Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Here Is a Good, Fair Review by David Scaer of the Stephan Book



http://www.ctsfw.net/media/pdfs/stephantheologicalobserver.pdf

Volume 724 October 2008

Theological Observer - Martin Stephan:The Other Side of the Story or At Least Part of It

For over a half a century, Walter 0.Foerster's Zion on the Mississippi (CPH, 1953) introduced seminary students to the circumstances of the 1839 Lutheran Saxon immigration which led in 1847 to the founding of The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS), whose chief architect was C. F. W. Walther. The formidable leader in the emigration was the now less-known Martin Stephan, pastor of St. John's in Dresden, who gathered confessional-minded Lutherans for the voyage to America. Chosen as bishop on January 14,1839, as the four ships waited to dislodge their Lutheran passengers in New Orleans on January 29, his episcopacy was short lived. His relations with Louise Guenther, which came to light in her confession on May 5 to Pastor G. H. Loeber, led to his expulsion from the Peny County colony on May 30 and his being escorted across the Mississippi to Illinois, where he died on January 26, 1846. Like the English Pilgrims two hundred years before, these Lutherans had found it increasingly more difficult to practice their faith in a land whose king was Roman Catholic and whose Lutheran pastors were enamored with the Lutheran-Reformed dktente in neighboring Prussia. Though two centuries separate the two migrations, their stories are strikingly similar: flight from oppressive government intrusion, chartering a ship, making a compact (charter) with regulations before landing, the prominence of clerical leadership, and the eventual disbanding of the colony.

During my seminary days (1955-1960), I came to know Phil Stephan, who spoke of his forefather, the ill-fated Bishop Martin Stephan. When I saw that the author of In Pursuit of Religious Freedom: Bihup Martin Stephnn's Journey ([Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2GU8], 327 pages, hardcover) was a certain Philip G. Stephan, I had to assume this was my classmate. Here he tells the other side of the story, which he and other family members have long desired to tell Fascinatingly fold, the book is well documented. Its thirty-three chapters are clustered under eight parts, followed by six appendices containing community regulations, Stephan's investiture as bishop, and 0.H. Walther's hymns written for the sea voyage from Bremen across the Atlantic. Parts one through four tell of the origins of the Saxon Emigration Society and those of Martin Stephan's family in Bohemia, his ministry at St. John's in Dresden, his legal problems over his religious and personal activities, his wife and family, and his departure for America. Part five tells of the group's internal problems, which were exacerbated by a hostile press in St. Louis. Stephan's deposition as bishop is told in part six. Part seven relates his last years in Illinois (1839-1846), his vindication in the courts, and his four-month pastorate in Red Bud, Illinois. In part eight, the author reflects on his forefather's place in history.

A certain bias can be expected in a book written by a descendant of its subject, but in this case it is a useful antidote in coming to terms with a man who, in spite of his infractions, tilled the ground from which the LCMS sprang. Even those who became his critics admired his preaching and his counseling skills, which drew admrers from all over Germany. He and his wife Julia, a woman of high social rank, had twelve children, four of whom died. Three daughters were born deaf and were later institutionalized [GJ - symptoms of congenital syphilis]. Family problems were exacerbated by legal charges, among which was organizing a sect. These proved to be unfounded. Before Stephan left Germany he was placed under house arrest for one year and could not minister to his congregation. He suffered from eczema [GJ - more likely syphilis], especially on his feet, a disease often caused by anxiety, and sought relief at the baths in Radeberg, a village twenty miles away from Dresden. There he gathered a group of followers, Louise Guenther among them. In her twenties and about thirty years younger than Stephan, she emigrated with him, was in charge of acquisitions for the society, and served as his housekeeper in his last years. This relationship has arguably prevented putting his detractors under the same scrutiny they applied to him and allowed others to attribute to him views he did not hold. For example, Stephan was not a chiliast, as Paul Burgdorf claimed (54).

The most intriguing, and perhaps tragic, part of Stephan's life is told in part six, "Deposing a Bishop." Shortly after arriving in this country, Stephan encountered bad press in St. Louis about his handling of the Emigration Society's property. When Pastor Georg Loeber shared Louise Guenthef's confession with Pastors Keyl, Buerger, and C. F. W. Walther, they were embarrassed by their published defense of their bishop (May 4, 1839), which they retracted on May 27. Assisting them in their intent to remove Stephan were the attorneys Vehse and Marbach (182). Louise Guenther was unaware that her private confession had become the reason for deposing Stephan as bishop. Though all this had become public knowledge, only on May 28 was Stephan confronted by a deposition signed by the pastors demanding his resignation. These pastors served as his accusers and his judges in requiring him to leave the community. At first Stephan refused what he considered an illegally constituted tribunal, but, in seeing a mob armed with whips outside his cabin, he acquiesced and was deprived of his possessions. He was bodily searched and was given only a shovel and pick to make a living and clothing which did not ward off the cold of winter (190, 237-238). His being forcibly taken to Illinois could legitimately be seen as kidnapping (247). Stephan's last years (1839-1846)were lived in pathetic misery. Once he returned to the colony for medicine, food, and clothing, but was refused. Loeber went to Kaskaskia to give him communion under the condition that he sign a confession. He refused (229). Four months before his death he became the pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in Red Bud, Illinois, where he lies buried.

In the minds of his accusers and in common synod folklore, Stephan deserved all the misfortune he experienced, but this hardly exonerates those who administered it. First, a confession made privately to a pastor is privileged information. It is one thing to ask the advice of other clergy and another thing to make it public, as Loeber and others did. On July 7, the same pastor told the congregation that two or three other women had come forward with the same claims. One of them wrote a letter withdrawing her allegations. Though current LCMS guidelines disallow making confessions public, the disposal of Stephan might be a warning for some to withhold potentially disastrous sins from their pastor (200-201). What was then considered a sacrament is looked on with suspicion now. Another unresolved issue is the society's forcing Stephan to surrender his personal belongings and property. Stephan's son, also Martin (V), returned to Germany where he studied architecture. After his mother's death, he returned to St. Louis and graduated from the seminary (1853).Walther's attitude to him as a student, and then as a pastor, was hardly positive. On one occasion the younger Mamn was publicly called a "Judas." The book recounts how the seminary president persuaded him to relinquish all claims to the family property (269). This harassment continued into his ministry. He used his architectural skills acquired in Germany to design buildings for the seminary and several churches. The amazing legacy of the Stephan family is that, in spite of both proven and unproven allegations against their forefather, four generations served as pastors in the synod.

