Monday, February 8, 2021

The Bible Book - Wescott-Hort Employed Tischendorf - And Now Nestle-Aland.
Nida Dynamic Equivalence Paraphrase? Eugene Is Your Man

 Lobegott (Praise God) Friedrich Constantin (von) Tischendorf

V. Wescott-Hort’s Use of Tischendorf Became Nestle-Aland’s Standard Text

 

            Three giant steps took us away from the Traditional Text of the King James Bible, Luther’s German Bible, and the concept of the Holy Scriptures being the inspired Word of God, infallible and inerrant.[1] From the perspective of its discoveries and promotions, the new basis for Greek New Testament had all the authority and supremacy of the Piltdown Man, “discovered” in 1912. The way in which people have become famous by finding and promoting new evidence should give us pause to consider its veracity. My Notre Dame professor in Judaism, Charles Primus, indelibly marked me with the habit of doubting all historical claims. We learn the so-called facts in neat little packages and then express alarm when someone challenges the man-made harmony. He often stated what we “knew” about ancient Judaism and offered examples that overturned the claim.

            Two contradictory views of the Bible are taught at the same time. One views the Bible as the Word of God, the product of Holy Spirit working through men to reveal God’s will. The other is often called the natural view, which means the Bible is a man-made book, just like every other creation of man, and should be studied from that perspective. The 20th Century denominations replaced the traditional view and text with the natural view and new text.

            The modern Bibles, with very few exceptions and only a fraction of the market, represent the natural view. Their New Testaments eliminate words, verses, and interpretations with unholy glee. The omissions, when too obvious, are given a footnote which deliberately confuses the matter. Changes in translation are footnoted with the same result. For example, the Revised Standard Version, a product of the National Council of Churches, translated the Virgin Birth in Isaiah 7 as “a young woman will conceive.” The ferocious backlash caused them to backpeddle, but only a little. The Virgin Birth was restored but the footnote was added “or young woman.” Readers will find that their modern Bibles remove the Virgin Birth with a footnote – “or young woman.”

            Let us look at the passage in English rather than debate the Hebrew word, almah, which does mean virgin. The Lord offered King Ahaz a great miracle, anything he asked, whether in heaven above or below. But hypocritical Ahaz refused God’s offer, a monumental toke of his arrogance.

Isaiah 7:13 And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also? 14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel [God with us].

If we translate these verses in harmony with the modernists, it makes no sense. Ahaz will not ask for a miracle from God, so God will show him a direct miracle no one could ever imagine – a young woman will have a baby. That does not sound like a great miracle from God Himself; the baby’s name is not at all fitting – Immanuel, God with us in Hebrew. The modern, rationalistic translation contradicts the context and the implications of the statement. This is a perfect example of the rationalists imposing their lack of faith on the text and translation. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America’s first bishop, Herb Chilsrom, did not believe in the Virgin Birth and treated Mary as just another pregnant bride. The same is true of the Braaten-Jenson Dogmatics, so we should not assume that the Bible text, the Biblical translation, and the doctrinal statements are insulated from each other. Apostasy is not atheism – it is far worse, those who once believed turning back from the Truth and worshiping pagan idols, whether Marxist or Marist.

The Piltdown Codices, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus – Nida Dynamic Translator

            Born in 1815, Lobegott[2] Friedrich Constantin (von) Tischendorf made a name for himself by finding the text under the manuscript called Ephraim Rescriptus[3]. His next great find, in 1844, was Codex Sinaiticus, almost as mystical as the Sword in the Stone, and made more powerful with his leverage. He became a famous Greek text editor and named his find Aleph, the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet. He designated Codex Vaticanus as B, so his favorite, personal and highly recommended discoveries were given automatic promotions, since they became the guidestones (like Joseph Smith’s) for knowing the true nature of the original text of the New Testament. The two discoveries were not identical but were advertised as the best, earliest, and most accurate texts, dubious on all three counts.

