Friday, October 16, 2009

The Appleton Dumpling Gang:
Paul Kelm's Victory Lap or Schwan Song?





An Appleton resident reminded me that WELS is definitely not "walking together," even in that hotbed of unionistic Church Growthism. Several WELS churches would not do a pulpit exchange with Witte, Parlow, or Kelm. However, Witte was promoted to the Asian board, so he does not care.

Paul Kelm Victory Lap or Schwan Song?

Another resident says Kelm is giving a Bible study at The Core Lutheran Church. I looked over the schedule, which is pretty bare. The October Groeschel sermons are about "Me and..." - stereotypical CG. There is a Bible study listed - Fuel, the name of a book by Joe White, Focus on the Family. I wonder if that is the Kelm Bible study. I recall FOTF being praised in the Fischer paper.

If Kelm is selling old boilerplate in Oconomowoc, preaching at Wisconsin Lutheran Chapel, and teaching the Word in Appleton, he may be taking his victory lap before retiring. He is 65 in December. Or this may be his swan song - based on the myth that silent swans offer a beautiful song just before dying. Unfortunately, this songster never stopped singing the praises of Deformed doctrine.

Kelm is God's chastisement for WELS' apathy about sound doctrine.



---

# RT @AndyStanley: Drive 2010. 100% Auto-Tuned! Register bf Christmas & you will be registered bf Christmas! No lie. http://bit.ly/12H6KG10:28 AM Oct 15th from TweetDeck

---

Learn the dance before you go.


St. Matthew in Appleton

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Why Do Doctrinal Pussycats Betray Their Own Synods...":

Don't forget St. Matthew in Appleton. It has been transformed in recent years from a solidly confessional church to a wretched den of church growth gimmicks. The result: probably a 40-50% decline in membership and the closing of a school that had served the congregation for 50 years. Their website, poorly designed as it is, screams church growth once you start digging into it. I was a member of this church for 27 years--no more.

http://sites.google.com/a/stmatthewlutheran.com/home/home 

Vision Summary

[GJ - Note to Mequon grads - left click is your friend]

Vision 2014: A family rooted in, growing through and living for Jesus.
2014 Goal
2014 Progress
60% of membership in Discipleship
_Started_
Two online Bible studies
Not Started
One large (25-75 ppl) study group during week
Not Started
Five informal groups (2-10 ppl) during the week
Not Started
Two large (25-75 ppl) Sunday Bible Studies
_Started_
Six small (10-25 ppl) study groups during the week
_Started_
80% of members in PLACE
Not Started
Partnering with other WELS churches
Not Started
All sermons have learning aid
_Started_
Continuing education for staff
Not Started
Monthly leadership training
Not Started
80% of members attending
_Started_
20% more members involved
Not Started
Weekly traditional & blended styles
_Started_
Showing 14 items from page Goals sorted by Branch, Priority. View more »



2014 Initiative:
2014 Progress
1. Communicate Vision
_Started_
2. Goverance
___Half Way_
3a. Discipleship: Inactives
Not Started
3b. Discipleship: The Underground
_Started_
3c. Discipleship
Not Started
4. PLACE
Not Started
5. Worship
Not Started
6a. Outreach
_Started_
6b. Outreach: Mission Partner selected
_________Done!
7a. Facility: Parking Lot
______Almost_
7b. Facility: Accomodating Plans
_Started_
Showing 11 items from page Key Initiatives sorted by 2014 Initiative:. View more »


---

Heart in Focus

posted ‎‎Sep 25, 2009 11:34 AM‎‎ by Ruddat, Jon
HEART IN FOCUS provides an opportunity for individuals and couples to grow in their relationship with God and guide them through wise financial choices. The session addresses practical financial topics such as recognizing income and blessings, wise saving and investing, careful spending, eliminating debt and new approaches to financial choices. A session will be held Saturday, October 10th at Eternal Love in Appleton from 8:30 AM - 4:30 PM. Snacks and lunch will be provided. Workbook cost is $20 payable on the day of the session. Contact seminar leader, Robert Fischer, at 920-560-5107 or Rfischer@fvlhs.org to reserve you seat. Reservations will close on Tuesday, October 6th.

Why Do Doctrinal Pussycats Betray Their Own Synods?




DP Engelbrecht loves or hates Church Growth, depending on the audience of the moment.


The apostates have all the advantages in the visible church. They stick together, no matter what. Conservatives form a circular firing squad and call it reform.

Apostates tolerate no deviation from their agenda. Dissent means permanent excommunication. Conservatives think they are being kind, patient, and loving when they overlook the gross errors of apostates, because the apostates tell them so. Conservatives want to be liked and respected, so the apostates play up to this need.

Doctrinal Pussycats are pragmatists. They want to solve the problem of the moment, so that means giving in to apostates while silencing the conservatives. DPs are also the ultimate conformists. Once the apostates get a few, key people in place, the rest will follow along, thanks to re-education efforts.

For example, The ALC DPs (post 1960 merger) were re-educated in the fallibility of the Bible, using a book by a seminary professor (The Bible: Book of Faith, the same title but probably a different book today in ELCA). The Little Sect on the Prairie, WELS, and Missouri engaged in a constant re-education effort to make their synods safe for Church Growth apostasy, starting 30 years ago. All three have studied Church Growth and found it delightful. To question CG is to doubt the infallibility of the synod leaders.

The so-called conservative synods never admit the numbers of leaders trained at Fuller, Willow Creek, and other hives of apostasy. Larry Olson bragged about it once, in a journal no one but CG advocates would bother to read. The millions of offering dollars wasted on Fuller and WC will never be revealed. At one point the WELS DMB was sending mission pastors to WC for free. Another indication is the double mention of WELS in the catalogue of Trinity, Deerfield, where Larry Olson also studied on his way toward getting a DMin at Fuller. How much loot did Trinity get from WELS? That does not count if it was skimmed from Schwan and Thrivent.

