Saturday, October 17, 2009

Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity


By Norma Boeckler


The Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 10 AM Central


The Hymn #260 O Lord Look Down 1.4
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual Ephesians 4:22-28
The Gospel Matthew 9:1-8
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #225 Come Holy Spirit 1.39

New Clothes – New Man

The Hymn #261 Lord Keep Us 1.93
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #452 The Son of God 1.10

KJV Ephesians 4:22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; 24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. 25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another. 26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: 27 Neither give place to the devil. 28 Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.

KJV Matthew 9:1 And he entered into a ship, and passed over, and came into his own city. 2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. 3 And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth. 4 And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts? 5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? 6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. 7 And he arose, and departed to his house. 8 But when the multitudes saw it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men
Nineteenth Sunday After Trinity
O mighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Son Jesus Christ didst mercifully help the palsied man both in body and soul: We beseech Thee, for the sake of Thy great mercy: Be gracious also unto us; forgive us all our sins, and so govern us by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not ourselves be the cause of sickness and other afflictions; keep us in Thy fear, and strengthen us by Thy grace that we may escape temporal and eternal wrath and punishment, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

New Clothes – New Man

KJV Ephesians 4:22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; 24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.

The image in this lesson is familiar in Paul’s letters. The phrase is associated with putting on clothing, especially a robe. Take off the old robe, the conduct of the Old Adam, which is corrupt, and be renewed in your mind, and put on the new robe of the New Man, created by the Word in righteousness and true holiness.

This image is very clearly associated with conversion to faith and Holy Baptism. Perhaps this image applied directly to the baptismal gown worn by adult converts. I am skeptical that all churches followed the same traditions in all places. However, it has been a custom to baptize on Easter Sunday. Even in modern churches one can find adults wearing a special robe for the occasion, not necessarily because they are being immersed. (The Baptists have an interesting argument. They say everyone must be immersed because the verb means to immerse. But the verb really means to wash, emphasizing the sacrament – God giving grace through a visible instrument.)

KJV Galatians 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In Galatians, which was most likely earlier than Ephesians (and well known to all), Paul connected this verb “put on” with Holy Baptism.

The Christian faith is a great blessing to mankind, because this only true religion, revealed by God, does not take, does not demand, but gives to man. Forgiveness is not earned by works, pain, torture, and self-sacrifice, but won by Christ and distributed by the Gospel Word, in preaching, teaching, Holy Baptism, and Holy Communion.

I often wonder why a nominal Christian society is saturated with so much bad behavior. One indication came to me at a political meeting I attended with my wife. Much was made of a new trend, called oath-takers or oath-keepers. Everyone who takes an oath to perform an office is included (military, firemen, police officers). That may remind people of another fad from 15 years ago, Promise Keepers. The idea is to get people to promise all the good things they will do and make them keep those promises. I have seen that adapted by Lutheran youth groups too. All of this is the Law and bears the fruit of hypocrisy.
People put their trust in their own actions, determination, virtue, and methods employed. Maybe they should write down their promises. Share them with others. Have a special service where they make their promises.

The Lutheran Pietists, who borrowed heavily from the Reformed, were always anxious to prove they were getting good results, visible results in their members.
Sermons and worship were aimed at this, and the conventicle or cell group was considered the key method.

Paul’s admonitions are just the opposite. That is why we see such a contrast between the Means of Grace and Reformed methods.

Luther was often criticized for emphasizing the Gospel so much in his sermons. He reasoned that the people had heard the Law alone for centuries and were properly scared to death about judgment and condemnation. They knew their sinful condition. He preached the Gospel to them to show them the cure was already planned, arranged, and fulfilled for them.

Modern drama evolved out of Medieval plays, which were ways of showing people how they were going to burn forever in Hell. These were effective fund-raising devices when indulgences were sold. That may sound crude but I know of a pastor who used the same method in visiting an elderly patient with brain cancer. He scared the man but that was not a comfort to him or the family.

Indulgences and Pietism methods both aim at works of the Law, so they fail in providing comfort and forgiveness. They stir up the dust of the Law, the evil desires (carnal and spiritual) without providing a solution or cure.

The false Gospel of Universal Objective Justification sounds like pure Gospel to some, but its Pietistic roots give it away. UOJ is anti-Means of Grace and therefore anti-Biblical. The method is clear, quoting Paul Kelm. He reversed Law and Gospel and said we should start with the Gospel (meaning everyone in the world is forgiven, without faith) and move to the Law (imposing demands on people). The Zinzendorf Pietists (now called Moravians) advocated the same plan, starting with the Gospel and ending with the Law.

Calvin and Karl Barth said the same thing – The gift (salvation) is a demand.

All the holiness and Reformed groups end up in the same position, requiring works with faith for salvation. That is why one Baptist author said his denomination was very close to Roman Catholicism in its concept of sanctification (the Christian life).

So how do we escape the swamp of Pietism, the Slough of Despond, which has attracted and trapped so many well-meaning Christians?

Paul’s words must be taken in the context of Scripture interpreting Scripture. Putting off the Old Adam means giving up on the way the world conducts itself and measures virtue.

Putting on the New Man, the New Creature, does not mean making a vow or going on a pilgrimage. Paul equates Holy Baptism with putting on Christ. Our robe of righteousness is not ours, but His.

Paul’s admonition is Gospel. Our conduct in life is based upon Christ paying for our sins and giving us His righteousness through the visible and invisible Word.
Remaining on the True Vine makes us fruitful, not because of us and our promises, but because of the Vine.

KJV John 15:1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. 2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. 3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. 5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned. 7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you. 8 Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.

Notice that the Father is glorified when believers bear fruit. Nothing speaks more eloquently about false teachers than their glorying in themselves. They are the best, the greatest, and they have most stuff. One CG blogger wrote, “Look at all the people we have.” Not once did he mention being faithful to the Word.

The anti-Means of Grace nominal Lutherans love the word “disciples” but they never quote this verse:

KJV John 8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

The statement is not, “If you have a large congregation, you are my disciples indeed.”

The statement is not, “If the world admires you and features you in the Sunday magazine supplement, you are my disciples indeed.’

KJV John 15:19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.

Jesus, in John’s Gospel, constantly emphasized the hatred of the world toward believers and the importance of guarding the Word. It is God’s Word given to them and to us, not our word to be bandied about and manipulated for our purposes. The Word has the cross attached to it, so many prefer the toxic word of success-magic, borrowed from the Asian magic religions (Taoism especially and perhaps Buddhism). One man told me he was becoming a Buddhist because his special number was 22 and they showed him that number as his number - at their temple. Knowing how much he talked, I imagine they gleaned that from him first, then “revealed” it later. He probably owns Trump mortgage bonds today.