While the synod's crucial events 170 years ago may seem remote, those who choose to ignore them, as they are presented from another perspective, are depriving of themselves of coming face to face with an account of how we came to be as a synod. Things may not be as golden as we thought. The Lutheran Saxon experiment in Missouri was, in a way, an attempt to set up the kingdom of God on earth (hence the title Zion on the Mississippi).Quakers were doing the same thing in New Harmony, Indiana, as were the Mormons, first in Nauvoo, Illinois, and eventually in Salt Lake City. This is the dilemma of any church which sees itself as the true, visible church on earth. It may be that there is a little bit of chiliasm in our history, but then reality sets in. These Lutheran immigrants exchanged one set of problems in Germany for another set in America. Some of the problems faced in Germany in the first half of the nineteenth century reared their heads in the latter half of the twentieth century in America and, ironically, in St. Louis where the forefathers had come to find r&fuge from them. If there is a parable here, it is that we can never run away from problems without exchanging them for others, or maybe the same ones.

Should In Pursuif of Religious Freedom have a rightly deserved second printing, a few changes might be in order. In reference to a church government supervised by a bishop, "episcopal" should be substituted for "Episcopal" (e.g., 267, which refers to a denomination. German verbs appearing in an English language manuscript should be lower case (enoeckt), not upper case (29). Nouns are reversed: not beichfvater but Beichbater (65), preferably in italics. Followers of Pietism at the University of Leipzig are calied "Disciples of Christ" (67) but should be "disciples of Christ." The third ship carrying the Saxon immigrants amved on January 12, 1839, not 1838 (129). Since its passengers lefi on November 12, 1838, they would have anived in New Orleans before they left Bremen. Loeber's Rogate Sermon, which stirred the conscience of Louise Guenther, was preached on May 5, 1839, not March 5 (179). "Sacrament of holy absolution" should be either all lower or upper caw, not both (266). "Emigration Society," yes, but the author does not address why they used the title "Society" (e.g., 8-9).

Its author has not yet responded to my letter sent in care of his publisher to confirm that we were once seminary classmates. If the heroic element of Bishop Stephan's story is that his family continued to give pastors to the LCMS for over a century after he was deposed, the tragic element is that the one descendant who wrote a book to show the other side of the story is no longer a pastor of the synod of which his great-great-grandfather was really the patriarch. Other classmates took the same path. That is a tragedy, too. Some have left the church. This is still even a worse tragedy, all of which is the subject for some other historian to recount. [GJ - The Stephan family was quite gracious, staying with the sect that robbed them of a fortune and elevated Walther to divine, infallible status.] David P. Scaer

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Anti-NNIV WELS Meeting in New Ulm

After getting a parking ticket at Martin Luther College,
one pastor suddenly realized what the problem was.

The Issues in WELS group, once scattered like Silly Putty hit with a hammer, has gathered together again to fight against the NNIV.

They are meeting in New Ulm at this time. I did not get an invite but only heard about it on the Net. I could identify the source, but he or she would never be heard from again.

I doubt whether they are using the Martin Luther College campus. Still, I had this great photo of their parking lot sign.

The support of the NNIV and ESV during the 400th anniversary of the KJV is ample testimony to the degradation and perversion of the teaching faculties of Lutherdom. There may be a Lutheran holdover here and there, but readers can be sure that anyone suspected of Confessional fidelity has a job in peril.

Ben Wink - On Joe Krohn and Martin Luther College



Ben Wink has left a new comment on your post "Joe Krohn Responds Again to the Nameless Cowards o...":

Going back over the letters and emails that were posted, I must believe that Quiet WELSian (may not be real name) had to have been reading the wrong letters. I see a lay member asking questions, wanting clarifications in an effort to learn and grow in faith. Isn't that a part of making disciples? I see too much emphasis on just spreading the Word, but not enough emphasis on teaching the Word, explaining it, examining it. I see a church refusing to go over major doctrinal areas with a member. And this was just the beginning of the snowball going down the mountain.

I don't care if you are a pastor, a district president, a synod president, if a member has a question regarding essential Christian foundations, you take the time to answer them. The responses from Joe betray that he is a student of Lutheran doctrine, his quotes alone are evidence of that. The responses from the church consist of saying there will be no discussion, repent and shut up or else, with not even token Scripture passages included.

On a separate note regarding something I saw in the FIC for the WELS 2011 Worship Conference. Over 850 attendees. WOW! And 150 students in the youth choirs! YOWZA! I can now see that the new MLC chapel could never have held that many people. Of course, if you go to the MLC website it states:

"What are the general requirements for this chapel?
■
Seating capacity: 1000 for worshipers, an additional 100 for choir, and overflow seating for 200; flexible seating preferred"

Hmmm...so that chapel can fit 1200 derrieres and over 850 showed up. Gosh that's quite the discrepancy and apparently no one read the PR on the website. Then again I can remember that math was not emphasized when I went to MLC, so why should that change anytime soon?

On a related note, they must have sent out a pamphlet explaining all the various reasons why they had to use an ELCA chapel after reading Ichabod. I overheard a pastor that was headed to the conference reciting almost point for point as to why MLC wasn't suitable: no A/C, not big enough, cafeteria issues, yadda yadda, blah blah, etc. Almost verbatim from what was brought up on Ichabod.

Boy the party line comes out in full force. Sad. Of course now it is quite a bit after the fact so who would really care, right?

http://www.wels.net/worship/about-national-worship-conference

http://www.mlc-wels.edu/home/administration/board/chapelfaq/?searchterm=chapel seating 

***

GJ - Joe can answer this better than I can, but I saw Joe asking questions and being immediately kicked out and trashed, with his wife Lisa. They would not meet with them except to tell off Joe and Lisa while they listened in silence. Ex-SP Gurgle would not even answer an email question.

My experience was this - the WELS pastors could do the repeat-after-me stuff, but they went into panic when I asked probing questions. In fact, I was told that I unraveled people by going to them directly, knocking them off their memorized answers. In spite of what they urge, the leaders do NOT want anyone to go to them and ask questions.

The issue in the Big Four is total control, not doctrinal fidelity. That is why God is letting them crash and burn, poisoning themselves with their own false doctrine.

---

LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "Ben Wink - On Joe Krohn and Martin Luther College":

Actually it was DP Glaeske that would not answer an email question.

Pr. Gurgel did meet with us graciously on two occasions in our home. Although we could not come to a consensus on terminology, he did not believe our confession was anything damning to our faith and left us feeling (his feeling) that we were probably saying the same things. I believe I did knock him off his memorized answers a couple of times.

Ben Wink is correct in his objective observations.

I asked on more than one occasion to meet with the elders to discuss justification. If anything, they begged us to meet re: fellowship. Why I do not know since we were already excommunicated. We did know what that meant already. But then they turned around and told the voting assembly that they extended invitations to meet about doctrine and that we refused. That led the voters to believe it was about justification when it wasn't.

