Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Luther Is Not for Snowflakes and Drama Queens.
Gems From The Sermons of Martin Luther, Volume IV, Lenker Edition

Luther is not for sissies - that is why the
graduates of Mequon, Bethany, and the Concordias
seldom read or quote Luther.

The Learned Are the Most Perverted
13. Hence it is very foolish for the councils to wish to determine and establish what a man must believe, when there is often not a single man present who ever tasted the least of the divine Spirit. So it was in the Council of Nice, when they undertook to enact laws for the spiritual orders that they should not marry, which was all false because it has no foundation in the Word of God. Then a single man arose, by the name of Paphnutius, and overthrew the whole affair and said: Not so, that is not Christian. Then the entire council, in which undoubtedly were many distinguished and learned individuals, were compelled to drop the resolution, and give. way to this simple and honest man. For God is a great enemy to high titles and human wisdom, hence he allows them at times to be handled roughly, and puts them to shame in their speculations, that the truth of the proverb may appear: The learned are the most perverted.
Eighth Sunday after Trinity

A Man Has Said This – Building on Sand
Even here so many holy fathers have erred like Gregory, Augustine and others, in that they take from us this right of judgment, for this torment and misery began far back in history, that we must believe the Pope and the councils. Hence you must be able to say: God said this, and that God has not said. As soon as you say: A man has said this, or the councils have determined that, then you are building on sand.
15. Hence there is no judge upon the earth in spiritual things concerning Christian doctrine, except the person who has in his heart the true faith, whether it be a man or woman, young or old, maid or servant, learned or unlearned. For God is no respecter of persons, since all are alike precious to him, who live according to his commandments, Acts 10:34, hence they alone have the right to judge.
Eighth Sunday after Trinity



Begin with Faith, No Sin on Earth Except Unbelief
28. Thus we must begin with faith. But the Pope begins with works, and commands persons to do good works that they may become good. Just as if I should say to the tree: If you want to be a good tree, then begin and bear apples. Just as though I could bear apples before I was an apple tree. But I must say: If you want to bear apples, then begin and be an apple tree. Hence the tree must be there before it can produce fruit.

29. From all this it follows now that there is no sin on earth except unbelief, as Christ says in John 16:8-9: “And the Holy Ghost, when he is come, will convict the world in respect of sin; because they believe not on me.”
Eighth Sunday after Trinity

Why Give the Soul to the Devil?
12. Here and there throughout the whole Scriptures we see how greatly it offends God, who regards it as the greatest sin when his Word is despised; which is so dear and precious, that it cost him the blood of his own dear Son, and we cast it to the wind as though it were of little importance. For this reason he sends us the severest calamities, which cannot be compared to the present calamity now going on in the world, that during and after the peasants’ war so many have been slain, of which there seems to be no end, for who knows when it will cease? Yet all this is but playwork in comparison to the misfortune when men are hardened, blinded and misled by false prophets, by which heaven is closed against them and hell opens to receive them, and everlasting life is lost forever. What does it matter, as die we must at any rate, if we are killed by the sword? But that the soul should be forever given to the devil, this is an eternal calamity, an everlasting misfortune and torment.

13. I would gladly prevent it, if I could, by preaching, praying and writing.
Eighth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon

The Bible Is a Book for Rogues and Heretics
23. Therefore it is true as men say, the holy Bible is a book for heretics, that is, it is a book that heretics dare to claim for themselves most of all.
For there is no other book which they so wickedly misuse, than just this very book. And there never was a heresy so bad or gross, that they did not try to patch up or cover with the Scriptures. Just as men say, God is the God of rogues, because they, who are the largest crowd in the world, claim for themselves the name of God, not that God is to blame, but the rogues, who thus take the holy name of God in vain. Thus the holy Bible must be a book for heretics, not that the holy Bible is to blame, but the rogues, who so shamefully misuse it. Should I for this reason neglect the Bible and not read it? By no means! As men are accustomed to say in the proverb: “In God’s name all misfortune begins,” which is true. Well then, I will not use the name of God at all, and guard myself against misfortune. But what talk is this? What blame can attach to a name, which is given us in order that we might be saved? God will surely punish such rogues and knaves. Thus the Bible is a book for heretics, but I will not for this reason cast it away, but so much the more study and learn it, because these rogues oppose it.
Eighth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon

Take Away the Heretic’s Weapon and Smite Him
24. Therefore let now every person be thus well prepared and thoroughly equipped, that he may not so easily be led astray by their showy life, although they even attempt to quote Scripture to you, for ravening wolves are most certainly back of it. And although they think they feed and satisfy you, they actually rend you, destroy and devour you. However, without spiritual eyes no one will be able so soon to decide or judge of this matter. The crowd and common people will not do it; the largest crowd despises the Gospel and are unthankful, while only the smallest flock accept it and can appreciate it. I have often said, and will always say it, that the greatest and most difficult contest is, for a person to contend with the Scriptures against the Scriptures; to strike aside another man’s sword and wrench it out of his fist, to slay him with his own sword; to take from him his weapon, and with it strike him again. This no one can accomplish, except he who is enlightened by the Holy Spirit, so as to be able to recognize these rogues.
Eighth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon



Against WELS and the Objective Justification Stormtroopers
30. Now, take heed rightly to distinguish works from one another. In all their works you will not find a single spark of love. You will indeed find that they are friendly within their own sect, calling one another Christians and brethren; but there is nothing in them but the very poison of the devil. They have neither mercy nor patience, nor friendship for anyone who is not of their sect. For if they could destroy us body and soul in an hour or a moment they would do it. This fruit flesh and blood do not see, but in the meantime they wear gray gowns and belong to a quiet order, and observe the same rule and habit.

Eighth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon


Post Script to John 14



I will add this section to the recently published post on John 14

People object to a combination of sound doctrine being taught and false doctrine being denounced, as if that were against Jesus and His style of teaching.

The Fourth Gospel makes it especially clear that Jesus taught the truth and also rejected the falsehood that might be substituted for it, leaving no question about His teaching.

For example, John 14:6
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

The liberals concede that Jesus was a teacher, but that is all. He is "a way, a truth," because all truths are God's truth and all paths lead to God. That warms the apostate heart-strings like no other.

But Jesus excluded that  by using a double negative, allowing no exceptions, no bolt-holes by which to escape - No man comes to the Father, except through Me. Those simple words are used to exclude any other Savior. No Buddha. No Lord Krishna. No Moses.

That reminds us of John 1 where two Greek words are used - the sources for homiletics and martyr.

John the Baptist witnessed (homiletics). He did not deny but testified (martyr).

A sermon (homiletics) should be witnessing the truth - never denying any truth of the Word - but testifying about these truths. The UOJ clergy sneak around, using the terms Justification and Chief Article. But like Valleskey caught in a searchlight, they bolt when asked about Justification by Faith, when asked to denounce UOJ.



"Error loves ambiguities," as Krauth said, so the entire crowd loves it when nothing offensive is said. They can take the statements one way or another. The upcoming beer-fest at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis. Will they teach Justification by Faith and denounce UOJ? No. They will dance around the theme of the Reformation, lest they clarify what they teach and how they excommunicate these days. To their credit, the LCMS allows for Justification by Faith and teaches  this truth through CPH books. But to their everlasting shame, the leaders promote UOJ and undermine the Gospel every chance they get.

 Will they teach the Reformation and Luther's Biblical doctrine, or Halle University's rationalistic Pietism?
I have noticed the LCMS clergy on Facebook lately
standing up for Justification without Faith, though in
mealy-mouthed, cowardly terms.
One of the intriguing episodes in the LCMS soap opera was the drama of Robert and Jack Preus using UOJ as the executioner's axe. But later, Robert Preus began writing a book where he included devastating quotations against UOJ. Two of Bob's many sons, Dan and Rolf, supposedly edited Justification and Rome, but they were as oafish in editing as they were in reading comprehension. They published the book posthumously without realizing that they called in heavy artillery on their own position. But do they answer that? No, Rolf is offended that I quote from and Photoshop his father's research, which he pretended to edit.

 I kelmed this from Justification and Rome.
Calov was a favorite author for J. S. Bach.
Is this not a complete refutation of UOJ's error?


As the future commentary will show, John's Gospel does not only teach the truth about Jesus, which means faith in Him, but also denounces error.

 Affirmative - a House of Prayer for All Nations.
Negative - not a Den of Thieves, as you have made it.
That applies to the LCMS, WELS, ELS, and other sects.