The Twelfth Sunday after Trinity
Pastor Gregory L. Jackson
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship
Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time
The Hymn #462 I Love Thy Kingdom 4:21
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual
The Gospel
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #123 O God Our Help 4:3
Sufficiency from God
The Communion Hymn # 304 An Awful Mystery 4:6
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 376 Rock of Ages 4:47
KJV 2 Corinthians 3:4 And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward: 5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; 6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. 7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth. 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.
KJV Mark 7:31 And again, departing from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, he came unto the sea of Galilee, through the midst of the coasts of Decapolis. 32 And they bring unto him one that was deaf, and had an impediment in his speech; and they beseech him to put his hand upon him. 33 And he took him aside from the multitude, and put his fingers into his ears, and he spit, and touched his tongue; 34 And looking up to heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him, Ephphatha, that is, Be opened. 35 And straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. 36 And he charged them that they should tell no man: but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it; 37 And were beyond measure astonished, saying, He hath done all things well: he maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak.
Twelfth Sunday After Trinity
Almighty and everlasting God, who hast created all things: We thank Thee that Thou hast given us sound bodies, and hast graciously preserved our tongues and other members from the power of the adversary: We beseech Thee, grant us Thy grace, that we may rightly use our ears and tongues; help us to hear Thy word diligently and devoutly, and with our tongues so to praise and magnify Thy grace, that no one shall be offended by our words, but that all may be edified thereby, through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.
Sufficiency from God
KJV 2 Corinthians 3:4 And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward: 5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; 6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
Lenski:
“In Second Corinthians Paul bares his heart and his life as he does in none of his other letters. This lends a special value to the letter. Combined with this self-revelation is the wonderful way in which Paul reaches out to the Corinthians. He lets all the love of his heart speak, and its language is perfection. Paul’s psychological judgment of his readers never errs. His arms reach out. He touches the secret springs in his readers who certainly could not help but respond. Even the sterner tones in the last chapter voice this compelling love. These inward things that run through the entire letter deserve far more attention than they have received. Other apostles may have been like this, but none of them has left us a document which reveals this as does this one dictated by Paul. Second Corinthians is precious indeed.” Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Paul's First and Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Minneapolis, MN. : Augsburg Publishing House, 1963, S. 804.
Second Corinthians is Paul’s defense of his ministry. Many people have concluded what was happening from Paul’s own comments. The religious opponents are illusive – we can only speculate. But clearly their attack was against Paul himself as not being adequate as an apostle. What remains is Paul’s response. From this we can see a deeply personal letter but also one which is universal and inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Some might question how a man with many flaws could write a letter and have Christians called it Scripture, inspired by God, inerrant and authoritative. The difference between Paul’s letters and many similar letters from the age is this – Paul was elected by God to be an apostle. Christ miraculously appeared to Paul and converted him through the Word. God chose Paul to be an extraordinary missionary and author.
Sceptics like to claim that Paul created the Christianity that we know, that without him there would have been no Christian church. They fail to note the miraculous growth of the Word before Paul was converted, recorded in Acts 1ff.
All this is dependent upon the foundation which Paul described here so well – the Word of God.
The Creating Word
Although this is almost universally neglected, the Scriptures teach that God’s power comes to us exclusively through the Word.
The Son of God Himself is the Logos (Word). When God created the universe in Six Days, the Logos was that creating Word. What Genesis 1 implies, John 1 teaches clearly:
KJV John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. 6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. 14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
This verse, John 1:3 connects the Creation Hymn (a nickname for Genesis 1) with the Logos Hymn (a nickname for John 1:1-18):
John 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
This clearly identifies Jesus, the Son of God, with the Creation of the entire universe. We cannot separate any feature or any detail—plant, mineral, star, animal, human—from the work of Jesus and the power of the Word.
What God declares, happens. There is no gulf between the will of God and the Word of God.
Sadly Lacking
What is sadly lacking today is a confidence in this power remaining in the Word of God. This has come about through neglect. Instead of teaching against this doctrine, the church leaders simply ignore it. That allows people to wander around in confusion.
The efficacy of the Word alone is taught throughout the Old Testament and is well known in Judaism. Among conservative Jews, the doctrine has inspired many stories, including the word of the rabbi.