***

GJ - For precise details, check with Joe Krohn's blog. WELS does not rise above repeating the same old talking points, which contradict each other. The leaders are deathly afraid that the laity will study the Book of Concord, read the KJV, and take appropriate action. They would rather have people pay, pray, and obey. That is why WLC felt comfortable inviting featuring a Roman Catholic archbishop as a speaker (not to mention a few of his priests). They have the same attitude toward infallible leaders and an indefectible church body. Not only that - WELS and the Church of Rome are identical in starting worship conferences with a cash bar for their alcoholics. "Bottoms up!" - as they say without blushing.

---

1580 has left a new comment on your post "Ben Wink - On Joe Krohn and Martin Luther College":

"I don't care if you are a pastor, a district president, a synod president, if a member has a question regarding essential Christian foundations, you take the time to answer them."

I completely agree with you. When I was in high school I sent an e-mail to the Dean of Students at Luther Prep, asking him about UOJ. Knowing this guy, he checks his e-mail constantly -- but failed to ever respond to my e-mail. Sad.

About the MLC Chapel: Sure enough when WELS has one good thing, a solid reverent chapel, they screw it up and put a $40,000 dollar projector in there. During the sermonette the other night it was used to give visuals like we were 5 years old. It was distracting to say the least. On top of that, during the rest of the service it read "Give me an undivided heart." It's ironic that it said that but the reality of the situation was that it gave me a divided heart because I kept looking at the screen instead of the massive cross hanging from the ceiling. I find the screen a stumbling block to my faith and concentration on the Word.

P.S. I hear they're waiting on another "gift" to put in another screen.

Intrepid Lutherans: A Little Touch of Marty In the Night



Intrepid Lutherans: A Little Touch of Marty In the Night:



(My apologies to the immortal Bard. I hope to make this a regular feature on IL, and that you find it interesting and edifying, and that it might generate fruitful discussion.)

From the Large Catechism of Dr. Martin Luther, comments on the Third Commandment, beginning at paragraph 87, from the online edition of the Book of Concord:

87] Accordingly, when asked, What is meant by the commandment: Thou shalt sanctify the holy day? answer: To sanctify the holy day is the same as to keep it holy. But what is meant by keeping it holy? Nothing else than to be occupied in holy words, works, and life. For the day needs no sanctification for itself; for in itself it has been created holy [from the beginning of the creation it was
sanctified by its Creator]. But God desires it to be holy to you. Therefore it becomes holy or unholy on your account, according as you are occupied on the same with things that are holy or unholy. 88]

How, then, does such sanctification take place? Not in this manner, that [with folded hands] we sit behind the stove and do no rough [external] work, or deck ourselves with a wreath and put on our best clothes, but (as has been said) that we occupy ourselves with God's Word, and exercise ourselves therein. 89]

And, indeed we Christians ought always to keep such a holy day, and be occupied with nothing but holy things, i.e., daily be engaged upon God's Word, and carry it in our hearts and upon our lips. But (as has been said) since we do not at all times have leisure, we must devote several hours a week for the sake of the young, or at least a day for the sake of the entire multitude, to being concerned about this alone, and especially urge the Ten Commandments, the Creed, and the Lord's Prayer, and thus direct our whole life and being according to God's Word. 90]

At whatever time, then, this is being observed and practised, there a true holy day is being kept; otherwise it shall not be called a Christians' holy day. For, indeed, non-Christians can also cease from work and be idle, just as the entire swarm of our ecclesiastics, who stand daily in the churches, singing, and ringing bells but keeping no holy day holy, because they neither preach nor
practise God's Word, but teach and live contrary to it. 91]

For the Word of God is the sanctuary above all sanctuaries, yea, the only one which we Christians know and have. For though we had the bones of all the saints or all holy and consecrated garments upon a heap, still that would help us nothing; for all that is a dead thing which can sanctify nobody. But God's Word is the treasure which sanctifies everything, and by which even all the saints
themselves were sanctified. At whatever hour, then, God's Word is taught, preached, heard, read or meditated upon, there the person, day, and work are sanctified thereby, not because of the external work, but because of the Word, which makes saints of us all. 92]

Therefore I constantly say that all our life and work must be ordered according to God's Word, if it is to be God-pleasing or holy. Where this is done, this commandment is in force and being fulfilled. 93]

On the contrary, any observance or work that is practised without God's Word is unholy before God, no matter how brilliantly it may shine, even though it be covered with relics, such as the fictitious spiritual orders, which know nothing of God's Word and seek holiness in their own works. 94]

Note, therefore, that the force and power of this commandment lies not in the resting, but in the sanctifying, so that to this day belongs a special holy exercise. For other works and occupations are not properly called holy exercises, unless the man himself be first holy. But here a work is to be done
by which man is himself made holy, which is done (as we have heard) alone through God's Word. For this, then, fixed places, times, persons, and the entire external order of worship have been created and appointed, so that it may be publicly in operation. 95]

Since, therefore, so much depends upon God's Word that without it no holy day can be sanctified, we must know that God insists upon a strict observance of this commandment, and will punish all who despise His Word and are not willing to hear and learn it, especially at the time appointed for the purpose. 96]

Therefore not only those sin against this commandment who grossly misuse and desecrate the holy day, as those who on account of their greed or frivolity neglect to hear God's Word or lie in taverns and are dead drunk like swine; but also that other crowd, who listen to God's Word as to any other trifle, and only from custom come to preaching, and go away again, and at the end of the year know as little of it as at the beginning. 97]

For hitherto the opinion prevailed that you had properly hallowed Sunday when you had heard a mass or the Gospel read; but no one cared for God's Word, as also no one taught it. Now, while we have God's Word, we nevertheless do not correct the abuse; we suffer ourselves to be preached to and admonished, but we listen without seriousness and care. 98]

Know, therefore, that you must be concerned not only about hearing, but also about learning and retaining it in memory, and do not think that it is optional with you or of no great importance, but that it is God's commandment, who will require of you how you have heard, learned, and honored His Word. 99]

Likewise those fastidious spirits are to be reproved who, when they have heard a sermon or two, find it tedious and dull, thinking that they know all that well enough, and need no more instruction. For just that is the sin which has been hitherto reckoned among mortal sins, and is called torpor or satiety, a malignant, dangerous plague with which the devil bewitches and deceives the hearts of many, that he may surprise us and secretly withdraw God's Word from us. 100]

For let me tell you this, even though you know it perfectly and be already master in all things, still you are daily in the dominion of the devil, who ceases neither day nor night to steal unawares upon you, to kindle in your heart unbelief and wicked thoughts against the foregoing and all the commandments. Therefore you must always have God's Word in your heart, upon your lips, and in your ears. But where the heart is idle, and the Word does not sound, he breaks in and has done the damage before we are aware. 101] On the other hand, such is the efficacy of the Word, whenever it is seriously contemplated, heard, and used, that it is bound never to be without fruit, but always awakens new understanding, pleasure, and devoutness, and produces a pure heart and pure thoughts. For these words are not inoperative or dead, but creative, living words. 102]  And even though no other interest or necessity impel us, yet this ought to urge every one thereunto, because thereby the devil is put to Right and driven away, and, besides, this commandment is fulfilled, and [this exercise in the Word] is more pleasing to God than any work of hypocrisy, however brilliant.


