Monday, October 24, 2011

Guess Who Published This? - Last Century.
MBO and Drucker




Friday, November 19, 1999

HAPPY 90TH, PETER DRUCKER

The Wall Street Journal announced today that Peter Drucker turned 90 today. He is now at the age where people say, “He’s still alive?” Perhaps you are not as impressed as I am. Peter Drucker invented management, specifically Management by Objective, MBO. Scholars of the history of management theory may disagree, but I believe Drucker is the genius behind the Mission Statement. Every department of every business must have a Mission Statement. The business or institution must also have a Mission Statement.

People are drinking coffee and wondering, “Why is he going on about this?” The Church Growth people latched onto Peter Drucker material right away. Donald McGavran, trained in educational theory, was keen about statistics. His secular mindset and opposition to the efficacy of the Word fit together perfectly with Drucker’s theories. At some point someone decided that management must also have a vision for the future, not to mention passion. So now we hear politicians babbling about their vision and their passion.

Church bodies too. I was trained in Management by Objective, first in the Lutheran Church in America. Then the same theories were promoted in the Wisconsin Synod. I remember Church Growth guru James Huebner turning white when I mentioned Peter Drucker and Management by Objective. WELS is the last Lutheran synod to discover a fad and then thinks it is a secret from everyone else. When I joined Northwestern Mutual Life, they sold me a 3 ring notebook in which I could write down my goals, objectives, strategies. It was MBO all over again, but more fitting in a business.

I was curious about the close connection between Drucker and Church Growth. (They adopted him. I doubt whether he thought much about Fuller Seminary.) Then a newspaper ran a story about a mega-church in Texas. The article made a point about Management by Objective being the Bible for this Texas church. I visited the narthex of a fine old Episcopal church in Charleston, South Carolina. The vestry voted to ask God for 10% increases in worship in each of the next three years! I thought, “Could this be? A Fuller graduate spoiling another church?” Yes, the priest was getting his Fuller degree and nagging his fellow priests about Church Growth at a future seminar.

In addition, when WELS and ELCA got together with the Missouri Synod at Snowbird, the president of the Drucker Institute spoke. In fact, all the speakers were either a) Church Growth; b) Management; c) ELCA; or d) liberal Reformed.

One WELS circuit pastor said this to me, “When WELS did not think much about itself as an institution, it ran well. Now that it is always talking about management, nothing is going well.” That was some years ago. I recall one of the seminarians bragging that the old fuddy-duddies were being pushed off the seminary faculty and out of the administration. WELS was going to be taught by sharp young pastors and managed by sharp young pastors. Some results: 1) a disastrous decline in membership while the population was growing and conservative churches were supposedly in style; 2) the arrest and conviction and imprisonment of various WELS church workers; 3) demoralization of the clergy; 4) closing two prep schools at a time of growing need and support of education, especially church workers; 5) a precipitous decline in church workers.

I just got an email forwarded about WELS health plan (VEBA) cost increases. Here is one sentence: “On Oct. 20, 1999, the VEBA Commission met to set the rates for Jan. 1,
2000. It had no choice but to raise premiums 25% on average. The rates
will vary by regions, but a family plan with $250 deductible will
increase in a range of $1,308 to $2,352 per year.”

I want to make something clear – the increase cannot be blamed on Church Growth or Peter Drucker. But this increase is another nail in the coffin. When synods go through huge increases in health care, the most flexible fund is the mission offering. When I was ordained in 1973, the health plan for my family cost $285 for the YEAR. It was paid in one lump sum as a minor budget item. My wife and I now pay about $4500 for coverage. When a synod goes through such increases, congregations are crushed by the increase. A large church has a large staff, so the pain is multiplied. A small church barely gets along, so it suffers.

Health care is going to be a major issue with any attempt to have congregations independent of the established synods. My wife was turned down by the CLC group health plan, in spite of promises made beforehand. But we were lucky to be moving to Minnesota, where a plan was established by law for uninsurable people. We were lucky again, if it can be called luck, to have the plan follow us to Arizona. Minnesota is happy to take our money on a monthly basis.

Happy Birthday, Peter Drucker. I would phone you and sing, but I think your lines are tied up by well-wishers from business magazines and church headquarters. There was a time when Lutheran leaders trusted another old man, by the name of Isaiah, and followed what he said. OK, he had some help in writing his book, but it was worth following for a long time. His version of management was a wee bit different:

KJV Isaiah 55:8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. 10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: 11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it. 12 For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their hands.

Luther also wrote about management:

"Those, however, who set the time, place and measure, tempt God, and believe not that they are heard or that they have obtained what they asked; therefore, they also receive nothing."
            Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 172. John 16:23-30.        

"In like manner, St. Paul says that God's ability is thus proved, in that He does exceeding abundantly above and better than we ask or think. Ephesians 3:20. Therefore, we should know we are too finite to be able to name, picture or designate the time, place, way, measure and other circumstances for that which we ask of God. Let us leave that entirely to Him, and immovably and steadfastly believe that He will hear us."
            Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 179f. Ephesians 3:20.     

"And although we do at times depart from the Word, we should not therefore remain altogether away from it, but return again, for He makes good His Word. Even though man cannot believe it, God will nevertheless help him to believe it, and this He does without man's reason or free will and without man adding anything thereto."
            Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 76. John 16:16-23      

"If the world were willing to take advice from a simple, plain man--that is, our Lord God (who, after all, has some experience too and knows how to rule)--the best advice would be that in his office and sphere of jurisdiction everybody simply direct his thoughts and plans to carrying out honestly and doing in good faith what has been commanded him and that, whatever he does, he depend not on his own plans and thoughts but commit the care to God. Such a man would certainly find out in the end who does and accomplishes more, he who trusts God or he who would bring success to his cause through his own wisdom and thoughts or his own power and strength."
            Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1151. Luke 5:1-11.  

"Let us, then, prepare ourselves to be patient and learn to bear the furious attacks and the blows of Satan, who is trying to tear the church of Christ to pieces and to establish his own church. We are not any better than the fathers. At the cost of much sweat and labor they, too, scarcely succeeded in their effort to preserve the Word and to snatch a few souls from the jaws of Satan."
            Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, I, p. 280. Genesis 11:10ff.   