Conservatives never face how bad things are. In the 1980s, I told SP Naumann's son that WELS was liberal because "Liberals are rewarded and conservatives punished." His response was to walk out of the room. John Seifert used the turmoil in Columbus--created by Mueller, Stolzenburg, Zehms, and Kuske--to become DP. One of his first acts as DP was to urge pastors to attend Tiefel's pan-denominational worship conference, where women taught men. Read Tiefel's Blended Worship That Works, to see if he is really part of the Patterson CG network.

Apostates work together to obtain the lion's share of the money, the best calls, board positions, and the key communication slots. The September issue of FIC features articles by three Shrinkers: Matek, Bivens, and Aderman. The Chicaneries all have keys to the synodical Xerox room. When they are not selling their articles to the periodical, they are publishing their horrid books or giving their dreadful conference papers. I remember WELS telling every congregation to buy Valleskey's CG manual, but I never saw them urging everyone to study the Book of Concord.

When people wonder at how bad things are, I hasten to point out how the Pastoral Epistles have proven to be exactly right. And there are many other Biblical passages illustrating the end times and false teachers.

KJV 1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

KJV 2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.

[GJ - "Lead silly women laden with sins" is a perfect description of CG gurus and their groupies. Not to worry, though. A CG pastor caught in flagrante delicto will be promoted to a consultant's position, with a raise in pay.]

KJV 2 Timothy 4:1 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

[GJ - WELS has spent more than $250,000 on The Core, to give Appleton WELS member more of what their itching ears want, as if Witte, Parlow, Glende, Kelm, Ash and the others were not doing a bang-up job of that already.]

KJV 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away [Greek word - apostasy] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

KJV Matthew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

[GJ - Valleskey argued that we should steal the fetid doctrinal garbage of Fuller and gather figs from thistles, so the apostates elevated him to the presidency of their seminary.]

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Why Do Doctrinal Pussycats Betray Their Own Synods...":

"[GJ - Valleskey argued that we should steal the fetid doctrinal garbage of Fuller and gather figs from thistles, so the apostates elevated him to the presidency of their seminary.]"

Too many problems in WELS today go back to pastors kowtowing to Valleskey. The bootlicking was obscene.

---

Kirk Francis has left a new comment on your post "Why Do Doctrinal Pussycats Betray Their Own Synods...":

Hello. I was researching WELS doctrine and stumbled upon your blog. I'm shocked at the caustic speech in every post. For someone who professes to be a pastor, you certainly fail at speaking the truth in love - unless comparing your enemies to members of the KKK qualifies as 'love.' Your efforts here seem to spill over from an abundance of self-indulgent malice. If you think you're doing God's work with this, think again - Satan may not like all of your content, but he sure likes your method of promoting it with these flippant, mocking entries.


***

GJ - I am impressed that someone stumbled onto this blog and read over 3,000 posts so quickly. Every one is caustic? That is quite a record. If this writer, if he is non-WELS, ever stumbles onto a Bible, he will find Jesus comparing false teachers to wolves and thistles.

Paul compares false doctrine to cancer or gangrene. 2 Timothy 2:17

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Sounds Like a Replay of the Stetzer Invitation





My researcher, a doctor of divinity, wrote:

If Jeske did not speak, who did? I would think the Bethesda website would have that piece of information.

Perhaps there is someone that attended this that will come forward and give witness.

The idea was to attack me for inventing information by citing a source I did not use.

This is exactly the way the Chicaneries played the Ed Stetzer invitation to their malodorous conference. At first, they denied Stetzer was invited, but I knew the Conference of Pussycats was discussing the invitation. By searching on the Internet, my specialty, I found:
1. The Church and Change conference on Stetzer's own calendar.
2. His earlier Tweet where he bragged about getting the invitation.
3. His blog, where he made fun of confessional Lutherans while bragging again about the invitation.
4. The Church and Change website, which said nothing about the speaker. The only source lying about the Chicanery Stetzer invitation was the Chicanery website.

The Chicaneries began saying, "How do you know we haven't canceled Stetzer?" That is one, twisted, deceptive way to avoid the real topic - inviting a Babtist to speak to a Lutheran conference. One pastor was so brow-beaten by these liars that he thought I perhaps had the information wrong. I am only guessing, but I think the invitation was made after Patterson took a bunch of WELS workers to the Exponential Conference where Stetzer spoke. "When Babtists speak, Chicaneries listen," according to a recent poll by George Barna. (I made up the poll.)

So the minders immediately began attacking my veracity again when the union service came up - Jeske and the LCMS leader uniting the Synodical Conference on their own. The Watertown newspaper printed and kept on their website the information that Jeske was the featured speaker, without naming his alleged WELS affiliation. (The LCMS guy was identified by synod - rather lopsided coverage.) Jeske's name was omitted from the Bethesda notice.

The issue is not whether Jeske participated in yet another union worship service. He clearly promotes that, judging from his Church Growth network and such graduates as Ski and Bishop Katie. Jeske now produces a TV show for two synods at once, ever loyal to WELS (fifth generation) and yet pledging to promote LCMS doctrine, practices, and churchgrowthiness. He had to put some LCMS person on his board, too, in order to obtain RSO status in Missouri - the golden ticket for money-raising. Jeske is now a regular speaker at Missouri events.

The issue concerns Chicaneries jumping in to accuse when all the information is verified and linked.

First they said I added information, making it up.

Secondly, without apologizing for their false accusation--an obligation they demand from everyone--they began insisting that Jeske never spoke. He also never spoke at an LCMS district meeting. And he never spoke at Concordia, Mequon (the only school in Mequon he will ever teach at).

