Anonymous on the Fox Valley copycat blog said...
Greggy is back in action with copy and paste. And did he ask permission from the church whose photos he plasters all over his blog?
Isn't that stealing?
And why doesn't he cite his translation source for his big copy/paste posts of the Book of Concord? He is deceiving people into thinking these are his translations of the BOC?
PLAGIARISM!!!!
How can he maintain his faculty status at the prestigious Internet university he class (sic!) to be a member of?
What kind of ethical blogging is this?
; )
***
GJ - I posted a belly-laugh video, above, on my Facebook page last night. This Fox Valley post is even funnier.
I did not know that a congregation's building had privacy rights (Griswold vs. the State of Connecticut).
"Mr. Zion, may we take your picture? Oh, we have to wait for a voters' meeting? July? OK.")
However, I did ask the photographer's permission and had a pleasant exchange afterwards. It was a chance to feature a beautiful but neglected (by the LCMS) building in St. Louis. A number of Lutherans were pleased to see the building featured on Facebook and Ichabod.
I will have to ask the Sofia cathedral permission to post those photographs and Photoshop them. Does copyright protection fade when a building is more than 50 years old?
The Book of Concord credits are posted throughout, especially on the table of contents page. I wonder how much the illiterate WELS pastor read. Typically, the Fox Valley crew reads to find fault, so they can publish more factual and typographical errors.
The Sausage Factory graduates are allergic to the Confessions. One of SP Schroeder's pastor-buddies says,
"The Book of Concord is boring and irrelevant."
 |
| This is one of many statements in the Book of Concord that destroys UOJ. |