Now, dear Readers, considering what Father Martin says here about the importance of focusing the worship service on Christ, His holy Word, and His Sacraments, and the fact that many erroneously labeled "contemporary" church services have so little Scripture in them - perhaps one reading at most, and that often quite short - and the Sacrament seldom to be seen, what might be said about such modern erstwhile worship gatherings? Comments anyone?


Pastor Spencer


'via Blog this'


Joe Krohn Responds Again to the Nameless Cowards of Fox Valley

Their Daddy Warbucks give them courage.



"Why dost thou disquiet me and bring me up?"

If I didn't know better, I would say Quiet WELSian is a member of Holy Word. You seem to have the same issues that Matt Wordell had.

I didn't misinterpret WELS position on UOJ. I refuted it. Nowhere does it say in the Bible that before we do anything we are forgiven. Which includes being born (as Holy Word and WELS teaches officially) or hearing the Word of God. I used solid scripture to back my position and they used Schaller, Buchholz and WELS 'This We Believe".

I keep getting accused of listening to Jackson and Meyer. I probably don't have half the brain that you do. I'm sorry.

But what of the Intrepid Lutherans? Rydecki and Spencer et al; they must be misinterpreting too, huh? Oh oh... :)

Joe

PS...You should really take your masks off. You make WELS look even more cultish even though I try to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Let the Counting Begin.
How Many Times Can Tiefel Quote Moo?
Mequon a New Moo U.?
I found 13 Moo's.

"I can hit a C over G in my Spanks.
I can hit a light-pole in my car."

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "The Foxes and Vixens of Appleton Pretty Much Talk ...":

(W)ELS gives birth to a two-headed calf. Another essay meant to prop up the dead cat UOJ and the other grotesque protuberance the NNIV.

http://scdwels.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/2011-10-tiefel-paper.pdf



Tiefel, "In NIV11, I do not see a Reformed coup. I see an unsurpassed group of scholars doing what they can to produce an inclusive translation in the hopes that a large majority of readers, including those whom we have not yet met, might use it in learning and discussing doctrine in modern English."

PS:
How many times can one (W)ELSian approvingly quote Douglas Moo in an essay on Justification?



***

GJ - Let's get a count of Moo quotations.

The original nickname of the first Wisconsin Lutheran College was Moo U.

Now Mequon can safely be called Moo U. as the faculty rush around trying to justify their porno-mytho NNIV. They will get what they want, because SP Mark Schroeder has already capitulated as a synodical leaders. Besides, he loves UOJ and the NNIV proves what WELS and all the mainline apostate denominations believer - everyone is born forgiven, absolved, saved.

Dr. Lio Cruz Pretty Much Flattens Appleton Thugs.
Can Sausage Factory Grads Read with Comprehension?

Dr. Lito Cruz earned a PhD in math,
but he also studied theology and Greek.


LPC said...

Quiet WELsian,

Dr. Jackson is correct, you lot do not know how to read. Though I am not a native English speaker and I awkwardly write, I can be forgiven for this.

However, you could have done better in reading the question I have posed.

 There are two questions. "What do you teach is the basis of predestination?

The proper response should begin by saying ... The basis of predestination is _____________.

 I did not ask how predestination happens, rather what is the basis of it, why it happens, not how. 

The second is Does God predestine people according to his decree?"

I am waiting for a simple yes or no, or if you will, repose the question and give reasons why the question is not a proper question to ask.

Did I get it? Nope.

 Also I am in touch with the Real Brett Meyer, and the Brett Meyer who commented in this thread is a fake

So sad, this is a fake Ichabod and the commenters are fake too.

There is no shame in your crowd and there is no limit on the tactics you will employ.

LPC

***
Shepherds need not apply.


GJ - In German, shameless is considered the worst possible verdict on anyone. The word fits the Northern Anything Goes District of WELS, especially Fox Valley, where the plagiarism of false teachers is accepted, praised, and rewarded.

I was teaching computer science class in Glendale when the students began laughing at a Viet Namese man (new arrival) who was actively participating in class in English. I said, "I would like to move all of you to Viet Nam, expect you to read the textbook in Vietnamese, and answer Vietnamese questions in that language. What a laugh that would be."

Lito uses some idioms that show his first language is not English. But does he blast people anonymously saying "pretty much" every few sentences? The Fox Valley vulpines should not call attention to their limitation in language, whether in reading or writing.

Lito is a cogent writer who has struggled with false doctrine from a variety of sources. The people who have been bounced around by various doctrinal claims are often more discerning than those who lay claim to being born Lutheran (a concept so dumb that Nicodemus did not think to ask about it in John 3).

I cannot even imagine trying for a doctorate in math. I have noticed that people with analytical training in math and science are especially good at examining arguments. Our best friend at Yale earned an MD and PhD at Yale Medical School, then worked at Harvard Medical. He could destroy bad argumentation with a few, amused questions. When LI was very young, he heard his godfather discussing a topic. LI said, "You are a pretty bright fellow." Bruce stopped and smiled warmly.



I hear from many laity. They have a better grasp of Christian doctrine than most clergy. They read the Word with humility and ask questions. They do not grab St. Paul by the shoulders and say, "This is what you should have written! I know what you really mean."

I pity Tim Glende and his crowd. Tim grew up in a fake church, St. Paul in German Village. The congregation pretended to be WELS to grab members, but had open communion, communion of Masonic members, boy scouts (gasp!), women voters, and women teaching men. The pastor never even brought up joining WELS. It was too cool to be fake WELS, having the best of both worlds. WELS listed them as a member congregation, too. Lying is fun and productive.

Tim Glende's congregation encouraged Floyd Luther Stolzenburg to pretend he was still a pastor, even though he was kicked out of the LCMS for adultery and sued by the husband of one mistress. One LCMS colleague said, "He betrayed his wife, his children, his congregation, and his conservative friends." A co-pastor said, "Floyd destroyed everything I had."

Floyd could not get a job in the school system or at any church. I wonder why. WELS arranged for him to be a fake pastor, a Church Growth Consultant, with a grant from one of their members, George Skestos. George went to church with his wife at St. Paul, with his future wife to Prince of Peace. When Floyd was done wrecking things, WELS endorsed him for a job at his current church, so he could be a pastor again. WELS enjoys feeding sheep to wolves - it's what they do for fun.