The ELS defense for a Roman Catholic bishop marching in procession, with the Little School on the Prairie sem faculty robed, was:
1. He was married and no longer a bishop! (No longer Roman Catholic?)
2. It was not a religious service. (So why did the seminary faculty robe and march in procession? It was clearly a religious dedication service where a Roman Catholic addressed the Lutheran audience.)
3. "Erling Teigen does not have an ecumenical bone in his body, and Greg Jackson knows it." - Rolf Preus. Rolf reads minds while defending the indefensible, proving once again he never comprehended Rome and Justification.
4. The ELS bragged about this Roman Catholic leader in the Mankato Free Press and hid vital details (papist bishop) in their own school annual. "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."

The prosecution wishes to close with humorous but edifying comments on the Church and Change board:
  1. Jeff Davis, who raises money for a commission, has a photo and no bio. The bio went missing after gaining notice on Ichabod. He is always promoting himself. Why hide his vocation? Stealthy!

  2. Brian Arthur Lampe, CEO Ministries, which is pan-denominational, no longer has his photo and also lacks a bio. Stealthy or perhaps his way of smacking Satan in the jaw.

  3. Ski is no longer listed on the board. Super-stealthy!
  4. Bruce Becker is no longer listed on the board. Super-stealthy!
  5. Mark Jeske has three staff who have served on this board, but his name never comes up on the website. Super-max stealthy!

Don't miss the Church and Change conference in November. This brochure will introduce you to the awesomeness of the gathering.

Church Growth's Last Big Push in WELS



Everyone knows who the chief Church Growth advocates in WELS are. If not, just read the Fisher paper linked below. He has named a good share of them. Supposedly Brug took him apart afterwards and the reaction to the paper was negative. However, I have to question the extent of the reaction, given that David Valleskey based his career on Fuller's Pietistic and Unionistic doctrines. Far from being hurt by this, Valleskey found himself promoted to president of The Sausage Factory, even though he spilled his guts about CG in his infamous Quarterly article and his book, which was even worse.

Worse than "The Church Growth Movement: An Evaluation?"

Yes, the book should have been titled - Church Growth, A Glory H alleluia Chorus.

Even worse than his FIC article, "The Church Growth Movement: Just Gathering People or Building the Church?"

Yes, even worse than that.

 The good news is this - I see a frantic effort by the entire Chicanery network to win at all costs, to saturate the synod with skirmish victories:
  1. Keeping Kelm on the payroll for now, even though he never should have been hired.
  2. Inviting Kelm to be the featured speaker at Willow Creek Chapel this weekend. What better way to celebrate a WELS congregation joining the Willow Creek Association and getting away with it?

  3. Sending Kelm out with his expensive boilerplate solutions for poor, innocent First German in Manitowoc.
  4. Putting Kelm in charge of seeding the symposium paper with his spin, the most hilarious being his worry about Reformed doctrine and quoting Focus on the Family!


  5. Regurgitating the same old bilge in the Fischer symposium paper.


  6. Promoting Jeske in the Missouri Synod as a warning where he and his rich followers will go, hiding the fact that he is desperate for funds with Thrivent and the foundations out of cash.


  7. Putting three CrossWalkers in leadership positions at Wisconsin Lutheran College: the president and two board members, all from a non-WELS Emerging Church experiment, which looks like everything else being done far better by the Enthusiasts of other denominations.


  8. Printing FIC articles lavishly praising Chicanery churches - like the stealth node in Chicago, and Hunter's Latte Lutheran Church Lounge, which got a vicar (a sign of DP favor).


  9. Giving Kudu Don Patterson a free vicar in the midst of the Great Obama Depression.




Divide and Conquer - The WELS Church and Change Method



DIVIDE
Someone alerted me to a dreadful essay given at the Sausage Factory 2009 Symposium. Here it is.

Pastor Ken Fischer clearly favors the Shrinkers and often quotes Professor of Chicanery at Mequon, Richard Gurgle. Wayne Mueller is another source. And Elton Stroh. And George Barna. Guilty as charged.

I hear the essay was warmly received, as in "tar and feathers." Nevertheless, some people arranged to have this tripe served up as Gospel to impressionable young minds. Let's hope they were sufficiently hung over to miss most of it.

The Chicaneries have been dividing the Synodical Conference for three decades. They march in and dare anyone to dislodge them. Anyone against them is lazy, brain-damaged, senile, or worse.

---

Freddy Finkelstein has left a new comment on your post "Divide and Conquer - The WELS Church and Change M...":

I just took some time out to read Rev. Fisher's paper. Where does one begin? "Dreadful" is an apt one-word description. It is nothing but a thinly veiled apologetic for CGM. Then again, maybe it isn't even a veiled attempt at all. I can't believe that WELS pastors still have the guts to publish this stuff. In this paper, the author conspicuously goes out of his way to drop names in a way that lavishes favor on long-known CGM advocates in WELS, even going so far as to indirectly associate them with Lutherans who are revered in WELS, like August Pieper and even Martin Luther himself.

Are there elements of truth in what he writes? Why, yes, of course. But this is the problem with CGM: it's insidious. More often than not, it turns normal gospel-motivated Christian practices into requirements of the Law. It turns the Holy Spirit's work, God's work, into man's work -- a work measured by man's means according to man's timing and according to his limited observational capacity (i.e., external evidence) -- and presumes to give God the credit for man's work. This is blasphemy, if I am not mistaken.

As one might expect, the topic of "congregational health" in this paper is predicated on CGM priorities, namely, the "Great Commission." The author even quotes Rev. Kelm to this effect, naming him as one who sent an email to all symposium authors, presumably as the one seeding their topics. When one filters church practice and evaluation through the filter of the "Great Commission," the result is imbalance. Truth out of balance leads to error.

Rev. Fisher clearly begins and ends with imbalance, with the "Great Commission, " i.e., "Going and Growing," as the prime indicator of congregational health. For example, he so defines a healthy church on pg. 17, "We seek to heal by putting plans in place that will lead to a healthier church – meaning a church that makes plans to seek the lost." Is it wrong for a congregation to seek the lost, or to plan to do so? I can't possibly think that it is. But is this the sole measure of a healthy church? Hardly. Is it even the primary measure of a healthy congregation? How can that be?

