Monday, February 6, 2012

Febreze Fumigates The CORE


Febreeze has left a new comment on your post "Another Lulu.com Sale":

So I was recently Googling The CORE's stuff. I found some stuff on Youtube. Apparently after each praise session they ask those in attendance what they thought. The following are youtube videos and my initial comments on them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DGCa4P2lF8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyU1rC41ptc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5QFkNyLFPQ&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPb_gyMvMzI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zBFCkid0tg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwMTH_Ir6lg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V08Xz6NXhGM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcaCeLRpMPU&feature=autoplay&list=UUIKirTPZYdvN9ue_32Wwu4A&lf=plcp&playnext=1

Now, I will admit, my comments are very unorganized. My comments really pertain to the videos I have linked and maybe some that I didn't link. Forgive my non-organization of my comments to the videos. But if one watches the videos they will see where my comments arise from.

My comments are as follows (along with the connotations of  The CORE's members):

"Ski is awesome"

"The music is great and relates to us."

"We worship and we sing."

"God is there, he's waitng for us to cry out to him."

"Heard the airport sounds and the setting was awesome"

"I'm at home at the airport"

"The message is just what I needed to hear" (as opposed to the Law and Gospel presented at a "traditional" Lutheran service?...what makes the Gospel different at the CORE then at a liturgical church?)

"I come because the people are nice"

"The CORE is relevant because it's a sinful zone as opposed to a sinless zone" (what? if we we're sinless we wouldn't go to church. We go to church, at a liturgical Service, because it delivers the forgiveness of sins to SINNERS!)

They think "regular" church Services are for "holy people" and not "sinners." They are harking on the third use of the Law. It will burn them out. They are hiding the Gospel because of the primary focus on the third use of the Law. They even admit that (pretty much) they don't like churches who preach the Gospel as opposed to a church who harks on the third use of the Law.

Episode 3: "why do you come?" "I am here because the people are excited, because there is a girraff." (What?)

Episode 4: focused on praise. introduction to people around you...because the Divine Service is all about personal friendships rather than God's Word to you. "what makes it real? Pastor Ski and the people here."

Episode 12: so much time in effort placed into a play like interactive gimmick. Why isn't the focus on the Means of Grace which deliver forgiveness?

The "ready for worship" video: "love this song!" Is it more about the music or...?

Episode 3: who are the muscisians?! They're celebrities! Instead of just assisting worship humbly.

Episode 7: "meeting other people" My comments would be: we grow in our relationship with God not through a pumped up preacher, popcorn, soda, and music, but through his pure and Holy Word and through the Sacraments. Anything else is putting those things aside and putting our personal interests higher.

From these participants comments it comes off that they were just released from an action movie or a motivational speaker. I would never guess that they were released from the confession of sins, Law and Gospel exposition, and the Holy Sacrament of the Altar. Where does this "praise" mentality come from? I have to wonder. Some say it comes from UOJ because UOJ says we just need to accept that we're already forgiven -- therefore we "praise" him because of his already declared verdict. Others say that it's not even that, but, rather it's because we need to feel connected to Jesus without the Word and Sacraments but rather through music, popcorn, and a pumped up, eccentric preacher. With either case, in my opinion, it's pure Enthusiasm.

---


Luther - The Large Catechism:

Therefore I beg such lazy paunches or presumptuous saints to be persuaded and believe for God's sake that they are verily, verily! not so learned or such great doctors as they imagine; and never to presume that they have finished learning this [the parts of the Catechism], or know it well enough in all points, even though they think that they know it ever so well. For though they should know and understand it perfectly (which, however, is impossible in this life), yet there are manifold benefits and fruits still to be obtained, if it be daily read and practised in thought and speech; namely, that the Holy Ghost is present in such reading and repetition and meditation, and bestows ever new and more light and devoutness, so that it is daily relished and appreciated better, as Christ promises, Matt. 18:20: Where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.


10] Besides, it is an exceedingly effectual help against the devil, the world, and the flesh and all evil thoughts to be occupied with the Word of God, and to speak of it, and meditate upon it, so that the First Psalm declares those blessed who meditate upon the Law of God day and night. Undoubtedly, you will not start a stronger incense or other fumigation against the devil than by being engaged upon God's commandments and words, and speaking, singing, or thinking of them. For this is indeed the true holy water and holy sign from which he flees, and by which he may be driven away.


***


GJ - I love the baggage video where the man drags his baggage to The CORE and no one is there.

Dual Purpose - Thrivent Grant?

Another Lulu.com Sale


Place the code word in the window at the bottom of the order, update the order, and the discount will apply.

Each sale only works once, but these sales keep appearing. Go to the main lulu.com page to find the graphic. I will try to keep up with them.

This is where to order the books. PDF downloads are free.

Comments against UOJ, Steadfast Lutherans



Brett Meyer:

Dr. Kilcrease doesn’t understand why I post quotes from Scripture or the Lutheran Confessions without explaining them. It’s been a source of frustration before as it is now.


