Missouri's clarion witness to the Man of Lawlessness
has led to many LCMS pastors becoming priests.
VATICAN LETTER Apr-10-2009 (880 words) With photos posted April 9. xxxi
Eastern meditation: Pope's Way of the Cross adopts an Asian viewpoint
By John Thavis
Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- This year's meditation for Pope Benedict XVI's Good Friday Way of the Cross has a distinctly Asian perspective, referring to Hindu scriptures, an Indian poet and Mahatma Gandhi.
But the linchpin of this Eastern reflection is the passion of Jesus Christ. In that sense, it reflects Pope Benedict's view of Christianity's relationship with the non-Christian world -- that the Gospel enlightens and fulfills the beliefs of other faiths.
Indian Archbishop Thomas Menamparampil of Guwahati wrote the meditation on the 14 stations, to be read as the pope leads the candelit "Via Crucis" at Rome's Colosseum.
The pope chose Archbishop Menamparampil, a 72-year-old Salesian, after hearing him deliver an impressive talk at last year's Synod of Bishops on Scripture. The archbishop took it as a sign of the pope's interest in Asia.
"His Holiness regards very highly the identity of Asia, the cradle of civilization. Moreover, our Holy Father has a prophetic vision for Asia, a continent very much cherished by him and his pontificate," he said.
The immediate assumption among many Vatican observers was that the choice of an Indian would serve to highlight religious freedom issues in the wake of anti-Christian violence in parts of India.
Archbishop Menamparampil has assumed a leading role in conflict resolution among warring ethnic groups in northeast India, and his Good Friday meditation reflects his conviction that violence is never the way to resolve problems.
But he doesn't explicitly mention anti-Christian discrimination. His aim here is not to list Christianity's grievances, but to present its hopes and its answers to universal questions.
The archbishop is chairman of the Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences' Commission for Evangelization, and has spoken many times about the receptivity of Asians to the Gospel. He has argued that the church's presentation of the Christian message tends to be intellectual and doctrinal, but that it works best in Asia when it is more personal, experiential and poetic.
He follows that approach in his "Via Crucis" meditation, focusing on the way Jesus deals with violence and adversity, and finding parallels in Asian culture.
Condemned to death before the Sanhedrin, for example, Jesus' reaction to this injustice is not to "rouse the collective anger of people against the opponent, so that they are led into forms of greater injustice," the archbishop wrote.
Instead, he said, Jesus consistently confronts violence with serenity and strength, and seeks to prompt a change of heart through nonviolent persuasion -- a teaching Gandhi brought into public life in India with "amazing success."
He cited another Christian success story in India, Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta, when reflecting on how Simon of Cyrene helped Jesus carry his cross.
Simon was like millions of Christians from humble backgrounds with a deep attachment to Christ -- "no glamour, no sophistication, but profound faith," in whom we discover "the sacredness of the ordinary and the greatness of what looks small," the archbishop said.
It was Jesus' plan to lift up the lowly and sustain society's poor and rejected, and Blessed Mother Teresa made that her vocation, he said.
"Give me eyes that notice the needs of the poor and a heart that reaches out in love. Give me the strength to make my love fruitful in service," he said, borrowing a line from the Indian poet Rabindranath Tagore.
Archbishop Menamparampil echoed one of Pope Benedict's favorite themes when he spoke about Jesus being mocked before his crucifixion. Today, he said, Jesus is humiliated in new ways: when the faith is trivialized, when the sense of the sacred erodes and when religious sentiment is considered one of the "unwelcome leftovers of antiquity."
The archbishop said the challenge today is to remain attentive to God's "quiet presences" found in tabernacles and shrines, the laughter of children, the tiniest living cell and the distant galaxies. His text reflected the idea that Jesus' own life embodies Indian values, including an awareness of the sacred through contemplation.
"May we never question or mock serious things in life like a cynic. Allow us not to drift into the desert of godlessness. Enable us to perceive you in the gentle breeze, see you in street corners, love you in the unborn child," he wrote.
Archbishop Menamparampil seemed equally comfortable drawing from the Western and Eastern Christian traditions. He illustrated the "mystic journey" of personal faith set in motion by Christ's death on the cross with a verse from a psalm and an eighth-century Irish hymn.
He ended with a meditation on Jesus' entombment, borrowing insights from the Eastern spiritual distinction between reality and illusion.
"Tragedies make us ponder. A tsunami tells us that life is serious. Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain pilgrim places. When death strikes near, another world draws close. We then shed our illusions and have a grasp of the deeper reality," he said.