Luther always taught the efficacy of the Word alone, but the other Protestants broke with him about this Biblical doctrine – Zwingli, Calvin, and the radicals who came to be associated with the Mennonites and Baptists.
And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward.
English changes. Today we would say – through Christ toward God, but I like the old structure, which reminds us of where toward came from.
5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;
Paul saw that the attack was against him, but he was not representing his ministry as his own but the ministry of the Word. He had nothing to offer on his own, so that was not his argument at all.
Paul’s sufficiency came from God. This is not a vague term, but one which is very clear in the next verses.
The Bible means the Word when it speaks of the work of the Spirit, and it means the Spirit when it speaks of the Word. This is only possible because the two are never separate. Hoenecke (WELS) – “The Holy Spirit never without the Word. The Word never without the Spirit. That is sound doctrine.”
Any variation is called Enthusiasm by the Book of Concord, and Enthusiasm is roundly condemned.
6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
God chose Paul to be an able minister (servant) of the Spirit – a minister of the Word. Another variation on this is – stewards of the mysteries of God. What God reveals in the Scriptures is not subject to man’s judgment. The Trinity does not need to appeal to man’s logic – it is a mystery revealed by God. The Creation may be tough to imagine, but that does not mean God is incapable because of man’s limitations.
The Holy Spirit works through the Law to create Godly sorrow in the hearts of listeners.
Luther emphasized most of us that people failed to trust in God’s Word – the greatest sin of all. People imagine the gross, carnal sins, but they are symptoms of man’s rebellion against the Word.






















August 27, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Thank you, Prof. Root. Many of us know that there is more wrong than we are able to articulate. I hope that you and others can help us with the historical/theological background to think this through.
We need more than anger, and more than the usual answers of “denominational” Lutheranism. I too have the same 2:00am thoughts.
August 28, 2009 at 5:23 am
I would love to hear more of your thoughts on numbers 3 and 4. It seems to me that last week’s decision was a furthering of the errors of ELCAism. We seem content to be a permanently separated church body and to be more sectarian than ever.
I am angry but more than that I am deeply saddened. Lord have mercy on us!
August 28, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Thanks Dr. Root for being a recognizable voice in the midst of so many others.
August 28, 2009 at 5:40 pm
True to the wishes of the governing Bishop, Mark Hanson, I wish to remind you, Mr. Root, that we are not to speak ill of the ELCA. As a current professor of Southern Seminary, unless you have tendered your resignation, we are called to speak well of each other and lift each other up in prayer. This constant bashing does no good. Bound conscience, as I read it says that we are to respect the other persons conscience and not use it as a personal tool. I hope, as a called faculty member of Southern Seminary, you keep personal opinions to yourself and teach the Systematic Theology class to which you have been called. Peace
August 29, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Joel, would you have made such a request of Martin Luther? I pray that Michael does not retreat to his faculty office but speaks the truth in love.
August 30, 2009 at 5:44 am
As I read Joel Brown’s response I wonder when it ceased to be a scholar’s legitimate role to publicly state his opinions – in this instance a professor of theology’s opinions regarding theology. I find no bashing here, and appreciate Professor Root’s establishing this blog, and the content he’s posted here already.
August 30, 2009 at 7:06 am
Mr. Brown should meditate on the Psalm for this Sunday: Who shall dwell on God’s holy hill? The person who speaks the truth from the heart. The issues we face involve commitments to truth on which there cannot be compromise — including that sin of remaining silent when we should have spoken. As Bonhoeffer noted in “Life Together,” nothing is more unloving than the silence that leaves another Christian in his sin, and nothing is more loving than a word of reproof (I Tim. 4.2) that calls a fellow Christian back from his sin.
August 30, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Joel, are your joking?? Please clarify that you are. To invoke the “governing” bishop Hanson by name in a call to “not speak ill of the ELCA” is almost camp!
C’mon, you sound like me making fun of the “inside ELCA” liberal culture that seems to, from my perspective, exist.