The new WELS youth rally is saturated with success propaganda based on the low ebb of Pietism, bordering on the occult. Pietism gets boring and the occult concepts tickle the fraying nerves of law-mongers. “Heather is 18 and recently graduated from High school. She is a single mom, and has a newborn baby named Kendall. She will talk about the struggles and trials she has overcome and the breakthrough victories she was able to accomplish because of her fearless faith in her Savior Jesus.” Her faith accomplished these things, so let’s all admire her fearless faith.

The Scriptures constantly emphasize faith, but they point to faith in Christ, not faith in us.

So put on the New Man means – Remember your baptism. Because Christ has done everything for you, paid for your sins with His innocent blood, and risen from the dead, conduct yourselves according to the Gospel.

Our baptism is a constant reminder of God giving us the Gospel at the earliest point in life (in many cases) or confirming our faith in the case of adult conversions. I remember seeing my baptism certificate, from a Congregational church. Later my family joined the local personality-cult church growthy church (Disciples of Christ). That led me to join the Lutheran Church. The pastor thought I might be put off by the liturgy. He never realized how superficial the non-liturgical churches were. Those who grow up in liturgical Lutheran churches take them for granted and think Evangelicals have more freedom and attractiveness. But what is better than the Word?

I have told this story often but it sticks with me. I was just at the world headquarters of Wal-Mart this week and attended a meeting there. An Evangelical minister toured McDonald’s headquarters and was dazzled by all the media equipment. He said to the Evangelism conference, “If only the church had all that equipment!”

But the church has the Word, and Gospel-energy is far more powerful than hardware and software, sub-woofers and tweeters.

Lenski has an ironic statement in one of his books, which is parallel to this discussion. He says, “Everyone prays for the one thing we do not need to pray for.” (Our daily bread – God provides this to believers and unbelievers alike). “But we do not pray for the one thing Christ prayed for – the unity of the church.” That unity can only come from agreement in doctrine, sound doctrine, God’s revealed Word.

Civilization IV recognizes that. This video game rewards the gamer who has the same religion in all his cities. It even helps in taking over other cities that belong to another country. Christian disharmony has been at the center of many crises affecting national governments. That leads to the influence of pagan religions. Minnesota was once a Lutheran state. Now it is rapidly becoming a Muslim run state, with a radical Muslim as Senator and the other Senator a comedian who supports the radicals.

So man constantly corrupts the true Word of God and turns it into the word of man. Justification by faith alone, apart from the works of the Law, is the healing message of the Gospel and the power to face temptation.

No one likes bad directions, which we got recently on the way to a doctor 120 miles away. I said, “Let’s try it my way,” and I was right for once. People can die from bad medicine.

I had a member whose father was dying in the hospital. His adult brother was called home from South America for the final days. They discovered the father was being given the wrong medicine for his condition, and that was killing him. They took him off the wrong medicine and he went home from the hospital, healthy.

It is essential that we receive the right medicine, no other Gospel, as Paul said to the Galatians. The right medicine is the cure. It is a comfort and relief, not a burden. It brings healing. From time to time I have had to take medicine for an illness or condition. The moment I took one pill, I said, “That’s it. Now I know what I needed.” Many types of medicine are on-going treatments, for things like blood pressure and diabetes. The Gospel is our medicine for our on-going condition of sinfulness, which is treated but never cured this side of Heaven.

A chorus of voices will tell us to take nostrums and bad medicine, but the Word of God prescribes the right medicine even if everyone else says otherwise.

KJV Psalm 103:1 {A Psalm of David.} Bless the LORD, O my soul: and all that is within me, bless his holy name. 2 Bless the LORD, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits: 3 Who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases; 4 Who redeemeth thy life from destruction; who crowneth thee with lovingkindness and tender mercies; 5 Who satisfieth thy mouth with good things; so that thy youth is renewed like the eagle's. 6 The LORD executeth righteousness and judgment for all that are oppressed. 7 He made known his ways unto Moses, his acts unto the children of Israel. 8 The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy. 9 He will not always chide: neither will he keep his anger for ever. 10 He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities. 11 For as the heaven is high above the earth, so great is his mercy toward them that fear him. 12 As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us. 13 Like as a father pitieth his children, so the LORD pitieth them that fear him. 14 For he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust. 15 As for man, his days are as grass: as a flower of the field, so he flourisheth. 16 For the wind passeth over it, and it is gone; and the place thereof shall know it no more. 17 But the mercy of the LORD is from everlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him, and his righteousness unto children's children; 18 To such as keep his covenant, and to those that remember his commandments to do them. 19 The LORD hath prepared his throne in the heavens; and his kingdom ruleth over all. 20 Bless the LORD, ye his angels, that excel in strength, that do his commandments, hearkening unto the voice of his word. 21 Bless ye the LORD, all ye his hosts; ye ministers of his, that do his pleasure. 22 Bless the LORD, all his works in all places of his dominion: bless the LORD, O my soul.
The benefits of this everlasting Gospel are the fruits we see from the power of the Word. We enjoy them first of all in our families, which are God’s appointed schools for building Christian character. We see them in many other relationships blessed by Christian faith.

I have lived in many different regions, thanks to the Church Growth people, and I have noticed a distinct difference in the populations. I was confirmed in an Augustana Synod church, a group profoundly influenced by William Passavant. He was so firm about the Confessions, after being part of the Church Growthism of the 19th century (revivalism, which was also unionistic), that he constantly emphasized Lutheran orthodoxy according to the Book of Concord. He insisted on a confessional subscription for all the seminary professors at the school he established by buying the land. He bought the land where Wrigley Field is located. That was bought by him for the seminary. It was purchased and land bought in Maywood, where the seminary was actually established. Every seminary professor had to sign his name to the Book of Concord, in order to teach there. Even then that was a remarkable emphasis, going against all the trends of the moment. Augustana never reconciled its divergent doctrine, but Passavant’s leadership (as an outsider!) meant the Swedish Lutherans were actively engaged in all kinds of charitable and missionary work as the fruit of the Gospel. They were far more involved and generous than their liberal, ULCA counterparts. Ultimately Pietism won out with unionism, and they turned their charitable work into political activism. The first LCA lobbyist in Washington DC was an Augustana pastor. Sad.