The reason is that direct quotes from Scripture are God’s pure Word. Through the Word the Holy Ghost works to build and strengthen faith in those God has called and also to harden the hearts of those who reject it.


Scripture doesn’t require philisophical manipulation in order to wrench a “concept” from it. God speaks clearly throughout the Bible which is the reason we look at the whole of God’s Word regarding Justification and not pixilate it as the sophists do. God’s Word is completely harmonious – there is no contradiction.
False teachings are contrary to God’s Word and will be, by their nature, contradictory to it.


I do not often go into great explanatory detail when I quote the Confessions. They too are very clear as they are wholely faithful to Scripture which is the Norm for Christian doctrine, Christian faith. It’s also good to let the Confessors speak directly to those who care enough to study.


It’s a trait of false teachings that they must masticate the source in order to substantiate their doctrines which are contrary to the source – in this case Scripture.


---


Brett Meyer:


Rev. McCall, Dr. Kilcrease,
I assure you there are no theological suppositions being superimposed on Scripture from the Justification by Faith Alone for the forgiveness of sins, righteousness and eternal life team.
Defense of my assertion is to quote the BOC, Smalcald articles Part II, Article I: The first and chief article. Note that the exposition of Rom. 4:25,John 1:29, Rom 3:23, Rom 3:26 the Confessors do not decree the unforgiven world forgiven without faith but clearly state forgiveness (justification) is by faith alone.
1] That Jesus Christ, our God and Lord, died for our sins, and was raised again for our justification, Rom. 4:25.
2] And He alone is the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world, John 1:29; and God has laid upon Him the iniquities of us all, Is. 53:6.
3] Likewise: All have sinned and are justified without merit [freely, and without their own works or merits] by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, in His blood, Rom. 3:23f
4] Now, since it is necessary to believe this, and it cannot be otherwise acquired or apprehended by any work, law, or merit, it is clear and certain that this faith alone justifies us as St. Paul says, Rom. 3:28: For we conclude that a man is justified by faith, without the deeds of the Law. Likewise 3:26: That He might be just, and the Justifier of him which believeth in Christ.
5] Of this article nothing can be yielded or surrendered [nor can anything be granted or permitted contrary to the same], even though heaven and earth, and whatever will not abide, should sink to ruin. For there is none other name under heaven, given among men whereby we must be saved, says Peter, Acts 4:12. And with His stripes we are healed, Is. 53:5. And upon this article all things depend which we teach and practice in opposition to the Pope, the devil, and the [whole] world.Therefore, we must be sure concerning this doctrine, and not doubt; for otherwise all is lost, and the Pope and devil and all things gain the victory and suit over us.
http://bookofconcord.org/smalcald.php#officeandworkofjesus
Also, under the Solid Declaration in the BOC forgiveness follows faith and without faith the unbelieving world is not accounted righteous and forgiven but under God’s wrath:
20] However, now that man has not kept the Law of God, but transgressed it, his corrupt nature, thoughts, words, and works fighting against it, for which reason he is under God’s wrath, death, all temporal calamities, and the punishment of hell-fire, the Gospel is properly a doctrine which teaches what man should believe, that he may obtain forgiveness of sins with God, namely, that the Son of God, our Lord Christ, has taken upon Himself and borne the curse of the Law, has expiated and paid for all our sins, through whom alone we again enter into favor with God, obtain forgiveness of sins by faith, are delivered from death and all the punishments of sins, and eternally saved.
This BOC quote also rejects Dr. Kilcrease’s teaching that the imperitive to “believe”, as a requirement for the forgiveness of sins, is Law and not Gospel. It is most definitely Gospel because Faith is solely worked, created and sustained by the Holy Ghost through the Means of Grace.
And in order to counter the UOJ claim that the BOC was only speaking of what UOJ would call Subjective Justification the BOC declares the two ways in which Scripture uses the word Justified – neither of them being a declaration of forgiveness without faith graciously worked through the Means of Grace.
72] And because “to be justified” means that out of unjust men just men are made, or born again, it means also that they are pronounced or accounted just. For Scripture speaks in both ways. [The term "to be justified" is used in two ways: to denote, being converted or regenerated; again, being accounted righteous.] Accordingly we wish first to show this, that faith alone makes of an unjust, a just man, i.e., receives remission of sins.


---


Brett Meyer:


The Seventh-Day Adventists confess the same UOJ as the Lutheran Synods.


---


Lito Cruz:


Mr. Halvorson,
To add a bit more, to my post in
The way to interpret Romans 4:25 that is safe and fair is to put it in context with the rest of Romans 4 as part of an argument and further to look at the statements of St Paul as a statement which includes the story of our Redemption as Christians.
Before you shoot more questions, I would suggest you deal with the explanation of Walther A. Maier whose paper I have included in the above post. Please study that paper carefully and try to shut yourself for the moment from any propaganda, if you wish by Team JBFA or Team UOJ.
When you have done that, I am happy to answer questions which you might direct to me personally.
LPC


---


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Comments against UOJ, Steadfast Lutherans":

I recommend reading through the "Oh did you hear what Rydecki said..." post on LutherQuest. Count each time a leap of human reason occurs in the confessions of those commenting.

