I am in Vimeo boot camp, trying things. Here is one link.
ICHABOD, THE GLORY HAS DEPARTED - explores the Age of Apostasy, predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, to attack Objective Faithless Justification, Church Growth Clowns, and their ringmasters. The antidote is trusting the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace. John 16:8. Isaiah 55:8ff. Romans 10. Most readers are WELS, LCMS, ELS, or ELCA. This blog also covers the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the National Council of Churches.
I am in Vimeo boot camp, trying things. Here is one link.
Today we have fairly dense fog, which reminds me of Kurt Aland's boast. All the denominations have united with the Church of Rome to produce the snip and clip, copy and paste text of the Bible. Aland calls it the "Standard Text." They have expelled the Majority Text, used since the Reformation.
| Barbara and Kurt Aland |
Apparently the earlier name - the Eclectic Text - did not roll smoothly off the tongue - or brain. Eclectic gave away the truth - they assembled a text that is not found anywhere in this universe, picking and choosing, and constantly changing their minds. A new edition of "the Greek text" can have thousands of changes, but no matter - they are in charge.
| Between the *** - WELS has no self-awareness about their pick of the worst translation ever, but it does deceitfully promote OJ. |
A few men and even fewer women made those choices.
Rev. Simpleton (MDiv, Ft. Wayne, DMin Fuller Seminary) is satisfied. "Now we have a standard text!"
No so fast. Each new translation (paraphrase) picks and chooses the text they use for their English version and carry on a footnote debate with that. The highly promoted ones - NIV, NRSV, ESV - do not agree with each other, except for rejecting the Majority Text and the KJV.
The New KJV changes its English, with new editions, whenever the itch is there. They also have quasi-KJV English footnotes smooching up to Kurt Aland. M is for Majority Text and NU is for Nestle-Aland-United Bible Societies. This accentuates the propaganda that the modern text critics have the oldest, best, most accurate original.
I have quite a pile of books on text criticism, so one fact struck me - Vaticanus (B) is a ghostly figure with very little said about it. Vaticanus has supposedly been owned by the Vatican for centuries and was completely ignored. Although it is newly promoted as the co-exemplar with Sinaiticus, the codex was ignored until recent times and disagrees with Aleph extensively.
Another fun fact - they often show a type set version of an old text because the original is extremely difficult to read. So what people see is really an edition, not the real thing at all, even if they could translate what they see.
I have used the Greek New Testament for 55 years and I would not call myself an expert, so I truly wonder if all the New Testament professors in Lutheran colleges and seminaries really know what they are promoting with their modern texts and their hatred of the KJV and the Majority Text. It is easy for academics to fall into a rut of school matters, denominational busywork, and other distractions. "Synod says" solves so many problems.
| Eugene Nida wanted to get as far away from the text as possible - hence the Spanish Good News for Modern Man as the stepping stone for radical bad Bibles - TEV. |
Eugene Nida was there the whole time, working away from the text and translation of the KJV. We could call him the Hort of 20th century, tremendously powerful from his century of connections, influential posts, and rewards.
Has the English language improved from the simpleton translations sold to the public? Each new edition is worse than the previous one.
Job One today was getting the copies of Lutheran Christina out the door at Amazon. I dropped off copies at the Circle of Life hospice, too, with Sassy's help. I enjoyed taking them there, because the nurses were so good to Christina.
The new books will arrive at random times. If someone does not have one by Thanksgiving, let me know. I can also send extras any time.
Second, I began shifting the computers around. The one with 32 megs of RAM is in the chapel for Vimeo. I also have 700-900 megs of download/upload from fiber optic. One computer is for writing and the oldest one is for backups, besides the backups, Dropbox, and cloud.
I am behind in communication because the email program crashed and burned. I am recovering some from new emails and 1-800-NSA-HELP (great people but always whispering).
