Friday, October 26, 2012

Mixed Message from LutherQuest (sic):
Buchholz Papacy and UOJ


Christian Schulz (Schulzcj)
New member
Username: Schulzcj

Post Number: 10
Registered: 10-2012
Posted on Thursday, October 25, 2012 - 9:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


Rydecki's letter to the district presidium. This may help answer some speculation that I've read.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/201 2/10/letter-to-wels-district-president-jon.html

Daniel Gorman (Heinrich)
Senior Member
Username: Heinrich

Post Number: 1646
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2012 - 8:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


Christian Schulz: If your link is authentic, Rev. Rydecki's letter has been received by every pastor in the Az-Ca district. The letter contains credible evidence that Rev. Rydecki denies the clear intent of AP, IV, 103. The letter also contains credible evidence that the WELS Az-Ca DP has been acting like a district pope and not like a true bishop of the Az-Ca district. The WELS Az-Ca DP's suspension of Rev. Rydecki is null and void.

The Az-Ca district may now conduct a public trial of Rev. Rydecki on credible charges of false teaching. The Az-Ca district should proceed with the trial with or without the participation of Rev. Rydecki.

The WELS Az-Ca DP's participation should be limited to submitting evidence. An unbiased judge should be appointed by the Az-Ca district to preside over the trial. All pastors and laymen of the district (including Emmanuel LC) must be invited (Matt. 18; LC, 8th Commandment).


Daniel Gorman is correct about the Buchholz Mini-Papacy but wrong about the Apology. The graphic below shows the clear intent of the paragraph, which he cited above. I put the heading into this section of the Apology, to remind the obstinate and indolent that the headings describe the intent of the author - That We Obtain Remission of Sins by Faith Alone in Christ.