For example here is a snippet from a comment from UOJ promoter Rolf Preus, " If Jesus paid the ransom and the Father accepted the ransom this must mean that God has absolved everyone for whom the ransom was paid. Otherwise God's a cheat."

The leap of human reason is "...this must mean..." add 1 to your count

http://www.lutherquest.org/cgi-bin/discus40/discus.cgi  

Johnny goes marching home again






Johnny goes marching home again:


Sadly, a few decision-makers never forgave Baker for dropping out. When he was nominated in 2004 for Moline High School's Hall of Honor, he was rejected. Even though school officials had excitedly awarded him an honorary diploma upon his return from war, it wasn't good enough.

Gary Koeller, Moline's principal at the time, added that more than "just a single phenomenon" was expected of a Hall of Honor inductee.

But even before President Lyndon Johnson hung the Medal of Honor around Baker's neck for selflessly saving the lives of eight Americans, the 5-foot, 2-inch soldier was awarded the Bronze Star, Silver Star and Purple Heart. He completed 300 missions as a "tunnel rat," crawling through tunnels and planting explosives where the enemy traveled.

In 1989, Baker retired from the U.S. Army as a master sergeant after serving 24 years.
After that, he went to work as a computer analyst for the Veterans Affairs hospital in Columbia, S.C., one of the largest VA hospitals in the country.

He long served as vice president of the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. And he was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2002 to serve on the National Cemetery Association's advisory committee on cemeteries and memorials.

He accepted invitations to speak at more than 1,000 public schools. The Interstate 280 Bridge was renamed Baker Bridge.

He was no one-hit wonder.

But the decision-makers at the high school refused to back off. One of Baker's former stepsons launched a relentless attack, claiming Baker was an alcoholic and was abusive to his mother after returning from Vietnam.

Even after an investigation by a retired FBI agent and a former member of the Secret Service revealed no such darkness in his past, school officials clung to their snubbing.

Ironically, the purpose of the Hall of Honor is: "To honor Moline High School alumni who have achieved distinction and positively influenced the lives of others."


Read more: http://www.qctimes.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/barb-ickes/johnny-goes-marching-home-again/article_da95f362-4719-11e1-8e26-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz1lcIKWdHy


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - Synods are far more petty, excelling in driving members and ministers away.

Sceptics Think the NNIV Battle in WELS Is Not Over



ChurchMouse - Carl Olof Rosenius

Carl Olof Rosenius is essential to the history of
Swedish Pietism and the Augustana Synod.


Swedish pietism: Carl Olof Rosenius and George Scott « Churchmouse Campanologist:


Although I plan to post on David Gustafson’s book on Moody and Swedish pietists (mentioned therein) early next week, it seemed apposite to explore the possibilities for their appetite for Anglo-American holiness.

A likely place to begin is with two men, Carl Olof Rosenius, Lutheran pietist and George Scott, an English Methodist.


'via Blog this'

ChurchMouse - Dwight L. Moody

Dwight L. Moody, as in WDLM radio in Chicago.
The Quad Cities had WOC -
Wonders of Chiropractic (Palmer's pioneering radio station).


Dwight Moody and the Swedish pietists « Churchmouse Campanologist:


In this post, we return to America (now and again) and to Dwight Moody. I also hadn’t realised he had such an effect on Swedish pietists until I read David Gustafson’s book, D L Moody and Swedes, a thorough and fascinating examination of the subject. Dr Gustafson teaches at Linköping University in the Department of Arts and Sciences.

I shall briefly attempt to summarise key points of how important this episode of the late 19th century would be for both parties. (Page numbers indicated below are PDF pages and might not tie in with the printed page number.)


'via Blog this'

Sunday, February 5, 2012

A Simple Summary about UOJ and Justification by Faith - From A Stranger



Comment Link: http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190&cpage=3#comment-282261
Author: John Standley
Comment:
I'm not saying they are like the Papists who reprimanded Luther. I'm saying that they are all open to interpretation according to the Scriptures and the Confessions. Both parties can be promoted as the "mascot" of the UOJ or anti-UOJ position. It's up to the Confessions to see who is interpreting Scripture correctly.

I'm going to have to agree with those who say that because Justification was the most argued point between the Papists and Protestants that obviously Objective Justification would have been covered exhaustively in a separate article. But it wasn't! I think that is profound! To say that one passage of Scripture or the Confessions is grounds for an Objective Justification that imputes righteousness to everyone prior to faith is crazy. The Papists have done the same thing with the book of James who completely interpret it out of the context of the whole of Scripture. To support their claims from James about works righteousness they throw "Synod essayists" at people and say that because of what they say it is true...because those in "power" say it is.