What is erroneously taken for granted is that methods of "outreach" fundamentally maintain the centrality of the Means of Grace; it is assumed, without qualification, from organizational growth that the true Means, not man's means, are responsible for that growth. Rev. Fisher even goes so far as label as "naive" those who think that faithful use of the Means of Grace alone are sufficient to result in Church growth. He is consumed with congregational growth, with organizational growth, not at all with true Church growth, which is accomplished by the Holy Spirit alone, through our faithful and consistent use of Word and Sacrament, alone.

Dr. Jackson, I hope you are correct, that this "warmly received paper" is one that in reality "tar[ed] and feather[ed]" the author.

Freddy Finkelstein
 

---

CONQUER


Excel in the Grace of Giving


Dear Brother in Christ,
Challenging economic times – opportunity or crisis for your congregation? 
These challenging times have impacted WELS members and our congregations. The stewardship challenges we all face provide ministry opportunity for spiritual growth.

We at Cornerstone Stewardship Ministry, Inc. stand ready to assist you during these times. We believe that God’s Word works! We rely on God’s Word to confirm and strengthen the Christian’s desire to give and capability to give. We witness that Word at work  - in good times and challenging times. In fact, during times of struggle there is often more receptivity to what God has to say to us.
On our web site - www.joyfulgiving.net/seminar -  you will find a description of  Excel in the Grace of Giving, a biblical stewardship emphasis. The biblical focus is this:  God’s grace turns our giving into an investment, an investment that provides returns for eternity. It is a message which deepens the joy of giving, overcomes doubts and insecurity, and increases our generosity.
Cornerstone is offering you and leaders of your congregation a free seminar as a means of introduction to Excel in the Grace of Giving.

To learn more about the free Excel in the Grace of Giving seminar and how it can impact the lives of your members, visit our website, www.joyfulgiving.net/seminar  
Serving Jesus with You!
Jeff Davis                   Jon Mahnke                  Ron Roth                 


---

Team

Our mission is to further God's kingdom by assisting and investing in Christian ministries through stewardship efforts and programs.
Cornerstone is a team of dedicated disciples who love their Lord Jesus. We consider it a privilege to serve God's kingdom by challenging His people to grow in the grace of giving. With almost 150 years of combined service in public ministry and 58 years of stewardship education, we strive to conduct programs that bring honor to Jesus while giving thanks to him for all things. We are highly approachable and ready to serve!
Jeff Davis (Co-Founder) [GJ - Church and Change Board]
Lake Mills, Wisconsin Jeff's 28 years of experience in administration, ministry and consulting, coupled with a strong desire to serve Jesus, have helped form his servant characteristics. Jeff enjoys teaching, directing and leading God's people. His personal commitment to stewardship is a reflection on his beliefs and thankfulness to Jesus. He has written extensively on stewardship, guiding and challenging God's people to live lives of thanks. Recently, Jeff co-authored Heart in Focus, a faith focused financial course (www.heartinfocus.com). Jeff and Sally, his wife, reside in Lake Mills, Wisconsin. They have been blessed with 5 children and 1 grandchild.
Tom Grunow (Co-Founder of CSM, MEd, CFRE)
Portland, Oregon Tom Grunow is a 33-year veteran in Christian Education, Fund Development and Strategic Planning having served with Lutheran educational ministries in Florida, Texas and Oregon. Following in the footsteps of his father, Dr. Robert A. Grunow, known throughout the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS) for his estate planning and fundraising expertise, for the past 14 years he has served as a consultant to Lutheran churches and schools throughout the U.S. Previously he served as Vice President of the Concordia University Foundation Portland and on the National Board of Directors of the Association of Lutheran Development Executives (ALDE). He currently serves Trinity Lutheran Church, as Volunteer Minister of Stewardship & Gifts, is an active member of ALDE, a member of the Christian Stewardship Association (CSA), and serves as Board Chair of the Lutheran Education Association (LEA). Tom resides in Portland, Oregon with his wife, Karin, a commissioned Lutheran schoolteacher. They have 3 children and 3 grandchildren.
Ron Roth (Director) [GJ - WELS CG Founding Father]
Hales Corners, Wisconsin Ron loves to teach and encourage God's people to respond to God's grace with thankful and generous gifts. He has served four congregations as pastor, leading three of them through capital expansion programs. As administrator of Christian giving for an international Lutheran church body, he developed a major gifts ministry and led three national campaigns. He was instrumental in developing a planned giving ministry which after twelve years is blessing various ministries with annual gifts of $10-12 million in current donations and matured bequests. Another $400+ million in estate gifts for the Lord's work have been completed. Ron and his wife Arlene live in the Milwaukee, WI area and are blessed with three children.
Wayne Baxmann (Associate)
Colgate, Wisconsin Wayne's forty plus years in public ministry have provided him with numerous opportunities to practice servant-leadership. He eagerly applies his spiritual gifts in working with God's people, particularly in the areas of organization, teaching and administration. He strongly believes in and models the attitude that Christian Stewardship is a manifestation of one's love and gratitude for what God has done. Wayne and his wife Renee live in Colgate, Wisconsin, just northwest of Milwaukee, and are active members of Risen Savior Lutheran Church in Milwaukee. Their three adult children and their families live in Washington and Texas.
Jon Mahnke (Associate)
Round Rock, TX One of Jon’s strengths is that of teaching where he has opportunity to personally connect with God’s people. Jon has served as pastor of a church plant, a medium size congregation, and the lead pastor of a large multi-staffed church and school ministry. He led his congregations through four highly successful major building programs. Throughout his ministry he implemented annual, congregation wide stewardship programs and emphases. Synodically, Jon has served on the Mission Board, Evangelism Commission, Synodical Council, Conference of Presidents (COP) as well as numerous sub-committees of the same. Jon and his wife Myrna live in Round Rock, TX. They have been blessed with four children and nine grandchildren.
Mel Fournier (Associate)
Leesburg, Florida Mel is "Mr. Lutheran" throughout Florida having served as a layperson in various Lutheran churches and in
every capacity both during his work as an independent electrician and later in his retirement years. He has served as both paid and volunteer for Thrivent (formerly AAL) in fraternal assistance and is well versed on the Biblical concepts of Christian stewardship.