MANAGEMENT by OBJECTIVES ( MBO) - ELCA, Missouri, and WELS Management



MANAGEMENT by OBJECTIVES ( MBO) - focus on achievable goals and to attain the best possible results from available resources (Your freeTen3 Business e-Coach):

"Management by Objectives (MBO) was first outlined by Peter Drucker in 1954 in his book 'The Practice of Management'. In the 90s, Peter Drucker himself decreased the significance of this organization management method, when he said: "It's just another tool. It is not the great cure for management inefficiency... Management by Objectives works if you know the objectives, 90% of the time you don't.""

'via Blog this'

The WELS pursuit of the NNIV is a good example of MBO at work. "We will just keep having commissions and meetings until you agree that the NNIV is the only right choice."

---

California adds:

Having had warnings fall on deaf ears 35 years ago, it would be dishonest to say that there isn't some satisfaction  to see recognition and acknowledgement at this late date,  that WELS made a disastrous turn in mid century 1960's. A generation ago  she decided to embrace the methodology of the world, and use MBO (PPBS) to facilitate (call it manipulate) replacing KJV with anything except KJV at first, then perpetrating the NIV, which was the choice of the changers.  

The MBO system and the translation issue are more than "related". The issues are intimately entwined.  Whether WELS will  ever be salvaged only God knows, but He is allowing a window of opportunity a generation later for pastors and laymen alike, to review,  understand and recognize what has been done unto them. 

Unless the system of MBO  is addressed, there will only be more of the same, for any  well meaning leaders or laymen will continue to be slaves of the system. Even if NNIV should be set aside for the time being  "one step back" in the process of "two steps forward, one step back" , the system  will still be in place for whatever brainstorm comes along.   This window of exposure may be happening for a remnant in WELS to enable  some to make very painful decisions, or join those whose decisions were (are) being made for them.

***

GJ - California went through it all, long ago. The same template is being used today, and the hip pastors of California  (Valleskey, Bivens, Kelm, Stadler) became the senior leaders of WELS. Sure, Stadler was allowed to leave on his own terms, with the property, but the general trend has never abated.

Watch While Corporate WELS Manipulates Its Congregations



This topic is so old that writing about Management By Objective again seems pointless. That also makes it more fun.

Look up Peter Drucker and Management By Objective. Next, attend one of the stewardship meetings spun up and presented by WELS.

Those who have experienced MBO meetings will have a Groundhog Day revelation that everything seems to be happening again and again.

Everyone is being played. MBO pretends to be participatory, but that is the game. Get everyone talking. Listen carefully to each idea, but smile warmly at the correct ones while using the frozen, forced smiles (and patronizing asides) on the wrong ones.

WELS only knows one style of leadership, modeled after Joseph Stalin. One can choose robotic following, silence, or liquidation.

---

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Watch While Corporate WELS Manipulates Its Congreg...":

Though the MBO idea is old (1954), I appreciate the reminder. I have witnessed this style of sham democracy in both the corporate world and in WELS congregations. A warning to WELS members and pardon the pun, but with this, the WELS leaders will play you like a pipe organ.


Sunday, October 23, 2011

Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity:
Matthew 22:34-46




The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity, 2011




Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 239     Come Thou Almighty King                        2:72
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #269            O Lord Our Father                  2:56     

David’s Son, David’s Lord

The Communion Hymn # 315:11-15            I Come O Savior             2:66
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #651               Be Still My Soul               2:17

KJV 1 Corinthians 1:4 I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ; 5 That in every thing ye are enriched by him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge; 6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you: 7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: 8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

KJV Matthew 22:34 But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together. 35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, 36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

Eighteenth Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father: We are poor, miserable sinners; we know Thy will, but cannot fulfill it because of the weakness of our flesh and blood, and because our enemy, the devil, will not leave us in peace. Therefore we beseech Thee, shed Thy Holy Spirit in our hearts, that, in steadfast faith, we may cling to Thy Son Jesus Christ, find comfort in His passion and death, believe the forgiveness of sin through Him, and in willing obedience to Thy will lead holy lives on earth, until by Thy grace, through a blessed death, we depart from this world of sorrow, and obtain eternal life, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

David’s Son, David’s Lord


Matthew 22: 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

The Passover tradition includes four questions being asked. The audience asks the rabbi or the head of the household three questions. The rabbi asks the fourth question. The idea is to test someone’s grasp of the Torah.

This happens in Matthew, with Jesus asking the fourth question.

The two parts of this Gospel lesson have this in common. Both show continuity with Judaism. This shows the union of the Old and New Testaments.

In the first part, Jesus was asked the greatest commandment. He answered –

Matthew 22: 37bThou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

As everyone knows, a similar summary was given by a lawyer in Luke, part of the introduction to the Parable of the Good Samaritan.

KJV Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? 27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

In fact, it is also known in rabbinical tradition that famous rabbis summarized the Old Testament exactly the same way. This leads the rationalists to say that Jesus was just a rabbi whose reputation was inflated by others, especially Paul.

Historical Sidebar – Pietism and Rationalism
Where does this rationalism come from? In Europe, the center of rationalism was Halle University. The school was established to promote Pietism, and its charitable institutions attracted a large, admiring audience across the world. Pietism emphasized Biblical studies but also avoided doctrinal debates. They promoted working with non-Lutherans in missions and charities.

It only took one generation for Pietism to become rationalistic. Georg Christian Knapp was considered the last of the Pietists, but he taught that the Trinity was not in harmony with the Scriptures. Tholuck, who was Adolph Hoenecke’s mentor at Halle, was a Universalist who imagined that everyone was saved.  American Lutheran leaders were taught at Halle (Muhlenberg, Bishop Stephan, Hoenecke) or profoundly influenced by Pietism.

In America, this shift from Pietism to rationalism took place in a generation or two. The WELS college designated for preparing men for seminary, Northwestern College in Watertown, Wisconsin, became the center of Seminex rationalism, producing the core leaders of the future ELCA.

Ralph Gerke and Richard Jungkuntz were considered LCMS martyrs for the Seminex cause. The OT prophet-like photos were often in Seminex publications. First they lost their jobs at Watertown, where they were admired as teachers, even though they taught against the Scriptures. College kids tend to idolize their professors.