The Gospel rain moves on, as Luther said. It is inevitable that people will take for granted whatever is abundant. We value Lutheran orthodoxy all the more now because so few give it any credibility, and it seems to be fading away in so many quarters. To judge results is not our job – only to remain faithful stewards of the mysteries of God.

Quotations

"Next in importance to the above three framers was David Chytraeus (1530-1600). A south German, educated at Wittenberg under Melanchthon, he spent most of his professional ife, 49 years, as professor at Rostock in Mecklenburg in north Germany. Like Melanchthon he was never ordained. Next to Chemnitz, he was the brightest and best theologian in the group...Like many other had had become disenchanted with Melanchthon and turned against him on the Lord's Supper."
J. A. O. Preus, The Second Martin, The Life and Theology of Martin Chemnitz, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1994, p. 186.

6) Antinomistic Controversy, 1527-1556. John Agricola, repentance wrought by Gospel, not Law. Rejection of Third Use. Decided by FC, Articles V and VI. 7) Crypto-Calvinistic Controversy, 1560-1574. Philippists in Wittenberg, Leipzig, Dresden, tried to supplant Luther's doctrines with Calvin's on the Lord's Supper and the majesty of the human nature of Christ. Unmasked in 1574. Decided by FC, Articles VII and VIII. 8) Descent into Hell - John Aepinus in Hamburg. FC, Article IX. Once saved, always saved. Zanchi, a Crypto-Calvinist, in Strassburg. FC, Article XI.
F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta, Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, 031 p. 103.

of innocent and faithful Lutheran ministers. The fact was clearly established that these Philippists had been systematically plotting to Calvinize Saxony. The very arguments with which Luther's doctrine of the Lord's Supper and the Person of Christ might best be refuted were enumerated in these letters. However, when asked by the Elector whether they were Calvinists, these self-convicted deceivers are said to have answered that 'they would not see the face of God in eternity if in any point they were addicted to the doctrines of the Sacramentarians or deviated in the least from Dr. Luther's teaching.' (Walther, 56.)"
F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta, Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, 057 p. 190.

"Calvin and his adherents boldly rejected the universality of God's grace, of Christ's redemption, and of the Spirit's efficacious operation through the means of grace, and taught that, in the last analysis, also the eternal doom of the damned was solely due to an absolute decree of divine reprobation (in their estimation the logical complement of election), and this at the very time when they pretended adherence to the Augsburg Confession and were making heavy inroads into Lutheran territory with their doctrine concerning the Lord's Supper and the person of Christ,--which in itself was sufficient reason for a public discussion and determined resentment of their absolute predestinarianism."
F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta, Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, 061 p. 195f.

"Calvin and his adherents boldly rejected the universality of God's grace, of Christ's redemption, and of the Spirit's efficacious operation through the means of grace, and taught that, in the last analysis, also the eternal doom of the damned was solely due to an absolute decree of divine reprobation (in their estimation the logical complement of election), and this at the very time when they pretended adherence to the Augsburg Confession and were making heavy inroads into Lutheran territory with their doctrine concerning the Lord's Supper and the person of Christ,--which in itself was sufficient reason for a public discussion and determined resentment of their absolute predestinarianism." F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta, Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, 061 p. 195f. "It was, above all, the spirit of indifferentism toward false doctrine, particularly concerning the Lord's Supper, which Luther observed and deplored in his Wittenberg colleagues: Melanchthon, Bugenhagen, Cruciger, Eber, and Major."
F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta, Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, 005 p. 94.

"For Scripture never calls either Baptism or the Lord's Supper mysteries or sacraments. Therefore this is an unwritten (agraphos) appellation." Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II, p. 29. "In addition there is this perversion, that whereas Christ instituted the use of His Supper for all who receive it, who take, eat, and drink, the papalist Mass transfers the use and benefit of the celebration of the Lord's Supper in our time to the onlookers, who do not communicate, yes, to those who are absent, and even to the dead."
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II, p. 498.

"For a sacrifice, according to Augustine, Contra adversarium legis et prophetarum, Bk. 1, and De civitate Dei, Bk. 10, is a work which we offer, render, and dedicate to God in order that we may dwell in Him in holy fellowship. A sacrament, however, is a holy sign through which God freely offers, conveys, applies, and seals His gratuitous benefits to us. It is therefore an extraordinary perversion of the Lord's Supper to make a sacrifice out of a sacrament, in the way the papalists speak of the sacrifice of their Mass, namely, that the representatory action of the priest procures for us the application of the benefits of Christ and that anyone who causes a Mass to be celebrated in his behalf by this work procures grace and whatever other things are ascribed to the Mass."
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II, p. 498.

"Naturally, Universalists deny that the Sacraments are Means of Grace. Some Universalists observe three sacraments--consecration, Baptism, and the Lord's Supper. The act of consecration of children consists in the parents' pledging themselves to rear their children in the admonition of the Lord." The. Engelder, W. Arndt, Th. Graebner, F. E. Mayer, Popular Symbolics, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1934, p. 409f. "As distinguished from the Gospel, Sacraments are acts, we apply water in Baptism, and we eat and drink in the Lord's Supper. They are sacred acts, and must, as such, be distinguished from ordinary washing, eating and drinking...A Sacrament which offers God's blessings cannot be instituted by man or the Church, but by God alone."
Edward W. A. Koehler, A Short Explanation of Dr. Martin Luther's Small Catechism, Fort Wayne: Concordia Theological Seminary Press, 1946, p. 254.

"The same is true of other factions--the Anabaptists and similar sects. What else do they but slander baptism and the Lord's Supper when they pretend that the external [spoken] Word and outward sacraments do not benefit the soul, that the Spirit alone can do that?" Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 208. 1 Corinthians 12:1-11;

"For in Confession as in the Lord's Supper you have the additional advantage, that the Word is applied to your person alone. For in preaching it flies out into the whole congregation, and although it strikes you also, yet you are not so sure of it; but here it does not apply to anyone except you. Ought it not to fill your heart with joy to know a place where God is ready to speak to you personally? Yea, if we had a chance to hear an angel speak we would surely run to the ends of the earth."
Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983 II, p. 199.

"The devil does not rest yet, and hence he stirs up so many sects and factions. How many sects have we not already had? One has taken up the sword, another has attacked the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, others that of baptism."
Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholaus Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, V, p. 266. John 4:46-54; 1 Peter 5:8; Ephesians 6:12

"For we can definitely assert that where the Lord's Supper, Baptism, and the Word are found, Christ, the remission of sins, and life eternal are found. On the other hand, where these signs of grace are not found, or where they are despised by men, not only grace is lacking but also foul errors will follow. Then men will set up other forms of worship and other signs for themselves."
Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 914. Genesis 4:3.

