![]() |
| Stanley Hauerwas |
![]() |
| MA, 1978; PhD 1982 |
![]() |
| Stanley Hauerwas |
![]() |
| MA, 1978; PhD 1982 |
![]() |
| The grape hyacinth has a pleasant sweet fragrance and multiplies on its own. The flowers push their way up in early spring. |
We made numerous attempts to plant all the bulbs. Ordering them is so much easier than planting in dry clay soil. I knew enough to water for two hours the day before digging, but that hardly registered.
It took four two-man digging teams to get them in, and I happily gave some extras to Digger. He has been absorbing leftover plants, and now their yard boasts - roses, crepe myrtle, wild ginger, and daffodils. I enjoy having extra roses to give away with the rainbow clearance sales in June.
As I wrote before, planting true bulbs is the same as planting flowers. That flower is already there, ready to emerge in the earliest part of spring. Bulbs slowly grow and divide, so the early investment will yield dividends until they are too crowded to bloom well.
I weighed the bag to estimate what was left. The weather was getting very chilly and a week of rain was posted on the weather maps. Saturday morning was quite cold, and it was our last chance. The temperature warmed up perfect for digging, and Digger came over to plant. That was really exhilarating, to see the bag become empty, save for the bonus for our friends. They had their original dozen bulbs in the ground already.
The rain has started, ideal for settling the soil and waking up the bulbs. They will form their roots and even grow to the surface, only to become dormant for the right weather in spring. They bloom when bugs are few, sunshine is abundant, and rain helps them build bulb power for the next year. Many expensive bulbs (tulips, true hyacinths) diminish in time. Many bulbs and corms are delicious to wildlife. Daffodils are not tempting, so they have all the virtues and none of the setbacks.
Nothing in Creation is so intricate as the timing of all the calendar events involving microbes, soil creatures, roots, plants, trees, insects, and birds.
One church building committee, heavy with engineers and chemists, did not want the carpet in the new part glued to the floor. That was viewed with alarm, so the rug layers took back the glue and tacked the carpet down for the very large room.
The upright piano was pushed into the room later, for Sunday School and choir rehearsal. The result was epic, an enormous expanse of carpet wrinkled and wavy, a sight to make the stomach sink. So are the ways of the great and wise.
In contrast, everything in God's Creation is so organized and involved that each form of life has a purpose and a schedule.
Given the revelation that God's will is only accomplished through God's Word, it should motivate everyone to employ God's Word rather than the schemes of carnival barkers at Fuller, Willow Creek, Groeschel-land, and Stanley Steamer.
![]() |
| "This anointed program will pay for itself. Why there was a congregation in Schnitzville that bought into this and was blessed by the Lord many times over." |
| Glen Kotten, Chris Shrader, and Pastor Jim Shrader, Sioux Falls. |
The war about
Election developed only because of Walther’s leadership. The self-serving jibe
is that one man did not get elected to a position, so he created the battle on
his own. That should remind people that Zion on the Mississippi was written
by “a disgruntled LCMS pastor,” and In Pursuit of Religious Freedom was
not written by church history professor. The three complaints have something in
common – they are irrelevant and illogical. The question is whether the three
men presented their information as truthfully as possible.
By 1877, Walther
was supreme in the Missouri Synod and highly respected in other synods. Each group
had a unique origin and they worked through various doctrinal and practical struggles
within their ranks. On the Masonic Lodge issue, the question was not who was
pure – because no synod was – but who was outwardly more critical.[1]
Once Walther
reached the issue of predestination in his theses, others noticed the
Calvinistic language and objected. Readers should be reminded that Objective
Justification already suffered from those shortcomings, but they were
overlooked for the same reason they are ignored now.
1.
People could assume that Objective
Justification was simply another word for the Atonement.
2.
They could also think that Subjective
Justification was an expression for believing the Gospel.
3.
Walther held such a powerful position
– synod, seminary, and publications head – that his perspective was
monopolistic and respected.
4.