I don't agree with anyone who forms a doctrine from ONE passage among a sea of other contextual passages about justification by faith alone.

To be clear: I agree with those who say that OJ means justification has been won. SJ means that the justification that has been won has been imputed through faith.

I disagree with those who say that OJ is justification imputed to the whole unbelieving world apart from faith (when Christ died and/or was raised). And also that SJ is simply accepting this already declared imputed righteousness.

The brief statement says this: “Scripture teaches that God has already declared the whole world to be righteous in Christ.”

To me, that interpretation of OJ is what I defined as justification being imputed to each and every person on earth prior to faith which therefore negates the need for SJ because it has already been imputed objectively.
Permalink: http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190

***

GJ - I do not know who this man is. I have no contact with him. I wanted to quote his statement from Steadfast Enthuisasts to show that people can discern the difference between crypto-Universalism and justification-by-faith.

Meanwhile, Brett Meyer and Dr. Lito Cruz are also making hash out of all the UOJ arguments. I think over 450 comments have been made so far.

The UOJ-widows may wish that their husbands were football fans instead.




Interfaith community is his legacy | Tulsa World

The Rev. Clarence Knippa, 98, takes a ride on his power wheelchair last week at Montreau, a retirement community. MICHAEL WYKE/Tulsa World

Interfaith community is his legacy | Tulsa World:


The Missouri Synod Lutheran Church did not endorse Knippa’s interfaith work, but they did not trouble him about it.

And he never felt that he compromised his Christian faith by working with other faith leaders, he said.

Read more from this Tulsa World article at
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=18&articleid=20120128_18_A17_TheRev570964


'via Blog this'

Concordia Seminary basketball is a throwback



Concordia Seminary basketball is a throwback:


CLAYTON • It was about time for the tip-off at Concordia Seminary's Pederson Fieldhouse, but before the Preachers could start their game against visiting Williams Baptist College, there was the matter of the national anthem.

A crowd of some 25 people rose from their seats to hear the anthem — sung by the Concordia players.
That's standard practice at Pederson Fieldhouse. This clearly was no ordinary college basketball game. It was more, or less depending on your point of view.

There was no admission charge, no bleachers, no concession stand and no game programs. The fieldhouse on the Concordia campus in Clayton is named for the Preachers' longtime coach, the late Eldon "Pete" Pederson. I didn't know Pederson, but I remember him as an imposing figure when I attended Preachers games as a youngster in the late 1950s and early '60s. It was during that era when I was a neighborhood gym rat and got to serve as a ballboy for the St. Louis Hawks during their preseason camp at Concordia.


Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/concordia-seminary-basketball-is-a-throwback/article_dedeb2df-99f0-5f35-9cc7-51623e275c33.html#ixzz1lZH3FgSM


'via Blog this'

But He Was Born Forgiven, According to Eduard Preuss, Jack Kilcrease's Favorite Theologian



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Nineveh the Great Has Fallen!":

NFL supporting pedophile via song royalties, even during SuperBowl 2012:

Super-Bowl Sized blunder by NFL:

http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/2090472/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093888/Paedophile-Gary-Glitter-pocket-thousands-pounds-royalties-hit-used-Superbowl-final.html?ITO=1490 

***

GJ - WELS is looking for a new Director of Communications.

Nineveh the Great Has Fallen!


From SP Mark Schroeder, WELS:

I apologize that the earlier copy of En Christo contained two errors. Please note that two pastors from each district attended the symposium, not three. Also note that an important word was omitted in the paragraph that begins "In addition to the fact that the TEC has . . ." The word "not" was omitted: the sentence should read, ". . . a number of other factors indicate that it may not be wise to make a final decision this summer." The corrections are included in the version below.

Fellow servants,

As you know, for more than a year we have been involved in discussions about the selection of a translation to be used in WELS publications. For a church body like ours, firmly committed to the truth of the inspired and inerrant Scriptures and to the Reformation principle of sola scriptura, few discussions could be more important. I know this is one more e-mail in your already full in-box, but I believe it's important for all of our called workers to be well informed of the facts of this process and what will be happening in the coming months.

As part of the ongoing effort to foster brotherly discussion and to clarify the issues involved in a translation choice, the Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC) organized a symposium held in early January. The symposium was attended by two pastors from each district (appointed by their respective district presidents) and the members of both the TEC and the Translation Feasibility Committee (TFC). Its purpose was not to promote one translation or to achieve consensus on a particular translation. Rather, it was intended to provide a forum to hear and discuss all sides of the translation issue and to work toward consensus on the translation principles that will guide our decision.

According to those who attended the symposium, it was a fruitful and beneficial gathering. Unfortunately, a summary of the symposium was circulated rather widely that unintentionally conveyed some inaccurate information. President Paul Wendland asked me to relay this message to you:

"There seem to be some misunderstandings circulating regarding the nature, the purpose, and the outcome of the TEC committee's recent symposium on translation. Out of a sense of love and fairness to all who were there, I offer the following as an attempt to clarify matters.