"Both Baptism and the Lord's Supper qualify as Means of Grace because of the simple fact that they are visible forms of the essential Gospel message announcing the forgiveness of sins." Martin W. Lutz, "God the HS Acts Through the Lord's Supper," God The Holy Spirit Acts, ed., Eugene P. Kaulfield, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1972, p. 117. "Since God has connected His most gracious promise of forgiveness with Baptism and the Lord's Supper, these also are true and efficacious means of grace, namely, by virtue of the divine promises that are attached to them."
John Theodore Mueller, Christian Dogmatics, A Handbook of Doctrinal Theology, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1934, p. 444.

"In reconciling the world unto Himself by Christ's substitutionary satisfaction, God asked no one's advice concerning His singular method of reconciliation. In like manner, without asking any man's advice, He ordained the means by which He gives men the infallible assurance of His gracious will toward them; in other words, He both confers on men the remission of sins merited by Christ and works faith in the proffered remission or, where faith already exists, strengthens it. The Church has appropriately called these divine ordinances the means of grace, media gratiae, instrumenta gratiae; Formula of Concord: 'Instrumenta sive media Spiritus Sancti' (Triglotta, p. 903, Solid Declaration, II, 58). They are the Word of the Gospel, Baptism, and the Lord's Supper, as will be shown more fully on the following pages."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1953, III, p. 103.

"We saw before that Scripture ascribes the forgiveness of sins without reservation to the Word of the Gospel, to Baptism, and to the Lord's Supper. Therefore all means of grace have the vis effectiva, the power to work and to strengthen faith." [Note: Augsburg Confession, V, XIII]
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1953, III, p. 108f.

"In fact, there is no basis for a real disagreement between Zwingli and Calvin. The situation here is analogous to the one that obtains in the doctrine of Christ's Person and Word and the doctrine of the Lord's Supper. In these doctrines Zwingli and Calvin and all Reformed will agree as long as they all teach that Christ's body can possess only a local and visible mode of subsistence or presence. Similarly, Zwingli and Calvin cannot differ materially in their teaching on the means of grace because they agree, first, that Christ's merit and saving grace do not apply to all who use the means of grace; secondly, that saving grace is not bound to the means of grace."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1950, III, p. 163.

"The Reformed, and all Reformed sects, deny the Real Presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Lord's Supper. Through this they detract from God's honor." Francis Pieper, The Difference between Orthodox and Heterodox Churches, and Supplement, Coos Bay, Oregon: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, 1981, p. 36. "Whoever denies the Real Presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Lord's Supper must pervert the words of Institution where Christ the Lord, speaking of that which He gives His Christians to eat, says: 'This is My body,' and, speaking of that which He gives them to drink, says: 'This is My blood.' [Also 1 Corinthians 10:16]
Francis Pieper, The Difference between Orthodox and Heterodox Churches, and Supplement, Coos Bay, Oregon: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, 1981, p. 40. 1 Corinthians 10:16.

"Furthermore, consider this: All doctrines of the Bible are connected with one another; they form a unit. One error draws others in after it. Zwingli's first error was the denial of the presence of Christ's body and blood in the Lord's Supper. In order to support this error, he had to invent a false doctrine of Christ's Person, of heaven, of the right hand of God, etc."
Francis Pieper, The Difference between Orthodox and Heterodox Churches, and Supplement, Coos Bay, Oregon: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, 1981, p. 41.

"It is, for example, very terrible that the Lutheran Church, because it has the true doctrine of Baptism and the Lord's Supper, is decried as 'Catholic.' This attack against the true Church is no small matter." Francis Pieper, The Difference between Orthodox and Heterodox Churches, and Supplement, Coos Bay, Oregon: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, 1981, p. 44.

"Is the Lord's Supper the place to display my toleration, my Christian sympathy, or my fellowship with another Christian, when that is the very point in which most of all we differ; and in which the difference means for me everything--means for me, the reception of the Savior's atonement? Is this the point to be selected for the display of Christian union, when in fact it is the very point in which Christian union does not exist?"
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: 1911, p. 905f.

"As to your observation that this kind of open communion is common practice in the WELS, you may be correct. It is an aberration that has caught on, especially in the mission fields like California. It's a kind of 'Don't ask, don't tell' for the Lord's Supper!" Rev. Steve Spencer, Letter to Gregory L. Jackson, 3-15-95.

"If we call Sacraments rites which have the command of God, and to which the promise of grace has been added, it is easy to decide what are properly Sacraments...Therefore Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Absolution, which is the Sacrament of Repentance, are truly Sacraments. For these rites have God's command and the promise of grace, which is peculiar to the New Testament. For when we are baptized, when we eat the Lord's body, when we are absolved, our hearts must be firmly assured that God truly forgives us for Christ's sake. And God, at the same time, by the Word and by the rite, moves hearts to believe and conceive faith, just as Paul says, Romans 10:17: 'Faith cometh by hearing.' But just as the Word enters the ear in order to strike our heart, so the rite itself strikes the eye, in order to move the heart. The effect of the Word and of the rite is the same..." [Luther, Bab Captivity, 3 sacraments]
Article XIII, Number/Use Sacraments, Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 309.

"Our adversaries have no testimonies and no command from Scripture for defending the application of the ceremony for liberating the souls of the dead, although from this they derive infinite revenue. Nor, indeed, is it a light sin to establish such services in the Church without the command of God and without the example of Scripture, and to apply to the dead the Lord's Supper, which was instituted for commemoration and preaching among the living [for the purpose of strengthening the faith of those who use the ceremony]. This is to violate the Second Commandment, by abusing God's name."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article XXIV, The Mass, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 414f.

"In what vulgar terms does Zwingli here speak of these sacred matters! When the Holy Spirit wants to approach man, He does not need the Word of God, the Gospel, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, for a conveyance; He can come without them! It must be a queer Bible which Zwingli read."
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 156.