Poor Tim Glende went to Michigan Lutheran Seminary, where John Lawrenz pretended to be a Lutheran. Unknown to many at the time, John was a leader in Church and Change. Lawrenz earned a PhD at a Jewish school. Why doesn't Tim denounce John on his fake blog? I know - because John is a Changer, a beloved member of the wolfpack.

Glende went to Northwestern College, closed by the Changers, and then to The Sausage Factory, where the professors pretend to be Lutheran but only care about:
  • Universal Objective Justification,
  • Church Growth plagiarism.


Poor Tim Glende cannot preach from the Scriptures, so he plagiarizes Groeschel, with the support of his DP, a fake leader.

The fakery is unending. St. Peter pretends that The CORE is another congregation, but it has never been a separate parish. The CORE is simply an evening service downtown, to gather all the Shrinkers and area youth together. Ski and Glende coordinate their Groeschel plagiarism. Ski is listed on the staff of St. Peter, Freedom. Everyone winks and chuckles at their fakery and sheep-stealing from area WELS churches.

When Glende was writing anonymous, nasty comments on this blog, I called him Anonymouse. He began his fake Ichabod blog and the even nastier Anonymouse blog. Poor Tim Glende cannot create anything, so he copies. Like Patterson, he ducked direct communication once I identified where the comments were coming from.

Poor Tim Glende is headed for a bad ending, I am afraid. His home congregation mis-trained him and turned the Ten Commandments upside-down. The process continued throughout his parochial education, where he was trained against the Confessions while brain-washing him about the infallibility of WELS. Getting away with bullying is not success. Being supported in plagiarizing false doctrine is not reason for boasting.

Those who teach universal justification and universal absolution are always anxious to justify themselves - albeit anonymousely.


The Foxes and Vixens of Appleton Pretty Much
Talk Down To Joe Krohn.
Why Is WELS Shrinking So Fast? Pretty Much This Is Why


Quiet WELsian said...
Joe-

Though I'm sorry for your plight, I'm afraid I'm not hugely sympathetic to your complaints about how you were treated on this blog. I remember reading the post and all the guy said to you is that he didn't consider it your fault for getting excommunicated because you obviously weren't taught the doctrine of justification correctly. You really shouldn't have put those letters between you and your church up on your blog. They didn't make you seem sympathetic at all. Rather, what it looked it is this: your pastor and the DP got that you pretty much were misinterpreting the WELS' position on objective justification.

Why didn't Kudu Don Patterson excommunicate Chad White for
attending Exponential in Orlando?
Because Patterson took him and other WELS staffers.
It was a package deal.


They basically begged you to come in and talk to them so that the correct understanding of the position of the Synod could be explain to you. You got up on your high-horse and arrogantly refused to do so. Bear in mind, I find it highly unlikely that they actually believe you to be a heretic in the substance of the faith. Rather, they excommunicated you for the same reason that the authors of the Formula of Concord rejected Flacius' way of talking about original sin: Certain ways of speaking about the faith tend to lead other people astray by giving them false impressions about different doctrines.

They couldn't have you going around their church and saying that the WELS was heretical because of UOJ (which you oddly seem to believe is universalism based on Jackson's false teaching) and therefore confusing the other members into some sort of Pietistic clap-trap about their faith causing God's verdict of justification. I realize in your mind that you're some sort of great persecuted heroic figure who has stood up for the faith. But I, and pretty much everyone else I know who reads your blog sees it differently. Rather, like Flacius you're guy who wouldn't listen to others when they tried to explain to you that you were using terminology that hurts the proper understanding of the faith. I guess what I would say to you is this: maybe you should start listening to some other voices than those of Jackson and Brett Meyer.

***

GJ - "Methinks the lady doth protest too much." Fox Valley, where they excommunicate for asking questions, has to show solidarity with Kudu Don Patterson, who excommunicates (with the blessing of ex-SP Gurgle) for asking questions.

See what The Latin Professor wrote about WELS. Although the clergy were spiteful, vindictive liars in both cases, they did their members a favor by revealing their slavering fangs and raking claws. They are passionate about sharing Jesus Groeschel.


Monday, November 7, 2011

Mammonize it: LCMS at the White House

Mammonize it: LCMS at the White House:

'via Blog this'

Transforming Church Network promised to transform the synod and it did.

The Chicago Way is ---“Pay to Play”. Adjust the particulars (of conscience/faith) and sell out the folks for Money.

Funds are denied to those that will not adjust for the right social contract.

The LCMS NID adoption agency, recipient of taxpayer funds, placed children in same sex homes, (9-15-2011)---- that item conveniently disappeared into the memory hole.

Fox Valley Jimmie Anonymously Defends Anonymous Attacks

Fox Valley Jimmy


Fox Valley Jimmy said... Jackson writes on his blog:

"This is a bit too obvious to mention - these sob-sisters have always posted anonymously, yet they attack people by name."

Huh?

So, it's cool to attack people anonymously on your blog (i.e, half the people who comment on your posts), but elsewhere it's immoral? Just like it's bad for people to get non-synodical degrees, except when you get one? Or how it's bad to slander people, except when half the stuff on your blog is a lie. Ok, I get it.

I look forward to the self-righteous and hypocritical response over at the Ichabode!

***

GJ - I look forward to the page-read figures when the foxes and vixens of Appleton are busy writing.

Strangers to the WELS cult need to realize that the clergy think they have a right to engage in ad hominem attacks whenever their false doctrine is questioned. The readers who post on this blog like to address the issues of false doctrine, the purpose for this little Internet effort.

No one reads Ichabod, Appletonians agree. There were 2,000 page-reads today. I write all my own comments, they claim - which I means I took time to write 15,000 comments in the last few years, many of them coming (as if by magic) from Garland, Texas (hometown, Don Patterson, a co-inky-dink) and Appleton (the rotten CORE of WELS).

The Latin Professor Comments on WELS - Yes, He Is a WELS Pastor


This pusillanimous little church body doesn’t do much at all, and what she does, she doesn’t do very well, but a couple of things she does extremely well –


a.) brainwash her teachers and pastors into thinking that she is as perfect and clean as the wind-driven snows of northern Wisconsin, and


b.) punish severely and thoroughly anyone and everyone, sooner or later, who either refuses to be brainwashed thusly, or breaks free of the WELSian mind-control, or, even worse, breaks free and then, horror of horrors, encourages others to attempt to do so!

The Appleton Fakes Reveal Their Paucity of Common Sense, Reading Comprehension, and Logic.