            Wescott and Hort used Aleph and B to whittle down the Greek text of their edition, which they did without including a critical apparatus to show their work, another reason to suspect their motives. The critical apparatus is a way of telling the public what words or phrases were used or omitted. The Revision of the KJV was a failure, but the Wescott Hort text eventually became the norm. Young students of the Greek New Testament bought a red plastic Greek New Testament from the United Bible Societies. The impression given to us was the readings favored by Aleph and B were the best.

            Karl Lachmann (1793-1851) declared his program in 1830 – “Down with the late text of the Textus Receptus, and back to the text of the early-fourth century church.”[4] Tischendorf devoted his work to accomplish this goal.

            The next step was the Nestle Greek New Testament text, which replaced the Textus Receptus printings of the British and Foreign Bible Society, twenty years after the Wescott-Hort edition was published. “This marked the final defeat of the Textus Receptus, nearly four hundred years after it was first printed.”[5] In the 1940s, Kurt Aland became associated with the work of Erwin Nestle, the son of the founder, Eberhard. Aland’s second wife, Barbara, was involved in this Nestle-Aland project and continued after Kurt’s death. Their institute is famous for the Nestle-Aland edition – Novum Testamentum Graece - and the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament. Significantly, Eugene Nida, who invented and promoted dynamic equivalence Biblical translating, worked with the Aland institute.



[1] For the longest time, infallible was enough to describe God’s Word as without any error or contradiction, revealed by the Holy Spirit. In its birth year 1947, Fuller Seminary was already watering down infallible to mean “only in doctrine, not in geography or history.” Later they withdrew that mild, compromising statement to state they did not have time to quarrel over terminology when so much mission work needed to be done. If only the Apostles had been so purpose-driven!

[2] Lobegott means Praise God in German.

[3] The Biblical text was erased to allow Ephraim’s timeless words to be saved. Writing material were difficult to obtain, so some ancient documents became palimpsests, rewrites.

[4] Cited in Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland, The Text of the New Testament, 1981, p. 11.

[5] The Text of the New Testament, p. 19.


 Eugene Nida - dynamic equivalence "translator"

Giving Up on the Heirs of Walther's Lies, Thievery, and False Doctrine

TELL began in 1977 with a written endorsement from the Synod President, Oscar Naumann.

I need to post for the early-birds, who worry about my health - if I fail to write before dawn. I understand. The doctor no longer says, "How do you feel lately?" but "Have you fallen since I last saw you?" 

I just did some copy/paste work on abuse in the broken WELS educational system. But I know nothing will come of it. The abusive bullies will deny everything and support one another with the love that only drunks have for one another. Yes, they encourage out of control alcohol abuse among the students too, but "There is no love greater than the love of one drunk for another," as my father used to say. 

GA buddies take care of each other.


WELS-LCMS will continue their rapid decline - and abuse of members - because they let the radical Left take over with Objective Justification. They claim, as Synod President Mark Schroeder does, that their synod was born in Lutheran Orthodoxy and formed to escape religious persecution, etc. WELS and Missouri once taught Justification by Faith officially but they let the Walther-Pieper OJ faction slowly take over. The next stages were ecumenism (where they love every doctrine but their own) and Church Growth gimmicks. Working with ELCA now, they are almost doctrine-free, which means - as everyone knows - anything goes.

WELS-LCMS fans - it was over about 50 years ago. See the graphics above. 

Does anyone ask, 

  1. "What became of all the money and property that the Walther-led riot stole from Bishop Martin Stephan?" 
  2. "Why did the Missouri Synod give Walther an enormous cash gift but refused to pay back more than a pittance of the stolen loot to Bishop Stephan?"
  3. "Why did Walther use Stephan's chalice for Holy Communion at his St. Louis church?"
 Fellow Church Growth genius David Valleskey (WELS) became seminary president on the strength of his Church Growth Enthusiasm.