Gerke and Jungkuntz moved to the LCMS where they were rewarded for being rationalists with doctorates. Jungkuntz was chairman of the board of the break-off seminary, which also served as the seminary for the Metropolitan Community Church, the exclusively homosexual/lesbian denomination.

That means Jungkuntz (who married a WELS professor’s daughter) arranged for and encouraged a joint partnership with a church body devoted to sharing the joys of Sodom. That influence carried over to ELCA, which made the lavender agenda the chief cause of the entire denomination. One reader of the blog, known only as 29A, wants people to remember, and I quote – “The radicalism of ELCA came from WELS, from its own college, from Jungkuntz, Gehrke, and their followers.”

Jungkuntz, while still in WELS, feared that UOJ would be lost or forgotten by his denomination. Unfortunately, it got even worse. UOJ became the springboard for the Church Growth Movement, a convenient way to hide rationalism and unionism. The Emergent Church toadies are more of the same.



The Bible Defeats Rationalism
The Bible defeats rationalism by opposing its foundations. As Luther taught, the Bible is the Book of the Holy Spirit, a book that judges all other books. Nothing shows the spirit of a teacher more than his attitude toward the Scriptures. When someone begins to rant against the inerrancy of the Bible, he is revealing himself as a rationalist.

But there is another way they give themselves away. That is where people must be far more careful, because their methods are so clever. They rave against the efficacy of the Word by saying, as the first VP of WELS has done in print, “Yes we know the Word is efficacious, but we make it effective with our methods.”

Or they say, “According to studies, a church will do better if…”

Or, “We have to market the Gospel.” They are so bold that they even expose their attitudes with such language. (Marketing is no longer a popular major at one business school. It was once the most popular major. Lutherans love to jump on abandoned band-wagons and yell about how clever they are.)

The Word never lacks the power and effectiveness of the Holy Spirit. When people listen attentively and humbly to the Word, this power is made known in God’s grace.

However, when people quote the Word to abuse it, the Holy Spirit’s power becomes one of condemnation, blinding, and hardening them. Thus their proud manipulation turns them into rationalists and eventually into atheists.

The laity have the good fortune of not being exposed to professors who glorify their own theories, who become authorities just for having a position at a school. After a period of time, no one can question that person’s teaching because that threatens the idol.

Luther dealt with that, too, because most of the theologians of his age were opposed to the Gospel and brilliantly argued their case as experts.

Today we have the Gospel cited by the Emergent Church types (who dress like bums), the Roman Catholic Church, and the modernists – all to their own advantage, giving people what their itching ears want to hear.

The Bible Brings Jesus To Us
The Word of God has one purpose – to bring Jesus to us. The saving message of the Bible is “Trust only in Christ for salvation. Believing in Him is forgiveness of sin. Forgiveness is salvation and eternal life.”

Luther often thought about a phrase of Scripture all day long. Each lesson gives us a chance to think about the passage for the entire week. Repeating the lessons each year means we get to know the passage better each time, awakening us to new insights provided by the work of the Holy Spirit.

This statement of Jesus is a clear example of the Two Natures of Christ. The religious leaders saw a man, an honored rabbi, teaching about the Torah. But Jesus asked them a question that plainly taught them about His divinity.

Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

How can the son of David call his own descendant “Lord”? That can only be from the Messiah being from the House of David (human nature) and the eternal Son of God (divine nature).

The statement itself draws from the history of human warfare. When one nation conquered another nation, the defeated king was used as a footstool for the victorious one.

One of the most ferocious warriors of all time, Bayezid, was reduced to spending his captivity in a large bird-cage.


This statement from the Psalms looks ahead to the end of time, when all things will be brought into subjection under Jesus as the king of kings, the lord of lords. There will be no opponents left, no enemies still raving against the Gospel. That is when every knee will bow, on earth, in heaven, and beneath the earth. Even the jibbering demons of Hell will have to acknowledge the truth, but without the saving benefits of faith.

When events seem overwhelming and defeating, this statement from 2,000 years ago, about the future, is still true.

We have the Messiah on, 24/7. Each time I get near the kitchen, a different part is playing. The Gospel is sung from every part of the Bible, using the actual words of the Bible. Each passage reminds me of Luther’s words – how can anyone be sad when these truths are known?

And that is why we need to hear the Gospel at all times. Our trust in the Word gets battered by events and by other people. Our Old Adam is inclined to say, “That may be true, but…” All “yes, but” statements are really “no” statements.

Sin, for most people, is dominated by images of carnal sin. Many churches have flailed away at carnal sin, with so much energy that they never get close to Jesus’ definition of sin.



KJV John 16:8 And when He (the Holy Spirit) is come, He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on Me.

The purpose of the Holy Spirit in the Word, in all preaching and teaching, is to say, “Lack of complete faith in Jesus in a sin.”

This is the root, the foundation of all other sins.

In contrast, faith in Christ is the basis for the fruit of the Spirit. All the qualities of life that people desire are the God-generated, Word-fueled products of the Gospel.

KJV Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.

If you want more of these in your life, trust in the Gospel. Listen to and read the Gospel. Hear the Gospel sung in faithful hymns and music. Become a Bach expert. He scratched on his music – Jesus Help Me, and To God Alone Be Glory.

We know someone who uses art to portray the Gospel. There is nothing like handing a book like The Story of Jesus in Pictures and hearing someone gasp at the full-color art.

Quotations

"The New Testament is the inerrant record of the revelation of Jesus Christ in word and deed, and of the truths and principles proceeding, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, from that revelation.  The Old Testament is in like manner an inerrant record, having the express and often repeated testimony and authority of Christ, of the preparatory and partial revelations made concerning Him before His coming.  Hebrews 1:1."
            Henry Eyster Jacobs, A Summary of the Christian Faith, Philadelphia:  General Council Publication House, 1913, p. 3. Hebrews 1:1.              