"They separate grace from Baptism and leave us a mere external sign, in which there is not a grain of mercy; all grace has been cut away. Now, if the grace of Christ has been removed from Baptism, there remains nothing but a mere work. Likewise, in the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper the fanatics remove the promise offered us in this Sacrament; they tell us that what we eat and drink is nothing but bread and wine. Here, too, the proffered grace is cut away and renounced. For they teach us that the only good work that we do by communing is professing Christ; as to the rest, we merely eat and drink bread and wine in the Supper, and there is no grace in it for us. That is the result of falling away from the First Commandment: a person promptly sets up an idol in the form of some meritorious work, in which he trusts." (Luther, on Deuteronomy 4:28; St. L. III, 1691 ff.)
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 160. Deuteronomy 4:28.

"Calvin was dissatisfied with Zwingli's interpretation of the Lord's Supper, but his own interpretation was also wrong. He said that a person desiring to receive the body and blood of Christ could not get it under the bread and wine, but must by his faith mount up to heaven, where the Holy Spirit would negotiate a way for feeding him with the body and blood of Christ. These are mere vagaries, which originated in Calvin's fancy. But an incident like this shows that men will not believe that God bears us poor sinners such great love that He is willing to come to us."
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 185.

Engage Maximum Deniability Drive...Now!




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Time of Disgrace: Teen Mother Preaches to WELS Tee...":


This is not sponsored by the synod. It's a local effort put on by St. Marcus and friends.

***

GJ - I will concede that this is not THE Official synodical youth rally. Nota bene - this event is not billed at the St. Marcus Youth Rally, Time of Gath Youth Rally, or even the Milwaukee Youth Rally. The title is:

WELS Teen Rally 2010,

so it cloaks itself as an official WELS event.

The Time of Gath links on the WELS.net website and St. Marcus' current WELS membership suggest an approval which is both unquestioned and undeserved.

Wisconsin Lutheran College is not a WELS college.

Thoughts of Faith is not ELS, just packed with ELS staff and board members, with missionaries commissioned at ELS conferences. Nothing to see, move on.

Church and Change is not WELS. Ok, WELS started it, but that is irrelevant.

WELS Prayer Warriors are not WELS. Ok, WELS started them too, with another grant. Legalist! Trouble-maker!

Pots of Pietism are not WELS, just WELS led and Fuller trained.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Engage Maximum Deniability Drive...Now!":

Thoughts of Faith came 'under the governance and control' of the ELS through the Board for World Outreach (formerly the Board for Foreign Missions), at the synod's 2009 convention.

***

GJ - I knew someone would post this about TOF. They were quick to deny TOF was ELS even though an ELS pastor ran it, an ELS/WELS board governed it, and the missionaries were all ELS and commissioned at ELS services by the ELS president. What was it before 2009? - Methodist?

Fuller First VP Reviewed by Freddy Finkelstein




First VP of WELS, James Huebner, Fuller-trained consultant.

Freddy Finkelstein has left a new comment on your post "Fuller-Trained WELS First VP Reveals His Lack of D...":

This was a sermon? I must be dense, or perhaps the good Reverend is just a little too nuanced for me, but I missed the message of Justification – I'm a simple Lutheran after all, and expect that the message of Justification be central, not a sideshow. This was essentially a Sanctification message, was it not – all about what we should do and think? Although Law and Gospel was discussed, I entirely missed its application. Law was not preached – it was preached about. I heard something about the Gospel as well, but I can't say that the Gospel was preached either. Then again, perhaps today's Lutheran pastors are so well trained, and their delivery so highly nuanced, that they can sound just like Evangelicals while in fact being entirely Lutheran...

Judging from what I see in the words, rather than from what I wish were in the words, or assume must be in the words since the good Reverend is a confessing Lutheran, this "sermon" seemed to me to be just an excuse to put the following phrase in the minds of its hearers: "haughty confessional Lutheran." An almost equal number of words on either side of that phrase, this seemed to be the central point as well, given that the true doctrine of Church Fellowship was driven into the shadows. Apparently, we only separate from “those who aren't promoting [God's] cause at all.” Only from those who fail completely to “promote” His cause. The good Reverend preaches that we indeed ought to be indignant, ought to cut out false teaching and separate from false teachers – but only for certain kinds of “wrong teaching,” i.e., wrong teaching that would “trap [His] people in the prison of unbelief and hell.” On the other hand, if folks are merely “leaning in the right direction,” why then, we adopt an approving attitude. Perhaps this means that we also join in ministerial association with them! That would certainly be approving! Perhaps we join the Willow Creek Association – after all, they lean in the right direction. Perhaps we sign up with the Purpose Driven Church – a ministry so popular that it certainly must “lean in the right direction.” And who could argue with its “effectiveness?” Perhaps we should all work harder to get the LCMS to recognize us, and secure RSO status for all of our outreach ministries. The message seems to be that as long as Christians are all leaning in approximately the same direction, why then, there is really no “wrong teaching” to be concerned about, indignant over, or to remain separate from.

What would a “haughty Confessional Lutheran” confess? Certainly not what the good Reverend seems to be saying. He would, instead, teach the whole Council of God on the subject of Fellowship, including the following points:

Mark and Avoid
"Now I beseach you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple." (Romans 16:17-18)

Anyone, Anything
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:8-9)

Full Agreement
"Now I beseach you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." (1 Corinthians 1:10)

I don't pretend that these verses are the beginning and end of the matter. Additional references would include 2 John 9-11, Philippians 1:27-2:11, Ephesians 4:2-16, etc., none of which I heard emphasized, “promoted,” or even echoed in the good Reverend's sermon.


Someone questioned on another blog entry whether a split in WELS is imminent. A split will occur, with costly, bitter, and embarrassing lawsuits over who gets the property, unless issues of false teaching and practice are decisively and swiftly handled under church doctrine, namely that of Fellowship. The legal authorities won't touch internal church issues handled under established doctrine – it is referred to in legal circles as “Cannon Law.” If, however, it can be shown or suggested that such doctrines are not consistently followed, such as would be the case in protracted delays in effectively dealing with false teaching, “Cannon Law” protection disappears and it becomes a matter for the courts. If you want the sordid and ugly history on how these matters progress, and the devastation wrought by them, read Nelson & Fevold's The Lutheran Church among Norwegian-Americans and pay attention to what happened in the late 19th Century. The COP recently looked into the status of our Synod's assets in the event of a split, and our Synod's Constitution was found lacking (read here). There would definitely be lawsuits in the event of a split. False teachers need to be disfellowshipped before they can gain a following large enough to bring about a split and open court battles over Synod assets.