How Flies the Mud When I Post the Truth



Baby Buzz is not happy!
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske Leads Joint WELS-LCMS Worship Service:S...":

Hey Jerkson. I'm sure that you will be reporting that Jeske was not the special guest speaker...oh wait, that would mean you would have to do some actual research and tell the truth.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "How Flies the Mud When I Post the Truth":

Thank you for clearing it up with the link. You come through again with the proof!


[GJ - And the link was there in the beginning!]


***
GJ - Some people need to pay attention to the Mrs. Ichabod effect. Sometimes I have to dash off to a doctor's office, as I did this morning, because of a last-minute appointment. That gave me no time for the precision and proof I normally supply - making it obvious where the story came from. This morning was not a medical emergency but a chance to line up some doctors for her care.

So what happens? People want to charge me with making up a story and inventing information. Sure I play around with words. If that is too creative for you, go back to the Church and Change listserve. They are beastly earnest  (tierisch ernst, as the Germans say). Today I decided to use the strike-out feature to edit stories that really needed clarification. That way readers can see the original words and my improvement upon them.

Did I say this came from the Bethesda website? No. I am not clever enough to make up stories. I never went through GA, where the art of lying is embedded in future WELS pastors and parolees.

Here is the website source:





Watertown Daily Times (WDT for Mequon graduates).


Ahem. I think those who make charges should spend  a few seconds with Google. Placing about five words from a story into the search window will normally generate the source. But golly, it is so much funner to make anonymous comments and to write cranky emails to people who have no connection with Ichabod. Someone should have set down with me, held my hand, and told me my sin of making stuff up from the Bethesda release. That is the model they advocate. I would have enjoyed the chance to say, "Google the Watertown Daily site, lazybones."


Here is so more humorous perspective on the complainers. The actual link was embedded in the John Bauer tag below his photo. That is my normal practice, to link any story I kelm. So some ran off to the Bethesda site and said the Jeske info was not there. Now it is looking like Bethesda parlowed (hid relevant information). That reminds me of the Little Sect bragging about having a Roman Catholic bishop march in their religious procession and speak at their religious dedication service - Mankato Free Press, but write it up without the religious information in the school annual.

My normal practice is to kelm the entire article and photos from the source, since sources go away. I regret that I did not do this with Rick Johnson's Leonard Sweet book review and his offering information. He erased both overnight, whining that I published his published information about disastrous offerings. The Chicanery minders never rest, making up for when they slept on their Triglottas.

Mark Jeske Leads Joint WELS-LCMS Worship Service:
Synodical Conference United Again!





http://www.wdtimes.com/articles/2008/08/14/news/news3.txt - This link was already embedded in the John Bauer tag above. Too bad the critics did not click on it. I realize how much trouble that would be - left click, oh, the agony.

Dr. John E. Bauer will be formally installed as president and CEO of Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services Inc. on Saturday at the Schujahn Memorial Chapel of the Good Shepherd on Bethesda's Watertown campus.

The service of installation begins at 2 p.m. and will be followed by a reception in the chapel concourse. The public is invited to attend.

Bauer is succeeding Dr. David Geske, who recently retired after a nearly 30-year career with Bethesda and Good Shepherd Communities.

Participants in Saturday's service include the Rev. Earl Bleke, Bethesda's chief religious life officer, and the Rev. John Wille, president of the South Wisconsin District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. The special guest speaker for the service will be the Rev. Mark Jeske of the Time of Gath Ministries based in Milwaukee.

While new to his position, Bauer has a long association with Bethesda. He served on the company's board of directors for 10 years, five of those years as chairman of the board. During that time he helped plan the affiliation of Good Shepherd Communities with Bethesda, a move that nearly doubled the organization's size.


After leaving the board in 2006, Bauer worked for Bethesda as an integration manager, a position where he was responsible for coordinating the multiple details of the affiliation process and ensuring the adoption of best practice recommendations.

He also served for almost one year as the interim chief operations officer for Bethesda.

Bauer earned his doctorate in education administration and supervision from Marquette University and for 22 years he served as the chief academic officer for Wisconsin Lutheran College. He was also the executive director of the CHARiS Institute, an affiliate of the college devoted to the scholarly study of challenges facing the church. advancing Reformed doctrine, unionism, and general craziness.

Bauer and his wife, Jacqueline, live in Watertown. They are the parents of three adult sons and have recently become grandparents.

***

GJ - So much is missing from this PR news release. What is Jeske's current affiliation? What is John Bauer's?

Charis is the WLC office next to the broom closet where Church and Change was hatched.

Charis sponsored the Symposium where Kent Hunter, Waldo Werning, and Malphurs were invited to teach WELS even more about Church Growth.

Bauer played the martyr about the Symposium being canceled and the Chicaneries consoled him. Please read this link.

The less experience someone has as a pastor, the more he is considered an expert: Hunter, Werning, Kelm, Paul McCain, Larry Olson, etc.

For He’s an Old, Church-Growthy, Calvinistic, Enthusiastic, Wisconsin Boy


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Willowcreek Lutheran Chapel Invites Paul Kelm":

You're a psychotic old man who is also very immature and just plain a waste of space. Do us all a favor and leave this earth now and go home to hell. 


***

GJ - Not everyone enjoys a droll sense of humor and song parodies.


Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Willowcreek Lutheran Chapel Invites Paul Kelm




Willowcreek Lutheran Chapel


  • Celebrate With Us!

    Worship on Sunday, October 18 at 8:30 am & 11:00 am

    On this Sunday we’ll give thanks to God for these spectacular blessings:

    • 90 years of WELS campus ministry in Madison, WI
    • Chapel’s 45 years as an independent ministry
    • Pastor Thomas Trapp’s 30 years of service at Chapel
    Pastor Paul Kelm (Chapel’s Campus Pastor from 1976 to 1979) will be the guest preacher, with Pastor Emeritus Richard Balge (Chapel’s first Campus Pastor, 1964-71) as lector. We’ll have a reception hour with tours at 9:45 a.m., and a luncheon and brief program of commemoration at 12:15 p.m. Please come celebrate with us!

    Someone wondered, after reading the Chapel newsletter:

A few high-lites in the newsletter:
"maintaining effective tradtions at the Chapel as well as initiating new and fresh ways of sharing the gospel of Jesus with our current student culture."
- I wonder if the "traditions" he speaks of include baptism? Is it relegated to a traditon, a museum piece?
- I wonder how effective having a secular rock band on a Friday night at the Chapel was at getting anyone talking or listening to the Gospel if it was even ever shared?

"we are exploring expanding worship opportuninties, offering a broader Chrisitan Education curriculum, growing the International Student Ministry, coordinating more Chapel and community service opportunities, increasing "marketing" efforts, and nurturing growth in the congregation."


The Bye Bye Birdie Defense in WELS





Nothing grows faster or stronger than a weed - except cancer.
NKJ 2 Timothy 2:14 Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to strive about words to no profit, to the ruin of the hearers. 15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 16 But shun profane and idle babblings, for they will increase to more ungodliness. 
17 And their message will spread like cancer.


We took a family friend to the musical "Bye Bye Birdie," about a reprobate who is drafted into the Army just before running into problems with his image and his fans.

In the musical and movie, the PR team is always working on new stories about Birdie, so they remind me of the CG gurus defending each other, so I kelmed (copied) the chorus in each response.

  • GJ - Northern Conference paper - Kelm was quoted by Kent Hunter (DMin, Fuller) to promote a pan-Lutheran Church Growth conference. Frosty Bivens stood up "to defend the good name of Paul Kelm."
    Chorus - For he's a fine, upstanding, patriotic, healthy, normal American boy!
  • GJ - To Doctrinal Pussycat Robert Mueller - Kelm is always promoting the Church Growth Movement.
    Mueller, Kuske, Oelhafen - "You are the only person in WELS complaining about Church Growth in WELS." For he's a fine, upstanding, patriotic, healthy, normal American boy!
  • Church and Change listserve - "We should not be inviting Leonard Sweet for a WELS conference." Kelm responded - I won't talk about it. For he's a fine, upstanding, patriotic, healthy, normal American boy!
  • GJ - Conference paper which became the final chapter of Liberalism - The WELS missions people were all listed as attending Fuller Seminary, in a blurb sent by Fuller. Adrian and Oelhaven, furious - "Going to Fuller does not mean we agree with them." For we are fine, upstanding, patriotic, healthy, normal American boys!
  • Ichabod - Kudu Don Patterson is the SP designate for Church and Change.
    Patterson Network - (Expletive deleted, expletive deleted, expletive deleted) For he's a fine, upstanding, patriotic, healthy, normal American boy!
  • Tuesday, October 13, 2009

    Time of Gath Discussed on Facebook:
    Ad Ichabodem Fallacy Surfaces



    Parlow, Jeske, Kelm, Patterson. Church and Change - Big hug!


    Kelmed from Facebook
    Displaying all 25 posts by 13 people.
    Post #1
    Joe Jewell (Oxford University) wroteon September 7, 2009 at 9:15pm
    Anyone have comments on this? It certainly surprised me!

    http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=15614

    Time of Grace is a now a "a Recognized Service Organization of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod"... I looked this up and part of what that involves is:

    "RSO agrees (a) to foster the mission and ministry of the Synod, (b) to engage in programs in harmony with the Synod and (c) not to act contrary to the doctrine and practices of the Synod as outlined in the LCMS Constitution and Bylaws, the LCMS Board of Directors’ Policies and the LCMS Convention Resolutions that apply."

    https://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/Service%20Opportunities/RSO%20Agreement.pdf

    Can a WELS pastor really place his ministry under the authority of "LCMS doctrine and practices" and "LCMS Convention Resolutions" and stay a WELS pastor?
    Post #2
    Joe Jewell (Oxford University) wroteon September 7, 2009 at 9:24pm
    To add: yes, I have emailed Pastor Jeske about this.
    Post #3
    Michael Schottey (Martin Luther) wroteon September 8, 2009 at 12:17pm
    I would not be comfortable with my pastor serving on the board of an LCMS church. I don't see how this is different. It is certainly not an extraneous "non-ministry" like Thrivent.
    Post #4
    Brent Peterson (Wisconsin Lutheran) wroteon September 8, 2009 at 2:29pm
    Hmmm. I would not expect this. All in all, the LCMS and the WELS do mission and outreach quite well, but I don't understand why Time of Grace would need to align itself with the LCMS's Recognized Service Organization.
    Post #5
    Levi Powers (Wisc La Crosse) wroteon September 8, 2009 at 3:42pm
    What can be done about this? Should we do something about this? This action of Time of Grace certainly sends mixed messages and may lead to some confusion.
    Post #6
    Benjamin Tomczak (Dallas / Fort Worth, TX) wroteon September 9, 2009 at 1:02pm
    Joe, et al ~

    Thanks for posting this.

    My thoughts (when I found out about it last week) were two-fold:

    1) What exactly is going on here? How strict is this agreement (apparently the LC-MS has already waived the absolute requirement of having LC-MS members on the board, according to some other blogs I perused)? What does being an RSO mean?