"The Old Testament dealt with the promises of God to the chosen people. Thereby God placed Himself in 'covenant' relation to Israel (berith).  This relation, like the promises and the gifts of God to Israel, is always onesided. It is always God's covenant, not Israel's, and not a mutual agreement, not a suntheke.  This promise and covenant indeed obligates Israel, and Israel assumes these obligations, but the covenant emanates entirely from God."
            R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews, Columbus:  Lutheran Book Concern, 1938, p. 235. Hebrews 7:22;                 

"In view of their spiritual meaning the psalms are really lovely and sweet; for they are comforting to all depressed, wretched consciences, who are in fear of sin, the anguish and agony of death, and all sorts of trouble and misery.  To such hearts the Book of Psalms is a sweet, comforting, lovely song, because it sings and preaches the Messiah, although one merely reads or recites the words without notes.  Nevertheless, the use of notes or music, as a wonderful creation and gift of God, helps greatly to produce this effect, especially when the people sing along and do so with fine devoutness...Thus David, too, often dispelled, or at least checked or weakened, the evil spirit for Saul with his minstrelsy (1 Samuel 16:17ff.).  For the evil spirit is not at ease when one sings or preaches God's Word in true faith.  He is a spirit of sadness and cannot stay where a heart is spiritually joyful (joyful in God and His Word).
            What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II,  p. 981. 1 Samuel 16:17ff.  




No Wonder ELCA and The Episcl Church
Are in Communion Fellowship.
Katherine Jefferts Schori, Popessa

"Agree with me or be expelled."




"The Episcopal Church is losing market share and closing the equivalent of one whole diocese a year. The Diocese of Delaware will put its cathedral on the chopping block next year. The rump Bishop of Pittsburgh is trying to cut deals with a modicum of success, but at the end of the day, he will be left with empty properties he will be forced to sell for pennies on the dollar in the name of the Dennis Canon, Jefferts Schori and The Episcopal Church."
Virtue Online

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Luther's Sermon on David's Son and David's Lord:
The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity.
Matthew 22:34-46





Sermon for the Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity; Matthew 22:34-46

A Sermon by Martin Luther; taken from his Church Postil. [The following sermon is taken from volume V:170-183 of The Sermons of Martin Luther, published by Baker Book House (Grand Rapids, MI, 1983). It was originally published in 1905 in English by Lutherans in All Lands (Minneapolis, MN), as The Precious and Sacred Writings of Martin Luther, vol. 14. This e-text was scanned and edited by Richard P. Bucher, it is in the public domain and it may be copied and distributed without restriction.]

1. This Gospel consists of two questions. In the first the lawyer on behalf of the other Pharisees asks Christ: Which is the great commandment in the law? In the second the Lord asks the Pharisees and the lawyer: Whose son is David? These two questions concern every Christian; for he who wishes to be a Christian must thoroughly understand them. First, what the law is, and the purpose it serves; and secondly, who Christ is, and what we may expect from him.

2. Christ explains here to the Pharisees the law, telling them what the sum of the whole law is, so that they are completely silenced both at his speech and his question, and know less than nothing of what the law is and who Christ is. From this it follows, that although unbelief may appear as wisdom and holiness before the world, it is nevertheless folly and unrighteousness before God, especially where the knowledge of the two questions mentioned above is wanting. For he who does not know how he stands before the law, and what he may expect from Christ, surely has not the wisdom of God, no matter how wise and prudent he may pretend to be. Let us therefore consider the first question, namely: What the law is; what it commands and how it is to be spiritually interpreted.

3. When the lawyer asked Christ, which was the great commandment in the law, the Lord said to him:

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second like unto it is this, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments the whole law hangeth, and the prophets."

4. As if the Lord would say: He who possesses love to God, and love to his neighbor, has all things, and therefore fulfils the law; for the whole law and all the prophets point to these two themes, namely: how God and our neighbor are to be loved.

5. Now one may wish to ask: How can you harmonize this statement, that all things are to be comprehended in these two commandments, since there was given to the Jews circumcision and many other commandments? To answer this, let us see in the first place how Christ explains the law, namely, that it must be kept with the heart. In other words, the law must be spiritually comprehended; for he who does not lay hold of the law with the heart and with the Spirit, will certainly not fulfil it. Therefore the Lord here gives to the lawyer the ground and real substance of the law, and says that these are the greatest commandments, to love God with the heart and our neighbor as ourselves. From this it follows that he, who is not circumcised, who does not fast nor pray, is not doing it from the heart; even though he may perform external acts, he nevertheless does nothing before God, for God looketh on the heart, and not on our acts, I Sam. 16, 7. It will not profit a man at all, no matter what work he may perform, if his heart is not in it.



6. From this arises another question: Since works are of no profit to a man, why then did God give so many commandments to the Jews? To this I answer, these commandments were given to the end that we might become conscious whether we really love God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our strength, and in addition our neighbor as ourselves; for St. Paul says in Rom. 7, 7 (3, 20), that the law is nothing but a consciousness and a revelation of sin. What would I know of sin, if there were no law to reveal it to me? Here now is the law that saith: Thou shalt love God with thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself. This we fulfil if we do all that the law requires; but we are not doing it. Hence he shows us where we are lacking, and that, while we ought really to do something, we are doing nothing.

7. That the Jews had to practice circumcision was indeed a foolish ceremony, yea, a command offensive to reason, even though it were given by God still today. What service was it to God, to burden his people with this grievous commandment? What good was it to him, or what service to a neighbor? Yea, and it did not profit the Jew, who was circumcised. Why then did God give the command? In order that this commandment and law might show them whether they really loved God with all their heart, with all their soul, and with all their mind, and whether they did it willingly or not. For if there were a devout heart, it would say: I verily do not know why God gave me circumcision, inasmuch as it does not profit any one, neither God, nor me, nor my neighbor; but since it is well pleasing to God, I will nevertheless do it, even though it be considered a trifling and despised act. Hence, circumcision was an exercise of the commandment, Thou shalt love God with all thy heart.

8. It was also a foolish command God gave to Abraham, to slay his son, Gen. 22, 2. For if reason had been the judge in this, both it and all mankind would have come to no other conclusion than this: It is an unfriendly and hostile command, how can it be from God, since God himself said to Abraham that he would multiply his seed through this son, and it would become as innumerable as the stars of the firmament and as the sand by the sea. Therefore it was a foolish commandment, a grievous, hard and unbearable commandment. But what did Abraham do? He closes his senses, takes his reason captive, and obeys the voice of God, goes, and does as God commanded him.