We (the TEC) felt that the symposium had served a good purpose. All of us came away with a deeper understanding of the complex choices that need to be made in translating God's Word into English. All of us were given ample opportunity to speak about our translational preferences and concerns, especially as those concerns applied to the NIV 2011. United in the belief that the Bible is God's inspired word and in our conviction that Christ is the center of the Scripture, we were able to discuss our preferences in a frank, and yet in a very fair and brotherly way. To that end, the symposium achieved its purposes. It was never envisioned that the symposium as such would draw any conclusions or make any recommendations to the synod or to the districts about a preferred translation. As a matter of fact, we did not do so."

Contrary to the impression the circulated summary gave, no "vote" was taken at the symposium regarding a preferred translation. In fact, there was a wide range of opinion expressed about the NIV 2011; both favorable opinions as well as various concerns were expressed. In keeping with the purpose of the symposium, the participants focused their attention on translation principles and the process of translation, agreed that more discussion and study is needed, and specifically determined not to take such a vote or as a group to express a preference for any particular translation.

So where are we now? What will happen in the coming months?

After the symposium, the TEC has come to the informal conclusion that continued discussion and further study is needed before any final decision can be made. Again, President Wendland has said,

"Is it wise for us given the time constraints we've all been working under to make a final decision this summer? For one thing, have we really—either as a synod, as districts, or even as an evaluation committee—had sufficient time to make a comparative evaluation of the various versions? Since July 2011, the TEC has been active, attending conventions and gatherings in all twelve districts, writing articles and reports and e-mails. We have done our best to do as the convention asked, namely 'to educate the synod on the general principles that we ought to use to evaluate the Bible translations mentioned in its reports, and so to help build a consensus among us on which translation to use for synod publications.' But the committee is still left with the question, 'Can a delegate really say that he has been provided with enough information to compare the merits and demerits of the NIV 2011, for example, with the merits and demerits of the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) so that he can vote accordingly?' "

In addition to the fact that the TEC has not had the time to study alternatives to the NIV 2011 as completely as it would like, a number of other factors indicate that it may not be wise to make a final decision this summer. When the convention determined that a decision should be made at the districts, the information available indicated that the NIV 1984 would not be able to be used in WELS publications after 2013. This has turned out not to be accurate. The "fair use" principle in copyright and publishing law indicates that Northwestern Publishing House would be able to continue using the NIV 1984 in its publications, provided that the quotations do not comprise more than 20% of the published material. In other words, NPH will be able to use the NIV 1984 in nearly all of its publications, including Meditations and Forward in Christ. Furthermore, NPH has said that it does not want its publication needs in any way to drive a final decision on translations and will find alternate solutions if necessary. For example, in the Christ-Light materials, NPH is considering a "translation neutral" approach, printing only Bible references and not the passages themselves.

All of this—the continuing concerns about NIV 2011 as well as the new information regarding the use of NIV 1984—means that the option to delay a decision may be one of the choices put before the district conventions this summer. The Conference of Presidents will be discussing this in upcoming meetings. If the COP adopts a recommendation to delay a decision, that recommendation will be forwarded to the districts for consideration.

What about the possibility of producing a new or revised translation by Lutherans? This matter is still under discussion by the TFC. If a decision is delayed by the districts this summer, additional time would be available to explore this option further. It is my personal opinion that this possibility should be pursued vigorously. While I recognize the obstacles and challenges (and many of those have been clearly voiced), it's an idea that should not be dismissed until we have carefully looked at all the factors involved. A translation (either a new one or a revision) by Lutherans would be a tremendous gift to the church. Admittedly, this option would not solve our more immediate problem with translations, but it could be a long term solution that proves to be a blessing for decades to come.

Some are concerned that this entire translation issue is an unfortunate cause of division among us. But in many ways, this entire discussion can be a blessing to us. We are not divided on doctrinal issues or the nature of Scripture itself. In all of our discussions—even those with some passion and heat—it is evident that we are completely united in our commitment to the inerrancy and inspiration of the Scriptures. It is clear that we have a fervent desire to communicate God's truth as clearly and as accurately as we can. Even among brothers there will be differences in how this can best be done. But we stand together, as Luther did, on Scripture alone. It's my prayer that our commitment to his Word will be deepened and strengthened by this process, difficult as it may sometimes be. After all, it is that Word that unites us in a common faith, committed to work together with one voice to preach the crucified and risen Christ.

Serving with you in Christ,

President Mark Schroeder

***

GJ - Scrape away all the PR and self-congratulations; the core message is - "Nineveh is dead."