September 1, 2009 at 9:33 am
I believe that to squelch the voice of dissension from within is a step from the light of truth and toward the darkness. If Dr. Root cannot – as one of the premier teaching theologians of the ELCA – publish a blog discussing his concerns with good theological and biblical grounding, then we have truly failed to be the church.
This blog is no different than 95 theses posted on a door in Wittenberg. A call to conversation and serious consideration that there may be other issues to consider in this process.
I for one want no part of religious institution which will not allow me to voice a disaggrement, concern, or attempt to hold accountable that which I in good conscience see as error. I EXPECT the teaching theologians in this institution that we call the ELCA, to TEACH and not tow the party line.
September 4, 2009 at 10:53 am
Exiling Dr Root to his classroom with a gag order is hardly a Lutheran perspective and totally un-American. I have heard many say we stood by quietly without voicing our opinion – guilty! Several years ago in the adult class I lead I uttered the phrase “political correctness gone totally awry.” I hear that sentiment spoken by many others now, but fear that it is rapidly moving downstream as if propelled by a jet engine!
August 28, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Professor Root, I give thanks for your clear head, theological and biblical clarity, and couragous willingness to speak the truth in love. You have not simply called a spade a spade, but in the words of a friend of mine called it what it is … a &*%$ing shovel.
Blessings to you for your voice and clarity.
A former student.
August 29, 2009 at 4:42 am
That’s right: now it moves into teaching. The first action I am going to take is to raise awareness in our congregation of what the CWA has done and its implications for the in-house Augsburg published materials. Specifically with my fellow SS teachers, who are accountable in preserving the faith. We have plenty of sound options. The Institute for Lutheran Theology comes to mind.
August 31, 2009 at 11:51 am
Brian, thanks for that additional resource…I have been wondering where I COULD turn in light of Augsburgs relationship with the ELCA and subject to its CWA actions.
August 29, 2009 at 6:19 am
I will pray for you Dr. Root. IMHO, Joel’s option above will soon become the norm within the church. Now that the advocates have “won,” they will work tirelessly to stifle dissent.
Long term the issue is about teaching. As a generation passes away that was trained to think as Lutheran theologians and is replaced by post-modern, argue from personal experience folks, the ability to produce pastors who can actually think critically about our “place in life” through the lens of scripture, the confessions and a proactive understanding of the paradox will become problematic. The slide away from the historic, orthodox church will accelerate.
August 29, 2009 at 7:55 am
Der Mike,
I fear that your 2am thoughts may be close to correct. The sickness of Lutheranism goes very far back. If Luther’s theology was creative in agood way, and if that of the Lutheran scholastics was fine, that is about the last period in Lutheran history where slogans about “law and gospel” or “justification” were not harmful to the faith.
Jens
August 29, 2009 at 8:45 am
Thank you, Dr. Root, for doing exactly what I expect from a professor of theology and teacher of the Church. I imagine there were a good number who told Luther, “Father Martin, go back to teaching your Bible classes and stop posting your personal opinions on the church door.” I am glad Luther didn’t listen to his critics.
The ELCA is in need of sound theological teaching. I will be interested in reading future posts.
August 29, 2009 at 10:13 am
Hopefully Pr. Brown will offer a tempering of his words, especially in light of a Facebook “conversation” we had when he expressed a similar sentiment to my posting of of the link to Dr. Root’s blog.
Thanks, Dr. Root, I look forward to reading more.
August 29, 2009 at 5:33 pm
At our Synod Gathering this week a colleague of mine said that the reality of “bound conscious” seems to be playing out in a simple phrase that we can all understand, “Shut up and play nice.”
We are not to challenge one another, we are not to redirect benevolence, we are not to do anything that could possibly be construed as standing against the decision of the CWA.
Unfortunately I am afraid that many of us will be called to task for doing just that, dissenting. I can only pray for some Wise Fredericks among us.
Thank you for your words Dr. Root – and blessings to you and to your clarion call.
August 29, 2009 at 9:46 pm
Today, as I was communicating with a Roman Catholic friend, I needed to confess my sadness, distress, and shame over the actions of our denomination. I, too, think that we have abrogated our theological heritage, our oneness with the “… one holy catholic and apostolic church …,” and have become an occasion for scandal for people seeking spiritual wholeness. In abandoning the canonical form of the scriptures as the norm for our faith, life, and practice we have become an apostate church. RCIA anyone?