When Appletonians pontificate,
even the babies face palm.

Jackson is now doing his typical thing of distracting from the real issue and claiming that I was justifying impersonation on this blog when I said that the fake-Brett Meyer quote was not slander. That is not true. IMPERSONATION IS WRONG. Let me be clear about that. My point was only that it was not slander. Slander is telling lies about someone in an attempt to make them look bad. My point was merely that whoever pretended to be Brett Meyer was not engaging in slander because they were not telling lies about his positions on things. Rather they were making him look bad by telling people what he normally says. Jackson as usual is simply changing the subject in order to distract from the real issue. Also, why does he have a picture of J.I. Packer? What does the LCMS' acceptance of the ESV have to do with any of this?

***

GJ - Some people think that Joel Lillo is in on this. The Appleton gang are all peas in a pod, so it does not matter. WELS funded Church and Change because the leaders of Church and Change were synod officers. Oh, it is so much fun to spend other people's money.

Fox Valley was developed as an all Church and Change doctrinal slum. Steve Witte served two different congregations in the same area. How often does that happen? Ethical leaders avoid that, but ethical leaders are in short supply in these last days of an insane, old world.

The members and pastors sat on their hands, letting a brush fire turn into a forest fire. Now they are watching it burn down while their cluck their tongues.

Above is one of those self-absolving excuses that energize WELS. Impersonating someone is not just wrong - it is a crime. For some reason, that crime keeps happening with the same group of thugs. The post excuses the crime, even though the whole idea was to create a bad impression using the disguise of another person.

The pastors involved pretend not to know who is doing what, but that is typical GA double-talk. They were born forgiven, so that allows them to do whatever they want. No wonder the only doctrine they defend is their toxic UOJ opinion. Nothing gets a WELSian frothier than justification by faith. It is almost like transporting the Pharisees to the 21st century.

This is a bit too obvious to mention - these sob-sisters have always posted anonymously, yet they attack people by name. That is the template for the WELS Shrinkers. They hide behind their "WELS Grapevine" and drop stinkbombs on their fellow pastors - by name. They always use personal attacks. John Lawrenz did not like the Harold Sauer paper, so he said to me, "His parish is dead!" Meanwhile, Lawrenz was denouncing Sauer for "naming names." Of course, Sauer was naming the false teachers in WELS, the Church and Chicanery brotherhood. Sauer's paper was quite kindly, just as he was.

The WELS Grapevine said Corky criticized their precious Church Growth and amalgamation because he was "brain-damaged." The former seminary president, Schuetze, opposed closing NWC because "he was senile."

Luther Rocks: Calling All Saints.
Pietists Shun Joe Krohn



Luther Rocks: Calling All Saints:

Calling All Saints

'via Blog this'


When I started up this blog last May, my first post was a Youtube video of some goofballs at a concert on a hillside. Someone cleverly put a soundtrack to it as a primer on starting a movement. I saw some truth in that video and harnessed the idea of it to this blog as an encouragement for those struggling with the same issues in American Lutheranism. As you know for those who have followed the postings, I have chronicled my journey from experiences at Holy Word here in Austin which are not unlike many churches across America today who are incorporating the anti-gospel emergent church template into their ministries; i. e. church growth methods which come from an emphasis on works righteousness, decision theology and a need to transform the church into palatable consumption for today's society. Anyone who has bought into this program really is no different than those who support the Roman Catholic Papacy.

It all comes from the same place but from a different angle or perspective. Both are anthropocentric. Roman Catholicism displaces Christ as our mediator with Mary and the Pope. Modern day Evangelicalism displaces the Word (Christ) with programs for this and programs for that all meant to entice folks into church. They say 'people come to church for the wrong reasons and stay for the right reasons'. But what is that other than a bait and switch? Not only that, what it is really saying is 'you are all too stupid to understand His Word or realize that you are on the highway to hell and need Christ and you need us to school you'.

I posted on my FB wall a few months ago an abridged version of a saying: "Hell hath no fury as a pietist scorned." It upset a few folks and needless to say we are no longer FB friends. It wasn't like we hung out all the time anyway. But you see, that is the problem. Why did they get so angry? Because they have stolen the mission of the church and made it theirs instead of who it rightfully belongs to - Christ and the work of the Holy Spirit through the Means of Grace. So naturally they take it personally when you criticize this program or that method.

I recall vividly two instances; one at Crosswalk in early 2005 and one at Christ the Rock in spring of 2009. We were experiencing a shortage of musicians. Both pastors asked basically the same question...'so what is your plan for the ministry?' My answer was the same both times. 'I will wait until the Lord reveals His plan and go with that...until then we will make do.' The responses were similar. 'If this type of worship is going to work, we are going to need a full band.' Huh, I thought...and what about the efficacy of the Word? Pastor Harris of Trinity in Austin offered this saying in Bible class today by Robert Preus (we have been studying Genesis and the promises of God): 'How dare we presume whether the Church is winning or losing'. Wise words indeed.

The sermon in church today talked about the beatitudes...'blessed are they'. Another time in my life I would have thought it was me who would be blessed for doing these things. But try as I might, it really is too difficult to do any of them well all the time. In fact I loathe them most of the time. No, blessed am I to have a Savior who did all of these things for me already so that I can take credit for them even though I am still a sinner.

St. Iranaeus said, "The business of the Christian is nothing else than to ever be preparing for death."* St. Augustine called death "the instrument by which life is reached."** St. Luther said, "Therefore the life of a Christian, from Baptism to the grave, is nothing else than the beginning of a blessed death."***

Dear Lord, May we always be mindful to have our houses in order, so that we may give testimony for the hope that we have when given the opportunity. May we always be fully dependent upon your care of our souls and the one true Church on earth. In Jesus' name. Amen.

*Fragments, XI, ANF, I, 570 **City of God, NPNF, II, 247 ***LW, 31, 35

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Impersonation, Deceit, Lying - All Characteristics of UOJ

Packer, a Calvinist, is the senior editor of the ESV,
which is promoted and sold by the orthodox LCMS.


The fake blog continues to lead with a fake post from someone impersonating Brett Meyer. Brett has written them to say he did not write the post they are "quoting" with "a good laugh, but a sad laugh." Tim Glende, who probably writes his own comments, defended this illegal activity by claiming it was a good representation of Brett's thought.

Here is the slimy response from Anonymous:
Anonymous said... 


I'm personally a little confused by the response of Brett Meyer and Jackson to what might or might not be a fake Brett Meyer quote on this blog.

Ok, it might be fake, right? But how is it slander? I mean, whoever put it down said all the same stuff the Brett usually says and even did weird-obsessive cutting-and-pasting thing with the BOC also.


Impersonation is defined as "The crime of pretending to be another individual in order to deceive others and gain some advantage."