On the other hand, the Left is good at push-back and the Right is good at premature celebration. Look at the Komen/Planned Parenthood fiasco. Komen abandoned Planned Parenthood for about 24 hours but fell on the murderous necks of the Margaret Sanger disciples, weeping that the price of their reconciliation not be too high. Komen is loud and proud for abortion again. It's about women's rights. It's about justice. It's about freedom.

That could happen with Nineveh, too.

The Love Shack Fire Department,
putting out fires all over the nation.
Guys. Guys! Look behind you!



Septuagesima Sunday, 2012:
The Unfair Wages Parable.
Matthew 20:1ff




Septuagesima Sunday, 2012

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #479   Zion Rise                            2:13
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 151            Christ the Life                       2:78

Jesus Illustrates God’s Grace

The Hymn # 227     Come Holy Ghost                             2:72
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #409   Let Us Ever Walk                              2:91

1 Corinthians 9:24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.  25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.  26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:  27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;  2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;  4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.  5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

KJV Matthew 20:1 For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard. 

3 And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4 And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way. 5 Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6 And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7 They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive. 

8 So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first. 9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny. 11 And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12 Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day. 

13 But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14 Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15 Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good? 

16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Septuagesima Sunday

Lord God, heavenly Father, who through Thy holy word hast called us into Thy vineyard: Send, we beseech Thee, Thy Holy Spirit into our hearts, that we may labor faithfully in Thy vineyard, shun sin and all offense, obediently keep Thy word and do Thy will, and put our whole and only trust in Thy grace, which Thou hast bestowed upon us so plenteously through Thy Son Jesus Christ, that we may obtain eternal salvation through Him, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

Jesus Illustrates God’s Grace


KJV Matthew 20:1 For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard.

One person asked recently, “How do we know whether the verse is to be taken literally or figuratively?” My answer was, “Context.”

Here is the context – “For the kingdom of heaven is like unto” – that is the language of a parable. We know that from the larger context of all the parables Jesus taught. Many times the words “like unto” are used. At other times they are called parables. They are also called figures.

Clearly they were intended for the catechism of believers, not for anyone who happened to be in the crowd. Jesus said so explicitly. Also we can see the effect when he spoke a parable, and the religious opponents realized it was spoken against them.

In other words, the Savior revealed as much as He chose to reveal. If a non-believer makes fun of a parable and mocks it in some way, that is the idea. He sees without seeing and hears without perceiving. Although the Word has this blinding effect, it also irritates and disturbs so that unbelievers cannot get it out of their minds. In trying to dispose of it they often grasp the Word so strongly that the Word converts them.

That is the mystery of election. God works through the Word, so we are not to investigate those things that belong only to Him. However, we are supposed to share this Word generously since God’s divine energy is bound up in it and He lets us see the results of it.

So one part of context is the parable. This is a short story, fictional, to teach one or more points. Since it is so brief, every detail is important.

The larger context is also important. The Bible never contradicts itself, so no one can assert one point that is against another position in the Bible. On the positive side, we say, “Scripture interprets Scripture.”

False teachers do the opposite of studying a passage in its immediate and larger context. They pixelate Scripture. Pixelation is a modern term for enlarging a graphic so much that we only see some pixels, which do not give us any concept of the picture.

In Photoshop I pixelate graphics so I can edit them, pixel by pixel. I can see the dark edges I want to remove but I cannot even tell how that looks until I use the full screen view again, to see my editing work in context.

So every false teacher will pixelate Bible verses. They often play with words and distort them too. Symbolic language is their little sandbox to play in. I have to know all of John’s Gospel to deal with someone who says the entire world was forgiven, because John said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” The verse by itself does not teach world absolution at all, but pixilation plus some authorities quoted will make it seem that way.

World absolution collides with

KJV John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

Some will say, but I have several more verses that prove world absolution. But each verse has to pass the test of John 3:36 and many other passages. Besides that, it is not a question of one verse against another. The verses were added later for convenience. The question is, “What does the entire Scripture teach?”

Roman Catholics use pixilation and authorities. I could go to my favorite Vatican owned seminary (the only one in America) and use their library in Columbus. I had sign out privileges. They had an entire wall of books about Mary, one recent set being 3 volumes long. I could use those to say, “This verse in the Bible teaches that about Mary, because I have 100 theologians who agree with me.” Of course, the effect of those Mariology books was just the opposite on me, but I could see the power of deception, having all those highly trained academics on one side of the issue.

The Hiring
We can see that we have a parable with an obvious agricultural parallel. Anyone who owns a farm or vineyard is going to hire people to help with the labor-intensive workers. The framework of the parable is hiring laborers at a penny day for their work.

3 And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4 And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way.

More laborers are needed, so they are hired. But there is no pay established. That was only for the first hired – a penny a day.

5 Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6 And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7 They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.

Three more sets of laborers are hired. This is the way they hired in Phoenix. The day laborers, as they were called, stationed themselves near the big hardware stores or another hiring place. People came by, made a deal, and took men home for a day’s work.