Freddy Finkelstein

PS - For readers who may have missed it, I'll add the following comment. Rev. Huebner's theology of Church Fellowship, as clearly preached in his sermon, excludes all but Fundamental Doctrines as those regarding which disagreement requires separation. WELS, and Scripture, exclude no doctrines. This is a serious departure from long-held WELS teaching on the matter of Fellowship.

PPS - My faithful editor, Mrs. Finkelstein, usually proofreads my posts before I actually post them, even reading background material to make sure I am responding appropriately. This is why my posts usually come off sounding so polished. Tonight was different. I posted without her second look at my writing. After I had posted, she examined my post along with Rev. Huebner published sermon. She was offended by his sermon to the point of tears. In her words:

“The text he uses does not at all support his assumptions. He admits that we know nothing about the man driving out demons other than that he was not one of the twelve. How then can he assume that this man was someone who was not in agreement with Jesus' teaching, and equate the difference between the twelve and this man with the difference between WELS 'haughty confessionalism' and, say, the teachings of the Ev. Covenant Church? How do we know that, at that point, the disciples themselves were in full agreement with Jesus' teaching? I believe that there is reasonable evidence from Scripture to conclude otherwise! If we accept his assumption that the man driving out demons was heterodox, Rev. Huebner says we must accept and imitate this heterodox, while Jesus only says, 'don't stop them.' If we believe, as a matter of Christian conscience, that Lutheran doctrine is correct doctrine, then why does he encourage us to imitate the heterodox!”

Yes, even a WELS woman can tell that Rev. Huebner's sermon is rubbish... If our esteemed First VP reads this blog, I would seriously suggest to him that he publicly retract his sermon. Second, I would suggest to him that his orthodoxy is now in question, and recommend that he issue a public clarification, not only of the points in his sermon, but of his position on the WELS “Unit Concept” of Church Fellowship. Third, I would even go so far as to suggest that merely admitting “I adhere to all WELS doctrines, etc.” is not sufficient, but that a full explication of this doctrine, from his perspective, is in order, that we might all measure his orthodoxy, rather than merely rely on his admission that he is orthodox.

***

GJ - WELS is already divided, polarized by the crafts and assaults of Church and Change. The question is where the pieces will fall in the end. I predict Mark Jeske taking his group out, which will be a partial exit. Some may end up LCMS. Others may be more honest and join the Evangelical Covenant Church or its clone, the Evangelical Free Church (nicknamed E-Frees). ECCs and E-Frees are both Pietistic and growthy to the max. Like the ELS and WELS, Missouri has always been troubled by Pietistic Enthusiasm. Under Kieschnick the Enthusiasts are in total control, but the Confessionals continue like a nasty rash. Shrinkers hate being rebuked so that would encourage a non-Lutheran landing zone.

Recent remarks lead me to believe that Chicaneries often read Ichabod, but without edification.

Has Huebner ever retracted his published false doctrine? Has Valleskey? Kelm? Olson? Ski? Parlow? Witte?

Someone noted that Grace has two pastors and the sermon has no name on it. But the congregation's website featured the sermon on its main page and also on its sermon page. They are walking together at Grace.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Fuller-Trained WELS First VP Reveals His Lack of D...":

Psst, Greggie: Jim Huebner didn't preach this sermon. Get your facts straight.

***

GJ - Poor anonymous. Huebner put this wretched sermon on his congregational website--which he brags about--so he displayed his agreement with the content. In essence, that is his sermon, or the congregation's sermon, on the website. Besides, if he allowed such a bad sermon, what does that say about his doctrinal supervision? He allowed it and approved it, yet he is the First VP of WELS. Surely the Wisconsin Synod can find a Lutheran to represent them - one who has never trained at Fuller, never mocked the efficacy of the Word in print.



Time of Disgrace:
Teen Mother Preaches to WELS Teens.
2010 WELS Teen Rally


Mequon grads: left click for the source. It will save you time, energy, and face. Thanks.


Thursday July 22nd, 2010
1:00 P.M Opening Worship - Pastor Paul Steinberg/Koine
1:45 P.M Make Your Mess A Message/Duck Tour - Heather Franske
What are you doing about the mess from your past?  Is it still there tucked away nice and neatly or is it continuing to create havoc and worry in your life?


Pastor Paul at the 2009 Rally



Everyone has a past to deal with. While we cannot change our past, we certainly change our response to it. We can either allow our past to defeat us or we can harness it, and use it for power in our lives today and tomorrow!




God will use Heather as a single teen mom to share with the group that no matter how messy our lives get, or how many obstacles we come across, sharing our victory through Christ will help others with their personal struggles.

Heather Franske

Make your mess into a message

Heather is 18 and recently graduated from High school. She is a single mom, and has a newborn baby named Kendall. She will talk about the struggles and trials she has overcome and the breakthrough victories she was able to accomplish because of her fearless faith in her Savior Jesus.


Wisconsin Dells Duck Tour 2009






4:00 P.M Check In
6:30 P.M Dinner
7:00-10:00P.M Water Park
10:30 P.M Connect Together
10:45- 11:45P.M TBA
Friday July 23rd 2010

 


7:30 A.M Breakfast
8:30 A.M Opening Worship - Pastor Paul Steinberg/Koine
9:15 A.M Never comprise your faith.- Sy Vannisaveth
Anything that's worthwhile, whatever course you decide upon, there's always someone to tell you you're wrong. There are always difficulties arising which tempt you to believe that your critics are right. To map out a course of action and to follow to an end requires some of the same courage which all Christians need.




8:00 P.M Fearless Faith To The Core - Pastor Ski

When you're fully committed to Jesus Christ, you have already died to self (the hardest loss of all) and you have been raised to a brand new life (eternal life which no one or no thing can take away), so you can be fearless even in the face of death. Are you at the place in your life where you have turned from your sins and placed faith in Jesus? Then and only then can you experience the blessing of a fearless faith to the core.


9:15 P.M Unleashing God's Word into your Fearless Life - Brian Arthur Lampe

Is this the life of a fearless faith Christ's followers are called to? God challenges believers to break out of our personal safety zones and share Christ through acts of love, intelligent conversation, and genuine compassion. Even teens are needed to step out in faith and point others to the salvation found in their fearless faith in Jesus!

10:15P.M TBA




11:30 P.M Announcements


Saturday July 24th 2010
8:00 A.M Breakfast
9:00 A.M Closing Worship Pastor Paul Steinberg/Koine
10:00 A.M Dismissal
Organizers: Pastor Paul Steinberg and Brian Arthur Lampe
More information will be available after September 12th 2009.

Have a great summer under God's care!