I am testing Vimeo for live/saved work Thursday-Friday. Note what one regular emailed me -
| Metzger's autobiography reminded me of Eighty Eventful Years, by Fuerbringer - but so dry. Young Calvinist, old Unitarian. |
The bedrock of all modern English New Testaments is Vaticanus (B), kept under wraps by the Church of Rome until recently. My textual criticism library has almost nothing on Vaticanus, but quite a bit on Sinaiticus, Aleph. The two Tischendorf miracle codices - Aleph and B - do not agree with each other, so they are childless orphans. They are associated with Egypt.
| Aleph in Wonderland. I wonder how this parchment (skin) manuscript lasted 1400 years. |
The situation today is something like 100 historians discussing the beginning date of the USA. Ninety-five of them agree that the Constitution in 1789 marks the beginning of our nation. Five deny the 1789 fact and quarrel among themselves about the original date.
That 95 to 5 ratio in Greek New Testaments means the traditional text was reproduced, published, and known by everyone - not hidden and cloaked with secrecy. Erasmus edited the GNT from Majority Text (the 95%) manuscripts.
The Latin Vulgate, attributed to Jerome, has been edited again and again by Rome, because certain popes wanted their edition to be the official Bible. They also hated the idea of people reading the Bible in their own language. Latin remained the only Roman Catholic language for Bibles until the Reformation forced their hand.
In modern terms, the 95% ratio is a hindrance to accepting the Majority Text. Rationalists assume that those passages contrary to traditional Christian faith are the earliest and best (Aleph and B). Because a later church council used the new term Trinity to define the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, there is no Trinity in the Bible and Jesus is just a man - a boatload of prejudice among these scholars, eh?
The ecumenical scholars own the Greek New Testament now, and Roman Catholics are part of every modern Biblical effort - American Bible Society, United Bible Societies, etc.
Bruce Metzger, the leading and longest lasting text critic in America, left us an autobiography, which could be considered a series of crime scenes. The first edition of the RSV New Testament dropped the ending of Mark (16:9ff) into a footnote. The next edition lifted it back with a space between 16:8 and 16:9-20. If I recall correctly, that is the same point made by the neo-Seminex Gospel of Mark commentary - published by Concordia Publishing House. ("Tastes great, less doctrine!")
Note this - a sure sign for most modern Bibles, though they all participate in the deception - footnotes below often reverse the meaning of the passage above. Many verses are simply omitted from the English text without comment.
Here is a simple Bible translation test. Look up Isaiah 7:10 - Behold a virgin will conceive...
The footnote will say "verse 10 - or a young woman." That is the great miracle from God Himself, and somehow Matthew and Luke continued the idea that a virgin gave birth to our Savior.
The same frauds who do this to the text cannot find the Virgin Birth in John's Gospel (the Word became flesh and dwelt among us) or Paul
Romans 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; 4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
I received the first 10 copies of Lutheran Christina yesterday and began filling out the print orders. Christian News is getting multiple copies - again - but is unlikely to acknowledge this one too. We were sitting in New Haven, Missouri when the editor was still on his trike.
No one would publish Bruce Metzger's first book, so he self-published it. Eventually it sold 200,000 copies.
Books last much longer than magazines, and magazines last longer than newsprint. When I reprinted a couple of my books, I had to buy them from Alibris and have them retyped.
Christina was the reason so many books were written. She was 100% behind them, all the time, and always anxious to know what the next one would be.
Many people dream of having great riches, finishing the race with the most money. I am happy to say that I can stay in the black and freely distribute the treasures of the Means of Grace.
KJV Matthew 6:19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
| Tischendorf |
| Tischendorf's Aleph, the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet. |
The Calvinist Warfield broke the ice for modernism by affirming that the original texts of the Bible were inerrant. He influenced A. T. Robertson, who influenced Lenski in playing with the original Greek text. In the Age of Billy Graham, the same was stated by Graham himself - the originals (which are lost) are inerrant. That meant all the Hebrew and Greek texts of today are errant, not inerrant.