Payday

8 So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first.

Now the plot develops. The Lord of the Vineyard is clearly God, and the Promise will be fulfilled, beginning with the last contacted.

Minimum Wage Dispute

9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny.

Those hired later assumed that the very latest getting one penny meant they would get more than that.

Arguing the Law

11 And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12 Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day.

Now we see that the parable is answering the question of Peter, just before this parable began. The workers are those believers who have labored in the Church (an image from Old Testament times for the Kingdom of God) and see people getting the same reward for working one hour.

This response is logical but also sinful. We used to say in Phoenix, “You will never mow the law at noon after you try it the first time.” Likewise, in this parable the workers are talking about the burning of the sun and the drying winds. It is exhausting to work under such conditions. So they argue, “We worked the hardest time of the day but you give them the same pay.”

13 But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14 Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15 Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?

The parable begins with a specific promise for the first workers and another promise to the rest.
This is a good example of man looking at God’s management from a human point of view. If those who work so little in comparison get 1 penny, they get far more.

But this is a matter of grace (Promises of God) rather than Law. The main point is leading up to another matter, which is far more serious. The first part shows what grace means, that God showers grace according to His will, not according to man’s measure.

The ending is a solemn warning, often not heeded.

16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Many Christian leaders prosper and win admiration for many different reasons. That goes to their heads and they think they can handle the Gospel so well that they can flaunt the Ten Commandments. So they do. They risk lives on the highway (DUIs). They destroy their own families and others with infidelity – first to the Word, then to their wives and children. They decide all the money is theirs, since they have worked so hard, so they live like royalty and steal like thieves. The longer they get away with it, the greater their daring. But when natural law catches up, they are drop-kicked into the abyss.

In contrast, many who think they are nothing are really the greatest in the Kingdom because of their child-like faith and the way that bears fruit over time. They do not think they matter at all, but God knows who they are and how they are fruitful for the Kingdom.

As Luther says, this verse warns the great against arrogance and encourages the downtrodden not to despair. Many are called but few are elect. The Gospel invitation goes out to the entire world, but that saving faith is lost through many temptations, the Old Adam, the assaults of the unbelieving world, and Satan’s work.

In the context of the preceding passage, we can see how the parable illustrates what Jesus taught.

KJV Matthew 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. 25 When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? 26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. 27 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? 28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. 30 But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first.

Sound Doctrine


"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands."
            Thorough Declaration, Of Other Factions and Sects, Formula of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 1103.

"'If there ever was a strictly conservative body, it surely is the Missouri Synod. Nevertheless, this growth!...It is a mark of the pastors and leaders of the Missouri Synod that they never, aye, never, tire of discussing doctrine on the basis of Scripture and the Confessions. That is one trait that may be called the spirit of Missouri. People who thus cling to doctrine and contend for its purity are of an entirely different nature from the superficial unionists who in the critical moment will declare five to be an even number. God will bless all who value His Word so highly.'"
            (Dr. Lenski, Kirchenzeitung, May 20, 1922)
            cited in W. A. Baepler, "Doctrine, True and False," The Abiding Word, ed., Theodore Laetsch, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1946, II, p. 515f.

"We should not consider the slightest error against the Word of God unimportant."
            What Luther Says , An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 637.

"Error and heresy must come into the world so that the elect may become approved and manifest. Their coming is in the best interests of Christians if they take the proper attitude toward it. St. Augustine, who certainly was sufficiently annoyed by wretched sectaries, says that when heresy and offense come, they produce much benefit in Christendom; for they cause Christians industriously to read Holy Scriptures and with diligence to pursue it and persevere in its study. Otherwise they might let it lie on the shelf, become very secure, and say: Why, God's Word and the text of Scripture are current and in our midst; it is not necessary for us to read Holy Scripture."
            What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 639.

“You cannot of a truth be for true doctrine without being unalterably opposed to false doctrine. There can be no 'positive theology' where the God-given negatives have been eliminated from the Decalog."
            Norman A. Madson, Preaching to Preachers, Mankato: Lutheran Synod Book Company, 1952. Preface.

  

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Using Guilt by Association - An Old But Useful Logical Fallacy



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Going the Extra Mile in Research - So You Can Enjo...":

The UOJists who falsely accuse me of heresy when I contend for Justification by Faith Alone have blamed you, Pastor Jackson, for poisoning me against their doctrine of UOJ. But it was long before we met that the problems with UOJ were brought to my attention. I was speaking to a Baptist about works righteousness being a part of making a decision for Christ. He laughed and said that it was 'us' Lutherans who teach works righteous through faith since 'we' teach the world is forgiven before faith and we just need to make a decsion to believe it. Wha...wh...? I started to study after that.

***

GJ - They fail to realize that publishing draws the like-minded together. Publishing also attracts opponents, who keep us sharp.

I am glad that the Wisconsin Sect finally bared its fangs with the NNIV. If that did not alert people about the apostate professors at the seminary, then this little blog will not accomplish the task with a few Photoshops. That stable needs to be cleaned. Missouri could not face its problems either, until they blew up in their face - and that was good for them.