Justification itself was a word skillfully
used to imply one thought (Justification by Faith) while declaring the opposite
(Absolution of the World, Without Faith): General Justification, Justification
of the Sinner, Justification by Grace, Objective Justification, Universal
Objective Justification.
5.
The fact remains that Objective and
Subjective Justification were terms used by the Calvinist translator of Knapp’s
Halle theology lectures, an important book for all Protestants, German and American.
6.
Halle University and the Halle
charities were so influential that their unionist (Lutheran-Reformed) doctrine
was easily spread but refuted with difficulty. Spener was simply beyond criticism,
so Pietism was practiced but Luther’s name was emphasized.[2]
Professors of
German literature love the term Wendepunkt – turning point. The Election
controversy is often described in view of history, but the Wendepunkt is
Walther’s embrace of grace without the Means of Grace, world absolution without
the Word, separation of the Holy Spirit and its exclusive work through the Word.
Walther’s weakness on Justification was the evil tree that bore the corrupt fruit
of Calvinistic double-predestination.
Walther was so eager
to deny anything in man contributing to salvation that he parroted Calvin’s
concept of a minority being predestined to glory while the majority were
predestined to eternal damnation. Walther’s odd and fatal notion of faith being
a “work of man” meant that one Enthusiasm (Objective Justification) would
easily foster another – Double Predestination. God alone works, as the Scripture
teaches and Book of Concord confesses, so faith is the work of the Holy Spirit
in the Gospel Word.
Nothing is quite so
heinous pitting grace against faith when the Holy Spirit says through St. Paul –
Romans 4:16 Therefore it is of faith, that it
might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to
that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of
Abraham; who is the father of us all.
Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace
with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 2 By whom also we have access by faith
into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
Looking at the
history of this topic will take us back to Augustine versus Pelagius, the
Molinists against the Jansenists, Calvin and Luther. The next stage would
include Walther’s own history and the Election debates, including The Errors
of Modern Missouri. That is its entirely would not focus on the real issue –
the poor Biblical foundation of Walther’s dogmatics. When the Chief Article is
presented in a hazy and deceptive way, lacking the key points of Biblical
teaching, nothing claimed for Election is going to be sound doctrine.
[1]
One WELS seminary professor told me about taking in Masons because “they were
all Masons in Pennsylvania.” A Missouri Circuit Pastor said the same thing.
Frosty Bivens admitted in his book that WELS took in Masons as soon as they
were removed by Missouri congregations. The former head of the ELS, George
Orvick, was known for the Masons in his congregation. St. Paul in German
Village (Independent, finally WELS, earlier Reformed-Lutheran, ALC, and Masonic)
had a policy of not communing Masons except for the one who was privately
communed when I was serving in Columbus.
[2] My
Christology professor at Waterloo Seminary (LCA, now ELCic), Otto Heick, graduated
from a German Pietistic seminary, belonged to a local Pietist congregation and
an LCA congregation. My vicarage supervisor regarded Heick’s other congregation
as “a bunch of trouble-makers.” They called themselves, in German, Separated
Christians. My home congregation had been Augustana Synod, where Pietism was
highly regarded instead of being denied. They had little regard for Bishop’s
Hill, an extreme Pietistic group.
![]() |
| Photofunia by Norma A. Boeckler |
![]() |
| WELS MLS Cheerleaders |
Marcus Manthey You are free, Greg, to continue to regurgitate your anti-Gospel bile. But to exploit this family photo to illustrate your screed is not only lazy. It's loveless. The ladies in the photo have nothing to do with the thelogical (sic) point you're trying to make. They no more deserve to be dragged into your pulic (sic) posturing than your family members do. You embarrass yourself with this. Do better.