By this he proved that he obeyed from the heart; otherwise, even if he had put his son to death a hundred times, God would not have cared for it; but God was pleased that the deed came from his heart and was done in true love to God; yea, it came from a heart that must have thought: Even if my son dies, God is almighty and faithful, he will keep his word, he will find ways and means beyond that which I am able to devise; only obey, there is no danger. Had he not had this boldness and this faith, how could his fatherheart have killed his only and well beloved son?

9. The Jews later wanted to follow this example and, like Abraham, offered their children unto God, hoping thereby to perform a service well-pleasing to God; but it was far from it. These poor people came to the conclusion: The service of Abraham was pleasing to God, therefore will ours also be, and consequently they killed one child after another. 0, how many healthy, noble and beautiful children perished! The prophets protested against this service, they preached, warned and wrote against it, telling the people that it was deception, but all was in vain. Yea, many a prophet lost his life because of this, as the history in the books of the kings shows.

10. But why was this service of the Jews displeasing to God? For the reason that it did not come from their heart, and was not done out of love to God; but they simply looked upon the service, and did it without the command and word of God; but God saith: My dear sirs, I was not concerned about the fact that Abraham offered up his son, but that he proved by this act that he loved me with his whole heart. There must be first love in the heart, then follows the service that will be pleasing to God; for all the works of the law tend to the end thereby to prove our love to God, which is in the heart; which love the law requires, and will have above everything else.



11. We are also to notice here that all the works of the law are not commanded merely for the purpose that we simply just perform them; no, no; for if God had given even more commandments, he would not want us to keep them to the injury and destruction of love. Yea, if these commandments oppose the love of our neighbor, he wants us to renounce and annul them. Take the example of this, I recently gave you: Moses brought the children of Israel out of Egypt, leading them for forty years through the wilderness, and not one of them was circumcised, although it was commanded them. Where was their obedience to the commandment? Was God not angry with them because they did not obey his commandment? No, there was a higher commandment in force at that time, namely, that they were to obey God who commanded them to come out of Egypt in haste to the promised land. By their marching they daily obeyed God, and God accepted it as obedience; otherwise he would have been angry in that they did not keep his commandments. Both the need and the love were at hand, which set aside all commandments, for it would have been unbearable to endure the pain of circumcision and at the same time the burden of the journey. Therefore love took the place of the commandment of circumcision, and thus should all commandments be kept in love, or not at all.

12. In like manner Christ excused his disciples, as is recorded in Matthew 12, 3-4, when the Jews accused them of transgressing the law, of doing on the Sabbath that which was not lawful to do on the Sabbath day, when they plucked the ears of corn and ate them. Then the Lord gave them to understand that they were doing no wrong, as if to say: Here is no Sabbath; for the body needs food, necessity demands it; we must eat, even though it be on the Sabbath. Therefore the Lord cited the example of David, which he laid before the Jews, and said, "Have ye not read what David did; he and 'they that were with him, when he was an hungered, how he went into the house of God and ate the shew bread which was not lawful to eat, nor for those that were with him, excepting for the priests?" 1 Samuel 21, 3f. Then David ate the bread, though he was not a priest, because hunger pressed him to do it. Neither did Ahimelech the priest violate the law in giving the bread to David, for love was present and urged him to give it. Thus even the whole law would have had to serve David in his need.

13. Therefore, when the law impels one against love, it ceases and should no longer be a law; but where no obstacle is in the way, the keeping of the law is a proof of love, which lies hidden in the heart. Therefore ye have need of the law, that love may be manifested; but if it cannot be kept without injury to our neighbor, God wants us to suspend and ignore the law.

14. Thus you are to regulate your life and conduct. There are in our day many customs, many orders and ceremonies, by which we falsely think to merit heaven; and yet there is only this one principle, namely: the love to our neighbor, that includes in it all good works. I will give you an example we recently heard. Here is a priest or monk, who is to read his prayers or the rules of his order, or to hold mass, or say penance. At this moment there comes a poor man or woman to him who has need of his help and counsel. What shall this priest or monk do? Shall he perform his service, or shall he assist the poor man? He should therefore act prudently and think: True, I am required to read my prayers, hold mass, or say penance; but now on the other hand, a poor man is here; he needs my help and I should come to his rescue. God commanded me to do this; but the others man devised and instituted. I will let the mandates of men go, and will serve my neighbor according to God's commandment.

15. However, very seldom do we think that the precious service of holding mass and reading prayers should be put in the background; and such a humble service, as you regard it, should have the preference. But what is the reason? The reason is that these dream-preachers, who have nothing to present to us but the ordinances of men, have made us so timid and fearful that we came to the conclusion, if we did not regulate ourselves in everything according to their preaching, heaven itself would fall. Yea, they would rather let ten poor people starve than fail to say one mass.

We find even today many monks or priests who rather let a poor man freeze, than violate their statutes and ordinances. So lamentably and miserably have they been deceived by their godless preachers and teachers, and by their superiors, who with their statutes and devilish ordinances have drawn, and are still drawing, them away more and more from the law of God to our own notions.

16. These are the principal fruits of unbelief and godlessness, which, as the Scriptures declare, provoke God. Should not God be angry with me, if he commands me to show my neighbor love, and I go and follow my own or other people's dreams? It is as if a master said to his servant: Go and work in the field, and the servant went and desired to wash the dishes. Should not the master rightly be angry with such a servant? Thus it is also with God. He wants us to keep his commandments, and to regard them more than the commandments of men, and all the commandments to be subservient to love, so that all be comprehended in these two commandments, of which the Lord here speaks in this Gospel: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself."



17. Do you want to do something pleasing to God, then do it out of genuine love. That the Jews practiced circumcision, fasted much, prayed much, and performed other like services, was not pleasing to God, for it did not come from the heart, as this commandment requires: Thou shalt love God with all thy heart. Thus it will be also with you, even though you should belong to the Carthusian friars, or to a still more exacting order; all would avail nothing, if you had not the love of God. From this you are to conclude, all works are nothing, that do not originate in love, or are against love. No commandments should be in force, except those in which the law of love can be exercised.