Wonders of wonders, the two books (codices) most famous are Codex Sinaiticus, dubbed Aleph to be first on the manuscript lists, and Codex Vaticanus, or B on the lists, only after A for Alexandrinus. Tischendorf made himself famous by promoting both Aleph and B.
| Westcott and Hort used their Greek New Testament stealthily to affect the KJV Revision. |
Westcott and Hort jumped on the Tischendorf bandwagon with their Greek New Testament, which I bought for $5, and their influence on the 19th century revision of the King James Version, 1881. The initial failure to gain traction on their ideas was replaced decades later with awe and respect for them.
The Westcott-Hort argument was simple - the oldest and best sources were to dominate the text, which meant Aleph and Vaticanus. However, that also meant the leading sources (Aleph and B) were "parents without children" - Pickering.
Pickering, my favorite author on the Greek New Testament, distilled the arguments into one phrase. If those two codices (bound books) were so great, why were they not copied as exemplars?
Using some common sense, there must be a reason why 90-95% of the witnesses are the Majority (Traditional, Byzantine, Ecclesiastical) Text, while the exceptions to this dominance are few and often unrelated to each other. Aleph and B disagree about 40%, so neither one is the parent or sibling of the other.
Many scholars concede that spurious copies of New Testament books came from the deliberate alterations of early heretics. That seems to have stopped around 200 AD as the known Majority Text established itself.
Thanks to Alexander the Great, Greek was not only the international language three centuries before Jesus Christ, but also the most beautiful and expressive language of all. The Apostolic Church did not archive manuscripts of skin (parchment) and paper (papyrus) because that could not be done with constant copying and the effects of weather. Once a standard text was outside a useful life, it was burned to protect it from heretics, after a new template was copied to use for the paper versions. Skin was extremely expensive and paper was fragile, so parchment served for the example and paper served the expanding population of churches. The Apostolic Church did not save up money for five acres, a busy highway, and a WEF to get started. They began with the inerrant Word of God.
Because they depended on the Word of God, the early Christians did not consider the value of gimmicks, fads, and evasions. As the Church pushed forward into new lands, based on preaching and persecution, translations were useful and necessary. Those copies are available and show the Majority Text was the standard back to 200 AD.
So which is "earliest, best, and most accurate"? Aleph and B have to be considered very late, even though Tischendorf raved about them. The highly promoted stars disagree with each other, but are "the best and most accurate"? Let us pause for some pious laughter.
In comparison, the Majority Text has to be the earliest and best because the papyrus discoveries after the 19th century reveal the affinity between them and the KJV text. As the Church expanded into many areas and languages, the Bible was translated accordingly. The Majority text is the example, not the childless Aleph and B.
That is why I have little use for the New KJV. First of all, the New KJV honors the changes made by the rationalist text critics, using footnotes for NU - Nestle Aland United Bible Society. Secondly, the New KJV changes its own wording, willy-nilly, proving their great breakthrough in the English language is only good for a few years at a time.
I thought I was broadcasting on Vimeo today, but I think not. Let me know if you saw anything.
I will send the Reformation service again after I experiment with short efforts and getting more background and help. Vimeo experts are welcome to write me at greg.jackson.edlp@gmail.com
I am dealing with the loss of all my emails and addresses, some hardware issues, and lack of experience with the new video freedom and complications.
I have two different sources with IBM, so one of them should be able to fill me in. I just bought a Kindle on the topic of Vlogs.
Be Patient - I Am Working on the Live Stream Plus Saving Option. Wait Until Later Today, Thanks.
My tentative move was to use YouTube. I am trying to set that up for the Reformation service live. If not, I hope to have it saved on my YouTube channel.
I am a total innocent in these matters, so it is difficult to navigate. IBM directed us to open source, so I have OBS loaded.
https://obsproject.com/welcome
In addition to the Web Broadcaster, you can also stream to IBM Watson Media using a variety of third-party encoding products. This compatibility with most encoding products on the market offers you an excellent number of choices for streaming, from free and easy-to-use, to robust and configurable encoders that offer enterprise-grade professional features.