    2) Then, when I found out what an RSO is, I asked, "Am I being overly sensitive, or is this a violation of the 'Keep away from them' (Romans 16) and 'Work together for the truth' (2 John) principles?" It's hard for me to see how, at the very least, this isn't confusing.

    It's hard to see how a WELS ministry wouldn't be "acting contrary to" the doctrines and practices of the LC-MS, unless that is read to meant, "Don't propagandize about the differences," or "Don't talk about the actual differences, just dwell on those things about which we agree." Either of which are still pretty unacceptable. Both of which seem to be "acting contrary to" the doctrines and practices of the WELS.

    After digging into it a little bit (isn't the RSO Manual a fun read?) I passed it up the line, that is, contacted my District President (my District's overseer of doctrine and practice) who contacted that District's President (Pastor Jeske's overseer of doctrine and practice) and the Synod President (our Synod's overseer of doctrine and practice).

    Without getting into details, the people who need to know about these things in order to find out what's going on and to work on this situation know what they need to know and are working on them.
    Post #7
    Silas Pieper (Milwaukee, WI) wroteon September 9, 2009 at 3:39pm
    hmm... seems we have some Icabod crazies...
    Post #8
    Michael Schottey (Martin Luther) wroteon September 9, 2009 at 4:16pm
    Yep, me (the MLC grad) and Rev Tomczak are "Ichabod Crazies" and not simply worried about a WELS pastor becoming closely affiliated with (and taking an oath to be bound in practice to) the LCMS.

    Ad Hominem much?
    Post #9
    Phil Eich (Martin Luther) wroteon September 9, 2009 at 5:49pm
    As long as we're in the crazy vein: Icabod (sic).
    Post #10
    Michael Schottey (Martin Luther) wroteon September 10, 2009 at 7:24am
    Phil...you so crazy!
    Post #11
    Kurt Kolander (Wisconsin Lutheran) wroteon September 11, 2009 at 12:29pm
    Its been awhile since my last church history class, so can someone quickly summarize the doctrinal differences between LCMS and the WELS?
    Post #12
    Joe Jewell (Oxford University) wroteon September 11, 2009 at 3:03pm
    1) Doctrine of church and ministry

    LCMS = Pastor is the only true and complete form of a mediate divine call, and the local congregation is the basic and true form of the church. Synod is not church.
    WELS = Divine call can take many forms: pastors, teachers, professors, administrators, others. Synod is church.

    2) Church fellowship

    LCMS = Altar (communion) and pulpit (preaching) fellowship require a common confession, worship and prayer do not.
    WELS = All forms of joint worship and prayer constitute church fellowship and require a common confession.

    3) Male/female roles

    LCMS = Only the pastoral office is exclusively reserved for men. Congregational officers and presidents (and even Elders in some LCMS congregations, although that is controversial) can be women.
    WELS = Offices that involve leadership over mixed groups are to be filled by men. However, a female could theoretically commune a group of all females.
    ELS = Same as WELS, except some controversy on that last point about women communing women.

    I might add that historically the WELS has shown a greater tendency to insist upon the inerrancy of Scripture, but that is related to all three of the above.

    A good book on this topic is "A Tale of Two Synods" by your very own Prof. Braun of WLC.
    Post #13
    Kurt Kolander (Wisconsin Lutheran) wroteon September 12, 2009 at 8:45am
    Thanks for the refresher. I believe I studied Dr. Braun's work when at WLC, but the details had escaped my memory.

    I know that this comment will get a lot of flak, but the above listed differences seem so practice based and minimally doctrine. To explain
    (because I am sure that I am probably losely using those terms), these appear to be discrepancies concerning the practice and outward image of the physical church on earth. They do not, in my opinion, have a direct effect on the actual message of the Law and Gospel.

    This is just my observation regarding the two synods division based on Joe's response to my post. If there is more to these divisions, then my observations are invalid.

    Post #14
    Paul T. McCain (Concordia Publishing House) wroteon September 13, 2009 at 5:01pm
    I've deleted my post. It is not my place on this Facebook Group to discuss doctrine with WELS folks. That is for another time, and place.
    Post #15
    Joe Jewell (Oxford University) wroteon September 13, 2009 at 5:03pm
    I think your judgment is correct on that, and I have deleted my response to your post as well.

    To anyone else reading this board, I've revised my statement on LCMS/inerrancy from that above to the narrower:

    "The LCMS has shown a greater tendency to tolerate without discipline within their ranks those who do *not* teach the inerrancy of Scripture".
    Post #16
    Luke Gieschen (Martin Luther) wroteon September 13, 2009 at 5:09pm
    Could someone please back up both the WELS and LCMS stances with scripture? I understand the points of the differences, I just can't connect their basis scripturally as I am not as well versed as I could be.
    Post #17
    Benjamin Tomczak (Dallas / Fort Worth, TX) wroteon September 15, 2009 at 12:55pm
    Two places you can go to read the WELS confession on these doctrines and teachings of Scripture:

    1) "This We Believe" -- http://www.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2601&collectionID=783

    2) "Doctrinal Statements of the WELS" -- http://www.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2601&collectionID=795

    Both can be downloaded and read there. You'll find copious Scriptural references to track down and study on all three topics -- Church and Ministry, Fellowship, and the Roles of Men and Women.

    Post #18
    Luke Gieschen (Martin Luther) wroteon September 16, 2009 at 2:46pm
    Thanks.
    Post #19
    Jay Ramos (Yale) wroteon September 24, 2009 at 8:47pm
    Pastor Tomczak (or others),

    Is there some kind of timeframe in which we can expect a statement or other action from those who are working on this?