18. From this it now appears what a misleading calling that of the monks and priests is, in that they wish to merit heaven through their works alone, and they also bind the people to do good works, in order that they may thereby merit heaven, which is a cursed and godless service. Hence, as already stated, the law is to be only an exercise to prove our love; otherwise, aside from love, God never inquires about works, no matter how excellent they are.

19. You can now see how many people know what the law means: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself. Surely they are few who know it, and fewer still who keep it. How can they keep that which they do not know? We are blind and our nature is totally blind, and so is also human reason. It knows nothing so imperfectly as that which the law of God requires.

20. Now here Christ shows the Pharisees and the Scribes a twofold kindness. In the first place, he dispels their blindness and teaches them what the law is. In the second place, he teaches them how impossible it is for them to keep the law. Their blindness he dispels, in that he teaches them what the law is, namely: that love is the law. Human reason cannot comprehend this nowadays any more than the Jews did then, for if it had been possible for human reason to comprehend it, the Pharisees and Scribes, who at that time were the best and wisest of the people, could have understood it; but they thought it consisted alone in performing the external works of the law; in giving to God, whether it be done willingly or unwillingly; but their inward blindness, their covetousness, and their hardened heart they could not see, and thought they thoroughly understood the law and were fine fellows, holy and pious people; but they stood in their own light. For no one is able to keep the law unless his nature is thoroughly renewed.

21. Therefore consider it an established fact that reason can never understand and fulfil the law, even though it knows the meaning of the law. When do you do to another what you want him to do to you? Who loves his enemy from his heart? Who loves to die? Who willingly suffers disgrace and shame? Dear sir, point me to a man who enjoys to have a bad reputation or to live in poverty! For nature and human reason flee entirely from this, are afraid, terrified and shocked; and if it were possible, as far as it were in their power, they would never suffer such misfortune. Human nature alone will never be able to accomplish what God in this commandment requires, namely, that we surrender our will to the will of God, so that we renounce our reason, our will, our might and power, and say from the heart: Thy will be done. And indeed, nowhere will you find a person who loves God with his whole heart and his neighbor as himself. It may indeed happen that two companions live friendly together; but even there hypocrisy is hidden, which continues until you are wounded by him; then you will see how you love him, and whether you are flesh or spirit. This commandment therefore requires me to be friendly with all my heart to him who has offended me; but when do I do this?

22. Thus Christ desires to show us that we preach the law rightly, only when we learn from it that we are unable to fulfill it, and that we are the property of the devil. This we learn from experience, and it is shown now and then in the Scriptures, especially by St. Paul when he says in Romans 8, 7-8: "Because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be," and it follows, that they who are in the flesh cannot please God.

23. Hence, take to thyself this commandment: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and think upon it, contemplate it, and search what kind of a law it is; how far you are from fulfilling it, yea, how you have not yet even made a beginning to suffer and to do from the heart what God demands of you. It is pure hypocrisy, if anyone wants to creep into a hiding- place and think: Oh I will love God. Oh, how I do love him, he is my Father! How gracious he is to me I and the like. Yes, when God does our pleasure, then we can easily say such things; but when he sends misfortune and adversity, we no longer regard him as our God, nor as our Father.

24. True love to God does not act in this way, but in the heart it thinks and with the lips says: Lord God, I am thy creature; do with me as thou wilt; it matters not to me. I am ever thine, that I know; and if thou desirest, I will die this very hour or suffer any great misfortune; I will cheerfully do so from my heart. I will not regard my life, honor and goods and all I have, higher and greater than thy will, which shall be my pleasure all my days. But you will never find a person who will constantly regulate himself according to this commandment; for the whole life you are living in the body, in the five senses, and whatever you do in your body, should all be so regulated as to be done to the glory of God, according to the regulations of this commandment, which saith, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind." As if Christ said: If you love God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind, then nothing will be lacking; you shall experience it in your daily life, namely: when everything you do, whether you wake or sleep, whether you labor or stand idle, whether you eat or drink, is directed and done out of love to God from the heart. In like manner your mind and thoughts will also be directed wholly and entirely to God, so that you will approve of nothing you are not certain is pleasing to God. Yea, where are those who do this?

25. And this part where he says, "With all thy mind, argues powerfully against the writings and teachings of man, upon which he especially depends, and thinks thereby to obtain a merciful God and merit heaven. Such imagination of the human reason draws us in a wonderful manner from this commandment, so that we do not love God with all the mind; as has been done hitherto, and is still done at the present day. For these priests and monks think nothing else than that God is moved by the mass and by other human inventions; but he abhors it and does not desire it, as is said in Isaiah 29, 13: "In vain do they serve me, because they are teaching such doctrines which are only the commandments of men." 'Mat. 15, 8-9. The commandment here requires you to consider nothing good that is against God and against everything he has commanded or forbidden. It thus requires, you to give yourself wholly and entirely to him in all your life and conduct.

26. From this you can conclude, there is no human being who is not condemned, inasmuch as no one has kept this commandment, and God wants everyone to keep it. There we stand in the midst of fear and distress, unable to help ourselves, and the first knowledge of the law is, that we see our human nature is unable to keep the law; for it wants the heart, and if it is not done with the heart, it avails nothing before God. You may indeed do the works outwardly, but God is not thus satisfied, when they are not done from the heart, out of love; and this is never done except man is born anew through the Holy Spirit. Therefore God aims to accomplish through the law nothing more than that we should in this way be forced to acknowledge our inability, frailty and disease, and that with our best efforts we are unable to fulfil a letter of the law. When you realize this, the law has accomplished its work. This is what Paul means when he says in Romans 3, 20, "Through the law is the knowledge of sin."

27. From this it appears clearly that we are all alike, and are one in the inner wickedness of the heart, which the law reveals, when we look into it rightly. Therefore we might well say, If one is good, then all are good. Therefore no one should accuse another. It is indeed true that in public and gross sins there sticks a deeper sin; but the heart is alike bad, unless it be renewed by the Holy Ghost. But what shall I do when I once recognize my sin? What does it profit me? It helps me very much, for when I have come thus far, I am not far from the kingdom; as Christ says to a scribe in Mark 12, 34, who also knew that the works of the law were nothing without love.