Therefore, when it is clearly pointed out to the fake blog, the sponsors defend their crime as justified. No wonder Rick Techlin objected to deceit and plagiarism at St. Peter in Freedom, with Tim Glende and Ski in charge.

Every week Glende and Ski pretend to be Craig Groeschel or someone else. They are afraid to give their own sermons and do their own work.

Constant lying is the chief characteristic of UOP Stormtroopers. For instance, they brag about going to Fuller Seminary and then deny that fact when this is brought out into the open (Valleskey, Bivens, Olson). They deny being members and leaders of Church and Change (Don Patterson, Paustian) while attending the Chicanery conferences.

I hope Tim Glende continues to keep his criminal activities posted for the public to see. Some day the synodical lawyers will have a talk with him about their liability. He can only hide so much, given his proclivity for bragging.

Ski and Glende are cornucopias of Photoshop opportunities.
Breaking news: "Ski wrote his own sermon last week!
Video at 10."
Feature story - "One of these is wearing a new Spanks,
The Tiefel, designed to keep it from all hanging out."
---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Impersonation, Deceit, Lying - All Characteristics...":


UOJers hahaha. Notice how they excuse themselves saying that they represented Brett's ideas even though they impersonated him.


Notice how they justify the crime of impersonating someone else by claiming they posted what Brett said etc.


This is down right antinomian. They do carry out the logical conclusion of their doctrine which is to excuse sin.


LPC 

Remember Our Veterans This Week


All Saints Sunday, 2011

Art by Norma Boeckler



All Saints Sunday, 2011


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson





The Hymn # 656            Behold a Host                      2:39
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 463            For All the Saints                   4:31 

To Hunger and Thirst for Righteousness

The Communion Hymn #  371             Jesus Thy Blood            4:6
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 657            Beautiful Savior            4:24  

KJV Revelation 7:2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, 3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand. 9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands; 10 And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb. 11 And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four beasts, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshipped God, 12 Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen. 13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? 14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. 15 Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them. 16 They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat. 17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.

KJV Matthew 5:1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him: 2 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, 3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. 7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. 9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. 10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

ALL SAINTS' DAY

O almighty and everlasting God, who through Thine only-begotten and beloved Son, Jesus Christ, wilt sanctify all Thine elected and beloved: Give us grace to follow their faith, hope, and charity, that we together with them may obtain eternal life: through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

To Hunger and Thirst for Righteousness

Matthew 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

The beatitudes are remembered by all of us as a very special set of verses. Many have tried to translate them better than the English Luther Bible (the KJV).

How happy… - awful.

Those who hunger and thirst after righteousness are blessed… - misses the main point.

Robert Schuller wrote a book called The Be-Happy Attitudes. That really sums up his entire ministry, now overshadowed by Joel Osteen, and other grinning wolves.

The beatitudes are peaceful and comforting, yet end with…

Matthew 5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

The moderns do not like that verse, because they shun the cross and all teaching about the cross. But there it is plainly revealed – the Gospel is associated directly with persecution and slander “for My sake”, just as it was in Old Testament times – and it is a blessing.

We are inclined to say, “I am sorry your congregation kicked you out, said you had lost your faith, and refused to listen to you or even hear your questions.”

Jesus says, “Blessed are you…”

We have a very smart and independent dog named Sassy Sue. She barked at our earthquake and warned us, although we did not know what the commotion was. When I take her to the post office, and turn left, she looks at me. She knows the dog park is a right turn. Whenever I do something contrary to her expectations, she looks at me and questions me. If I send all the dogs out to the deck, she stops twice to look at me. She is saying, “Not me, just them. Right?”

So the entire Christian Church has always questioned this. We are moved and inspired by examples from the past, such as Luther kidnapped and locked up to keep him from being burnt at the stake. To this day falsehoods about him are published as the truth. So we say, “That is our hero, the Reformer.” And if we get punched in the mouth, as Luther said we must, for the sake of the Gospel, we say, “Not me, just them. Right? I am supposed to have smooth sailing.”

This is directly related to the key verse, Matthew 5:6

Matthew 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

As Luther taught, there are only two kinds of righteous – righteousness from within (based on our works) or righteousness from the outside (based on Christ alone).

Jesus’ mission was to teach faith in Him, so he accepted the consequences of taking away the righteousness based on human works – the cross. They did revile and torture Him for healing the sick or raising the dead. They did not crucify Him for His kindness to widows and the poor. They raged against Him for saying, “Forgiveness comes from trusting only in Me. It is not your righteousness, but My righteousness that you need.”

The wrong righteousness always explodes in claims about works. When I questioned the conservative groups working with ELCA while criticizing ELCA, one ELS pastor phoned me and yelled, “Do you realize how hard I have worked to get congregations to join us?”

When the feminist editor of The Northwestern Lutheran came under scrutiny for her views, many responded, “Do you know how much her family has done for the synod?”

Pastors have said to me, “I did this!” I kidded one who oriented the entire worship area to face another direction, “Now you can say – I turned this church around!” He really liked that claim. It was superficially truthful and delightfully misleading.

Few are the leaders who say with Lenski (once a district president) – “Programs come and go, but the only thing that builds up the church is the Word.” How many leaders say that today? None. Not a single one.

This is strange to me, since my father was a baker and both parents grew up on a farm – Lutherans love to brag about their relatives, claiming an associated righteousness. They assume that I know who all the minor stars of their minor sects are, so they name them and wait for me to gasp in amazement. I should say, “You are his grandson!” Denominational history (all denominations) that the children of famous church workers are often the worst characters, like trust fund babies, living off the work of their ancestors.

The problem with works righteousness is that it kills the appetite for true righteousness. I always wondered as a child why appetizers filled people up and yet were called appetizers. I thought they were appetite-killers, except my appetite was hard to kill in those days. Besides, I found most offerings less than appetizing – salty fish eggs on a dry cracker. What did I do to deserve this?

Therefore, to take away the satisfaction of works-righteousness, Jesus said, “You are not righteous. You are white-washed tombs full of dead men’s bones.” (Not loving? Just the opposite.)

The works-salesmen had a lot of trouble with their foundation in life being yanked out from under them. The more trained they were in the religion of the time, the more they resisted Jesus. They hated His message and tried to trap Him. The first three Gospels show the hatred, and John 9 shows how comical it could be (truly one of the funny chapters of the Bible – the Keystone Kops chapter).

That is still true today – the clergy and the theologians are the ones who resist the Gospel the most. They want to interpose their philosophies and say, in effect, “I will follow the form that I have constructed in my mind. The plain words must be turned into complicated concepts that only a few of us can understand.”