If you're new to the world of encoding, we recommend that you are familiar with IBM Watson Media's recommended encoding specs. And don't forget to read the manual for whatever product you buy! By learning your encoder's settings and following recommended encoding settings, you can combine the power of industry-leading hardware and software with the industry-leading streaming platform.
Note on plugins: Many third party encoders have built in plugins that allow a user to enter their login using their IBM Watson Media(or other service) credentials to access their endpoints for streaming. We have discovered that connecting via the old Ustream plugin, or logging in with your IBM Watson Media credentials, can cause broadcasting issues. To avoid this, please connect via manual RTMP configuration as opposed to using IBM Watson Media or the older Ustream login credentials and select a channel.
You can find instructions for streaming to IBM Watson Media for some of the most popular encoders here, or follow the instructions below to obtain the RTMP server address and the stream name for your IBM Watson Media channel and consult your encoder's manual for how to send RTMP streams.
Choose the channel you wish to broadcast to within the dashboard.

Click on Channel>Broadcast Settings or Broadcast settings in the overview section
| From the movie, starring Gregory Peck, with Orson Welles as the preacher. |
The European "scholars" already dismissed the divinity of the Bible, in part from the influence of Halle University and its rancid, rationalistic Pietism. American denominations are no different today. They teach the visible institution, not the Word of God.
Does it not make sense that the apostolic church carefully made copies of the Gospels and Epistles, expanding the total as Christianity spread? And did they not also translate versions for different languages? And quote the originals? Yes, all that is found in the Greek New Testament, translations, and quotations - the Majority Text, aka Traditional, aka Byzantine, aka Textus Receptus (for Latin 101 graduates). That is the KJV New Testament, from Greek to English.
And do we not know that various heresies corrupted and changed the copies they made, which were as popular as whoopee cushions in a lecture hall? Yes, we have many early Church complaints of those early frauds. They would be rather low in number, because the believing Church did not want strange notions invading worship and teaching.
So we have an unequal comparison, the 95% of all sources - the Majority Text. The 5% come from the heretics.
Now look at your congregation's Bible. Is it the original Luther Bible from the Reformation? Or a copy? Is it from the printing presses licensed by King James? Or a copy? Bibles last a long time, but not all the way back to the first printing, and those earl examples are usually high quality productions.
The early Church burned the worn out copies so they would not fall into the hands of the government or heretics. Please hold back on expecting a Bible on parchment (skin) or papyrus (paper) to last. What can last is the oddball copy in a seldom seen library.
At Augustana I found a book on comparing Greek grammar to Latin grammar, truly a labor of love. No one had taken it out for 30 years. I wonder why.
There is only one Sinaiticus, which does not match the unique Vaticanus, but both were hailed by Tischendorf as the earliest and best. David Daniels published a book on Sinaiticus as a forgery, a new production which was artificially aged. The Vatican has never held back from fraud, lies, and demonic perversions of the Bible.
It takes a lot of study to get through the smoke screen created by Tischendorf, Rome, Westcott-Hort, Nida, Nestle, Aland, and the Bible salesmen of today. That is why The Bible Book will soon have a second edition - so many layers of liars to expose, so many typos to fix.
RSV-NIV-TEV-ESV
The modern English paraphrases (they are not true translations) do not match each other. The publishers gather some mediocrities with positions and create something new and different to sell. Like the heretics of the earliest days, they erase what they do not like and completely change phrases to suit their dogmatism. And their spear-carriers fight like demons to keep the errors. The Great Commission is not "make disciples" but "teach all nations," a challenge that makes the Growthers rage and spit.
And - the changes are always changing. The modern paraphrases have no problem with changing their own wording, year after year, and that keeps the copyright ($) legal, sound, and unique. Even better - call the old one New, which works for most of them except the New International Version, which became the New International Version by dumping the "classic" and somewhat less obnoxious NIV. Now the nostalgic in WELS and Missouri pine for the "classic" NIV which Murdoch (Lizard Hands) took away from them. O Tempora O Mores O Shucks.
| Murdoch gave you the NIV. WELS said, "Do not let the members know." |