    I would hope that the statement addresses the reason for becoming an RSO and why this is or is not acceptable.
    Post #20
    Benjamin Tomczak (Dallas / Fort Worth, TX) wroteon September 25, 2009 at 7:24am
    Jay ~

    Honestly, I don't know how long things will take to be taken care of and dealt with. The Bible doesn't give us a "timeframe" just an action frame (Matthew 18:15ff). It could be days, it could be weeks, it could be months, depending on what and who is involved.

    Post #21
    Jeffrey Sonntag (Martin Luther) wroteon October 7, 2009 at 10:46pm
    Has anyone contacted Time of Grace and asked them about this personally. Do they know what this website says about them? Just wondering.
    Post #22
    Joe Jewell (Oxford University) wroteon October 11, 2009 at 6:11pm
    I emailed Mark Jeske right before I started this thread a month ago. He says [I'm paraphrasing; I didn't ask his permission to quote him] essentially that RSO status doesn't really mean what the LCMS RSO website says it does, and that he feels it simply means that LCMS has vetted his program and considers it OK for LCMS people to watch. Pastor Jeske says that becoming an LCMS RSO doesn't actually give LCMS any authority over Time of Grace.

    That seems like (putting the Lutheran "best construction" on this) an exceptionally naive take on an agreement "not to act contrary to the doctrine and practices of the Synod as outlined in the LCMS Constitution and Bylaws, the LCMS Board of Directors’ Policies and the LCMS Convention Resolutions". I have never in the past known Mark Jeske to be that naive.

    They are aware of what the LCMS website says about Time of Grace's official affiliation (I sent him the same link I posted to start this thread, and I doubt it was a surprise in any event) and OK with it.

    For what it's worth, the LCMS pastor in my hometown (who is equally surprised that a WELS entity would affiliate with LCMS in this way) tells me that it is quite a process to get RSO status--it involves lots of paperwork and approval at the district/synodical level. He and other area LCMS congregations have been going through the process to get RSO status for some joint work that they do, and it is apparently not at all trivial.
    Post #23
    Samuel Jeske (Martin Luther) wrote6 hours ago
    I understand your concern, joe. But I agree with Kolander. This is really minor. Can we, in this financial time of crisis, afford to argue amongnst each other about the differences in the invisible church? Amongst the Lutheran Church? So you slap a LCMS label on a WELS box of cereal. Does that mean the "WELS" truth will taste different? Does that suddenly mean he's preaching heresy? Does that mean that the Holy Spirit no longer works through him?

    Naive? That seems pretty straight forward. Is not their truth our truth? Yeah there are the differences in clergy, but did not Jesus die for them too? Are they suddenly not allowed to watch Time of Grace because of some denominational acronym? No.

    Why are we arguing about how the truth of God's love enters the homes of people? God is reaching people through this ministry. Has anyone here attended St. Marcus? Has anyone here ever watched Time of Grace? If so, do you hear heresy in what he says? No. You don't. The differences you've listed seem trivial to argue about. Are we not commanded to go into ALL the world and preach the good news, the truth, to ALLl creation? So if the truth comes in a LCMS box are you saying it no longer is truth? You mentioned earlier that it scares you. Why? ELS works hand in hand with the WELS. Why can't LCMS? Aren't we all called for the same work?
    Post #24
    Jeffrey Sonntag (Martin Luther) wroteabout an hour ago
    The reason that LCMS and Wisconsin Synod don't work together is because they are not in fellowship because they don't agree on all the teachings of the Bible. The WELS and ELS ARE in fellowship and therefore they do joint tasks.

    As for the differences, how about we come at this from a logical reasoning. The WELS and LC-MS don't teach the same things. They are similar but not the same. If we just get rid of the doctrine of fellowship and say "If we are pretty close in our teachings and beliefs that's good enough, where do you stop?'' Do you stop with the ELCA or do you stop with Presbyterians or do you stop with Catholics or do you stop with anyone who says they believe in Jesus or ... etc.

    There is a reason that we don't work together with other Synod's with whom we are not in fellowship with, and that is because we are not the same. St. Paul specifically says in Romans 16:17 "I urge you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them."
    Post #25
    Samuel Jeske (Martin Luther) wrote26 minutes ago
    I understand that. My point is if LCMS sees Time of Grace and says, "Hey, here's a television show that we can watch and would like to use and doesnt clash with our doctrine," does this suddenly mean that the pastor preaching for Time of Grace is LCMS? LCMS is a wide division of Lutherans. Some are extremely liberal like their friends in ELCA, others are more conservative like us WELS. Every synod has its issues. Believe it or not even the WELS has its own problems.

    Paul was right in what he said. And i agree. But do we stay away from all Christians who do not fall under the WELS umbrella? Do we immediatley assume that we are always right and judge others because we are WELS? Do they not read the same Bible passage and apply that towards us? Most likely. If anything this thread of whether or not Mark Jeske is LCMS is an obstacle and a cause of division. Time of Grace has more viewers on a Sunday morning than the WELS does members on a Sunday morning. What does that say? Do you think just Lutherans watch this show?

    Lets look at the facts. Does Time of Grace teach anything that goes against WELS doctrine? No. So why do we raise our eyebrows if LCMS WANTS to use a WELS based television show? Why are we getting mad about this? If anything this is something to rejoice about. LCMS using a WELS doctrinated show? So why do we bicker? Why do we waste time fighting amongst ourselves? Right now the WELS has plenty of bigger issues that could use a facebook thread on before we start questioning the intentions of a 20 year WELS pastor veteran.

    Where we draw the line is where denominations no longer let scripture interpret itself. Does not Time of Grace do that?

    Time of Grace was approached by LCMS asking if their material could be used. They have no control over the doctrine of Time of Grace which has and always will be WELS. It is simply material that they intend to use. Period. Time of Grace is WELS affiliated. LCMS has ZERO control over them doctrinally.

    Let us remember that we are first servants of Christ and remember our jobs as Christians are to spread the truth. Time of Grace IS spreading the truth. Does anyone else feel this thread is the least of our concerns?