***


GJ - For those who remain clueless about who is running WELS - this national rally is a Jeske/Time of Grace/Church and Change operation. Ski is on the Chicanery board and worked for Jeske before joining the Appleton Dumpling Gang. Lampe is on the Chicanery board and works at Jeske's church.
Steinberg works at Jeske's church.


Nothing new about that. When Wayne Mueller put the Perish in Perish Services, as the first administrator, the youth and adult education leaders left posthaste. They were replaced by men with new titles - Adult Discipleship and Youth Discipleship.


The Columbus WELS Rally was managed by LPR, the "first WELS CG agency" (not really - The Love Shack came first). Three divorced pastors ran that rally - Floyd Luther Stolzenburg, Roger Zehms, and Marc (not the SP) Schroeder. Floyd never joined WELS and Marc took his congregation into the LCMS. They had a rock band there, too - Soter.
---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Time of Disgrace: Teen Mother Preaches to WELS Tee...":

Well, this is just ducky! Maybe church and change considers getting pregnant outside of marriage "adiaphora"? What in the world are these folks thinking? If I were in a leadership position, I would scrap the plans for this rally and start from scratch. Some of the pastors involved are in their late 30's or early 40’s. Are they having a mid-life crisis? I would like to can the whole group. I have teens, and this is not a rally they will be attending. It just seems things are getting worse instead of better! I really do think that they have made their mess into a message! I am ashamed to admit that I belong to the WELS. 


 

Fuller-Trained WELS First VP Reveals His Lack of Doctrinal Knowledge, His Love of Pietistic Unionism


Before inventing charges against an innocent blogger, left click on this link for the source.

Jesus' friend John never heard of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, but in the Gospel for today from Mark 9:38-50, John came to Jesus with a problem that's a lot like the problem we're talking about this morning. Jesus shared a solution with John and he's going to share it with us for those times when we find ourselves asking, "So What If They're Not WELS?" October 11, 2009.




If you look carefully at the signs on the southeast corner of the church you’ll see four letters: WELS. If you glance at the back of the bulletin you’ll see what those four letters stand for: Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Grace Lutheran Church is a member of WELS, the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod.


So what does it mean to be a member of WELS? It means that we have partners—almost 400,000 of them—who work together with us to spread the gospel of Jesus around the world. We learn about that work every month when we watch the WELS Connection. But there’s more to being a member of WELS than training pastors and teachers and sending missionaries. When we joined WELS—and that’s what we did when we joined Grace—we made a statement about what we believe. We said we believe Jesus is the only way to life with God. We said we believe Jesus is the center of the Bible, and the Bible is the Word of God in all its parts. Being a member of Grace and WELS isn’t just activity, it’s also confession. We work together because we believe together.


So what do we do with the other churches around town, the ones that don’t confess what we confess? And what do we do with friends and relatives and classmates who don’t believe everything we believe? This isn’t an impractical question. We don’t live in a little WELS world where everyone goes to the same church and believes the same truths. How do we handle this? What’s our attitude toward churches and people who aren’t WELS, who aren’t Wisconsin Synod?


Jesus’ friend John never heard of WELS, but in the Gospel for today John came to Jesus with a problem that’s a lot like the problem we’re talking about this morning. “Teacher,” said John, “we saw a man driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us.” Driving out demons wasn’t the issue; John was in favor of that. The issue was: he’s not one of us. That’s our issue, too. Jesus had a solution for John. He shared it with John and he’s going to share it with us this morning for those times when we find ourselves asking, So What If They’re Not WELS?


Accept all who promote the Savior’s cause


So how did Jesus respond to John? “Do not stop him. No one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, for whoever is not against us is for us.” So what do we know about this man who was driving out demons? Really nothing. We can assume this was a man who had heard Jesus preach and believed he was the Savior. Whatever the man’s motive might have been, God must have given him power to do the miracle. Why wasn’t he one of Jesus’ disciples? Well, Jesus hadn’t called him like he had called the twelve, and maybe the man wouldn’t have been ready to follow even if Jesus had called him. But here’s the point Jesus made to John; “Be patient, John. This man may not have the same knowledge or commitment you have, and he hasn’t had the opportunity you’ve had to be in my group of followers, but if he’s speaking about me and doing things I do, he’s obviously not against us. He may not be one of us now, but he’s leaning in the right direction. Don’t drive him away.”


Let’s talk about this. What happened to John in today’s Gospel sometimes happens to WELS people. When it comes to confessing the truths of the Bible, we know we’re in the minority. And sometimes we get ourselves so concerned about what other churches teach and what other people believe that we look right past the love these churches and often show in the name of Jesus. We know people like this. They aren’t part of us, they don’t share our confession, they may not be ready or even able to understand everything God tells us in his Word, but they’ve caught the love of Jesus and they’re welcoming little children in Jesus’ name. They may not all confess the truth or even know the truth, but they’re leaning in the right direction. They baptize children and operate Christian schools, they run day care centers and soup kitchens, support orphanages and hospitals, and send missionaries all over the world with the simple message that Jesus loves people. So how do we react to this? We love God’s Word and we’re faithful to God’s truth. Are we going to turn that love and faithfulness into arrogance? Will I raise my haughty confessional Lutheran eyebrows and look down on these churches and people? Will I assume God would not and could do great things through them? Will I be like John, “He is not one of us?” Listen to Jesus: “Whoever welcomes one of these little children in my name welcomes me; and whoever welcomes me does not welcome me but the one who sent me.” So, what if they’re not WELS? Jesus wants to tell us: Accept all who promote my cause. Thank God for them, pray for them, encourage them, praise them and, better yet: imitate them! And then create an open door so you can witness to the truth.


There are a lot of religious people around who would suggest that people like us need to be more tolerant, more broad-minded. WELS people hear that criticism all the time, even from other WELS people! How many of us haven’t heard someone say, “You WELS people (or we WELS people) have to loosen up?” Is that what Jesus was telling John? If Jesus is urging us to be more accepting of what people do in his name, is he also encouraging us to be more tolerant of what they say in his name?


Reject all who destroy the Savior’s children


I don’t think so. Jesus took the conversion with John to the next step. “If you’re going to get upset, John, don’t get upset with people who are leaning in the right direction. Get upset at people who are moving in the wrong direction. Save your righteous anger for people who aren’t promoting my cause at all.” This is what Jesus said about people like that: “If anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around his neck.”The picture Jesus used here is a trap, the kind of trap you use to catch pests in your garden. But Jesus isn’t talking traps and varmints. He’s talking about wrong teaching, the kind of teaching that isn’t in the Bible, teaching that some people and some churches invent or assume or deduce. He’s talking about simple, sincere Christians who sometimes get confused and distracted by wrong teachings. And he says that anyone who uses wrong teachings to trap simple Christians and ruin their faith—well, you heard Jesus: “It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around his neck.”