August 30, 2009 at 3:18 am
Thank you Dr. Root for starting this site, we need it. I think some of us are wondering if within Lutheranism there is not a recessive antinomian gene that keeps showing its ugly face throughout history. It does seem to me that the most pressing item right now is to give a theological and ecclesiastical framework for the discussion going on in Lutheran CORE that will lead up to the September national gathering. I am also aware that the crisis in the ELCA expression of Lutheranism can benefit from the Lutheran developing world perspective.
August 30, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Thank you D. Root. I need trusted voices to speak out, as I struggle with these issues, not just as a pastor but as a person of faith.
August 30, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Dr. Root, your point three is gut puncher for me… when I first learned _theologica crucis_ and of the Lutheran similitudes under Hank Kadai it was refreshing stuff in the midst of Springfield Sem’s theological stuffiness… Your “Work of Christ and the deconstruction etc.” devastes my remembrances and use of these strains pastorally over the years… While you argue their thin use in Luther, can they be used wisely as new Lutheran thought as well as a flimsy basis for some our present weak footings? Harvey Mozolak
August 30, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Thank you Dr. Root for leading this discussion and for standing firm in the historic, catholic and apostolic faith. Thank you Nathan Hilkert for posting the link to this blog on Facebook. I frankly was appalled to read so few responses, pro or con, this week by my colleagues to the actions taken by the CWA. It seems that now we are beginning to find our voices.
This morning, as I was standing before the altar leading the prayers of the people to God, I was overcome with such a deep sense of grief and shame at what our denomination has done that the words simply would not come. What prayer can I possibly utter that adequately expresses or explains to God what we have done?
And now we are being asked to play nice together as if this were some sporting event where the winners and the losers all shake hands after the game and go out to have a few beers together. That attitude would have us believe that it is only a group of people who have lost, but I maintain that the argument is fundamentally flawed, for it is not a group of people who have lost, but rather it is the cause of the proclamation of the gospel and our life together as a community that lives into the gospel proclamation that have been damaged.
As one of you so astutely observed, it is now the teaching of Lutheran theology that will be affected. Perhaps the task that lies before us now is to begin the process of teaching our congregations exactly what the far-reaching ramifications of these decisions are, and the effects that they will have on our life of faith.
Not only have we gone from Luther’s doctrine of ‘sola scriptura’ to a new doctrine of ‘sorta scriptura,’ but the ELCA has also declared that it is now possible to change any doctrine or dogma of the church by a simple majority vote. All we have to do, we now discover, is to gather enough folks together in a room, have a straight up or down vote, and we can declare the divinity of Jesus to be null and void. I know, let’s make it easy for those who can’t grasp the concept of one God in three persons and do away with the doctrine of the Trinity.
August 31, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Evidently the only one who can have voice are those who disagree with what the way 2009 CWA voted. I understand that your bound conscience says that the ELCA has strayed, but how can we live into that difference and continue to be church.
August 31, 2009 at 5:28 pm
As far as I can see now, the ELCA can “live into” these decisions only if it is willing think through ways of living in impeded, or impaired, or partial communion within its own life. We will have to see.
You are certainly free to have a voice here.
Michael Root
August 31, 2009 at 8:01 pm
Joel,
I am still waiting for your response to my question as to whether you were joking in your first post. I was seriously asking if you were joking. Because if you weren’t, then you could have only been issuing a threat.
August 31, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Not sure HOW you consider ANY of that a threat, and I was serious. Conversation is good, but evidently only for the dissenting. Peace, out!
September 1, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Joel,
Let me quote you:
“I wish to remind you, Mr. Root, that we are not to speak ill of the ELCA.”
“As a current professor of Southern Seminary, unless you have tendered your resignation, we are called to speak well of each other.”
“I hope, as a called faculty member of Southern Seminary, you keep personal opinions to yourself and teach the Systematic Theology class to which you have been called.”
To paraphrase: “You had better not express a differing opinion, Mr. Root, or you may well lose your job with the ELCA.”
That’s HOW, Joel.
Joel, your comments sound like something Dean Wormer from “Animal House” would say.