Nevertheless, there is only one Gospel. The most terrible and effective use of the Law is to say, following John 16:8 – “You do not believe, and that is a sin. That is not only a sin, but the foundational sin upon which all others sins are based.”

Jesus taught, The Holy Spirit will convict the world of sin – because they do not utterly trust in Me. (Jackson Living Bible Translation)

Sin is not believing. Faith in Jesus is forgiveness.

I go through Sam’s Club on tasting days. The best time is before lunch, when I am hungry. They usually have around 10 stations, where meat and bread and ice cream are offered. I tried some fresh mixed nuts one day and said, “Hmm. I am still deciding. I need another cup.” The woman laughed and gave me another one.

However, if I go after lunch, all those complicated chemicals in the body have taken over and removed the appetite for anything. The food which looks attractive is odious.

The best meal we ever ate – we still talk about it. We were driving in our frozen van on a cold night, when everything was closed. We were shivering and hungry. We stopped at our favorite Chinese restaurant, but too late. They were closing. All they could do was give us a big tub rice and eggs and two plastic forks. We sat in the car, eating the food, which was quite good, but leveraged by the cold and our famished state. Every bite was delicious and satisfying.

Matthew 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

Someone recently asked, “What does justification mean?”

That word borrows a term from the legal system. When we believe in Christ, we are justified by faith in Him. God judges us free from all sin, because we receive in faith the righteousness of Christ.

We hunger and thirst for righteousness when we deal with the consequences of our sin and our need for forgiveness.

We hunger and thirst when we encounter many false claims about forgiveness and salvation. False teachers lead us through error’s maze.

People mock those who cherish justification by faith. They say, “Weren’t you Mormon, then Catholic, then Pentecostal, then one Lutheran and then another?”

In fact, those who have sought the truth in many places are the ones who value the plain words of the Gospel the most. They have been knocked around so much that they know where certainty lies. They hear the voice of the Shepherd, who knows them by name. And they follow.

On All Saints Sunday we remember those believers who have died before us – as saints in the Biblical sense. They became righteousness through faith in the Good Shepherd, who led them to green pastures.

KJV Psalm 23:1 {A Psalm of David.}
The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.
3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.
6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.

Quotations

"But when we are speaking of the subject itself, it is certain that the doctrine of gracious reconciliation, of the remission of sins, of righteousness, salvation, and eternal life through faith for the sake of the Mediator is one and the same in the Old and in the New Testament. This is a useful rule which we must retain at all costs: The doctrine, wherever we read it, in either the Old or New Testament, which deals with the gracious reconciliation and the remission of sins through faith for the sake of God's mercy in Christ, is the Gospel."
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 459.     

"Therefore God, 'who is rich in mercy' [Ephesians 2:4], has had mercy upon us and has set forth a propitiation through faith in the blood of Christ, and those who flee as suppliants to this throne of grace He absolves from the comprehensive sentence of condemnation, and by the imputation of the righteousness of His Son, which they grasp in faith, He pronounces them righteous, receives them into grace, and adjudges them to be heirs of eternal life. This is certainly the judicial meaning of the word 'justification,' in almost the same way that a guilty man who has been sentenced before the bar of justice is acquitted."
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 482. Ephesians 2:4  

"Yet these exercises of faith always presuppose, as their foundation, that God is reconciled by faith, and to this they are always led back, so that faith may be certain and the promise sure in regard to these other objects. This explanation is confirmed by the brilliant statement of Paul in 2 Corinthians 1:20: 'All the promises of God in Christ are yea and amen, to the glory of God through us,' that is, the promises concerning other objects of faith have only then been ratified for us when by faith in Christ we are reconciled with God. The promises have been made valid on the condition that they must give glory to God through us."
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 495. 2 Corinthians 1:20  

"Therefore this apprehension or acceptance or application of the promise of grace is the formal cause or principle of justifying faith, according to the language of Scripture."
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 502.         

"We must note the foundations. For we are justified by faith, not because it is so firm, robust, and perfect a vritue, but because of the object on which it lays hold, namely Christ, who is the Mediator in the promise of grace. Therefore when faith does not err in its object, but lays hold on that true object, although with a weak faith, or at least tries and wants to lay hold on Christ, then there is true faith, and it justifies. The reason for this is demonstrated in those lovely statements in Philippians 3:12: 'I apprehend, or rather I am apprehended by Christ' and Galatians 4:9: 'You have known God, or rather have been known by God.' Scripture shows a beautiful example of this in Mark 9:24: 'I believe; help my unbelief.'"
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 503. Philippians 3:12; Galatians 4:9; Mark 9:24. 

"For we are not justified because of our faith (propter fidem), in the sense of faith being a virtue or good work on our part. Thuse we pray, as did the man in Mark 9:24: 'I believe, Lord; help my unbelief'; and with the apostles: 'Lord, increase our faith,' Luke 17:5."
            Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 506 Mark 9:24; Luke 17:5.       

"But because not doubt but faith justifies, and not he who doubts but he who believes has eternal life, therefore faith teaches the free promise, which relies on the mercy of God for the sake of the sacrifice of the Son, the Mediator, and not on our works, as Paul says in Romans 4:16: 'Therefore it is of faith, that the promise might be sure according to grace.'"
Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 507. Romans 4:16      

"Thus when we say that we are justified by faith, we are saying nothing else than that for the sake of the Son of God we receive remission of sins and are accounted as righteous. And because it is necessary that this benefit be taken hold of, this is said to be done 'by faith,' that is, by trust in the mercy promised us for the sake of Christ. Thus we must also understand the correlative expression, 'We are righteous by faith,' that is, through the mercy of God for the sake of His Son we are righteous or accepted."
Melanchthon, Loci Communes, “The Word Faith.” Cited in Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., trans. J. A. O. Preus, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. p. 489.    



American Catholics prep for new Mass translation - Yahoo! News.
Did These Yahoos Graduate from Mequon?

Wisconsin Lutheran College speaker Archbishop Weakland,
a liturgical expert...when he wasn't pining over his boyfriend,
or raising blackmail money by embezzling from the church.
WLC knows talent!


American Catholics prep for new Mass translation - Yahoo! News:


Many clergy are upset by the new language, calling it awkward and hard to understand. The Rev. Tom Iwanowski, pastor of St. Joseph Roman Catholic Church in Oradell and New Milford, N.J., turned to the section of the new missal that calls funeral rites, "the fraternal offices of burial."

"How can I say those words? It doesn't make sense," said Iwanowski, who has been a priest for 36 years. "It separates religion from real life."

In the new translation, in the Nicene Creed, the phrase "one in Being with the Father," will change to "consubstantial with the Father." When a priest prays over the Holy Communion bread and wine, he will ask God for blessings "by sending down your spirit upon them like the dewfall."


'via Blog this'