Our Lord Jesus cares passionately about people. He knows the situation people are in. People sin; they do things everyday that God tells them not to do and they don’t do things God tells them to do. We know all about that, don’t we? Jesus also knows how God feels about sin: God hates sin and he’s ready to send sinners packing to hell. That’s why Jesus came to earth. He came to take care of the sin problem. When he lived and died he was carrying the sins of every sinner. When he rose from the dead he proclaimed that he had conquered the sins of every sinner. Now he adopts people into his family through Holy Baptism, he creates faith in their hearts with his Word, and he strengthens them in with the meal of his body and blood. Jesus has a whole lot invested in us! And when somebody uses wrong teaching to trap his people in the prison of unbelief and hell, Jesus is furious. And he wants us to be furious, too. He makes a very dramatic point: If your hand was diseased, or if your eye was cancerous, or if your foot was gangrenous, wouldn’t you have a doctor remove it or amputate it so you could save your life? Well, of course; any of us would do that. We’d be crazy not to. That’s how Jesus wants us to react to any wrong teaching or any wrong teacher who tries to trap us in hell where—and this is what Jesus said in the gospel--where maggots will eat us and fire will burn us forever. And if you didn’t know before, now you know why Jesus cares so passionately about saving and protecting his children.


So what if they’re not WELS? We’ve all heard it. Parents hear it when they caution their kids about choosing their closest friends or a partner for life. So what if they’re not WELS? Families hear it when a relative moves to a new town and joins a different denomination. So what if they’re not WELS? Pastors hear when someone tells them they heading for a church that means more to them. So what if they’re not WELS? What does it mean when someone says “So what if they’re not WELS?” Does it mean “I don’t care about wrong teaching” or “I’m not worried about wrong teaching” or “I won’t be fooled by wrong teaching”? People can say what they like; it’s a free country. But anyone who talks like that sure doesn’t sound like Jesus.


So what do we do when people aren’t WELS: the churches in town and our friends and relatives and classmates who attend those churches? Everything depends on everything doesn’t it? When we see people leaning toward Jesus with love and compassion for others, we rejoice and praise God for the way he works even through people who haven’t discovered all of his truth. When we see them leaning away from Jesus and trying to trap Jesus’ people with wrong teaching, we grieve and we label them for what they are.


How can we ever keep this all straight? How can we live in our community with people who don’t confess what we confess about God’s Word? How can we know when to rejoice and when to grieve? Jesus has the answer: “Have salt in yourselves,” he said. We can find it in almost every home. We see it everyday and know exactly what it looks like. We use it to preserve things and improve things. You know what Jesus is talking about, don’t you? Not salt! He wasn’t really talking about salt; that was just a picture. Jesus was talking about the Bible! Take the Word God into your hearts, Jesus said. Let the truth about God preserve your faith, improve your knowledge, and enhance your wisdom. And the more we rely on Jesus’ Word, the more we’ll be able to solve difficult problems, including this difficult problem: What if they’re not WELS? Amen.


Preached at Grace Lutheran Church, Milwaukee, WI (www.gracedowntown.org) on October 11, 2009

***

GJ - I remember Paul Tiefel (cousin of James) also trying to make a wedding cake out of one drop of vanilla and a cup of evaporated milk. In other words, this is a verbose straw man argument. Huebner sets up a straw man, an argument no one is making, and destroys it with great gusto.

With leaders like him, the question will not be - "Is anyone outside of WELS saved?" but "Are any believers left in WELS?" The leadership is almost entirely apostate: higher education, FIC, VP, Love Shack, Time of Gath.

Unionists start with the fact that there are Christians outside the synod boundaries. But they use this to justify their doctrinal indifference and unionism. Huebner is one member of the Gang of Three, the traveling Fuller salesmen (Huebner, Kelm, Olson) who share their CGasms with everyone, at synod expense. They also bill congregations outrageous sums to be consultants - i.e. printing boilerplate with the same suggestions for each victim-church, often with the wrong name or details in that boilerplate.

Huebner is the typical ecumenist - he loves every denomination except his own. His published comments mock the efficacy of the Word in the silliest smart-alecky way, and yet he is a synod officer. The good news is he barely won. The bad news is - he won, replacing another Shrinker, Wayne Mueller.

WELS forced all the pastors to attend a seminar led by the Gang of Three, about 17 years ago. Everyone had to pay $100. One pastor asked me if I would attend. I said, "If you hold a machine gun to my head, yes." The ovine pastors went and complained. One thousand pastors had their chance to stay home and send a chill up the spine of The Love Shack. Instead they forked over $100,000 to hear rank heresy. That is what careerism has done to the Lutheran ministry.

The GA Ministerium




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "St. Matthew in Appleton":

“the ignorant membership drives out the excellent confessional pastor by making his life miserable and constantly pressuring him to change (i.e. why can't we be like those nifty modern churches?), replaces him with a series of young, "hip," CG apostates, and then sits back and watches the church shrink.”

While this no doubt happened in some cases, it flows counter to church governance where ideas and initiatives are cascaded down from the pastor through the board of elders, to the church council, and to the members for ratification. CG apostates generally infect other pastors, churches, and members with their swill about being like other growing congregations. It spreads like cancer until it is removed or killed. Frequently ‘confessional pastors’ get pressure to alter direction. There is a lot of peer pressure amongst pastors to go along to get along. That is how survival works in the synod.

Then, are ignorant members really the root cause? No, it comes in from other hotbeds of CG advocates. They get to the pastor in one way or another to adopt CG claptrap. While at it, they infect the members, too.

A truly confessional pastor has the support of the elders and council, and he does not allow the apostasy to take root. The process is complicated and stealthy, certainly not simply the result of “ignorant membership.”

***

GJ - I know of many cases where WELS Shrinker pastors have meddled in target congregations. It is true that the members should not cooperate with those who meddle, but the wolves know which members are vulnerable to flattery and manipulation. A few people can be used to make life miserable for the pastor. A case in point is The Love Shack, previously known as 2929. There the Gurgle-appointed Shrinkers fight against the duly elected Synod President.