![]() |
| This is the Chief Article which the false prophets, below, reject. |
![]() |
| Moldstad, Schroeder, Eaton, and Harrison teach Universal Justification, and they support abortion through their devotion and joint-work through Thrivent. |
![]() |
| Hale, the cub editor of Christian News, fulminates against the Chief Article, and, like his Father Below, cannot say the words of the Holy Spirit - Justification by Faith. |
![]() |
| Cascione has been corrected about his false reporting of the facts many times, but like his OJ pals, he cannot get the truth out, due to his homage to his hoofed Master. |
![]() |
| McCain's slander is the highest possible commendation. Sometimes he is so dumb, he is funny. He accused me of broadcasting from the "spare room of a rented house." Can Paul name any precedents? |
![]() |
| Bivens, a Fuller alumnus, borrowed Zarling's daring OJ/JFBA switch. |
![]() |
| Brenner is another OJ Salesman at Mequon. |
![]() |
| Like Bivens, Valleskey didn't go to Fuller Seminary too. His UOJ is breathtakingly stupid. |
![]() |
| Walther's Predestination War was really a promotion of Justification without Faith. John Brenner wrote his dissertation on that era. |
This section of the Formula of Concord, Election, #11, Solid Declaration,
Book of Concord, should be read and considered carefully, especially in
light of the elevated, quasi-inspired Brief Statement, 1932, of the Missouri
Synod. The Brief Statement is a doctrinal fiasco, yet elevated to quia
status by the misnamed Church of the Lutheran Church, a statement honored and
yet not understood by the WELS and the ELS.
Martin Chemnitz wrote this section of the Formula of Concord himself,
not because it was an issue, but to prevent error from arising later, as it did
with CFW Walther himself. Walther ignored this warning –
13. Therefore, if we wish to think or speak correctly and
profitably concerning eternal election, or the predestination and ordination of
the children of God to eternal life, we should accustom ourselves not to
speculate concerning the bare, secret, concealed, inscrutable foreknowledge
of God, but how the counsel, purpose, and ordination of God in Christ Jesus,
who is the true Book of Life, is revealed to us through the Word…[1]
If people pay attention to the word-play of Walther and his acolytes,
the Election of Grace is nothing more than a cover for his claim for grace in
Justification, pitting grace against faith in both topics.
The straw man fallacy in both cases is faith. To this day,
Synodical Conference loyalists warn the innocent, “Do not make faith a work of
man.” That assumes faith is a work of man, making faith something to condemn. They
imagine that making faith disappear elevates the role of grace. Ironically,
many believe this with righteous certainty – and they are the leaders of the
mainline denominations. They are Calvinistic heirs of rationalism, so they
naturally sink into Universalism, all people being saved - without faith - due
to God’s overwhelming grace.
Romans 4:16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace;
to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is
of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the
father of us all,
Denying faith in Justification makes forgiveness a product of the
Law, not grace. Divorcing election from faith continues that error.
This is my speculation, based on extensive reading about this
topic, starting with Augustine, Calvin, the Molinists, LCMS history, and
related issues –
Walther taught the Justification of the Halle Pietists that he
learned from Bishop Stephan. He never deviated from that position. However, the
Lutheran leaders of the 19th century were not easily fooled. The
Missouri Synod’s official position was Justification for a considerable period
and the Wisconsin Synod was no different. Proof of the Wisconsin heritage, only
recently abandoned, is the number of people raised with the Gausewitz Catechism,
taught Justification by Faith. The perpetrator of the Kokomo conflict in WELS
admitted he had never heard of Objective Justification until he reached the
seminary at Mequon.
But now the clergy are easily fooled. The burning and shining
lights of their synods call themselves “Doctor” and insist on that title
because they paid Fuller Seminary for a drive-by DMin degree.
Walther wanted his dogma to prevail and used Election for that
purpose. He wanted Loy to sign onto a paper at a conference. Loy reported that
he could not, and that Walther was so enraged by this that he withdrew that essay
from the conference. Was that Walther’s precious Election without Faith
argument? I believe so.
The so-called Grace War was really Walther’s attempt to get rid of
those dissenting from his false doctrine and to rule the survivors as the
Number One Theologian. He issued a call to Loy to be a seminary professor, and
Loy turned it down. Was that an attempt to neutralize a German-speaking,
brilliant theologian and hymn-writer?
John Brenner wrote a PhD dissertation on this era and agrees that
the Grace or Election War was a way to shore up Walther’s Objective
Justification.