Lutheran Layman Code-Named 29A - Reminds Us about Adiaphora

From Yet Another Layman - 29A:
Reading Ichabod.  I remember the big to do back in the 1980s about adiaphora. Even CFW made a quote about adiaphora in a state of confession. They forgot that about their hero. 

Reminds me of that Theodore Schmauk   I read on ichabod. I summarize. It will not stop until they cross the borders of Scripture itself. Maybe they already have with NIV2011.

About the Crunchy Lutheran Mommy Conversion to Eastern Orthodoxy

From Another Reader - with permission:

I read your latest post about the LCMS Pastor who became Eastern Orthodox. I am not sure it is solely because of UOJ. I went to his blog and read a couple of his posts. He is arguing that liturgy and practice do matter. This is going to continue happening. I say the same thing to my husband all the time. The Lutheran Church I grew up in was very strict in matters of liturgy and practice. Now I am being told that it is adiaphora. We can all worship how we are moved. For your church that may be with Keith Getty music, but it doesn’t matter. We are all one. To which I ask, “Are you really sure about that?”  What am I going to be told is adiaphora next? If we can just change practice depending how I feel, why not just change the whole thing?  I  believe the truth of Sola Scriptura, but worship and practice do matter. They are a mirror of our doctrine. They are a reflection of who we are. If we are not teaching that, we are failing. I am sure the Pastor who left has more reasons. I am sure the struggle for him was real. I find that the Lutheran Church does not want to address this. They are fine with the fact that they are fractured. How many more people are struggling inside?

***

GJ - The synods are happy to grab the tuition money, so they keep their eyes half-shut when a paying customer is in the seminary. Having someone leave afterwards is not so bad, because it opens up a slot. If anyone thinks the synod leaders care about the individual congregations...think again. I asked a prominent Concordia St. Louis professor about the "shortage" situation. He said, "I don't know and I don't care."

The adiaphora excuse only shows the apostates have not opened the Book of Concord for any reason. Or they simply despise the Confessions.

Formula of Concord - SD X:

10] We believe, teach, and confess also that at the time of confession [when a confession of the heavenly truth is required], when the enemies of God's Word desire to suppress the pure doctrine of the holy Gospel, the entire congregation of God, yea, every Christian, but especially the ministers of the Word, as the leaders of the congregation of God [as those whom God has appointed to rule His Church], are bound by God's Word to confess freely and openly the [godly] doctrine, and what belongs to the whole of [pure] religion, not only in words, but also in works and with deeds; and that then, in this case, even in such [things truly and of themselves] adiaphora, they must not yield to the adversaries, or permit these [adiaphora] to be forced upon them by their enemies, whether by violence or cunning, to the detriment of the true worship of God and the introduction and sanction of idolatry. 11] For it is written, Gal. 5:1: Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not again entangled in the yoke of bondage. Also Gal. 2:4f : And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage; to whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you. 12] [Now it is manifest that in that place Paul speaks concerning circumcision, which at that time had become an adiaphoron (1 Cor. 7:18f.), and which at other occasions was observed by Paul (however, with Christian and spiritual freedom, Acts 16:3). But when the false apostles urged circumcision for establishing their false doctrine, (that the works of the Law were necessary for righteousness and salvation,) and misused it for confirming their error in the minds of men, Paul says that he would not yield even for an hour, in order that the truth of the Gospel might continue unimpaired.]

I do not know where this reader worships, but the adiaphora argument was used constantly to excuse WELS chasing after the Evangelicals and Pentecostals. Visit any Assemblies of God congregation and you will find all the key ingredients of a Mark and Avoid Jeske church:

1. Praise band.
2. Stage - not a chancel. A table maybe, no real altar.
3. No pulpit.
4. Coaching sessions, no sermon. 
5. Hide the sacraments.
6. Screens here, there, everywhere.
7. Selling coffee - supposedly gourmet. Ha.
8. Parking valet. No, I am not kidding.
9. Digital giving, such as having an ATM in the narthex.
10. Clergy attire confused with going to a picnic.

Notice that the favorite motto of the Jeske circle - A Changeless Christ in a Changing World - is also employed by the apostate American Lutheran Publicity Bureau. It is the name of their history book about how they bravely abandoned Lutheran doctrine. So, is that a liberal thing? Yes, the motto is a liberal thing.

The other argument used by WELS is - "Perhaps we should not exercise our liberty, because that might harm those of you with a weak faith." A smirk would follow. There is no use citing the red section of Article X above, because that has as much meaning to them as Egyptian Book of the Dead in its original language.

Besides all that, Eastern Orthodoxy is long on ceremony, short on doctrinal clarity. The poor abused students of Concordia, Ft. Wayne graduate with two great loves - Eastern Orthodoxy and UOJ. UOJ paves the path to Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Church Growthism, and ultimately atheism. I know two WELS pastors who espoused Church Growth and UOJ only to become atheists - loud and proud - as their confused thoughts led them away from the Word.

The WELS-LCMS-ELS leaders, yea even the CLC (sic) have facilitated this loss of doctrine for the last 40 years plus.

The only WELS excommunication of a pastor for doctrinal reasons was DP Buchholz, SP Schroeder, and their DP allies extending the Left Foot of Fellowship to someone who defended Justification by Faith, the Chief Article of Christianity. How dare he?

 And your little dog too!

The Obligation To Know Our Constitution and To Study the News. Hint. TV News Is Entertainment, Not News

I do not comment on the news and politics very often because genuine research and writing on those topics is being done. Hardly anyone is dealing with the Chief Article and the Means of Grace.

Every American citizen has an obligation to know the US Constitution and what it means. A reporter asked about the issues and I said, Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. I also visited the Congressman's office and talked to the staff member.

Link to the text of the US Constitution

I read a  lot of news sources but laugh at the TV puppet shows. They rely on print journalism, so their material is already second-hand and suspect. The amount covered in a TV broadcast is slight and even that is slanted toward the numbers they value. A non-journalist often makes the news happen - The Drudge Report. He reports 10 billion views in the last year. Yes, b-b-b-billion.

Free Republic is the best news discussion website because the Left-wing sources are linked and discussed. Many participants are experts in their fields, unlike Steadfast Lutherans and SpenerQuest.

Conservative Treehouse has detailed analysis about what is happening, and who is connected to whom. He is the Dilbert writer, too. I was struck by his intuition about leadership, during the election.

The American Spectator has been good at times, but is more likely to provoke a W-H-A-T? response because of truly awful essays. The Spectator led on the Arkansas State Troopers and Clinton, years ago.

The American Thinker has quite a few articles every day. I find some gems there from time to time.

Jack Cashill tends to take on neglected topics, showing independence and great research. However, his columns are too short. However, for the rare news analysis, not going with the pack, he is unusual.

ChurchMouse is in Britain; he is one of the few religious bloggers I respect. By the way - if you want American news stories, read the British press. They are not curled up in the laps of politicians. Recently CM linked to a new source that I knew nothing about.  Look up his Brendan Dilley posts for some behind-the-scenes reporting.

Reading extensively is the only way to get a grasp of what is happening in this Age of Apostasy. Is child trafficking really a world-wide crime of the wealthy elite? I know from many sources that it is, from Hillsong and the Australian Cardinal to Jimmy'll Fixit and Haiti. Those who do not know the basics are condemned to spend their lives in cognitive dissonance, not believing the truth because the facts are so shocking.

It is foolish to rely on one source, because there are so many agendas. Suppressing the news is very popular. One reader responded to this one sentence post.

Peter Hitchens - News is what somebody, somewhere, wants suppressed.

Our job as American voters is to find that news.