28. But what shall we do to get rid of our bad conscience? Here follows now the other part of this Gospel, namely, who Christ is and what we can expect of him. From him we must receive and secure freedom from a wicked conscience, or we shall remain in our sins eternally, because for this purpose is Christ made known and given by the Father, in order that he might deliver us from sin, death, from a wicked conscience, and from the law.

29. We have now heard what the law is, and how through the law we come to the knowledge of sin; but this is not enough, another has a work to do here, whose name is Christ Jesus; although the first, the law, must indeed remain; yea, it is necessary. For if I have no sense of my sins, I will never inquire for Christ; as the Pharisees and scribes do here, who thought they had done everything the law commanded and were ready to do yet more; but of Christ they knew nothing. Therefore, first of all, when the law is known and sin revealed through the law, it is then necessary that we know who Christ is; otherwise the knowledge of sin profits us nothing.

30. But the law is known, when I learn from it that I am condemned, and see that there is neither hope nor comfort anywhere for me, and I cannot even help myself, but must have another one to deliver me. Then it is time that I look around for him who can help, and he is Christ Jesus, who for this purpose became man, and became like unto us, in order that he might help us out of the mire into which we are fallen. He loved God with all his heart and his neighbor as himself, and submitted his will to the will of his Father, fulfilled the law in every respect; this I could not do and yet I was required to do it. Therefore, he accepts him; and that which he fulfilled in the law, he offers me. He freely gives me his life with all his works, so that I can appropriate them to myself as a possession that is my own and is bestowed upon me as a free gift. He delivers us from the law, for when the law says, Love God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself, or thou wilt be damned, then I say, I cannot do it. Then Christ says: Come to me, take me and cling to me by faith; then you shall be rid of the law.

31. Now this is accomplished in the following manner: Christ has through his death secured for us the Holy Spirit; and he fulfils the law in us, and not we. For that Spirit, whom God sends into your heart for the sake of his Son, makes an entirely new man out of you, who does with joy and love from the heart everything the law requires, which before would have been impossible for you to do. This new man despises the present life, and desires to die, rejoices in all adversity, and submits himself wholly and entirely to the will of God. Whatever God does with him, is well pleasing to him. This Spirit you cannot merit yourself, but Christ has secured and merited it. When I believe from the heart that Christ did this for me, I receive also the same Holy Spirit that makes me an entirely new man. Then everything God commands is sweet, lovely and agreeable, and I do everything he desires of me; not in my own strength, but by the strength of him that is in me, as Paul says in Philippians, 4, 13: "I can do all things through Christ that strengtheneth me."

32. But you must take heed, that you do not undertake to secure this faith in Jesus Christ by your own works or power, or that you think lightly about this matter; for it is impossible for the natural man; but the Holy Spirit must do it. Therefore beware of the preachers of selfrighteousness, who simply blabber and say: We must do good works in order to be saved. But we say that faith alone is sufficient to this end. Our good works are for another purpose, namely, to prove our faith, as you have already frequently heard from me.

33. Now this is the purpose of the question the Lord put to the Pharisees: What think ye of Christ; who is he and whose Son is he? But their answer, in that they say, He is the son of David, the Lord rejects and obscures their answer and refers to a passage from the Psalm, in order to leave them in doubt; so that no one is able to answer him a word.

34. However, when David calls Christ his Lord, in that he says in Psalm 110, "But the lord said unto my Lord, 'Sit thou on my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool,'" it is to be understood that David speaks of him both as God and man, for according to the flesh alone he was the son of David. Paul also joins these two when he says in Romans 1, 1-4: "I am called to be an apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God, which he promised afore through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh; who was declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead." But it is something to know that Christ is Lord; for this has might and power and is especially comforting in the time of affliction. But concerning this I have said more elsewhere and will therefore now close, and pray God for grace.



Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Faith.
Chemnitz or the Synodical Conference?



Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Faith:

'via Blog this'

Lutheran Free Conference :: Nov. 9-10 - New Ulm, MN



Lutheran Free Conference :: Nov. 9-10 - New Ulm, MN:

'via Blog this'


Presentation #1

(10:30 a.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Is there any genuine Lutheranism left in American Lutheranism?" And "Can it be brought to bear?" Mark Braun (Wisconsin Lutheran College, Milwaukee) will read an essay by Mark Noll originally entitled, "American Lutherans Yesterday and Today," from Lutherans Today: American Lutheran Identity in the 21st Century, Eerdmans, 2003.
Reactions by John Pless (Concordia, Ft. Wayne), Gaylin Schmeling (Bethany, Mankato)


Presentation #2

(1:30 p.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Lutheranism is catholic and evangelical," by David Scaer (Concordia, Ft. Wayne)
Reactions by Mark Mattes (Grand View College, Des Moines), Mark Schroeder (WELS President)


Presentation #3

(3:30 p.m., November 9; reactions follow)
"Lutheranism's Chief Article--Justification by Faith and Its Flipside--Bondage of the Will," by James Nestingen  (North American Lutheran Church)
Reactions by Joel Fredrich (Martin Luther College, New Ulm), Scott Murray  (LC-MS Vice President)

Presentation #4

(9:00 a.m., November 10--Martin Luther's Birthday!; reactions follow)
"Luther's Doctrine of the Word: The Incarnate Word in the Written Word," by John Brug  (Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, Mequon)
Reactions by Steven Paulson (Luther, St. Paul), Dan Metzger (Old Zion Lutheran Church, Philadelphia)

WELS Contradicts Itself on UOJ.
WELS DP Buchholz Contradicts Himself on UOJ.
The Solution: Efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace

The prince of theologians or a WELS DP?
I am working on that.


AC V has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law: WELS Stewardship Pr...":

WELS UOJ confusion:

WELS theologians should consult with each other before they publish. In the October 2011 edition of Forward in Christ contributing editor Forrest Bivens, a professor at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, states: "The astonishing reality is that God has forgiven the sins of the whole world, whether people believe it or not" (p.9).

