deceptive streak in the history of doctrine. Anyone can trace the history of doctrine - believer or not - if the individual is honest about it. But they are both dishonest in the same way, and they are not even related (so far). Give the Preus clan enough time and they will marry into all the families of the Synodical Conference. They even have their own publishing firm to produce books about...The Preus Family.

 Preus uses "objective justification" four times, but the word "objective" another eight times, in relation to his special pleading for objective justification. In his dimly lit den of dogma, Preus imagines -

The whole world has been justified and declared righteous in the eyes of God by virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection. p. 20

As I have written many times before, the Absolution of the World - without Faith - is the strange merger of the Atonement and Justification by Faith, accomplished by the Calvinistic and rationalistic elements in Lutheran Pietism.

Walther was trained in this Easter Absolution of the World by a syphilitic cell group guru - Martin Stephan - who studied at Halle University but never graduated from any university. Stephan only had his call by virtue of being a Bohemian Pietist. The congregation had some special privileges, which he abused steadfastly until he was finally tried, convicted, and allowed to escape with his cult, the Walther circle, and some minor children.

Daniel also quotes Walther's absurd sermon, Halle rationalistic Pietism, false exegesis of 1 Timothy 3:16.

Just as Christ’s condemnation was the condemnation of all mankind, Christ’s death the death of all mankind, Christ’s payment the payment for all mankind, even so Christ’s life is now the life of all mankind, His acquittal the acquittal of all mankind, His justification the justification of all mankind, His absolution the absolution of all mankind. p. 18

1 Timothy 3:16 does not teach that God "justified the entire world" when Jesus rose from the dead. Has anyone read Chemnitz on this?

Walther is Luther? or Rambach?

Walther is Huber Unaware - not Luther at all.
Rydecki on 1 Timothy 3:16

Intrepids on 1 Timothy 3:16; Jay Webber sides with Rambach.


Daniel's essay is another example of Walther's impoverished thetical style -
A. Proclaim the dogma.
B. List some Scripture to prove the dogma.

David Valleskey - another fan of Universal Absolution without Faith - defended Church Growth the same way, with paper thesis statements so contrary to Scripture that I called it "Figs from Thistles."



Fate is capricious, unless we believe that God is at work in history, even in our puny lives. Daniel Preus is listed with his brother Rolf as editors of Justification and Rome, by their father. And yet the book refutes their passionate promotion of Pietistic World Absolution.

Daniel and Rolf like to mention their authorities. I will quote the book.





 "No fair quoting Luther, Melanchthon, and the Concordists from the Book of Concord." Does anyone read today?