Event: 'Relationship Wars: Why Lasting Love Is So Hard to Find' | Bethany Lutheran College, Mankato, MN

Event: 'Relationship Wars: Why Lasting Love Is So Hard to Find' | Bethany Lutheran College, Mankato, MN:

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - He calls himself a Christian, not a Lutheran, on his Facebook page. That is what we need - more generic speakers transforming lives.

Information about him seems slight.

Going the Extra Mile in Research - So You Can Enjoy the Superbowl



Joe Krohn found an interesting post denouncing Objective Justification and linked it on his blog.

http://heartoftn.net/users/gary27/Objectiv.htm

I usually Google new names, to see what comes up.

In this case, the author was Gary Ray Branscome.

The first thing I noticed was a new post on Herman Otten's blog that was not quite anti-OJ but could be read that way.

http://christiannewsmo.blogspot.com/2012/02/justification-by-faith-alone-material.html

I am always uneasy with affirmations that lack negative statements. Every clear confession needs the negative side to avoid ambiguity. "Error loves ambiguities." Mormons believe in the Trinity, they say, but they do not denounce three separate persons because they are not Trinitarian.

Herman Otten's Christian News is a UOJ shop, although he waffles toward justification by faith at times. Like Rolf Preus, he will always come down on the UOJ side when pressed.

That is why I found the Branscome post so oddly out of place when I just read an anti-UOJ post from the same author.

So I looked again, Google-searching the name.

Here is Gary posting against infant baptism:

http://heartoftn.net/users/gary27/caseagin.htm

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Going the Extra Mile in Research - So You Can Enjo...":

The UOJists who falsely accuse me of heresy when I contend for Justification by Faith Alone have blamed you, Pastor Jackson, for poisoning me against their doctrine of UOJ. But it was long before we met that the problems with UOJ were brought to my attention. I was speaking to a Baptist about works righteousness being a part of making a decision for Christ. He laughed and said that it was 'us' Lutherans who teach works righteous through faith since 'we' teach the world is forgiven before faith and we just need to make a decsion to believe it. Wha...wh...? I started to study after that.

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Going the Extra Mile in Research - So You Can Enjo...":

As you know I was accused of being a heretic myself, and to be shunned and avoided.

It is really insulting for me to say I was poisoned; it means, I have no mind of my own and could not discern things for myself.

LPC

***

GJ - Lito and Brett, they have nothing left but insults and logical fallacies.

---

http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190&cpage=3#comment-281918

Author: Lito Cruz
Comment:
<a href="#comment-281793" rel="nofollow">@John Standley #32 </a>

John,

Did you see what I mean? The condescension?

Read Dr. Kilcrease  at

<a href="#comment-281905" rel="nofollow">@Dr. Jack Kilcrease #36 </a>

Kilcrease brands Team JBFA as <i>Most of his followers tend to be people who are not very well versed in theology</i>. We are Galileans, we are unlearned that is why we are fooled.

Despite the fact that we have offered and given reasonable doubt on their famous UOJ verse, Romans 4:25 we are ignorant in theology, right. We can not read and we do not exercise critical thinking 101.

You open every commentary on this, the only interpretation that slightly support their contention about Romans 4:25 is Everett Harrison's commentary on Romans, see Expositor's Bible Commentary, Vol 10. There he speaks about accomplishment, but in the end of his long exposition he offers a caveat, he says, of course, the justification mentioned there in that verse is justification through faith.

Just for your info, I have 4 degrees, 1 degree is in Religious Studies (specialising in Biblical Languages, 2-4 years in Classical/Koine Greek,1 year Biblical Hebrew), it is a degree between a Bachelor and a Master's degree(http://www.latrobe.edu.au/). My prof was G H R Horsley who authored a multivolume set found here http://books.google.com.au/books/about/New_documents_illustrating_early_Christi.html?id=28YyARfAsesC&amp;redir_esc=y

Over here, we do not parade our academic accomplishments, it is bad form. We only do it for ethical reasons because if we are a doctor and we don't say it, we are misrepresenting ourselves specially when we are in a career situation.

John, the mark of a person who has no argument is to insult you.

LPC

***

GJ - Ach, Lito - do not fall for his anti-Jacobs rant. Academic qualifications often get in the way of discernment. Poor Jack was trained by ELCA and next by the Jesuits at Marquette, the little school where Notre Dame graduates go to do their student teaching.

Kilcrease is annoyed by people running circles around his pet opinion. Academic theologians like to start some new fad or flog some dog-eared theory. Going back and forth gives them visibility. One man, with far better credentials than anything on Kilcrease's light resume, argued that Jesus founded a mushroom cult. As the impressed book seller told me, "Look! He has 400 footnotes!"

My unscientific study of justification-by-faith stalwarts yields this conclusion - almost all of them are laity.