He quoted a prayer from the Hindu holy writings, the Upanishads: "Lead me from the unreal to the real, from darkness to light, from death to immortality." He said this was the path taken by the early Christians, who were inspired by Jesus' life to carry his message to the ends of the earth.
That message remains a simple one today, he said: "It says that the reality is Christ and that our ultimate destiny is to be with him."
END

4 comments:
Dr. GJ,
In the Lutheran Synods, they do not call him anti-Christ anymore. He is their daddy.
LPC
I would agree with LPC. Certainly through their false doctrine of Universal Objective Justification the WELS teaches that the Antichrist has been declared by God's divine verdict to be forgiven of all sin, righteous in Christ, justified and that God is at peace with him, the Antichrist.
If you tell a Lutheran pastor that the RCC teaches: that Christ only paid for original sin, that we must pay for all of our sins committed while on earth, that if you believe you are forgiven by faith alone you are damned to Hell, that if you don't believe the Pope is Christ on earth you will be damned to Hell, that the only way to purgatory and then eventually Heaven is through the Pope and that all religions in the world lead to the same God the pastor will agree with you. If you then say that the Roman Catholic Church is not Christian they will disagree and argue with a vengeance that the RCC is Christian.
Seems it's not what you teach, believe and confess that makes a person or group Christian anymore but as long as they say they are then it's true no matter what thistles fall from the branch, no matter what blashemy is spoken from the lips and no matter how perverted the Word is in their midst. Doctrine has been utterly severed from practice. That's why the Church Growth maggots within the WELS, ELS, LCMS, CLC, ELCA etc. complain when their practice is tested against Scripture and the Confessions - "but we said we are Christian and we're doing it all for Christ!"
There is little or no discernment on the part of the Lutheran clergy and laity anymore. They are more than ripe for the picking by the son of perdition.
Those Christians who are still in the Lutheran churches who see the problem should do what they can to teach, defend and contend for Confessional Lutheran doctrine but not to the point of losing their own faith and confession and that of those they are responsible for.
In Christ,
Brett Meyer
Brett,
If the internet is an indication, a survey of the things church leaders say in their blogs regarding the anti-Christ reveal that they consider him a saint.
Of course, if the pope is justified already but has not believed it yet, so what is the problem? He is a saint already, right? In fact everyone is.
LPC
LPC, I think you're correct. The pastors and laity on Luther Qwest had a very lively discussion last year concerning whether or not the Pope would or could be saved. Many believed he would and could even though the Papacy is considered by historic Lutheranism, based on Scripture, to be the seat of the Antichrist.
Also, your second paragraph details a significant problem with UOJ. UOJ has the whole world, including the son of perdition, being declared by God to be justified, forgiven of all sin and righteous in His sight. But UOJ also teaches that it isn't true until an individual believes it's true. And if he believes it's true that person doesn't immediately become justified - UOJ teaches they were already justified when God declared the verdict at the cross. If that person remains in unbelief then he's condemned to Hell for the sin of unbelief - but Christ paid for all sins even the sins of unbelief which we were all born with. So then Christ didn't pay for all sins? Or Christ blood paid for all sins but not for the sin of unbelief? But then we'll all be condemned to Hell for the sin of unbelief which we're all guilty of and Christ didn't pay for? And if righteousness in God's sight is justification and is sufficient to be saved after a person believes it, why wasn't it sufficient before faith when the whole world rejected it but were declared by God to be justified and righteous?
You see UOJ teaches a blasphemous and evil caricature of God. UOJ has the God who made everything in a Word, in a Word declaring the whole world to be forgiven of all sin, justified and righteous in Christ - BUT they aren't until God works in them the faith to believe it and even when they believe it they are no different than before when they didn't believe it. UOJ makes God a liar, Christ into an underachiever who didn't die for all sins and turns what it means to be justified into a mockery of God's divine judgment of the forgiveness of sins through faith in the blood of the Lamb. UOJ teaches that those dead in sins, still under the law and who have rejected His Son Jesus Christ have all been declared justified, righteous and at peace with God. Is it any wonder that the doctrines of Satan promoted in and through the New Age Church Growth movement have taken over the hearts and minds of the Lutheran churches? The Synods won't change in my opinion. The New World Order of the Antichrist will store all the wealth within their global financial system. The Synods will have to go to the RCC if they will continue operate and avoid suffering. They've already proven a willingness to adopt or condone any doctrine, method or practice to continue their false claim of "reaching the lost in Christ." It won't stop when the decision to join Rome is the only way to avoid the loss of all earthly treasures.
In Christ,
Brett Meyer
Post a Comment