Yet WELS CA/AZ District President Jon Buchholz states in his paper entitled Justification Expounded by Scripture presented to the synod in convention in 2005:

"The doctrine of objective justification is a defining doctrine for the Wisconsin Synod and for the old Synodical Conference. In our zeal to expound the true, biblical doctrine of objective justification against those who oppose the doctrine, we have, at times, 'pushed the envelope,' and employed words and phrases in imprecise and incorrect ways. ... I offer the following as a loving critique of some wording and phraseology which has circulated in our midst:

'God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins.' This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word 'forgive' is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, 'God has forgiven the world.' Rather, the Spirit of Inspiration overwhelmingly uses the word 'forgive' (Greek: afihmi) within the context of repentance and faith, effected through the means of grace. There are good reasons why the Spirit chooses a particular word to be used in a particular context. Using the word 'forgiveness' in the atypical sense, apart from repentance and faith, one might easily find himself in the incongruous position of saying to the impenitent or unbelieving, 'God has forgiven your sins [objective gospel], but your sins are not forgiven [Ministry of the Keys].'"

Note to Jon Buchholz, if in Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense, then it should not be used in a universal sense, i.e. UOJ. Maybe it's because we are justified by faith alone?


Mark Jeske's Change and Die Program:
It's Working for WELS and Should Spill Over for LCMS



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality. Meet Mark Jeske...":

Rev. Jeske said something to the effect of, "Design the worship service for the visitor, for the young people, not the 'club members'."

Young, famous, comedian Jimmy Fallon would disagree:

Listen from about 32:30 and especially why he doesn't go to Mass anymore:

http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=3&islist=true&id=13&d=10-21-2011  

***

GJ - The audio is worth a listen, because Fallon complains that the new Catholic mass is too involved and silly. He liked the traditional mass. He cannot go to the relevant, relational masses.

Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality.
Meet Mark Jeske, the Real Synod President of WELS,
Appointed by a Few, Just Like the Pope


Luther Rocks: Cult of Personality:

'via Blog this'

The comments regarding Holy Communion are at approximately 58:00 minutes in the video. Do yourself a favor and view the whole video here. The Church belongs to Christ and His believers. We do not accommodate culture at the expense of the Church. We disciple the Word in our daily lives and bring believers into the church where there is the forgiveness of sins.

UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law:
WELS Stewardship Program To Emphasize the Work of Man Instead of the Efficacious Gospel in the Means of Grace



Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

Christ's Love, Our Calling.  That's the theme of our Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod.  It's also the focus of the second year of our four year stewardship emphasis.

The word "stewardship" usually brings to mind encouragement to be more intentional with how we use our worldly wealth.  However, there are other important aspects of stewardship as well.  This year our primary focus will be on talents.  We all have different gifts, but share in the same grace of Jesus Christ!

Consider the following:
1) If God's people aren't regularly using their talents at worship, should it really be called worship? [GJ   - If the congregation offers the Means of Grace instead of the Law...yes!]
2) If we don't invest our talents in raising our children and serving our neighbor, what will soon happen with our society? [GJ - That is why God started this precious program, to save society through our work.]
3) If we aren't interested in using our talents to promote the preaching and teaching of Christ in our midst--and around the world--what will soon happen to mission work? [GJ - What will happen to the paid vacations around the world for the elite if we have no exotic locations to visit?]

The point?  God has blessed each member of his body, the church, with certain talents.  When each member uses those talents to serve God and each other, the body thrives.  If members leave their talents untapped, the body suffers. [ GJ - God is counting on you to do His Word. He has no hands but yours, no feet but yours, no cash but yours.]

A special Bible Study and Worship service titled Different Gifts, Same Grace will use Romans 12:6-8 as the biblical framework for this Sunday, which includes discussions about the talent of serving and whether everyone has that talent or not.  For those members who regularly attend Bible study, we'll pause the "Speaking the Truth in Love to other Christians" Bible study for a week and take a look at the Gift of Service.  Whether or not you regularly attend Bible study, I'm confident you will really appreciate and enjoy this Bible study.  It begins at 9:00.

We'll see you in church this Sunday!  Until then, know for certain that the Lord of the church has richly blessed every member of our congregation with gifts and abilities to be used to God's glory and our neighbor's good: "We have different gifts, according to the grace given us.  If a man's gift is prophesying, let him use it in proportion to his faith.  If it is serving, let him serve; if it is teaching, let him teach; if it is encouraging, let him encourage; if it is contributing to the needs of others, let him give generously; if it leadership, let him govern diligently; if it is showing mercy, let him do it cheerfully" (Romans 12:6-8).


---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Turns the Gospel into Law: WELS Stewardship Pr...":

WELS UOJ confusion:

WELS theologians should consult with each other before they publish. In the October 2011 edition of Forward in Christ contributing editor Forrest Bivens, a professor at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, states: "The astonishing reality is that God has forgiven the sins of the whole world, whether people believe it or not" (p.9).

Yet WELS CA/AZ District President Jon Buchholz states in his paper entitled Justification Expounded by Scripture presented to the synod in convention in 2005:

"The doctrine of objective justification is a defining doctrine for the Wisconsin Synod and for the old Synodical Conference. In our zeal to expound the true, biblical doctrine of objective justification against those who oppose the doctrine, we have, at times, 'pushed the envelope,' and employed words and phrases in imprecise and incorrect ways. ... I offer the following as a loving critique of some wording and phraseology which has circulated in our midst:

'God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins.' This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word 'forgive' is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, 'God has forgiven the world.' Rather, the Spirit of Inspiration overwhelmingly uses the word 'forgive' (Greek: afihmi) within the context of repentance and faith, effected through the means of grace. There are good reasons why the Spirit chooses a particular word to be used in a particular context. Using the word 'forgiveness' in the atypical sense, apart from repentance and faith, one might easily find himself in the incongruous position of saying to the impenitent or unbelieving, 'God has forgiven your sins [objective gospel], but your sins are not forgiven [Ministry of the Keys].'"

Note to Jon Buchholz, if in Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense, then it should not be used in a universal sense, i.e. UOJ. Maybe it's because we are justified by faith alone?

***

GJ - This statement contradicts what was just quoted above: